Legal & Regulatory Considerations for Waste Heat Development Current landscape & future prospects Waste Heat-to-Power Workshop University of California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recycling Waste Heat – CHP as an alternative
Advertisements

EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Water Energy Nexus Charley Wilson Urban Water Institute February 21, 2013.
Energy in the U.S. - Why Wind? Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy Institute for Professional and Executive Development Santa Fe, N.M. July 25,
State Policy Initiatives Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 7-9, 2008 Richard Cogen.
Renewables (CHP), Global Warming, and Energy Efficiency Richard Brent Solar Government Affairs Lake Tahoe, California July 28, 2005 California Manufacturers.
GEORGIA POWERS SMALL POWER PRODUCERS FUNDAMENTALS.
Siemens Building Technologies 1 Renewable Energy Alterntives in The State of Florida Developers Perspective July 26, 2007 Scott Keeley Energy.
Solar Water Heating as a Green House Gas Reduction and Energy Conservation Strategy Florida Solar Energy Industries Association and Florida Solar Energy.
Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
Producing energy does not have to threaten the environment. In fact, its very production can reap major environmental benefits. The United States biomass.
EnvironmentEnvironnementCanada Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia September 5 – 7, Part 4: LFG Utilization.
California Energy Commission 1 Energy Workshops for W&WW Agencies UTILITY STRATEGIES FOR SHIFTING PEAK DEMAND PERIOD WATER & ENERGY USE REGIONAL STRATEGIES:
Proposed Federal Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) April 20, 2009.
OHIO ENERGY POLICY PROGRESS & REVIEW UCEAO 6 th Annual Conference Securing Ohio’s Energy and Economic Future THE BEST OF TIMES, THE WORST OF TIMES: ADVANCED.
Does owning a solar array make you a utility?...and other questions A presentation to the Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Andrew Melnykovych.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
The Potential for CHP in the Northeast Provided by the Industrial Energy Consumers Group, 1/18/07 Source: Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Stimulating Renewables Do We Need A Federal RPS? David K. Owens Executive Vice President Edison Electric Institute NARUC Summer Meeting 2007 July 2007.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law & Policy Institute October 14, 2012 Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future (PennFuture). A statewide.
Buying Electricity and Natural Gas for a BIG User Joan Kowal Energy Manager, UMCP March 6, 2012 Sustainable Tuesdays Speaker Series.
Darden School Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship April 2, 2007 Recycling Energy: Profitably Mitigating Climate Change Tom Casten Chair, Recycled.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
“Green Means ‘Go?’ – A Colorful Approach to a U.S. National Renewable Portfolio Standard Authors: Benjamin K. Sovacool and Christopher Cooper Public Policy.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Energy Law Joel Roberson Spring 2007 State Strategies for Promoting Renewable Energy Topic: State Strategies for Promoting Renewable.
Engineering Technology Division
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
1 Enhancing the Role of Renewable Energy in California Robert A. Laurie Commissioner California Energy Commission Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting.
NJ Clean Energy Program Noveda Technologies Liberty Science Center By: Joe Fiorella Information from the:
Rory McIlmoil, Downstream Strategies. Introduction to distributed energy The case for distributed renewable energy Opportunities for developing distributed.
Lori Singleton Manager, Sustainability Initiatives and Technologies September 15, 2010 SRP’s Sustainability Initiatives and Programs.
Energy Policy Levers. 2 State as a Taxing Authority Income tax credits or deductions Income tax credits or deductions Residential Alternative Energy Tax.
The Alternative Energy Policy Landscape Surrounding AR.
Renewable Energy: Legal and Policy Issues Frank Prager Vice President, Environmental Policy Xcel Energy November 20, 2009 Frank Prager Vice President,
1 CHP – The Concept Presented At: Methane Recovery from Farm & Food Processing Waste Peru, Indiana June 6 th, 2006 Presented By: John Cuttica Midwest CHP.
Distributed Generation Programs, Incentives and Interconnections Ian Loughran, P.Eng. DSM Program Leader Renewable Energy Programs
Small Scale Wind Energy. Capacity factor The net capacity factor of a power plant is the ratio of the actual output of a power plant over a period of.
Policy Impacts on Installed Capacity in Forest Bioenergy Sector in the United States Anna Ebers SUNY-ESF.
State Energy Policy: Implications for Consumers and Consumer Policy Carole Makela.
Renewable Energy in New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program Scott Hunter Renewable Energy Program Administrator, Office of Clean Energy in the New Jersey Board.
Oregon Renewable Energy Action Plan April 2005 with Geothermal Energy highlights by Carel DeWinkel Senior Policy Analyst.
Creating A Greener Energy Future For the Commonwealth MA State Programs and Policies Meg Lusardi Mansfield, MA June 17, 2009.
NW Regional -- Washington n n Washington’s residents, businesses and industries spend $10 billion on their energy costs each year. n n Washington’s long-term.
[Legislative] [American policy] Passing of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) in Introduced competition within the supply sector.
Introduction to Renewables Milton Geiger Energy Extension Coordinator WSARE Agricultural Renewable Energy Training Seminar November 29, 2011.
EE/RE in the 83 rd Texas Legislature Dub Taylor Director, SECO.
Making Sense of U.S. Renewables Policy & Markets Rusty Haynes DSIRE Project Manager N.C. Solar Center / N.C. State University Italian Trade Commission.
The Texas Renewable Energy Program National Governors Association Scottsdale, Arizona April 29, 2004.
Selecting Renewable Projects at Colorado Springs Utilities APPA Conference John Romero GM Acquisition, Engineering and Planning October, 2009.
Greening the Energy Supply Monga Mehlwana Tuesady, 05 October 2010.
Washington State Energy Policy Trends in OPALCO Speaker Pro Tem Jeff Morris.
Taking the Lead: State Innovations to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Bill Becker STAPPA/ALAPCO February 28, 2002.
1 Synergies Between Climate Change Financing Mechanisms: Options for China The PCF/CC Synergy Workshop.
Energy Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Herb Stevens.
Combined Heat and Power Workshop Report and Next Steps Power Committee Briefing 7/15/03.
Discussion Forum 2004 APPA National Conference June 19 – 23, 2004 Seattle, Washington Issues for Green Power Programs Designing Marketing and Pricing.
1 Cogeneration in the Forest Products Industry January 2008 by Phil Zirngibl.
Livable Delaware Energy Task Force - the Key to Energy and Environmental Co-Benefits.
Oregon State Bar Association Environmental & Natural Resources Annual Conference October 8, 2010 Athena M. Kennedy Renewable Energy Law Update 2010.
Background of Maryland’s Renewable Portfolio Standard Solar Technical Conference October 19, 2007 Maryland Public Service Commission.
1 Guidance on Renewable Energy in Federal Facilities under EO and EPACT 05 June 5, 2007 Anne Sprunt Crawley Federal Energy Management Program Energy.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICY ANALYSIS Abhishek Chaudhary, Tim C
A Historic View of Clean Energy Power Purchase Agreements
Energy Conservation CERD /12/2017
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Renewable Energy Project Investments
Presentation transcript:

