Health IT Policy Committee Meeting June 5, 2013 Jennifer King, ONC Data Analytics Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Hospital Overview
Advertisements

Meaningful Use Update: How to Prepare Dr. Denise W. Hines, PMP, FHIMSS Director-Outreach & Education GA HIT Regional Extension Center.
ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
0 Arizona Rural & Critical Access Hospitals HIT/Quality Workshop December 6, 2013 Connie K. Ihde Regional Extension Center Director ~ Programs Director.
MaineCare Electronic Health Information Technology Incentive Payment Program Updated May 30,2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 10, 2014.
2011 HealthBridge Meaningful Use and Health Care Transformation Conference Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs.
1 Medicare Only EPs, Subsection (d) Hospitals and CAHs EHR Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions.
Health IT Standards Committee Meeting Data Analytics Update January 27, 2015.
REC Reported Practice Level Challenges to Achieving Meaningful Use Office of Provider Adoption Support Dawn Heisey-Grove, MPH September 10, 2012.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
NPAIHB REC NPAIHB Regional Extension Center Update Katie Johnson, Pharm D EHR Integrated Care Coordinator, REC Manager June 2012.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee March 9, 2015.
Meaningful Use Registration & Attestation WV HFMA / WVHIMSS Fall Conference The Changing Seasons of Healthcare September 26-28, 2012.
Component 11/Unit 2c Meaningful Use Quality Measures.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting Data Analytics Update January 13, 2015.
Medicare and Medicaid Attestation June 19, 2012 Presented by Jesus F. Ruiz, CPA.
Slide 1 Regional Care Collaborative March 26, 2015.
Kentucky Regional Extension Center Status Update - Hospitals Dr. Barry Little Physician Advisor
Meaningful Use and the EHR Incentive Program Tribal Self-Governance Conference.
Data Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 18, 2015.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee February 10, 2015.
Electronic Health Records – Meaningful Use, Certification, and the Regulatory Rulemaking Process June 18, 2015 Lori Mihalich-Levin,JD
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting June 10, 2014 Data Analytics Update 1.
1 Presented by Jacqueline Koffi, Program Director Georgia Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentives Program Hometown Health Monthly Medicaid Update.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting February 4, 2014 Data Analytics Update.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee November 4, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Research and analysis by Avalere Health The Opportunities and Challenges for Rural Hospitals in an Era of Health Reform April, 2011.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014.
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Professionals Overview.
Mat Kendall, MPH Director of the Office of Provider Adoption Support (OPAS) Leila Samy, MPH Rural Health IT Coordinator Rural and Critical Access Hospital.
Leila Samy, MPH Rural Health IT Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Strengthening Rural Communities: Improving Access to Education,
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee March 11, 2014.
1 EHR Incentive Program Registration & Attestation Tips for the Eligible Professionals Marlene Hodges & Denise Warren June 8, 2011.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting July 8, 2014 Data Analytics Update 1.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee January 14, 2014.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting July 9, 2013 Data Analytics Update.
Filing with Ohio Medicaid for EHR Incentives in 2012 Cathy Costello, JD March 16, 2012.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
State Medicaid HIT PLAN Cabinet for Health and Family Services Kathy Frye, Deputy Executive Director and CIO Sandeep Kapoor, CTO.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting May 6, 2014 Data Analytics Update 1.
MO HealthNet EHR Incentive Program MHA Meaningful Use Symposium April 27, 2012.
EHR Certification and Meaningful Use Chris Lamer Cathy Whaley.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee December 4, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.
Leila Samy, MPH Rural Health IT Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Hometown Health: Health IT and HIPAA Workshop September 26,
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting December 4, 2013 Data Analytics Update.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee August 7, 2013.
EHR INCENTIVES (“MEANINGFUL USE”) for Eligible Professionals (EPs): First Year, Stage 1 Ivy Baer Director and Regulatory Counsel Health Care Affairs
MaineCare HIT Update April Total Incentive Payments Pending or Paid from October 1, 2011 – March 31, 2012 Provider TypeNumber of Applications Total.
Making Meaning of “Meaningful Use”- EHR, Medicare and Texas Medicaid Funding Presented by Pamela McNutt Sr. VP & CIO Methodist Health System 1.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee September 3, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee January 13, 2014.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting April 8, 2014 Data Analytics Update.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) Jason Werner Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) is a bipartisan legislation signed into law on April 16,  Repeals the flawed Sustainable.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee July 9, 2013.
WHAT IS THE MEDICARE PAYMENT PLAN?
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Presentation transcript:

Health IT Policy Committee Meeting June 5, 2013 Jennifer King, ONC Data Analytics Update

Data Analytics Update Items 1)Progress to MU by key characteristics 2)Indicators of future trends 1)Trends in attestation/payment after registration 2)Objective performance relative to thresholds 1

Progress to MU by key characteristics: Hospitals 2

Hospital progress to MU, April Note: Categories are hierarchical and mutually exclusive. For example, a hospital that has attested and received AIU payment and is enrolled with an REC is counted only in the Attested MU category. See Data Sources and Definitions slides for more details.

