Short period wiggler prototype for the CLIC damping ring Alexey Bragin, Denis Gurov, Anatoly Utkin, Pavel Vobly Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
Advertisements

Mezentsev Nikolay Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Heat transfer in SIS 300 dipole MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke.
A.KOVALENKO SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS for NICA BOOSTER & COLLIDER NICA ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION - 3 JINR, Dubna, November 05, 2008.
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
Undulator R & D Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK BAW-2 SLAC Jan 2011.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Progress Report V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
BNG Industrial experience on Superconducting Undulators C. Boffo, T. Gehrard, B. Schraut, J. Steinmann, W. Walter, Babcock Noell GmbH T. Baumbach, S. Casalbuoni,
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
M. Modena, A. Aloev CERN, Geneva, CH “An alternative Super-ferric design for ILC QD0” “LCWS14, 6-10 October 2014 Belgrade.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
Permanent magnet wiggler based on NdFeB material. This wiggler type uses the same design principles as the wigglers which have been developed for PETRA.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
BINP EXPERIENCE IN THE DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF INSERTION DEVICES BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS NOVOSIBIRSK.
SIS 300 Magnet Design Options. Cos n  magnets; cooling with supercritical Helium GSI 001 existing magnet built at BNG measured in our test facility 6.
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
CEA DSM Irfu WP 7.4 : Insert design and construction M. Devaux J-M Rey, M. Durante, P. Tixador, C. Pes 18/09/2012HFM collaboration meeting WP 7 - Milano.
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova The air core magnets.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
Simona Bettoni, Remo Maccaferri Analysis of a proposal for the design of the CLIC damping rings wigglers.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
Prototyping of Superconducting Magnets for RAON ECR IS S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Dr. Hans Müller Primary Beams, Dept. SC Magnets and Testing (PB-MT) GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung.
Jim Kerby Fermilab With many thanks to Vladimir Kashikhin, the FNAL, KEK, and Toshiba teams. SCRF BTR Split Quadrupole ILC ML & SCRF Baseline Technical.
Magnet design and field calculations
Nb3Sn wiggler development
Superconducting wiggler magnets for CLIC damping rings
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
CBM magnet overview of the BINP work
A model superconducting helical undulators wound of wind and react MgB2 and Nb3Sn multifilamentary wires Center for Superconducting & Magnetic Materials.
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Status of the manufacturing process of a Nb3Sn wiggler prototype
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
Coil design the CBM magnet
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Task 6: Short Period Nb3Sn Superconducting Helical Undulator
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
BINP superconducting insertion devices and their applications
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
I. Bogdanov, S. Kozub, V. Pokrovsky, L. Shirshov,
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project
Structural analysis of the CBM magnet coil
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
PANDA solenoid quench calculations
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Proposal for new coil design the CBM magnet
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Magnet design, field calculations
Review of Quench Limits
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Presentation transcript:

Short period wiggler prototype for the CLIC damping ring Alexey Bragin, Denis Gurov, Anatoly Utkin, Pavel Vobly Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia Mikko Karppinen, Remo Maccaferri, Jacky Mazet, Stephan Russenschuk, Daniel Schoerling CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Main parameters of the wigglers  Period – 50 mm  Total length of wigglers  Peak magnetic field – 2.5 T  Pole gap – 20 mm  Beam aperture – 12 mm  Total number of wigglers – 104  The wigglerdesign has to be easy-to- produce, reliable and inexpensive  The wiggler design has to be easy-to- produce, reliable and inexpensive

Overview of existing BINP wigglers Year Magnetic field, T Number of poles Gap, mm Period, mm Length, mm Vertical aperture, mm Elettra (Italy) (3.5) CLS (Canada) (2.0) DLS (UK) (3.5) Siberia-2 (Moscow) (7.5) CLS-2 (Canada) (4.0) LNLS (Brazil) DLS-2 (UK) ALBA-CELLS (Spain)

NbTi design of the short prototype for the CDR  Common NbTi wires (Cu/NbTi = >1) don’t meet the requirements of the CDR. Engineering current of the NbTi wigglers at 4.2 K should be by a factor of higher if the wigglers would be made of common NbTi wires.  The NbTi wire, containing NbTi/Cu = 1.5/1, was used in the BINP discussed here. The same wire was used previously as shown in above table.  The SC wire parameters are - Insulated diameter 0.92 mm - Insulated diameter 0.92 mm - operational current 660 A at 6 T magnetic field in the coils - operational current 660 A at 6 T magnetic field in the coils - number of filaments number of filaments filament 34 m - filament 34 m

