The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System: Development and Application to Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional and Coastal Circulation Modeling: California Current System Art Miller Scripps Institution of Oceanography ECOFOR Workshop Friday Harbor, WA September.
Advertisements

© Crown copyright Met Office Implementing a diurnal model at the Met Office James While, Matthew Martin.
Introduction to Data Assimilation NCEO Data-assimilation training days 5-7 July 2010 Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data Assimilation Research Center (DARC) University.
Introduction to Data Assimilation Peter Jan van Leeuwen IMAU.
The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System:
Forecasting Forecast Error
Polly Smith, Alison Fowler, Amos Lawless School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Reading Exploring coupled data assimilation using.
Characterization of Forecast Error using Singular Value Decomposition Andy Moore and Kevin Smith University of California Santa Cruz Hernan Arango Rutgers.
Assessing the Information Content and Impact of Observations on Ocean Circulation Estimates using 4D-Var Andy Moore Dept. of Ocean Sciences UC Santa Cruz.
Yoichi Ishikawa 1, Toshiyuki Awaji 1,2, Teiji In 3, Satoshi Nakada 2, Tsuyoshi Wakamatsu 1, Yoshimasa Hiyoshi 1, Yuji Sasaki 1 1 DrC, JAMSTEC 2 Kyoto University.
Initialization Issues of Coupled Ocean-atmosphere Prediction System Climate and Environment System Research Center Seoul National University, Korea In-Sik.
Prediction of Ocean Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea An application of the ROMS/TOMS Data Assimilation Models Hernan G. Arango (IMCS,
Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.
Application of Satellite Data in the Data Assimilation Experiments off Oregon Peng Yu in collaboration with Alexander Kurapov, Gary Egbert, John S. Allen,
ROMS/TOMS Tangent Linear and Adjoint Models Andrew Moore, CU Hernan Arango, Rutgers U Arthur Miller, Bruce Cornuelle, Emanuele Di Lorenzo, Doug Neilson.
The ROMS TL and ADJ Models: Tools for Generalized Stability Analysis and Data Assimilation Hernan Arango, Rutgers U Emanuele Di Lorenzo, GIT Arthur Miller,
October, Scripps Institution of Oceanography An Alternative Method to Building Adjoints Julia Levin Rutgers University Andrew Bennett “Inverse Modeling.
1 COAS-CIOSS Coastal Ocean Modeling Activities Coastal Ocean Modeling Studies at COAS are focused on:  Wind-driven upwelling and downwelling [Allen et.
Advanced data assimilation methods with evolving forecast error covariance Four-dimensional variational analysis (4D-Var) Shu-Chih Yang (with EK)
Variational Data Assimilation in Coastal Ocean Problems with Instabilities Alexander Kurapov J. S. Allen, G. D. Egbert, R. N. Miller College of Oceanic.
Advanced data assimilation methods- EKF and EnKF Hong Li and Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland July 2006.
Coastal Ocean Observation Lab John Wilkin, Hernan Arango, John Evans Naomi Fleming, Gregg Foti, Julia Levin, Javier Zavala-Garay,
An Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of the Southern California Current Circulation and Ecosystem Andy Moore, Emanuele DiLorenzo, Hernan Arango, Craig Lewis,
Coastal Ocean Observation Lab John Wilkin, Hernan Arango, Julia Levin, Javier Zavala-Garay, Gordon Zhang Regional Ocean.
A Forecasting system for the Southern California Current Emanuele Di Lorenzo Arthur Miller Bruce Cornuelle Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD.
An Assimilating Tidal Model for the Bering Sea Mike Foreman, Josef Cherniawsky, Patrick Cummins Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney BC, Canada Outline:
4D Variational Data Assimilation Observation Operators 4D Variational Data Assimilation Observation Operators Hernan G. Arango.
ROMS/TOMS TL and ADJ Models: Tools for Generalized Stability Analysis and Data Assimilation Andrew Moore, CU Hernan Arango, Rutgers U Arthur Miller, Bruce.
JERICO KICK OFF MEETINGPARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 WP9: New Methods to Assess the Impact of Coastal Observing Systems Presented by.
Andy Moore, UCSC Hernan Arango, Rutgers Gregoire Broquet, CNRS Chris Edwards & Milena Veneziani, UCSC Brian Powell, U Hawaii Jim Doyle, NRL Monterey Dave.
NOPP Project: Boundary conditions, data assimilation, and predictability in coastal ocean models OSU: R. M. Samelson (lead PI), J. S. Allen, G. D. Egbert,
Computing a posteriori covariance in variational DA I.Gejadze, F.-X. Le Dimet, V.Shutyaev.
“ New Ocean Circulation Patterns from Combined Drifter and Satellite Data ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material from.
3D/4D-Var Methods Liang Xu (NRL) JCSDA Summer Colloquium on Satellite DA 1 3D-Var/4D-Var Solution Methods Liang Xu Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey,
