Chapter 15: Apportionment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mathematics of Congressional Apportionment David Housman Goshen College.
Advertisements

How are the number of seats per state assigned by the Constitution?
STATISTICS. SOME BASIC STATISTICS MEAN (AVERAGE) – Add all of the data together and divide by the number of elements within that set of data. MEDIAN –
+ Apportionment Ch. 14 Finite Math. + The Apportionment Problem An apportionment problem is to round a set of fractions so that their sum is maintained.
Fair Division & Apportionment
The Apportionment Problem Section 9.1. Objectives: 1. Understand and illustrate the Alabama paradox. 2. Understand and illustrate the population paradox.
§ The Apportionment Problem; Basic Concepts “The baby legislature would be cut in half, creating a unique bicameral structure, consisting of.
4.1 Apportionment Problems
Fractions Chapter Two McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Other Paradoxes and Apportionment Methods
Division of Whole Numbers I
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
Fairness in Apportionment How do you decide whether a method for apportioning representatives is fair?
Chapter 15 Section 4 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Math for Liberal Studies.  The US Senate has 100 members: two for each state  In the US House of Representatives, states are represented based on population.
Discrete Math CHAPTER FOUR 4.1
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 3 - Slide Election Theory Apportionment Methods.
Chapter 15: Apportionment Part 1: Introduction. Apportionment To "apportion" means to divide and assign in proportion according to some plan. An apportionment.
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.3 Apportionment Methods.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Chapter 15: Apportionment
Slide 15-1 Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. SEVENTH EDITION and EXPANDED SEVENTH EDITION.
Dividing Decimals; Average, Median, and Mode
Prerequisites: Fundamental Concepts of Algebra
Factors and Multiples. Definition of Factors and Multiples If one number is a factor of a second number or divides the second (as 3 is a factor of 12),
Statistics Measures Chapter 15 Sections
Other Apportionment Algorithms and Paradoxes. NC Standard Course of Study Competency Goal 2: The learner will analyze data and apply probability concepts.
The Webster and Hill Method for Apportionment Both are like the Jefferson method.
Chapter 15: Apportionment Part 7: Which Method is Best? Paradoxes of Apportionment and Balinski & Young’s Impossibility Theorem.
HAWKES LEARNING SYSTEMS Students Matter. Success Counts. Copyright © 2013 by Hawkes Learning Systems/Quant Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Section 2.1.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
Classwork: Please read p in text p. 144 (1, 11, 19a, 23) Homework (Day 14): p. 144 (2, 12, 20b, 24)
1 Message to the user... The most effective way to use a PowerPoint slide show is to go to “SLIDE SHOW” on the top of the toolbar, and choose “VIEW SHOW”
Paradoxes of Apportionment The Alabama Paradox, Population Paradox, and the New State’s Paradox.
1 © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 3 Polynomial and Rational Functions.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Getting Your Fair Share Jelly beans, student groups, and Alexander Hamilton Everyone wants to make sure that they get their fair share, but dividing assets.
Chapter 2 Descriptive Statistics 2.1 Frequency Distributions and Their Graphs.
FACTORING – Common Terms Factoring an algebraic expression helps us to simplify the expression. It puts the expression into easier terms for use when dealing.
Chapter 15: Apportionment Part 5: Webster’s Method.
Apportionment There are two critical elements in the dictionary definition of the word apportion : (1) We are dividing and assigning things, and (2) we.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
1 Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition Peter Tannenbaum.
Chapter 4: The Mathematics of Apportionment. "Representatives...shall be apportioned among the several States, which may be included within this Union,
Independent Practice Problem There are 15 scholarships to be apportioned among 231 English majors, 502 History majors, and 355 Psychology majors. How would.
Apportionment Apportionment means distribution or allotment in proper shares. (related to “Fair Division”)
Apportionment So now you are beginning to see why the method of apportionment was so concerning to the founding fathers……it begs to question, why not just.
Paradoxes of Apportionment
AND.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Hamilton’s Method of Apportionment -- A bundle of contradictions??
APPORTIONMENT An APPORTIONMENT PROBLEM:
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics
Chapter 15: Apportionment
Chapter 15: Apportionment
Section 15.4 Flaws of the Apportionment Methods
Section 15.3 Apportionment Methods
§ The Apportionment Problem; Basic Concepts
Warm Up – 3/3 - Monday Describe in your own words the steps to each of the following fair division processes and when to use each process. Divider-Chooser.
HAMILTON – JEFFERSON - WEBSTER
Warm Up – 3/7 - Friday Find the Hamilton Apportionment for 200 seats.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Warm Up – 3/10 - Monday State A B C D E Population (millions)
Quiz.
Warm Up – 3/13 - Thursday Apportion the classes using Adams Method
Flaws of the Apportionment Methods
Frequency Distributions
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 15: Apportionment Part 2: The Hamilton Method

