Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership Andrew C. Porter University of Pennsylvania Joseph Murphy, Ellen Goldring, & Stephen N. Elliott Vanderbilt University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. Research and Development The team: Porter, Murphy, Goldring, Elliott, Polikoff, May, OToole, Cravens Wallace Foundation.
Lessons Learned on Val Ed Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Dr. Erika Hunt Center for the Study of Education Policy.
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Alabama Teacher Leaders VAL-ED Instructional Leadership Survey January 2013.
Elliott / October Understanding the Construct to be Assessed Stephen N. Elliott, PhD Learning Science Institute & Dept. of Special Education Vanderbilt.
Parents as Partners in Education
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Trends in Teacher Evaluation Systems in Public Education CEC’S POSITION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
The Conceptualization and Validation of the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education (VAL-ED) Ellen Goldring, Vanderbilt University Henry May,
Applying the Research to Maximize Efficiency and to Best Meet Your School and District Needs Kim Gulbrandson, Ph.D. Wisconsin RtI Center.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
C R E S S T / U C L A Improving the Validity of Measures by Focusing on Learning Eva L. Baker CRESST National Conference: Research Goes to School Los Angeles,
Differentiated Supervision
National SAM Project Kentucky Georgia Iowa Illinois Delaware California New York Missouri Texas Missouri.
Copyright © 2001 by The Psychological Corporation 1 The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES) Rating scale technology for identifying students with.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
An Administrator Evaluation System Curriculum Leaders Institute Cohort 5 Day 8.
DEVELOPING ALGEBRA-READY STUDENTS FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF EARLY ALGEBRA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:Maria L. Blanton, University of Massachusetts.
Today’s website:
Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership Andrew C. Porter University of Pennsylvania Joseph Murphy, Ellen Goldring, & Stephen N. Elliott Vanderbilt University.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
IMPACT OF NWP ON TEACHERS’ CLASSROOM PRACTICE: Results of a teacher survey Inverness Research Associates NWP annual meeting 2001.
MULTIPLE MEASURES What are they… Why are they… What do we do… How will we know… Dr. Scott P. Myers KLFA Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
EDU 791 Module Figures Permissions for Graphics Barbara Orr September 2007 This document and the others within the series can be downloaded free of charge.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Using Multiple Measure to Evaluate Principals Hillsborough County Public Schools.
Evaluating School Principal Effectiveness Why We Need to Evaluate Principals and Use Principal Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Improvement October.
Symposium: Assessment, Accountability, Instruction, and Learning in Urban Districts Research funded by the Joyce Foundation and Helen Bader Foundation.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Timberlane Regional School District
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
The Principal’s Role in Supporting Teacher Leadership To Improve Student Outcomes Rhonda Hoyt EDAD 854.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
IES Evaluations and Data Collection Instruments Lauren Angelo National Center for Education Evaluation and Sally Atkins-Burnett Mathematica Policy Research.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
Assessing Learning for Students with Disabilities Tom Haladyna Arizona State University.
EPotential ICT Capabilities Resource. The ePotential ICT Capabilities Resource (ePotential) is designed to: Assist teachers to develop their own ICT Professional.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
CAROLE GALLAGHER, PHD. CCSSO NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT JUNE 26, 2015 Reporting Assessment Results in Times of Change:
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
C R E S S T / U C L A Validity Issues for Accountability Systems Eva L. Baker AERA April 2002 UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 16 – Validity.
Teacher Observations Summative or Formative? ( Glickman et. al.)
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research: Principal Characteristics Time Out: §3012-d Planning Forest or the Trees? Making a “To-Do”
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
“Leadership is second only to classroom instruction among all school related factors that contribute to what students learn at school.” ― How Leadership.
What is the 90/90/90 Research?  The Original Research  169 schools in high-poverty, high minority system  21 schools broke the mold – 90%
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Next Generation Iowa Assessments.  Overview of the Iowa Assessments ◦ Purpose of Forms E/F and Alignment Considerations ◦ Next Generation Iowa Assessments.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Measuring Principals’ Effectiveness:
Learning Point Associates
Lessons Learned on Val Ed Performance Evaluation Advisory Council
Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear
State Board of Education Progress Update
A3 – Improving State Level Supports and Stakeholder Engagement through Effective Evaluation Kim Gulbrandson, Justyn Poulos – Wisconsin RtI Center Key.
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership Andrew C. Porter University of Pennsylvania Joseph Murphy, Ellen Goldring, & Stephen N. Elliott Vanderbilt University October 2010

The Goal – Produce a Psychometrically Sound Assessment of School Leadership The team – Porter, Murphy, Goldring, Elliott, O’Toole, Cravens The Stimulus and Support – The Wallace Foundation identified the need, provided $1.5 million of support for 2005 to The Institute for Education Sciences is currently funding psychometric studies for the period of 2008 to

Purposes of school leadership assessment To guide self improvement and professional development For high stakes decisions; pay for performance, tenure Higher student achievement Better teacher retention Benefits of better school leaders 2010

