Kip Billings, P.E. Andy Li, Phd Wasatch Front Regional Council October 14, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
Advertisements

Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
Implementing Soak-Time Distribution Models in a GIS Framework Aruna Sivakumar Department of Civil Engineering (Transportation) University of Texas at Austin.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
SEE (Spatial Emissions Estimator): A New Tool for Estimating Link & Zone Emissions with MOVES Presentation for Southeast Texas Photochemical Modeling Technical.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
Traffic Engineering Studies (Volume Studies)
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Modelling Motor Vehicle Emissions
Mobile Source Inventories for SIPs Matt Laurita Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section EPA Region 4.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
May 10, 2011 Life-cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternatives for Accommodating Heavy Truck Traffic in the Las Vegas Roadway Network Dr. Alexander Paz,
Fuel Economy in Harris County-2007 Graciela Lubertino, PhD.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model TPB Technical Committee June 5, 2009 MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator.
National VMT Development Procedure Highway Information Seminar October , 2012 Patrick Zhang, PE
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
1 ON-ROAD AND NON-ROAD SOURCES Melinda Ronca-Battista and Angelique Luedeker, ITEP/TAMS Center.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
Bangkok September, Economic Integration 2 Bangkok September, 2012.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Alexis Zubrow 1, Chris Allen 2, and James Beidler EPA OAQPS and Region 1; 2. CSC.
Oregon’s Work Zone Traffic Analysis Program FHWA Work Zone Rule Virtual Workshop November 6, 2008 Irene Toews, P.E. Oregon Department of Transportation.
Sunil Kumar and Eulalie Lucas MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG August 18, 2009 Development of Inputs, Outputs, and Procedures for EPA’s Draft MOVES2009 Model.
1 Part 4 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data Computation. Additional Columns 2  Ucode=if(urban_code=99999, “Rural”, “Urban”)  VMT=(end_point-begin_point)*AADT.
Part 3 Understand Some HPMS Data Items and Other Related Concepts 1.
COG/DTP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow Comments on Draft MOVES 2009 International Emission Inventory Conference April 16-17, 2009 Baltimore,Maryland.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
Moves 2010 Midwest Traffic Model Users Group September 30, 2010 Ames, Iowa Mark Filipi, AICP PTP Manager, Transportation Planning Services Metropolitan.
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
Best Practices for Collecting Counts and Risk Evaluation for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Krista Nordback, P.E., Ph.D., PSU Taylor Phillips, PSU Mike Sellinger,
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
WRAP SCC Temporal and Speciation Profile Improvement Project Status WRAP Regional Modeling Center Carolina Environmental Program November 4, 2003.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Do Mobility-Based Performance Measures Reflect Emissions Trends? Congestion and Emissions Co-performance Alex Bigazzi & Dr. Miguel Figliozzi ITE Western.
Sunil Kumar MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG January 19, 2010 Review of MOVES2010 Local Data Inputs.
The University of Malta Responsible for: -Road Topology -Mapping of the Transport Infrastructures Coordinator for: -Joint Strategy -Implementation Plan.
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Mesoscopic Modeling Approach for Performance Based Planning
Network Attributes Calculator
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
MOVES-Based NOx Analyses for Urban Case Studies in Texas
Using NPMRDS Data for System Performance
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
The Transportation & Air Quality Research Group
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Zissis Samaras Professor
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Presentation transcript:

Kip Billings, P.E. Andy Li, Phd Wasatch Front Regional Council October 14, 2010

I. WFRC travel model characteristics II. TDM2MOVES - description III. TDM2MOVES - data inputs IV. TDM2MOVES - methodology V. Emission calculations: look-up tables VI. Other MOVES adaptations a. Daily VMT inputs b. New road type for Local Roads 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES2

 Population  M  M  Four counties  distinct I/M programs  Six non-attainment areas (+2 for O 3 )  Two pollution seasons  Four time periods (AM, midday, PM, evening)  TDM zones – 3,400  TDM links – 21,000 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES3

 Travel demand model application (CUBE)  Post process following traffic assignment  Creates CSV input for MOVES (42 files)  Speed profile  VMT by vehicle type  Ramp percentage  Road type distribution  Creates travel activity summary (24 files)  Run time: 47 sec 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES4

 HPMS factors  Adjust model results to HPMS  For the base year: HPMSf = HPMSvmt / MODELvmt  By county and facility  AADT factors  By county, facility, and season  VMT mix (vehicle type activity percentage)  By county, facility, and year 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES5

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES6 Note – Column “A” denotes county or city geographic area.

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES7 Note – Column “A” denotes county geographic area.

