A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 8//03 Virginia Department of Education NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Implementation of Virginia’s Consolidated Plan Dr. Patricia I. Wright Assistant.
BIE Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress
Parents’ Right to Know Their Child’s and School’s Achievement.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Exploring Alternate AYP Designs for Assessment and Accountability Systems 1 Dr. J.P. Beaudoin, CEO, Research in Action, Inc. Dr. Patricia Abeyta, Bureau.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Public Law
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Public Law
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
NCLB and Title I Schools
Campus Improvement Planning
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook

Accountability Workbook A Parent’s Guide To Understanding The State Accountability Workbook

ACCOUNTABILITY  A frequently used word with big meaning: Responsibility Answerability Expectations Identifies What’s Good Identifies What Needs to Be Changed

What is the “Accountability Workbook”? A Written Agreement Between State Education Agencies and the U. S. Department of Education in which each individual state outlines……

A PLAN A BLUEPRINT Identifying How the Progress of Students, Schools, LEAs, and the SEA is determined

The U. S. Department of Education has approved all State Accountability Workbooks A State Can Amend or Make Changes to its Accountability Workbook Each Year

 How is the Accountability Workbook Used?  STATE EDUCATION AGENCIES: To Communicate with their LEAs  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: To monitor states implementation of their plan  CITIZENS: To know how their State is committed to implement the NCLB standards and assessment requirements  PARENTS: To know important information that affects their child, the local school, the LEA

 Parents Use of the Accountability Workbook To Know the terminology and components of NCLB that are used to determine student progress To Understand the use of the State assessments and other academic indicators in gauging schools’ progress To Become familiar with how the progress of their child’s school is monitored To Understand the importance of school achievement data in determining school accountability

Location of State Accountability Workbooks At SEARCH type in the name of State plus Accountability Workbook.

Components of this Blueprint, this Plan for Accountability Assessment AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) AYP Determinations

Assessment Components  Based primarily on academic assessments (Grades 3-8 and one high school grade) separately accountable for reading/language arts and mathematics.  Separate Approval Process for State Content Standards.  Contains the State’s definition of basic, proficient and advanced: student academic levels of achievement for reading,/language arts and mathematics.  Describes the State’s ranges or levels of achievement: basic proficient advanced # ## State Specific

Each State Education Agency: expects ALL (100%) student subgroups, public schools, and LEAs to reach proficiency by the academic year; establishes an achievement starting point; establishes statewide annual measurable objectives; establishes intermediate goals; determines annually the progress of schools and districts; and defines “full academic year” (FAY) - the period of time students must be enrolled in a school or school district in order to be included in decisions about AYP.

After the State sets it targets and describes the FAY eligibility criteria, the annual progress of schools and LEAs can be determined. Each State uses a method for determining whether student subgroups, public schools, and LEAs made adequate yearly progress or “AYP”. * FAY: for example, from October through May

AYP COMPONENTS  Test Performance % Proficient – Reading % Proficient – Mathematics  Test Participation ( at least 95%) Separately for Reading and Mathematics  Other Indicator(s) Graduation Rate (High Schools Only) Other Academic Indicators (Elementary and Middle Schools) for example Attendance Rate

95%+ AYP Target –At least 95% Students Tested During the Testing Window Only Students Enrolled for the Full Academic Year (FAY) are included in AYP determinations (FAY)

All schools and LEAs are accountable for the progress of student subgroups. School and District Performance Did All Students Reach Annual Targets Did All - Racial/Ethnic Groups Reach Target? Econ. Disadvantaged Reach Target? Students with Disabilities Reach Target? Students with Limited English Proficiency Reach Target?

AYP Determinations  Include all schools and districts in the State.  Hold all schools to the same criteria.  Require decisions to be made in a timely manner, before the next academic year. State must allow enough time to notify parents about public school choice or supplemental educational service options in time for parents to make informed decisions.  Included with other district and school information on a State report card available to the public.

The State, LEA, and School Report Card include all the required data elements 1. information, in the aggregate, on student achievement at each proficiency level on the State academic assessments disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, disability status, and migrant status; English proficiency and status as economically disadvantaged (where the minimum “n” has been met); 2. comparison of the actual achievement levels of each group of students previously described in the State’s annual measurable objectives for each required assessment; 3. information on how students served by the LEA achieved on the statewide academic achievement assessment compared to students in the State as a whole; 4. the percentage of students not tested, disaggregated by the same categories noted above by subject; 5. the most recent two-year trend in student achievement in each subject at each grade level, for grades in which assessment is required;

The State, LEA, and School Report Card include all the required data elements 6. aggregate information on any other academic indicator used by the State to determine AYP; and aggregate information on any additional indicators used by the LEA to determine AYP; 7. graduation rates that are consistent with ED-approved State definitions; 8. information on the performance of local education agencies in the State regarding making adequate yearly progress, including the number and names of each school identified for school improvement, and 9. the professional qualifications of teachers in the LEA, including percentage of such teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes not taught by highly qualified teachers, in the aggregate and disaggregated by high-poverty compared to low-poverty schools. The Report Cards are available to the public at the beginning of the academic year.

What if a School fails to make AYP?  Schools that consistently do not meet AYP will receive extra help.  Students in schools that chronically do not meet AYP will have to be offered public school choice or SES.  Schools that continue to not meet AYP after receiving extra help may be reformed by the State.

 Use The Accountability Workbook to Share Responsibility and Build Capacity for Parental Involvement Parents will be better able to:  Be involved in addressing the academic issues that led to school or district identification for failure to make AYP.  Utilize information contained in the Annual Report Card.  Work with their child’s teachers and other educators to improve their child’s academic achievement.  Understand individual student assessment reports that contain student interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports; and  Interpret their child’s achievement on academic assessments that are aligned with State academic achievement standards.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS