McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2: Elements of the Instruction-Learning- Assessment Model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
The Teacher Work Sample
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Response to Intervention
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Summary of Chapter 4 Differentiation and the Brain Katie Boyle.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Understanding by Design designed by Grant Wiggens and Jay McTighe.
July 28, 2011 Nancy Nation & Mirna Whidden.  What do you associate with the word assessment??
PRIMARY/SECONDARY SOURCE HISTORY LABS SOCIAL STUDIES CRITICAL THINKING LABS.
ASSESSMENT Formative, Summative, and Performance-Based
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7:
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Learning Targets NNMST Science Breakout Session December 8, 2011.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
EDU 385 EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN THE CLASSROOM
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR TEACHERS The New Professional Expectation.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
HOW ASSESSMENT SUPPORTS RTI 2 AND CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP Clinch-Powell Cooperative Presenters:
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
CT 854: Assessment and Evaluation in Science & Mathematics
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
 If every student is to become a productive, successful adult, we must create schools that provide an education which is both rigorous and relevant. No.
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Obtaining Valid and Reliable Classroom Evidence Chapter 4:
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Teaching and Learning with Technology, 4e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Designing and Planning Technology- Enhanced Instruction.
Chapter 14: Affective Assessment
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 15: Getting Started on the Assessment Path Essential Issues to Consider.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Key Focus- The central focus of this chapter is to examine the fundamental question; What do my students need to learn in the classroom and how do I use.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
WHAT IS EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION? E xplicit D irect I nstruction.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: Guiding Student Learning Formative Assessment.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Donna Lipscomb EDU 695 MAED Capstone Common Core Presentation INSTRUCTOR KYGER MAY 21, 2015.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Evaluation and Testing
Chapter 4 Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning
Presentation transcript:

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2: Elements of the Instruction-Learning- Assessment Model

2-2 Pedagogy in the Classroom  Whenever you focus on teaching, you must also focus on assessment because they are directly connected (Earl 2003).  Figure 2.1: Essential components of the process: Learning targets, Pre-assessment, Preview of instruction, Instructional Approach and Technique(s), Formative assessment & Feedback, Self-assessment, and Summative assessment.

2-3 Instruction-Learning-Assessment Elements Instruction- Learning- Assessment Elements Identified Learning Targets Pre- Assessment of Students Preview of Instruction Instructional Approach and Techniques Formative Assessment Self- Assessment Summative Assessment

2-4 Learning Targets  A learning target is the educational destination that a student must reach and acquire as a result of an instructional experience.

2-5 Identifying Instructional Learning Targets  Learning targets need to be selected prior to instruction and shared with the students.  Targets need to be clear and specific so students better understand: 1) What they are expected to learn; 2) What they are expected to do as part of the instructional experience.  The lesson needs to align itself and be directed toward acquiring appropriate grade-level indicators and proficiencies.

2-6 Skill Performance Standards  Along with curriculum coverage, learners need to acquire the performance standards connected with the lesson and its material.  Identifying skill levels according to Bloom’s modified taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001) is most helpful for both teacher and students. Skill levels need to be clearly articulated by the instructor and understood by the students.

2-7 Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy  Knowledge Dimensions Factual Conceptual Procedural Meta-cognitive  Cognitive Dimensions Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

2-8 Skill Performance Standards  For example, if analysis and evaluation of material is expected, then those skills need to be taught and practiced within the lesson for students to acquire those skills. If only knowledge and comprehension skills are taught and emphasized in the classroom, then students will most likely acquire and use those skills.  Remember: What is taught, at the skill level that it is taught, is what students will likely display.

2-9 Pre-Assessment  Pre-assessment involves the essential check of confirming that learners are ready to benefit from the instruction that is to be provided.

2-10 Pre-Assessment of Learners  Pre-assessment: conducted prior to teaching a lesson. Need to determine what students know and don’t know about the content that is to be taught.  Two basic areas are typically reviewed in pre- assessment: 1) Assessment of prerequisite skills 2) Assessment of information and skills taught Both areas are important  Assessment of prerequisite skills isn’t always necessary: Previous assessments can confirm the existence of knowledge/comprehension and skill levels.

2-11 Pre-Assessment Essentials  Pre-assessment activities typically: Require a short period of time; Can be easily embedded within the normal instructional process.  It is important to make sure all of the intended learners are pre-assessed (not just a select few) to get an accurate view of the entire classroom.

2-12 Pre-Assessment Essentials  A pre-assessment activity should measure the students’ skills that reflect the intended learning targets and outcomes of the lesson.  Pre-assessment should confirm that the intended learners have the prerequisite skills necessary and that the material in the upcoming lesson wasn’t previously learned or mastered.

2-13 Instruction Preview  Preview of instruction should provide an overview to students about the educational journey that they will be taking, the activities that will be shared, and the desired goals and outcomes connected with that instructional work.