“ Combining Ocean Velocity Observations and Altimeter Data for OGCM Verification ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material.
ROMS User Workshop, Rovinj, Croatia May 2014 Coastal Mean Dynamic Topography Computed Using.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Ocean Data Variational Assimilation with OPA: Ongoing developments with OPAVAR and implementation plan for NEMOVAR Sophie RICCI, Anthony Weaver, Nicolas.
Issues in Ocean-Atmosphere-Land-Ice Coupling Ocean Integration in Earth System Prediction Capability Data Assimilation University of Maryland September.
Weak and Strong Constraint 4DVAR in the R egional O cean M odeling S ystem ( ROMS ): Development and Applications Di Lorenzo, E. Georgia Institute of Technology.
In collaboration with: J. S. Allen, G. D. Egbert, R. N. Miller and COAST investigators P. M. Kosro, M. D. Levine, T. Boyd, J. A. Barth, J. Moum, et al.
1 Advantages of data assimilation in coastal ocean circulation models: Oregon perspective Alexander L. Kurapov, J. S. Allen, G. D. Egbert, R. N. Miller.
Conclusions The quantitative dynamical fitting procedure has been tested successfully for CalCOFI hydrographic data by adjusting temperature and salinity.
ROMS 4D-Var: The Complete Story Andy Moore Ocean Sciences Department University of California Santa Cruz & Hernan Arango IMCS, Rutgers University.
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
Research Vignette: The TransCom3 Time-Dependent Global CO 2 Flux Inversion … and More David F. Baker NCAR 12 July 2007 David F. Baker NCAR 12 July 2007.
Modeling the biological response to the eddy-resolved circulation in the California Current Arthur J. Miller SIO, La Jolla, CA John R. Moisan NASA.
Data assimilation and forecasting the weather (!) Eugenia Kalnay and many friends University of Maryland.
The OR-WA coastal ocean forecast system Initial hindcast assimilation tests 1 Goals for the COMT project: -DA in presence of the Columbia River -Develop.
FastOpt Quantitative Design of Observational Networks M. Scholze, R. Giering, T. Kaminski, E. Koffi P. Rayner, and M. Voßbeck Future GHG observation WS,
Weak Constraint 4DVAR in the R egional O cean M odeling S ystem ( ROMS ): Development and application for a baroclinic coastal upwelling system Di Lorenzo,
2005 ROMS/TOMS Workshop Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA, October 25, D Variational Data Assimilation Drivers Hernan G. Arango IMCS,
Derivative-based uncertainty quantification in climate modeling P. Heimbach 1, D. Goldberg 2, C. Hill 1, C. Jackson 3, N. Petra 3, S. Price 4, G. Stadler.
Predictability of Mesoscale Variability in the East Australian Current given Strong Constraint Data Assimilation John Wilkin Javier Zavala-Garay and Hernan.
Weak and Strong Constraint 4D variational data assimilation: Methods and Applications Di Lorenzo, E. Georgia Institute of Technology Arango, H. Rutgers.
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
Slide 1 NEMOVAR-LEFE Workshop 22/ Slide 1 Current status of NEMOVAR Kristian Mogensen.
1 A multi-scale three-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme Zhijin Li,, Yi Chao (JPL) James C. McWilliams (UCLA), Kayo Ide (UMD) The 8th International.
Inverse Modeling of Surface Carbon Fluxes Please read Peters et al (2007) and Explore the CarbonTracker website.
Observations and Ocean State Estimation: Impact, Sensitivity and Predictability Andy Moore University of California Santa Cruz Hernan Arango Rutgers University.
G. Panteleev, P.Stabeno, V.Luchin, D.Nechaev,N.Nezlin, M.Ikeda. Estimates of the summer transport of the Kamchatka Current a variational inverse of hydrographic.
Predictability of Mesoscale Variability in the East Australia Current given Strong Constraint Data Assimilation Hernan G. Arango IMCS, Rutgers John L.
X 10 km Model Bathymetry (A)Temperature (B) Alongshore Velocity Cross-shore Velocity Figure 1: Panel (A) model grid and bathymetry. The model has closed.
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Identical Twin Experiments for the Representer Method with a Spectral Element.
Towards the utilization of GHRSST data for improving estimates of the global ocean circulation Dimitris Menemenlis 1, Hong Zhang 1, Gael Forget 2, Patrick.
June 20, 2005Workshop on Chemical data assimilation and data needs Data Assimilation Methods Experience from operational meteorological assimilation John.
Assimilation of Sea Surface Temperature in OPAVAR State of the art: Relaxation to Reynolds SST (daily, interpolated to ORCA grid, ENACT) - strong relaxation.
Gleb Panteleev (IARC) Max Yaremchuk, (NRL), Dmitri Nechaev (USM)
Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of the California Current Circulation and Ecosystem using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) Andy Moore, Emanuele.
Adjoint Sensitivity Studies on the US East Coast
Presentation transcript:

