Academy of Pacesetting Districts Examining Rapid Improvement Leader and School Level Indicators.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Breaking Ranks II Strategies for Leading High School Reform.

Advertisements

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.

By Linda Munger and Valerie Von Frank. Principal is the Instructional Leader, yet the sole leader is no longer enough. Current research emphasizes a team.

PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL June 11, 2014 OSPI’s Office of Student and School.

MINNESOTA P-16 EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP January 28, 2009 Overview of Potential Future P-16 Partnership Initiatives to Strengthen Teacher Effectiveness.

Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.

Central Office Administrator Development and Evaluation Adaptations for Central Office Administrators.

Transition To The Common Core Transforming Teaching & Learning Santa Clara County Office of Education August 27, 2012.

Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.

Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.

1 University of the State of New York State Education Department Differentiated Accountability School Quality Review (SQR)

EFFECTIVE TEAMING, AND INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING Academy of Pacesetting States July 19-24, 2009 Princeton, New Jersey 1.

NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.

Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,

Academy of Pacesetting Districts January 11 – 12, 2012.

Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance (SINA & DINA) Phase I: Audit Keystone AEA January 28, 2008.

Student Learning as a Priority Faculty Development Leadership Development Instructional Plan Implementation Decision Making.

Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol

Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.

DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2

New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.

The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...

Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.

What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.

Classroom Data Feedback, Follow Up and Follow Through Feedback, Follow Up and Follow Through CSDE CSDE CAS CAS C.E.S. C.E.S.

Session Three Data Overview sharing Looking at Student Work (Step 4 Digging into Data) Looking at Teaching Practice (Step 5 Examining Instruction)

Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.

External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.

Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.

2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.

Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.

I DAHO S TATEWIDE S YSTEM OF S UPPORT (SSOS) NNSSIL Webinar – Addressing the Needs of All Students through School Improvement September 12, 2012 Steve.

Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.

Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.

System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.

Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine

Michigan Coalition of Essential Schools Welcome to the Critical Friends Groups November 1, 2013.

Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.

P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.

What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….

Examining & Improving Student Performance on the Georgia High School Graduation Test : One Subgroup at a Time First District RESA Spring 2010.

IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.

ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.

Webster Public Schools October 8, Goal for AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. We can do this.

Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.

KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.

PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.

About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School

Office of Service Quality

Ted Lindquist Skills and Processes That Sustain Data Teams.

External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.

Florin High School Professional Learning Communities Rationale Flexibility Effectiveness Sustainability.

Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,

Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.

School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.

Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.

Norwalk Community School District Instructional Rounds October 26, 2010.

Reporting in Schoolnet Trainer Trainer/Consultant.

Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.

You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,

Redefining Leadership for Inclusive Instructional Leadership: The Role of Higher Education Brian A McNulty Ph. D.

Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math

Smarter School Spending Community of Practice

What is Strategic Performance Management (SPM)?

Mentor-Principals February Webinar

Administrator Evaluation Orientation

Introductions Introduction

UNIT SELF-TEST QUESTIONS

Introductions Introduction

Presentation transcript:

Academy of Pacesetting Districts Examining Rapid Improvement Leader and School Level Indicators

Effective Schools Research

High Expectations

Continuous Improvement

Leadership

Use of data

Professional Teaching Culture

Student Supports Multiple Interventions

School Climate

Family Engagement

Talent

Curriculum & Instruction

School Schedule

Indicators  Indicators are statements of good practice against which current practice may be examined. 15

Exploring Indicators The Academy focuses on:  14 Rapid Improvement Leader Indicators (pg 114)  9 Teaching & Learning Indicators (pg 115)  21 District Indicators of Effective Practice (pg 53) 16

Exploring Indicators Task #1: 1.Distribute indicators in envelopes 2.Individually, read your indicators. For clarification review “Wise Ways ” (#) 3.Individually, think about how well the SU (all schools) is implementing the indicator (1-Not at All; 2-Occassionally; 3-Frequently) 4. Place indicators under the rating on easel sheet 17

Exploring Indicators Task #1 (continued): 5.As a group discuss:  Any surprises?  Questions that arise concerning why an indicator might fall in a certain rating.  What evidence are you collecting to support what you are indicating? 6.As a group, come to consensus on how each indicator should be rated 18

Exploring Indicators Task #1 (continued): 7.For the indicators that you rated a “1” or “2”, discuss:  Any policies/processes/practices that are getting in the way of moving you a “3.” If so, can they be changed?  Any policies/processes/practices that might be included in a District Operations Manual to assist the schools in strengthening these indicators. 19

Debrief Any AHAs? Surprises? What was most difficult part of ranking? 20