ANALYSIS FORUM: Status & Outstanding Issues Yagmur Torun MICE Collaboration Meeting Oct 10, 2006 - RAL ˘

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Advertisements

PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.
1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
MICE Collaboration meeting May 31 st – June 3 rd 2009 RAL Tim Hayler, Andy Lintern DRAFT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS STEPS
1 Scintillating Fibre Tracker Simulation Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006V. Palladino Plans for MICE PI detectors & Shielding MICE CM16, RAL Oct 11, 2006 V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for the small.
1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
Beamline Takashi Kobayashi 1 Global Analysis Meeting Nov. 29, 2007.
1Malcolm Ellis - Video Conference - 7th December 2006 Data Challenge Report  Disclaimer  Data Challenge definition(s)  Software status u G4MICE u GRID.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
1 PID status MICE Analysis phone conference Rikard Sandström.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE detector meeting.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
Controls Review  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”, including controls data.  Event trigger = accelerator.
VC Sept 2005Jean-Sébastien Graulich Report on DAQ Workshop Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction o Monitoring and Control o Detector DAQ.
1Malcolm Ellis - Software Meeting - 31st May 2006 Data Challenge Requirements  First list of requirements, based on Yagmur’s document: u
1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
1 Timescales Construction LCR MICE Beam Monitoring counters + DAQ My understanding Jan 07 Feb 07 Mar 07 Apr 07 May 07 Jun 07 Jul 07 Aug 07 Sep 07 ISIS.
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
1 Simulations of MICE March 2005 BENE Week Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
17 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 MICE Cooling Channel: Can we predict cooling to ? Edda Gschwendtner Challenge Systematics Cooling Channel Beam Line.
Summary of the AWAKE Technical Board Meeting September 2014 – March 2015.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Status of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Yagmur Torun Illinois Institute of Technology April 1, 2013.
Sci-Fi Tracker: Progress Report Malcolm Ellis, MICE Video Conference Wednesday 6 th October 2004.
MICE PID & trigger Detectors MICE CM11, LBL Feb 12, 2005 for the PID team Bonesini, Cremaldi, Gregoire, Kahn, Roberts, Sandstrom, Summers, Tilley, Tonazzo,
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
MICE PID size &scraping MICE CM16, RAL, Oct V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for R. Sandrstrom and others contributing to this effort Yagmur, Holger,
Paul drumm, mutac jan Precursor: - Resources since cm16. Beamline Review Response. Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status.
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
MICE CMPB Alain Blondel 1 Highlights on MICE.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
MICE CM39 St Catherine’s, Oxford, 26 June 2014 Paul Soler Instrumentation Global Commissioning Plan.
Controls and monitoring in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Data record M. A. Cummings April 2004 CERN.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
M. apollonio 7/7/2010CM27 - RAL11 Beam-Line Analysis …
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
MICE VC Alain Blondel 1 MICE NEWS MICE VC Next Collaboration meeting will be at Cosener’s14-16 February meeting at Coseners House.
(one of the) Request from MPB
S TATUS OF THE P HYSICS A NALYSIS V. Blackmore MICE Project Board 29 th April, /30.
21 Mar 2007ALICE - Paul Dauncey1 ALICE CR07: Installation and Commissioning Paul Dauncey Material from: L. Leistam: “ALICE Status” W. Riegler: “Commissioning.
Online – Data Storage and Processing
MICE Computing and Software
MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations
MICE Collaboration Meeting Saturday 22nd October 2005 Malcolm Ellis
Presentation transcript:

ANALYSIS FORUM: Status & Outstanding Issues Yagmur Torun MICE Collaboration Meeting Oct 10, RAL ˘

Action items from cm15 +Run plan Time of flight measurements and relation to trigger Algorithm for rf voltage calibration +Effects of collimation, scraping in beamline +Downstream geometry (sizes of TOF2, EMCal, shields) Rf-induced background in TOF (and with different optics) Global PID performance (up/downstream) in different optics/momentum +Beam envelope interference with spectrometer cryostat +Effect of variations in window shape, absorber density, etc. +Scraping/beam envelope/acceptance through cooling channel and detectors Weighting/virtual beam Performance indicators (transmission, emittance, phase space density,..) Y. Torun - cm16