The Hamilton Method The Hamilton Method, one of several methods of apportionment we study, is named after Alexander Hamilton. It was first used to decide the initial apportionment of the seats in the House of Representatives in 1790. That apportionment was vetoed by George Washington and the House was reapportioned that year according to the Jefferson Method. The Hamilton Method did come back into use in 1850 and was then used until 1900. To explain this and other methods, we must define certain terms… There are problems of apportionment other than those involving the House of Representatives but because apportionment of the House has been so historically significant to the development of these methods in general, the terms we use reflect that connection.

The Hamilton Method Suppose the total population of all states is p and that are there are h seats in the house (we call h the house size). That is, house size is the total number of seats available. We define the standard divisor, s, as follows: or

The Hamilton Method Next, we define the term quota as follows: or Thus, each state could have a different quota. In the case of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives, the quota is the number of seats that a state would get if they could have a fractional part of a seat. That is, it is a fractional part of the whole before being rounded to an integer.

The Hamilton Method By definition, and That is, and Therefore, Conclusion:

The Hamilton Method Notice that because of the conclusion we can calculate a state’s quota without actually using the standard divisor. This is what was done in a previous example… Suppose house size is 200, Alabama has a population of 940 and the total population is 20,000. Then h = 200, pi=940 and p = 20,000. Thus, to find Alabama’s quota The question then becomes, how do we deal with the fraction of a seat?

The Hamilton Method For the Hamilton method we will also need the following definitions: The lower quota, which is denoted by , is the value that results from rounding down the quota to the next lowest integer The upper quota, which is denoted by , is the value that results from rounding up the quota to the next highest integer. If q is an integer, then = = q . That is, no rounding is done.

The Hamilton Method The Hamilton Method of apportionment is as follows: Calculate each state’s quota. Temporarily assign each state it’s lower quota. Starting with state’s having the largest fractional part in their original quota, distribute any remaining seats, in order from largest to smallest, until all remaining seats are distributed. The Hamilton Method does not specify what to do in the case of a tie – if two states had the same fractional part in their quota - but this is unlikely to occur.

Example #1 - The Hamilton Method Consider a country with 4 states and 30 seats in a congress and populations distributed as in the table below. Population State A 275 State B 383 State C 465 State D 767 Total 1890

Example #1 - The Hamilton Method Consider a country with 4 states and 30 seats in a congress and populations distributed as in the table below. Population State A 275 State B 383 State C 465 State D 767 Total 1890 We find the standard divisor to be 1890/30 = 63

Example #1 - The Hamilton Method Consider a country with 4 states and 30 seats in a congress and populations distributed as in the table below. Population Quota Lower quota Add remaining seat State A 275 275/63 4.37 4 State B 383 383/63 6.08 6 State C 465 465/63 7.38 7 +1 State D 767 767/63 12.17 12 Total 1890 30 29

Example #1 - The Hamilton Method Consider a country with 4 states and 30 seats in a congress and populations distributed as in the table below. Population Quota Lower quota Add remaining seat State A 275 275/63 4.37 4 State B 383 383/63 6.08 6 State C 465 465/63 7.38 7 +1 State D 767 767/63 12.17 12 Total 1890 30 29 State C has the largest fractional part