The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System: Development and Application to Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H. Arango, B. Chua, B. D. Cornuelle, A. J. Miller and Bennett A.

Overview of the Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System Implementation - How do we assimilate data using the ROMS set of models Examples, (a) Coastal upwelling (b) mesoscale eddies in the Southern California Current Goals

Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System (IROMS) Chua and Bennett (2001) Inverse Ocean Modeling System (IOMs) Moore et al. (2003) NL-ROMS, TL-ROMS, REP-ROMS, AD-ROMS To implement a representer-based generalized inverse method to solve weak constraint data assimilation into a non-linear model a 4D-variational data assimilation system for high-resolution basin- wide and coastal oceanic flows

def: NL-ROMS: REP-ROMS: also referred to as Picard Iterations Approximation of NONLINEAR DYNAMICS (STEP 1)

REP-ROMS: def:

TL-ROMS: AD-ROMS: REP-ROMS: def:

TL-ROMS: AD-ROMS: REP-ROMS: Small Errors 1)model missing dynamics 2)boundary conditions errors 3)Initial conditions errors (STEP 2)

TL-ROMS: AD-ROMS: REP-ROMS:

TL-ROMS: AD-ROMS: REP-ROMS: Tangent Linear Propagator Integral Solutions

TL-ROMS: AD-ROMS: REP-ROMS: Integral Solutions Adjoint Propagator

TL-ROMS: AD-ROMS: REP-ROMS: Integral Solutions Adjoint Propagator Tangent Linear Propagator

TL-ROMS: AD-ROMS: REP-ROMS: Integral Solutions Adjoint Propagator Tangent Linear Propagator

TL-ROMS: How is the tangent linear model useful for assimilation?

TL-ROMS: ASSIMILATION (1)Problem Statement 1) Set of observations 2) Model trajectory 3) Find that minimizes Sampling functional

TL-ROMS: Best Model Estimate Initial Guess Corrections ASSIMILATION (1)Problem Statement 1) Set of observations 2) Model trajectory 3) Find that minimizes Sampling functional

TL-ROMS: 1) Initial model-data misfit 2) Model Tangent Linear trajectory 3) Find that minimizes ASSIMILATION (2)Modeling the Corrections Best Model Estimate Initial Guess Corrections

TL-ROMS: ASSIMILATION (2)Modeling the Corrections 1) Initial model-data misfit 2) Model Tangent Linear trajectory 3) Find that minimizes

TL-ROMS: ASSIMILATION (2)Modeling the Corrections  Corrections to initial conditions  Corrections to model dynamics and boundary conditions 1) Initial model-data misfit 2) Model Tangent Linear trajectory 3) Find that minimizes