The need for multiple measures when making high stakes decisions “As the stakes of testing increase for individual students, the importance of considering additional evidence to document the validity of score interpretations and the fairness in testing increases accordingly” (AERA, APA, NCME, 1999, p.141). Value added to student achievement is one measure. A direct assessment of learning centered leadership such as the VAL-ED is another The relative weight given to each measure is an important consideration. Probably greater weight, say 0.75, to behavior in a principal’s first year in a building and less as the principal continues in the same building, say

Learning-Centered Leadership Leaders should be assessed on leadership behaviors associated with student learning. Learning-centered leadership is leadership for student performance. Learning-centered leadership is the framework for our leadership assessment system. 2010

Leadership Behavior Framework 2010

Purpose & Uses The VAL-ED reports principal performance through  Norm-referenced scores and  Criterion-reference scores. VAL-ED can be used annually or more frequently to:  Facilitate a data-based performance evaluation,  Measure performance growth, and  Guide professional development. 2010

An Example Set of Responses 2010

Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership: The VAL-ED vision… A leadership assessment system that has the following properties: Works well in a variety of settings and circumstances, Is construct valid, Is reliable, If feasible for widespread use, Provides accurate and useful reporting of results. Is unbiased, Yields a diagnostic profile for summative and formative purposes. Can be used to measure progress over time in the development of leadership, and Predicts important outcomes. 2010

Some Results Respondent Groups – Supervisors (3.68) were significantly more positive than were teachers (3.59) or principals (3.53). There were no significant differences among levels of schooling (with controls high school principals were slightly less effective). There was no difference between Forms A (3.61) and C (3.62). The greater a principal’s years of experience in their school, the more effective the principal. Internal Consistency – Internal consistency reliability was high for both total score and each of the core components and each of the key processes with all reliabilities.87 or higher. For total score, the correlation between principal and supervisor was.13, principal and teacher.27, supervisor and teacher

Aggregated Effectiveness Ratings 2010

Comparisons Across Respondent Groups 2010

Cell-by-Cell Feedback 2010

Supporting Research & Publications Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A.C. (In Press). Leaders for productive schools. In M. Brundrett & M. Crawford (Eds.), Developing School Leaders: An International Perspective.London: Routledge. Porter, A.C., Polikoff, M.S., Goldring, E., Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., & May, H. (2010). Investigating the validity and reliability of the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2). Porter, A.C., Polikoff, M.S., Goldring, E., Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., & May, H. (April 2010). Developing a psychometrically sound assessment of school leadership: The VAL-ED as a case study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2010) Leaders for productive schools. In B. McGaw, P. Peterson, & E. Baker (Eds), International Encyclopedia of Education (3 rd ed.). Elsevier. Polikoff, M.S., May, H., Porter, A.C., Elliott, S.N., Goldring, E., & Murphy, J. (November 2009). An examination of differential item functioning in the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education. Journal of School Leadership, 19(6), Goldring, E., Porter, A.C., Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), Goldring, E., Cravens, X. C., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Porter, A. C. & Carson, B., (2009). The evaluation of principals: What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership? The Elementary School Journal, 110(1), Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliot, S., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership: Connections to Research, Standards and Practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), Goldring, E. Porter, A. Pollikoff, M (2008). Report on the Study to Evaluate the Performance Level Descriptors for the VAL-ED. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A.C. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership & Management, 27 (2), Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., Goldring, E.B., & Porter, A.C. (2006). Learning-centered leadership: A conceptual foundation. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Murphy, J.F., Goldring, E.B., Cravens, X.C., Elliott, S.N., Porter, A.C. (2007, August). The Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education: Measuring Learning-Centered Leadership. Journal of East China Normal University. Porter, A.C., Goldring, E.B., Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., & Cravens, X. (2006). A framework for the assessment of learning-centered leadership. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Porter, A.C., Goldring, E.B., Elliott, S.N., Murphy, J., Polikoff, M., and Cravens, X. (2008). Setting Performance Standards for the VAL- ED Assessment of Principal Leadership, New York: NY: Wallace Foundation. Porter, A.C., Goldring, E.B., Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., Polikoff, M., and May, H. (2008). VAL-ED Assessment of Principal Leadership Technical Manual, New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Elliott, S.N., Porter, A.C., Goldring, E.B., Murphy, J., Polikoff, M., and May, H. (2008). VAL-ED Users’ Guide, New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. These and other publications are all available for download at

Reliability and Validity Studies in Progress – IES-funded IES-funded Studies  Known Group Study – Does the VAL-ED reliably distinguish principals who are identified by others as more or less effective?  Test/Retest Reliability  Consequences Study – Study of How the VAL-ED Was Used and to What Effect  Longitudinal Study – Does effectiveness as measured by the VAL-ED predict future gains in student achievement? 2010

To Learn More … Google: VAL-ED We invite conversation with you on the timely and important topic of school leadership assessment 2010