Example #1 - The Hamilton Method Consider a country with 4 states and 30 seats in a congress and populations distributed as in the table below. Population Quota Lower quota Add remaining seat Final apportionment State A 275 275/63 4.37 4 State B 383 383/63 6.08 6 State C 465 465/63 7.38 7 +1 8 State D 767 767/63 12.17 12 Total 1890 30 29

Example 2: The Hamilton Method Let’s use the Hamilton Method to apportion students into classes. Suppose a high-school math teacher can teach a maximum of five classes in one day. Suppose that she teaches geometry, pre-calculus and calculus. Suppose that 52 students registered for geometry, 33 for pre-calc and 15 for calculus. How many of each class should the teacher be assigned? We have a total population of students: 52+33+15 = 100 students. These 100 students are divided among 3 subjects. We are also dividing the 5 classes among the 3 subjects.

Example 2: The Hamilton Method We can look at these apportionment problems in terms of groups and items. There are several groups, like states which have different populations and there are items, like seats to be divided among those groups, based on the populations. Here we have 3 groups, in this case the subjects – geometry, pre-calc and calculus and 5 items, the classes of each subject to be taught. How do we distribute the available 5 classes among those groups? Notice how the groups are weighted differently by their populations – in this case by their enrollments. We plan to distribute the items among the groups based on their relative size.

Example 2: The Hamilton Method Because we have 100 students and 5 classes we can see the teacher will expect about 20 students per class. This is the standard divisor. The total population from all of the groups is 100 and the number of items is 5. Thus (total population)/(number items) = 100/5 =20. Of course, in other examples, this can be written (total population)/(house size) Now, each group (each subject) will get how many of the classes (items)? The answer is given by the quota. In general, quota = (group population)/(standard divisor) Geometry: quota = 52/20 = 2.6 classes Pre-Calc: quota = 33/20 = 1.65 classes Calculus: quota = 15/20 = 0.75 classes

Example 2: The Hamilton Method We have Geometry: quota = 52/20 = 2.6 classes Pre-Calc: quota = 33/20 = 1.65 classes Calculus: quota = 15/20 = 0.75 classes Notice that 2.6 + 1.65 + 0.75 = 5. Notice that we are trying to divide up the whole total number of items (available classes) among groups (different subjects) but with different groups getting more or less than others. That is, the division is not equal and the problem of apportionment is to round the fractional parts in a way to maintain a sum equal to the whole. In other words, obviously we can not have 2.6 geometry classes or 0.75 calculus classes.

Example 2: The Hamilton Method We have Geometry: quota = 52/20 = 2.6 classes Pre-Calc: quota = 33/20 = 1.65 classes Calculus: quota = 15/20 = 0.75 classes The Hamilton method is one way to round the values of the sum 2.6 + 1.65 + .75 so that the terms are integer but the sum is the same. By the Hamilton method we’ll first round every quota to the lower quota… Geometry = 2 classes Pre-Calc = 1 class Calculus = 0 classes

Example 2: The Hamilton Method We have Geometry: quota = 52/20 = 2.6 classes -> 2 classes Pre-Calc: quota = 33/20 = 1.65 classes -> 1 class Calculus: quota = 15/20 = 0.75 classes -> 0 classes When we round down to the lower quota, we will add any remaining items to the groups with the largest fractional part. Those are assigned in order from largest fractional part to smallest until all classes are assigned. In this case, we assign 1 class to calculus and 1 to pre-calc.

Example 2: The Hamilton Method We have Geometry: quota = 52/20 = 2.6 classes -> 2 classes Pre-Calc: quota = 33/20 = 1.65 classes -> 1 class + 1 Calculus: quota = 15/20 = 0.75 classes -> 0 classes + 1 The final apportionment is: Geometry: 2 classes Pre-Calc: 2 classes Calculus: 1 class Notice how the average is 100/5 = 20 students per class but it may occur that no class has 20 students. For example, the calculus class will have 15 students and geometry (with 52 total students) could have 26 students each.