2-14 Preview of Instructional Material  Students need to know where they are going during an educational lesson or activity.  Providing a preview helps students receive: A clear picture of what they will be learning; How the information and skills fit into the overall educational plan.  A preview usually provides information to learners in these areas: 1) General content/information to be covered; 2) Skills or applications to be gained from the new knowledge; 3) Relevancy and functionality of the new information and skills for the learners.

2-15 Instructional Approach  Instructional approach reflects the teacher-guided pathway(s) that is taken to deliver students to their intended educational destination and the expected learning outcomes.

2-16 Instructional Techniques  Whatever instructional techniques are selected by a teacher, evidence-based research and support verifying the effectiveness needs to exist (NCLB requirement)  Assessment as a process is neutral relative to the type of instructional techniques that are used in a classroom.  Instructional-assessment alignment must exist: What is taught and learned is what must be assessed in some systematic manner.  The ability to individualize and differentiate instruction for students is critical in generating successful learning outcomes. ALL students, at some point, require individualized instruction to be successful in the classroom. Differentiated instruction is not just for students with identified disabilities

2-17 Formative Assessment  Formative assessment involves using current student learning evidence and feedback to affirm and improve future learning.

2-18 Formative Assessment  Formative assessment, or “assessment for learning,” serves an essential and direct purpose: To provide the learner and instructor with useful feedback regarding students present performance; To improve or enhance that performance in the future.  This type of assessment is not evaluative, so a “no cost” effect is associated with the performances generated. Learning and performance mistakes do not alter or directly impact a student’s grades or official standing or status within a class.

2-19 Formative Assessment  Formative assessment focuses on confirming or corrective instructional feedback to students systematically along the instructional pathway.  Thus, student learning should not veer off the intended pathway If misdirection does occur, then corrective action can and should immediately take place.  Throughout the process, students remain informed of their progress and what goals still remain within the learning activity.

2-20 Learning Feedback  Progress feedback is the essential learning return and status check that a student needs when engaged in an instructional activity.

2-21 Learning Feedback  Critical elements of effective teacher feedback (Van Houten, 1980) that have been identified include: 1) identifying and addressing a specific aspect of performance; 2) precise performance feedback; 3) immediate feedback (as opposed to delayed feedback); 4) feedback frequency; 5) positive feedback regardless of performance; 6) correct modeling of the desired response; 7) differential feedback with an emphasis on improvement.  Collectively, these practices are recognized as basic and foundational to student learning success.

2-22 Self-Assessment  Self-assessment is a review process designed to check, monitor, and modify one’s progress in order to reach an intended learning outcome(s).

2-23 Self-Assessment Defined  Self-assessment involves: Internal review of an individual’s learning progress; Recognition of required adjustments and modifications needed based on personal review that need to be made to reach an intended learning target or goal.  With this form of assessment, students learn to self-monitor their own learning progress and to recognize needed learning “corrections.”  Completed during the learning event so students ensure that they attain the intended learning outcomes of the lesson.

2-24 Self-Assessment Essentials  Conditions and opportunities must be provided in the classroom so students can learn and practice to evaluate and monitor their own learning progress.  Self-assessment is a process that requires effort, practice, and critical review on the learner’s part. Needs to be a public event “Public” because one primary way we learn is by watching  By modeling self-assessment as a productive and useful learning tool, teachers can provide direct instruction to their students, as well as provide essential practical experience.

2-25 Self-Assessment Essentials  Self-assessment is a life skill that can serve learners in many aspects of their lives: Practical problem-solving; Can serve as a foundation for learning issues and challenges that students face in and out of the school.  Given the immense complexity of today’s world, we want young people to make “good decisions” and to make the “right choices.” Self-assessment can help with that mission.

2-26 Summative Assessment  Summative assessment serves as the formal record and measure of an individual’s accumulated learning and achievement progress.

2-27 Summative Assessment  Summative assessment or “assessment of learning” represents the formal and traditional measure and evaluation of a student’s accumulated learning.  Within the classroom, summative assessment involves formal measurement and evaluation, often in the form of testing, of student learning at some predetermined point. A chapter test or final exam serve as key classroom examples of this kind of measurement and is designed to evaluate an individual’s acquired learning.

2-28 Summative Assessment  This form of assessment is important and clearly essential given its basic function of measuring learning gains of students.  However, because of the continuous push for accountability and ever higher test scores, the importance of summative assessment often (and in some cases inappropriately) overshadows the other forms of assessment and important instructional processes.

2-29 Summative Assessment  It functions as a needed indicator and measure of acquired learning at a particular instructional point.  It is evaluative in nature. Quality of learning and performance of skills is examined.  This form of assessment will not diminish now or in the future.  Since summative assessment plays an important role in the classroom, it is essential that valid and effective measures be constructed and utilized by teachers.

2-30 The Assessment Troika  Formative, Summative, and Self- assessment need to be part of the instructional process. Although configured for different purposes, collectively they provide the opportunity for academic success to be maximized for all learners.  All have value and purpose  Need to be considered and utilized when constructing a classroom assessment system.