Individual Program Plan (IPP) Module 3: IPP Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.
Understanding the IEP Process
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Winter 2013.
Supporting Students with Disabilities in the Classroom Standards Based IEPs LASPDG Presented by Kathy Kilgore January 22, 2015.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Consistency of Assessment
Cohort A Project-wide Data “Our goals can only be reached through a vehicle of a plan, in which we must fervently believe, and upon which we must vigorously.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-1 Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services.
Assessment Strategies Visual Tools EDUC 4454 P/J Methods.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Principles of Assessment
Session Materials  Wiki
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
Partnerships for Supporting Student Success. Expectations for Participants As a result of participating in this in-service session, you can expect to.
Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Introducing The Work Sampling System. What is Work Sampling? Authentic Performance Assessment Curriculum Embedded Instructional Assessment Authentic Performance.
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
Inclusive Schooling “An inclusive school is a school where every child is respected as part of the school community and where each child is encouraged.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Fall 2014.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting October 4, 2012 Creating Effective Student Support Teams.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 7 Portfolio Assessments.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Teaching Students in Inclusive Settings. Getting Started Course Overview Discussion Posts and Rubrics Major Assignments Q & A Dr. Phyllis Schiffer-Simon.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Parent Learning Morning November 6th 2007 October 2009.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Students with Exceptionalities
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Individual Education Plans.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Individual Program Plan (IPP)
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education,9th Edition ISBN X © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Planning.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student Progress SBIEP Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Individual Program Plan (IPP) Module 3: IPP Implementation

Something to think about … Our goals can only be reached through a vehicle of a plan which we must fervently believe in and upon which we must vigorously act. There is no other route to success. Stephen A. Brennan

Translating IPP Outcomes into Daily Teaching The Importance of Measurable Outcomes An annual individualized outcome is a statement which articulates the knowledge, skills and attitudes that a student on an individual program plan (IPP) will be expected to know and demonstrate within the given time frame of one school year, having been provided with appropriately planned instruction and learning experiences.

Translating IPP Outcomes into Daily Teaching Making Connections with Classroom Topics Making connections with classroom topics should not be interpreted that a student with an IPP is working on the PSP outcomes for the subject. It means that, to the extent possible, teachers use classroom topics as a vehicle for implementing a student’s IPP.

Translating IPP Outcomes into Daily Teaching Responsibility for Implementation: Key Components Responsibility for implementation includes: Instruction Assessment Evaluation

Translating IPP Outcomes into Daily Teaching IPP Matrix Assists Implementation The IPP matrix shows the team: how the student’s IPP will be integrated across the curriculum and activities that constitute the school day who has primary responsibility for teaching each individualized outcome and who has responsibility for additional practice and reinforcement of each outcome which parts of the student’s day may require more focus whether any outcomes require additional implementation support ( Sample of IPP matrix for Nathan)

Translating IPP Outcomes into Daily Teaching Collaboration in Locating, Selecting, and Developing Materials Considerations: regular communication between classroom teacher and resource teacher regarding implementation of the IPP sharing of responsibility for locating, selecting, and/or developing materials ensuring sufficient lead time for locating, selecting, and/or developing materials ensuring that the materials are appropriately respectful of the student’s dignity

Translating IPP Outcomes into Daily Teaching Accountability for Documenting Progress Observation As an Assessment Tool Identification of the indicators for observation Decision regarding the format of the documentation form Development of the documentation form Consistent use of the documentation form for assessment Analysis of the data from the documentation forms completed over time to arrive at an evaluation of progress Samples of assessment tools: checklist, rubrics, informal observation, etc.

Provision of Services for Students with an IPP “Only as Special as Necessary”

Service Delivery Co-Teaching and Withdrawal of Students for Support Regardless of the method of service delivery, ongoing communication and collaboration between classroom teachers and resource teachers are critical to effective implementation of IPP’s and ultimately, to students successfully achieving their individualized outcomes. Service Delivery Models: Co-Teaching Withdrawal for Support in a Resource/Learning Centre Setting

The Role of the Student in Implementation Factors that define the parameters of a student’s role Effects of active student involvement Importance of a focus on student independence Gradual release of responsibility Only as special as necessary

Role of Teacher Assistants in Implementation Responsibility Areas: Personal Care Behaviour Management Support for Instructional Program What Assistants Must Not Be Given Responsibility For/Engage In Planning and initiating learning activities Designing or implementing of evaluation of students work Substitute teaching Reporting to parents/guardians Accessing or recording information on student cum cards

Communication Amongst Program Planning Team Members Key Components Clear understanding of roles and responsibilities Collaboration Administrative support for communication and collaboration Communication plan Communication with parents

IPP Quiz 1. If a parent refuses to sign an IPP it cannot be implemented.T F 2. A psycho-educational assessment is required before T F placing a student on an IPP. 3. The Program Planning Team decides whether to place a T F student on an IPP. 4. The parent is present at the very first meeting when T F developing an IPP. 5. The student’s strengths should be used to develop the T F teaching strategies in an IPP. 6. An IPP is reviewed before each reporting period.T F 7. Teachers are more accountable for implementing an IPPT F than regular PSP outcomes.

IPP Quiz Continued: 8. If a student does not achieve all annual individualized T F outcomes in one school year, they can be carried on to the next academic year. 9. The individual classroom teachers develop the specificT F curriculum outcomes on their own. 10. There are no more than four annual individualized outcomes T F developed at one time. 11. The student’s challenges are used to develop the annualT F individualized outcomes. 12. Actual diagnoses of conditions (i.e. ADHD, Autism) shouldT F never be indicated on an IPP. 13. The Program Planning Team must meet if changing any T F specific curriculum outcomes during the school year. 14. At the final review, annual individualized outcomes for the T F following school year must be developed.

Something to think about … The most important single ingredient in the formula of success is knowing how to get along with people. Theodore Roosevelt