Progress since cm15 Maintained almost bi-weekly phone meeting schedule –Jun 29, Jul 13, Aug 10, Sep 7, Sep 21 –Average attendance: down to 4.6 mice Discussed –Data challenge (Ellis, YT) –Acceptance of channel, scraping and detector sizes (Apollonio, Cobb, Palladino, Rogers, Sandström) –Software tools (Ellis, Rogers) Also –MICE-Note-146 (Sandström) - sophisticated PID analysis –MICE-Note-147 (Graulich) - DAQ event model documentation Overall effort has not increased as needed. Key players busy with theses, etc. –Need more people to pay attention Y. Torun - cm16

Background Experimental configuration –Has not fully converged –Hard to draw robust conclusions until we break the “conformal symmetry” Software tools –Conflicting pressures Once the data starts flowing in, it will be impossible to improve the infrastructure  Need to clean up as much as possible now BUT Physics results need to be reliable and stable long before the run and stay that way  Certify for data challenge now; no major changes in the future without extensive testing Y. Torun - cm16

Data Challenge Requirements/Status Inputs –Full beam tic-tac-toe at correct interface location –Run plan Monte Carlo Tools +Definition and simulation of trigger, event model Realistic electromagnetic model (rf maps, Fe shields) –Rf voltage/phase fluctuations? +Realistic collimation in beam simulations Ckov: build G4 model, incorporate into PID +TOF2 geometry +EMCal geometry Tracker geometry Rf background model Realistic materials/shapes in cooling channel modules User-friendly virtual detectors for what-went-where type studies –Misalignments +Realistic model of detector front ends (including dead/hot/mixed channels) Y. Torun - cm16

Data Challenge Reconstruction Tools +Track swimmer with realistic model –Full fitter using all detector digits Analysis Tools +Global PID algorithm/tuner +Data weighting/virtual beam algorithms +Performance indicators (transmission, emittance, phase space density, amplitude, moments, vector potential, etc.) –User-defined cuts/functions Computing Resources +Disk, CPU, personpower –Monte Carlo vs "data"? Y. Torun - cm16

Run Plan: General Considerations MICE is complex, we have to control –Beam settings: momentum, diffuser –Detectors: pedestals, gains –Cooling channel: magnets, absorbers, cavities We may want many special configurations for calibration, alignment, systematics Change-over to different settings involves many timescales, the loop is not completely clear –Beam (beamline magnets, collimators, diffuser) –Absorber change (full/empty, He/H, solid/liquid) –Optics (magnet currents) –Rf (on/off, phase/voltage) –Trigger (cosmic, empty, incoming-µ, good-µ, bad-µ, …) Also various other operational constraints –Don’t want to warm up superconducting magnets –Safety Search/secure after access, magnetic survey before power-up? Y. Torun - cm16

Example: Start-up Y. Torun - cm16 PurposeBeamlineDiffuserAbsorber s Tracker field Cooling channel magnets Trigger front end DAQ + online rec. Time Detector smoke test Don’t care 1 day Detector shakedo wn OnDon’t care CabledDon’t care 1 day DAQ shakedo wn Don’t care TimedRunningfew days Initial det. calibratio n OnDon’t care On1 week Beam tuning OnDifferent settings Don’t care OnDon’t care On

Miscellaneous Downstream apertures –Process has not converged attempt to update geometry uncovered various problems will commit changes by end of cm16 can continue with the Blondel/Palladino plan afterward Rf-induced background in detectors –detailed simulation study on hold until sizes, etc. converge (although not strictly necessary) –Guesstimate of TOF/tracker rate ratio based on size, thickness, channel count implies this may be a problem in the “100xnominal” case; need to tackle soon Y. Torun - cm16

Outlook Downstream apertures still in flux but should be resolved “soon” Run plan under discussion with K. Long, draft to appear on the web “soon” Data Challenge to be launched in a few weeks –will help establish/debug standard analysis chain for MICE –analysis of the results will keep us busy until cm17 Other problems on hold due to lack of analytical mice –my MICE-time substantially reduced We need –more people working on analysis issues –more participation in the analysis forum Things are getting interesting, don’t miss the fun! Y. Torun - cm16