 Link level calculations  Aggregate & sort results  Generate files  MOVES inputs  VMT summary 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES8

 Link level calculations  Speed profile  (determine speed bin and tally VHT)  VMT by vehicle type  Ramp percentage  Road type distribution 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES9

For the AM time period: PfwyVHT_AMbin_x = fwyVHT_AMbin_x / {[SUM]fwyVHT_AM} and, PartVHT _AM bin_x = artVHT _AM bin_x / {[SUM]artVHT _AM } and, PlocVHT _AM bin_x = locVHT _AM bin_x / {[SUM]locVHT _AM } Repeat for midday (MD), PM peak (PM) & evening (EV) Where: PfwyVHT_AMbin_x, PartVHT_AMbin_x, and PlocVHT_AMbin_x are the percentage of VHT in speed bin “x” for freeways, arterials, and local roads respectively, fwyVHT_AMbin_x, artVHT_AMbin_x and locVHT_AMbin_x are the VHT on freeway, arterial and local road class links with operating speeds in the range of bin_x, and [SUM]fwyVHT _AM, [SUM]artVHT _AMand [SUM]locVHT _AM are the totals respectively of all freeway, arterial and local road VHT for all speed ranges. 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES10

VMT_wtVeh_n = (rampVMT + fwyVMT) * mixF_n * HPMSf * AADTf_wt + artVMT * mixA_n * HPMSa * AADTa_wt + locVMT * mixL_n * HPMSl * AADTl_wt Where: VMT_wtVeh_n is the winter VMT for vehicle type “n” (MOVES types 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60), RampVMT, fwyVMT, artVMT, and locVMT is the modeled VMT for freeways, ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively, mixF_n, mixA_n, and mixL_n is the percentage of VMT on freeways/ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively for vehicle type “n” (MOVES types 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60), HPMSf, HPMSa, HPMSl is the HPMS adjustment factor for freeways/ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively, and AADTf_wt, AADTa_wt, and AADTl_wt is the winter AADT factor for freeways/ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively. 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES11

RampPCT = rampVHT / ( rampVHT + fwyVHT) Subject to EPA Review. Where: RampPCT is the ramp VHT as a percentage of total ramp and freeway VHT, rampVHT is the VHT on ramps, and fwyVHT is the VHT on freeways. 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES12

Veh_nPctFwy_wt = (rampVMT + fwyVMT) * HPMSf * AADTf_wt * mixF_n / TotalVMT_wt{for veh_n} And likewise for Arterials, Locals, and Total VMT….. Where: RampVMT, fwyVMT, artVMT, and locVMT is the modeled VMT for freeways, ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively, mixF_n, mixA_n, and mixL_n is the percentage of VMT on freeways/ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively for vehicle type “n” (MOVES types 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60), HPMSf, HPMSa, HPMSl is the HPMS adjustment factor for freeways/ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively, and AADTf_wt, AADTa_wt, and AADTl_wt is the winter AADT factor for freeways/ramps, arterials, and local roads respectively. 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES13

 Aggregate calculations  By time period  By speed bin  By facility type  By city (non-attainment only)  By county  By season (VMT & Road type)  Print Resulting Files  “MV” prefix for MOVES inputs  Year, county, season, file type  CSV format  Summary files with “lookup” index 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES14

 MV_VMTxVeh_SL2030_sm.csv *  MV_Ramp_SL2030.csv  MV_Road_SL2030_sm.csv*  MV_Speed_SL2030.csv  hpmsVMTxBinS_SL2030.csv*  Summary_SL2030.csv *Note – “S” and “sm” denote summer season files. Winter season files are also created and denoted with “W” and “wt”. 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES15

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES16

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES17

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES18

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES19 Note - new road types created for rural local (32) and urban local (52) (optional) Also note the difference in local road percentage for passenger cars (16.2%) and heavy trucks (2.8%)

 Run MOVES: emission rates  Rates lookup table: by speed bin & facility  Can be reused  VMT summary: by speed bin & facility  Spreadsheet: Emissions = rates * VMT 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES20

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES21 Note: This table can be reused for instantaneous emission calculations.

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES22 SL_2008_NOx_RunEx_A_1 County – Year – Pollutant – Process – Road Type – Speed Bin

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES23

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES24

 MOVES = Annual  Conformity = Daily 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES25 ?

 Monthvmfraction  design month = 1  all others = 0  Dayvmtfractions  design month:  roadTypeID = 1-5, 32, 52  dayID = 5  dayVMTFraction = 1  all other days = 0  Hourvmtfraction  all dayID (2) = 0  all dayID (5) = MOVES default  Monthofanyyear  all noOfDays =1  Dayofanyweek  noOfRealDays for weekend = 0  noOfRealDays for Weekdays=7 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES26

 Modify default database  MOVESdb_  Save modified database  UtahDailyMOVESdb_  Set modified database as default  MOVES gui: Settings/Configure MOVES  Another webinar? 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES27

 THIS IS OPTIONAL!  Local Roads = residential streets  Less truck activity on locals  Mobile6 separated local roads  MOVES combines locals with arterials  Truck activity on local roads exaggerated  Another webinar? 9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES28

9/15/2010WFRC - TDM2MOVES29