Design principles, first prototype  The design principles are shown on the one half of the first prototype.  The coils were wound around the iron yoke without internal wire splicing.  The neighbor coils are wound in opposite directions.  Fiber glass plastic was placed between the coils  Dry winding  Epoxy compound impregnation at bar pressure.  Epoxy compound is epoxy – 50 mass parts epoxy – 50 mass parts Al 2 O 3 powder – 50 mass parts Al 2 O 3 powder – 50 mass parts  Active quench protection was used coils in one half

Design principles, second prototype The same design, but - the straight parts of the - the straight parts of the coils were rounded coils were rounded - the fiber glass plastic - the fiber glass plastic was removed. was removed. High heat capacity Gd 2 O 2 S powder was added to the epoxy compound. epoxy compound. Its quantity is 10% of the total mass of the compound.

Magnetic fields calculations ANSYS 2D calculations and MERMAID 2D and 3D calculations Magnetic fields in the working volume. ANSYS 2D. Second prototype. Really wound coils are shown. Maximal magnetic fields are in the central coil at round parts. MERMAID 3D.

Stability and Protection of the wiggler  Stability parameters of the considered wiggler design are low due to less amount the copper stabilizer and high Iop/Ic ratio. These factors cause high risk of a degradation. To increase stability of the wiggler To increase stability of the wiggler - epoxy compound with fine powder is used - epoxy compound with fine powder is used - all possibilities to increase Ic should be used - all possibilities to increase Ic should be used  Active protection is considered as a main method of the wiggler protection. It was tested in the first prototype.

Epoxy impregnation One half of the wiggler is Prepared for the impregnation. The half of the wiggler after impregnation. The Gd 2 O 2 S powder is seemed to be completely precipitated on the bottom. Four wiggler parts were successfully impregnated by this way. Impregnation area. Autoclave presses the impregnated wiggler by MPa at 90 C.

Test results of the first prototype The first prototype was tested three times. A strong degradation was observed. The maximal current was 450 A at 1.9 K (CERN) that is too far from the operational 660 A. The main reason of the degradation was the glass fiber spacers due to much difference between the thermal contraction of the spacers and the iron. ANSYS calculations have Proved this conclusion.

Test results of the second prototype  One half of the second prototype was tested separately with iron plate.  Operational current of 660 A and critical current of 700 A were achieved.  In the second prototype test operational current of 660 A and critical current of 693 A of the second half were achieved.  High ramping rate is seemed to be the main reason of much training quenches. (5 times higher) (5 times higher) One half training history Second prototype training history

Test results of the second prototype, conclusions  1. Operational current of 660 A was achieved – the main result.  2. Training quench statistics shows: - 88% of the quenches of the one half test were in the - 88% of the quenches of the one half test were in the 6A coil. 6A coil. - 56% of the quenches of the wiggler test were in the - 56% of the quenches of the wiggler test were in the 6B coil. The 6A and 6B coils contains ½ turns of central coil. 6B coil. The 6A and 6B coils contains ½ turns of central coil. - the central coils (4A, 4B) induced the training quenches. - the central coils (4A, 4B) induced the training quenches.  3. The influence of the high ramping rate was not understood during the wiggler test. It was by a factor of 5 higher than in the one half test, so a heat generation due to AC loss was by a factor of 25 higher.  4. The depth of grooves in the iron, where the coils are wound, is not optimal. SO, in the conducted tests the maximal magnetic field was about 2.2 T in the working volume. Nevertheless, it does not affect the maximal field inside the coils. Outer turns of 6A and 6B coils are not backed by iron walls as in 2A and 2B.

Possible improvements of the NbTi design  1. Removing of 2 mm of iron at the round parts will increase the critical current up to 730 A. It will improve the stability. PropertiesTiB 2 SiCAl 2 O 3 BNAlN Cryst. structureHex. Density, g/cm , /K E, GPa  t, GPa T m, K  2. Taking BN as a filling powder for the epoxy compound is more advantageous according the shown table and plots.

Conclusions  The short prototype of the wiggler were tested up to the critical current that prove the possibility to use NbTi wiggler design at 4.3 K for the CDR.  The developed technology of the epoxy impregnation seems reliable and effective.  Improvements of the current design are shown which should increase stability of the wiggler.  The reasons of premature quenches of the first and second prototypes are understood and discussed how can they be minimized.