Hospital progress to MU by size, type, and urban/rural April Note: Categories are hierarchical and mutually exclusive. For example, a hospital that has attested and received AIU payment and is enrolled with an REC is counted only in the Attested MU category. Large = 400+ staffed beds; Medium = staffed beds; Small = <100 staffed beds. Rural = non- metropolitan; Urban = metropolitan. See Data Sources and Definitions slides for more details. Non critical access hospitals

Hospital progress to MU by system and ownership type April Note: Categories are hierarchical and mutually exclusive. For example, a hospital that has attested and received AIU payment and is enrolled with an REC is counted only in the Attested MU category. See Data Sources and Definitions slides for more details.

Progress to MU by key characteristics: Professionals 6

Eligible professional progress to MU, April Note: Categories are hierarchical and mutually exclusive. For example, a professional that has received Medicaid payment for both attestation and AIU is counted only in the Attested MU category.

Number of professionals by MU status, April * Includes all professionals who are registered with CMS EHR Incentive Program or enrolled with an REC. See Data Sources and Definitions slides for more details. Other category includes: dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, chiropractors.

Physician specialty by MU status, April * Includes all professionals who are registered with CMS EHR Incentive Program or enrolled with an REC. Data on all ambulatory physicians are from SK&A Office Based Provider Data Base, See Data Sources and Definitions slides for more details. Other primary care includes: family practice, general practice, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, adolescent medicine, and geriatrics.

Physician urban/rural location by MU status, April * Includes all professionals who are registered with CMS EHR Incentive Program or enrolled with an REC. Data on all ambulatory physicians are from SK&A Office Based Provider Data Base, See Data Sources and Definitions slides for more details. Rural = non-metropolitan; Urban = metropolitan.

Trends in attestation/payment after registration 11

Progress to attestation after registering for Medicare EHR Incentive Program 12 All professionalsProfessionals enrolled with REC Proportion of registered professionals who have attested among selected registration cohorts

Progress to incentive payment after registering for Medicaid EHR Incentive Program 13 All professionalsProfessionals enrolled with REC Proportion of registered professionals who have received payment for AIU or MU among selected registration cohorts

MU objective performance relative to thresholds 14

Objective score distributions for Eligible Hospitals 15 Note: Percentages represent percent of eligible hospital attestations that reported a score in the corresponding range for the objective. Calculations based on attestations processed as of February 2013.

Objective score distributions for Eligible Professionals 16 Note: Percentages represent percent of eligible professional attestations that reported a score in the corresponding range for the objective. Calculations based on attestations processed as of February 2013.

Questions? 17

Data Sources and Definitions 18

Data Sources and Definitions Hospital Data To describe hospital progress to Meaningful Use by key characteristics, data on all CMS certified hospitals as of March 2013 were merged to data from the CMS EHR Incentive Program, the ONC Regional Extension Center (REC) Program, and the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey by CMS Certification Number (CCN). The final analysis file contained 4,970 hospitals, 97% of which matched to the AHA Annual Survey. Hospitals were categorized into 1 of 5 hierarchical and mutually exclusive categories: (1) Attested MU – hospitals successfully attested to Stage 1 Meaningful Use under the Medicare EHR Incentive Program or received payment for attesting to Stage 1 Meaningful Use under the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Category includes some hospitals that had successfully attested but still had Medicare payment for the attestation pending. (2) AIU only – hospitals received Medicaid EHR Incentive Program payment for AIU but not yet attested or received payment for attesting to Meaningful Use. (3) Registered EHR incentive program – hospitals registered for the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program but had not yet attested or received payment for AIU or Meaningful Use. (4) Enrolled REC – hospitals enrolled with an REC but not yet registered for the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. (5) Not participating – hospitals not registered for the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program and not enrolled with an REC. 19

Data Sources and Definitions Professional Data To describe professional progress to Meaningful Use, data from the CMS EHR Incentive Program were merged to data from the ONC Regional Extension Center Program by National Provider Identifier (NPI). Three categories (not mutually exclusive) of professionals were examined: (1) Attested MU – eligible professionals successfully attested to Stage 1 Meaningful Use under the Medicare EHR Incentive Program or received payment for attesting to Stage 1 Meaningful Use under the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Category includes some professionals that had successfully attested but still had Medicare payment for the attestation pending. (2) Attested MU or AIU – eligible professionals in Attested MU category plus professionals that had received Medicaid EHR Incentive Program payment for AIU. (3) Engaged EHR Incentive Program or REC – eligible professionals in Attested MU or AIU category plus professionals that were registered for the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program or were enrolled with an REC. This category includes some REC-enrolled professionals who may not meet the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program eligibility requirements but are working to achieve Meaningful Use through REC participation. To monitor professional progress to Meaningful Use by key characteristics, characteristics of physicians in the three categories above were compared to characteristics of all ambulatory physicians nationally using data from the 2012 SK&A Office-Based Provider data base. 20