Legal & Regulatory Considerations for Waste Heat Development Current landscape & future prospects Waste Heat-to-Power Workshop University of California Irvine March 2, 2005 John Nimmons & Associates Mill Valley, California Presented by John Nimmons, J.D.

2 Topics Why legal / regulatory issues matter Characterizing waste heat & its functions Selling waste-heat-generated power to utilities Federal & state support for waste heat development Conclusions Useful next steps

3 Why legal/regulatory issues matter Sensible legal & regulatory treatment can – expand markets for electricity from waste heat improve economics of waste heat recovery through grants, loans, rebates, tax benefits, etc. raise awareness & promote consideration & adoption of waste heat options reduce transactional barriers & cost of waste heat projects reduce regulatory barriers to waste heat conversion & use minimize environmental impacts support efficient & sustainable resource use

4 Characterizing waste heat Fish, fowl or …? Waste Federal (PURPA benefits) residual heat heat from exothermic reactions States: some define, many dont. Definitions differ. E.g. – energy otherwise lost (Nevada) energy otherwise released to the environment (Washington) produced but unused (Oregon) Conservation – CA Pollution Control Fin. Auth. (CPCFA), OR, MT Efficiency improvement – OH, OR Alternative energy – ILL, MT Pollution control – CPCFA Renewable – CPCFA, CO, FL, OR, VT, WA

