Bayh College of Education September 23, 2011 The Educator as Mediator of Learning Assessment Day 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
UNDERSTANDING NBPTS STANDARDS
PORTFOLIO.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Conceptual Framework of McDaniel College. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE)
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
 Reading School Committee January 23,
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Bluebonnet Elementary School Celebrations and Recommendations for Continuous School Improvement Round Rock Independent School District Module 7 Assignment.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Family, School, and Community Partnerships: A Model for Pre-service Teacher Education Presentation at Center for Research, Evaluation & Advancement of.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Assessment Day 2012 Focus: Educator as Member of Communities Data: Alumni Survey Initial Programs Employer Survey Initial Programs Alumni Survey Advanced.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Innovative Teaching and Learning MOVING FROM THEORY TO ACTION 6 th June 2012.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © The Homework Effect: Does Homework Help or Harm Students? Katherine Field EdD Candidate, Department.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Exhibit 3.11 Data Report to Unit Assessment Committee Spring 2008.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
MDCOE Unit Assessment System Michael D. Eisner College of Education Data Warehouse & Assessment System Beverly Cabello July 9 – 10, 2009.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Contemporary Issues September 8, Adjunct Professor Kristin P. O’Neil Office Hours: Scheduled on an individual.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
CHAPTER 3 Strategy Cards for: Communication with Colleagues, Students, & Families.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Quality Assurance in VET M. Kirsch & Y. Beernaert Internal Quality Assurance and the self-evaluation report Magda Kirsch & Yves Beernaert Bulgaria –
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. School, Family, and Community Collaboration Chapter 3.
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Champaign Unit 4 Parent Advocacy Committee Update Cheryl Camacho & Tony Howard April 22, 2013.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Nevada STEM Program Recognition Rubric K-12 Program Definitions Exploratory The Exploratory STEM program describes a school program that has intermittent.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Assessment Committee Meeting December 15, 2010
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Sylvan Hills Middle (Carver Cluster)
Presentation transcript:

Bayh College of Education September 23, 2011 The Educator as Mediator of Learning Assessment Day 2011

Bayh College of Education Conceptual Framework Becoming a Complete Professional Assessment Day 2011 Place CF image here Becoming a Complete Professional Educator as an Expert or Mediator of Learning Educator as a Member of Communities Educator as a Person

Past Assessments Program Assessments Discussion Implement Intuitive decision making Program meetings Department meetings Program-levelWhatever is required by an accrediting body Where we have been Assessment Day 2011

Unit Assessment System (UAS) Program Assessments Unit Assessment Discussion Implement Program meetings Department meetings UAS/TEC meetings Assessment Day Program level Unit level New stuff Key assessments across all programs: Field Experiences Dispositions Technology Work Sample Diversity Unit Operations* Transition Points SPA Aggregation of program data, and disaggregation of Unit data: UAS Committee Assessment Center Assessment Handbook Candidate Complaints Where we are going Assessment Day 2011 See UAS Program Assessment Matrix

Where we are Data Assessment Day 2011 Student Teaching Work Samples Field Evaluations

CIMT Unit Report and Exceeds expectations ranges from 53.1% %, means from in Exceeds expectations ranges from 59.9% %, means from in Evidences overall strength – highest area being Activities in the Unit, lowest being Evaluation of Effectiveness of the Unit. No basis is 16.9% % for Fostering Relationships with Colleagues and Community. Assessment Day 2011

What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? An ongoing theme….

“You are the average of the five people you spend the most time with.” - E. James Rohn Look around…..

CIMT Field Evaluation of Teaching Composite Area Means range from 2.46 – 2.59 in Composite Area Means range from 2.40 – 2.75 in Evidences stable and strong scores. Some standards are receiving sizable percentages of No Basis marks: Engages students in testing hypotheses, Uses knowledge of student backgrounds, Uses instructional technology effectively ( only), Maintains useful records, Encourages self assessment by students, Interacts productively with other professionals, Participates in school activities beyond the classroom. 65.3% No Basis % No Basis Assessment Day 2011

ELED Field Evaluation of Teaching Numeric ratings from are missing from the system. Vast majority of ratings indicate Meets Expectations. All standards appear equally strong, with composite means ranging from 2.05 to Assessment Day 2011

School Psychology Field Evaluation Majority of ratings at Exceeds Expectations. Means range from 1.88 to Three items evidence one student at Does Not Meet, one item evidences two students at Does Not Meet. Educational Leadership M.Ed. Program Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.00 to Educational Leadership Ed.S. Program Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.60 to Assessment Day 2011

Special Education Program Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Vast majority are at Exceeds Expectations. Educational Technology Field Evaluation All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.54 to Means range from 2.67 to Assessment Day 2011

What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? Field Evaluations

Student Teaching Evaluations Small N in urges caution in interpretation. Majority of ratings indicate Exceeds Expectations. Exceeds Expectations range from 44.8% to 86.2% in All areas appear equally strong, with composite means ranging from 2.60 to 2.75 ( ). Three items show sizable No Basis percentages ; Engages students in testing hypotheses (10.5%), Interacts productively with parents and guardians (21.5%), and Participates in school activities beyond the classroom (14.7%). Assessment Day 2011

What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? Student Teaching

…those who were dancing were considered insane by those who could not hear the music.

ELED Teacher Work Sample Small N in stymies overall interpretation Exceeds expectations range from 36.5% %, with means from Evidences overall strength. A few areas show near or above 10% of Does Not Meet Expectations; Active Engagement (14.5%), Daily Formative Assessments (9.7%), Includes teacher-made assessment or rubric (14.3%), Modifications Based on Analysis (12.7%), Collaboration with Families (9.5%) and Revisions/Edits (9.5%). Assessment Day 2011

Educational Leadership Ed.S. Program Work Sample Small N in All ratings indicate Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.00 to Assessment Day 2011 Educational Leadership M.Ed. Program Work Sample All ratings indicate Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.09 to Means range from 2.39 to School Counseling Program Work Sample All ratings indicate Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Means range from 2.36 to Means range from 2.00 to

Communication Disorders Program Work Sample Majority of ratings are at Meets Expectations. Means range from 1.44 to Means range from 1.83 to Intervention Plan and Data Collection and Analysis have sizable percentages at Does Not Meet Expectations School Psychology Program Work Sample Small N Majority of ratings are at Meets Expectations. Indicates strong scores with three areas of relative difficulty 1.Clearly operationalized (42.9% and 66.7% Does not meet), 2.Barriers to success (71.4% and 66.7% Does not meet) and 3.Available strengths (42.9% and 66.7% Does not meet). Assessment Day 2011

Elementary Education Program Work Sample Small N All ratings are at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Majority of ratings are Exceeds Majority are Meets Curriculum and Instruction Program Work Sample All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations, with the vast majority being Exceeds. Educational Technology Program Work Sample All ratings at Exceeds or Meets Expectations. Majority of ratings are at Exceeds Expectations. Standards one and two evidence consistently higher ratings. Assessment Day 2011

What’s working? What needs to be changed? What would that change look like? Work Samples

The role of the parent is to prepare the child for the path, not to prepare the path for the child.

Breakout Sessions Work SamplesRoom 111 Student TeachingRoom 113 InternshipsRoom 114 SPA ReportsRoom 215 Culture of Assessment Survey results Assessment Day 2011

Assessment Day Debrief Work Samples Student Teaching Internships SPA Reports Next Steps….

Thanks for coming! Assessment Day 2011