1) Initial model-data misfit 2) Corrections to Model State 3) Find that minimizes ASSIMILATION (2)Modeling the Corrections  Corrections to initial conditions  Corrections to model dynamics and boundary conditions

1) Initial model-data misfit 2) Correction to Model Initial Guess 3) Find that minimizes ASSIMILATION (2)Modeling the Corrections  Corrections to initial conditions  Corrections to model dynamics and boundary conditions Assume we seek to correct only the initial conditions STRONG CONSTRAINT

ASSIMILATION (2)Modeling the Corrections ASSIMILATION (3)Cost Function 1) Initial model-data misfit 2) Correction to Model Initial Guess 3) Find that minimizes

ASSIMILATION (2)Modeling the Corrections ASSIMILATION (3)Cost Function 1) Initial model-data misfit 2) Correction to Model Initial Guess 3) Find that minimizes 2) corrections should not exceed our assumptions about the errors in model initial condition. 1) corrections should reduce misfit within observational error

ASSIMILATION (3)Cost Function

ASSIMILATION (3)Cost Function def: is a mapping matrix of dimensions observations X model space

ASSIMILATION (3)Cost Function def: is a mapping matrix of dimensions observations X model space

ASSIMILATION (3)Cost Function Minimize J

4DVAR inversion Hessian Matrix def:

4DVAR inversion IOM representer-based inversion Hessian Matrix def:

4DVAR inversion IOM representer-based inversion Hessian Matrix Stabilized Representer Matrix Representer Coefficients Representer Matrix def:

4DVAR inversion IOM representer-based inversion Hessian Matrix Stabilized Representer Matrix Representer Coefficients Representer Matrix def: Data to Data Covariance

Representer Matrix def: How to understand the physical meaning of the Representer Matrix? IOM representer-based inversion Stabilized Representer Matrix Representer Coefficients

Representer Matrix TL-ROMSAD-ROMS

Representer Matrix Assume a special assimilation case:  Observations = Full model state at time T  Diagonal Covariance with unit variance

Representer Matrix Assume a special assimilation case:  Observations = Full model state at time T  Diagonal Covariance with unit variance

Representer Matrix

Assume you want to compute the model spatial covariance at time T

Representer Matrix Assume you want to compute the model spatial covariance at time T

Representer Matrix model to model covariance Temperature Temperature Covariance for grid point n

Representer Matrix model to model covariance Temperature Temperature Covariance for grid point n Temperature Velocity Covariance for grid point n

Representer Matrix model to model covariance most general form model to model covariance

Representer Matrix model to model covariance most general form model to model covariance if we sample at observation locations through data to data covariance

… back to the system to invert ….

4DVAR inversion IOM representer-based inversion Hessian Matrix Stabilized Representer Matrix Representer Coefficients Representer Matrix def: STRONG CONSTRAINT

4DVAR inversion IOM representer-based inversion Hessian Matrix Stabilized Representer Matrix Representer Coefficients Representer Matrix def: WEAK CONSTRAINT

Stabilized Representer Matrix Representer Coefficients WEAK CONSTRAINT How to solve for corrections ?  Method of solution in IROMS IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix Representer Coefficients WEAK CONSTRAINT How to solve for corrections ?  Method of solution in IROMS

Method of solution in IROMS STEP 1) Produce background state using nonlinear model starting from initial guess. STEP 2) Run REP-ROMS linearized around background state to generate first estimate of model trajectory STEP 3) Compute model-data misfit STEP 4) Solve for Representer Coeficients STEP 5) Compute corrections STEP 6) Update model state using REP-ROMS outer loop

Method of solution in IROMS STEP 1) Produce background state using nonlinear model starting from initial guess. STEP 2) Run REP-ROMS linearized around background state to generate first estimate of model trajectory STEP 3) Compute model-data misfit STEP 4) Solve for Representer Coeficients STEP 5) Compute corrections STEP 6) Update model state using REP-ROMS outer loop inner loop