5 Why it matters: Federal PURPA benefits Facilities producing electricity from waste heat can qualify for PURPA benefits, including: interconnection with serving utility power sales to serving utility at its avoided cost transmission to another utility for purchase non-discriminatory backup service from utility

6 Why it matters: Federal PURPA benefits Qualifying cogeneration facility Topping cycle: operating & efficiency standards apply 5% useful thermal output 42.5% efficiency, if natural gas or oil input (45% if thermal output < 15%) Bottoming cycle: 45% efficiency (if gas or oil supplemental firing; otherwise no efficiency requirement)) Qualifying small power production facility waste - including residual heat - is an eligible energy source no operating or efficiency standards 80 MW limit at a single site

7 Why it matters: Federal production & investment credits Production credit for electricity from some renewables 1.5¢ / kWh credit for electricity sold, for 10 years Qualified energy resources now include (among others): most biomass resources closed loop organic material planted exclusively for electricity open loop – livestock manure & bedding, forest residues, landscape trimmings geothermal energy solar energy municipal solid waste combustion available until 12/31/05 (but has been renewed before) 10% investment tax credit for certain energy property solar electric & thermal geothermal

8 Why it matters: State & local examples Direct financial incentives grants, loans, rebates – e.g., CA Pollution Control Financing Authority, SGIP tax benefits (credits, exemptions, reimbursements, etc.) – at least 7 states Other market support mechanisms renewable portfolio standards – 12 states mandatory, 3 voluntary net metering – about 40 states green pricing – ~ 32 states, over 500 utilities (.5–6.0¢ /kWh premium, avg. $5.50/mo.) public agency mandates ( planning, design, life-cycle costing, etc.) – at least 3 states regulatory exemptions – some explicit, most through cogen exemptions RD&D, planning, &/or promotion – at least 5 states education, training & assistance – at least 1 state emissions & efficiency credits – work in progress local zoning preferences – at least 1 state

9 State Portfolio Standards Many states have adopted portfolio standards Purpose: to stimulate markets for clean, efficient resources Mechanism: utilities & other electricity providers must generate or acquire an increasing annual percentage of electricity from favored resources until target is reached Standards generally focus on renewables, but states define eligible resources differently

10 State Portfolio Standards (potential waste heat resources) Solar Thermal Biomass Geothermal Landfill Gas Digester Gas Fuel Cells Waste, incl heat MSW Qualified Energy Recovery Process Other No. of States

11 Nevada RPS A qualified energy recovery process means: a system that converts otherwise lost energy from – exhaust heat from engines, or manufacturing or industrial processes or pressure reduction in water or gas pipelines (before distribution) to electricity, without additional fossil fuel or combustion up to 15 MW Excludes systems that use energy (lost or otherwise) from electric generation For RPS, not renewable energy as such, but a distinct type of renewable energy system

12 State Net Metering Programs Utilities normally buy power at wholesale, & sell to customers at retail Net metering allows self-generators to offset their excess production (otherwise valued at wholesale) against their retail purchases Essentially self-executing – minimizes transaction costs for customers & utilities States limit eligible system size range: 10kW – 2 MW typical: 25 kW – 100kW States define eligible resource types & customers

13 State Net Metering Programs: eligible resource types Solar Thermal Biomass Geothermal Landfill Gas Digester Gas MSW Fuel Cells Microturbines Cogeneration No. of States

14 Conclusions Legal & regulatory treatment will strongly affect the direction & value of waste heat development Waste heat is characterized in diverse ways, without clearly articulated policy rationale Waste heat projects appear eligible for important financial & market incentives already in place, but largely untested so far in the waste heat context Developing coherent, consistent & defensible regulatory policy will simplify the work of waste heat proponents, & catalyze more widespread resource development

15 Useful Next Steps Develop a more comprehensive understanding of the existing legal & regulatory landscape Develop a coherent policy rationale for treatment of waste heat-to-power Develop model legislation & regulatory approach to enhance certainty for providers & customers