How to evaluate the action of the stabilized Representer Matrix

How to evaluate the action of the stabilized Representer Matrix

How to evaluate the action of the stabilized Representer Matrix

How to evaluate the action of the stabilized Representer Matrix

How to evaluate the action of the stabilized Representer Matrix

ROMS Coastal Upwelling Model Topography 10km res, Baroclinic, Periodic NS, CCS Topographic Slope with Canyons and Seamounts, full options! ShelfOpen Ocean 200 km Seasonal Wind Stress

ROMS Coastal Upwelling Final Time Initial Condition Temperature Sea Surface Heigth 10km res, Baroclinic, Periodic NS, CCS Topographic Slope with Canyons and Seamounts, full options! = 1 JAN ‘06 = 4 JAN ‘06

The ASSIMILATION Setup Final Time Initial Condition Problem: Assimilate a passive tracer, which was perfectly measured. Passive T racer

Model Dynamics are Correct True  Corrections only to initial state

True Diagonal Covariance Model Dynamics are Correct

True Diagonal CovarianceGaussian Covariance How about the initial condition? Model Dynamics are Correct Explained Variance 92%Explained Variance 89%

True True Initial Condition Model Dynamics are Correct Diagonal Covariance Explained Variance 75% Explained Variance 92% Gaussian Covariance Explained Variance 83% Explained Variance 89% Strong Constraint

What if we allow for error in the model dynamics? True True Initial Condition  Time Dependent corrections to model dynamics and boundary conditions

True Gaussian Covariance Explained Variance 24% Explained Variance 99% True Initial Condition Weak Constraint

True Gaussian Covariance Explained Variance 24%Explained Variance 83% Explained Variance 99%Explained Variance 89% True Initial Condition Weak Constraint Strong Constraint

Data Misfit (comparison) Weak Constraint Strong Constraint

What if we really have substantial model errors, or bias?

Assimilation of data at time True True Initial Condition

Model 1Model 2 Assimilation of data at time True True Initial Condition Which is the model with the correct dynamics?

Model 1Model 2 True True Initial Condition Wrong Model Good Model

Time Evolution of solutions after assimilation Wrong Model Good Model DAY 0

Time Evolution of solutions after assimilation Wrong Model Good Model DAY 1

Time Evolution of solutions after assimilation Wrong Model Good Model DAY 2

Time Evolution of solutions after assimilation Wrong Model Good Model DAY 3

Time Evolution of solutions after assimilation Wrong Model Good Model DAY 4

Model 1Model 2 True True Initial Condition Wrong Model Good Model What if we apply more smoothing?

Model 1Model 2 Assimilation of data at time True True Initial Condition

Assimilating SST Prior (First Guess)

Assimilating SST Wrong assumption in Prior (First Guess)After Assimilation

Assimilating SST No smoothing Prior (First Guess)After Assimilation

Assimilating SST Gaussian Covariance Smoothing Prior (First Guess)After Assimilation

RMS difference from TRUE Observations Days RMS Diagonal CASE Gaussian

Assimilation of Mesoscale Eddies in the Southern California Bight TRUE 1 st GUESS IOM solution Free SurfaceSurface NS VelocitySST Assimilated data: TS 0-500m Free surface Currents 0-150m

Normalized Misfit Datum Assimilated data: TS 0-500m Free surface Currents 0-150m (a) T S VU  Assimilation of Mesoscale Eddies in the Southern California Bight

Happy data assimilation and forecasting! Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H. Arango, Chua, B. D. Cornuelle, A. J. Miller and Bennett A. (2005) The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System (IROMS): development and application to data assimilation of coastal mesoscale eddies. Ocean Modeling (in preparation)

… end

True Assimilation EXP 1Assimilation EXP 2 Assimilation of data at time Gaussian Diagonal

True GaussianDIagonal Data Misfit (comparison) Weak Constraint Strong Constraint Model Dynamics are InCorrect

True Assimilation EXP 1Assimilation EXP 2 Assimilation of data at time Wrong Gaussian

True Assimilation EXP 1Assimilation EXP 2 Assimilation of data at time Wrong Gaussian

True Gaussian Covariance Explained Variance 24%Explained Variance 91% Explained Variance 99% True Initial Condition Model Dynamics are Incorrect

Coastal Upwelling Baroclinic - Passive Sources