Terrestrial Resources Working Group June 3, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Introduction Consists of 9,040 acres of deeded land and 52,000+ acres of state and federal lands. Encompasses 16.6 miles of the South Fork and.
Advertisements

Restore McComas Meadows /Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Restore McComas Meadows/ Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries.
The Central Washington Landscape Assessment (CWLA) project update and discussion.
Middle Fork American River Project AQ 2 – Fish Population Technical Study Report Overview March 3, 2009.
May Middle Fork Project Project Operations Overview May 2006 PCWA MAY 16, 2006 HANDOUT #4.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Update on Proposed Project.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Approach for Developing New.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting July 21, 2008.
Climatic and biophysical controls on conifer species distributions in mountains of Washington State, USA D. McKenzie, D. W. Peterson, D.L. Peterson USDA.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 6,
June 26, PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
The Coniferous Forest. Coniferous Forest The coniferous forest gets the name coniferous because the main type of vegetation located in it is conifers.
July Middle Fork Project Additional Information Potential Project Betterments to be evaluated during Relicensing July 2006.
Wolf Creek Community Alliance Wolf Creek is Special! It’s all about diversity: Geography Geology Biodiversity History Human Impacts.
June 2006 Middle Fork Project Project Maintenance June 20, 2006.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 4: Special-Status Wildlife Preliminary Results.
Commonly referred to as MIS.  From the 1982 planning regulations 36 CFR (a)(1)- “… certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the.
S e s s i o n 5 Managing riparian land for terrestrial wildlife.
Colorado Front Range Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Project : Initial Pre and Post-Treatment Stand Structure Analysis for the Pike and San.
North Coast Forest Conservation Program Northern Spotted Owl Status Overview Madison Thomson (707)
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 - Attachment A California Red-legged Frog Site Assessment March 10, 2008.
4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview of Vegetation Data, Modeling and Strategies Used to Develop the Proposed Action Neil McCusker Silviculturist 4FRI.
TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLAN Wallowa-Whitman National Forest March 2008 Nez Perce Tribe Update Nez Perce Tribe Update.
Vegetation Inventory and Survey Methods: A Reclamation Tool Monica Pokorny, KC Harvey Environmental, LLC Dennis Neuman, KC Harvey Environmental, LLC Kristine.
Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed Division Mark Johnson-Project Leader
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
1 Potential Project Betterments to be studied further during Relicensing June 20, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 8, 2010.
Claytor Lake Debris Study. Hydro Environmental Services of Kleinschmidt Associates  Shoreline Management Plans (SMP)  Aquatic & Terrestrial Habitat.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting April 8, 2008.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Middle Fork Project Potential Project Betterments October 1, 2007.
World Biomes A group of ecosystems that are related by having a similar type of of vegetation governed by similar climatic conditions Major Terrestrial.
Lushan Mountain Evergreen broad-leaved forest Evergreen deciduous broad-leaved forest Deciduous evergreen broad-leaved forest Deciduous broad-leaved.
Stand initiation: South facing hillside, kept open by moisture limitations + repeated fires, Douglas-fir slowly invading (Kalamopsis.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting June 1, 2009 Handout #2.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Cultural Technical Working Group Meeting November 18, 2008.
Yosemite National Park By Emily Toth. Biome At higher elevations, fewer wildlife species tend to be found due to the lower complexity of the forest Above.
 Tier 1: Monitoring that will be done regardless of funding received:  Forest Service Preference is to focus on vegetation, e.g. Stand Structure including.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
Sustaining Front Range Forests & Communities February 26, 2010.
m | °C | Oak (Quercus kelloggii) woodlands with pine, annual grasses and native grasses and forbs 513 mm precipitation per year, predominantly.
Coniferous Forest Laurie St. Clair. Common Names Evergreen Coniferous Forest Evergreen Coniferous Forest Boreal Forest Boreal Forest Taigas (tie-guhs)
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
Middle Fork Project TERR 6 - Special-Status Bat Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 3, 2008.
Landscape Analysis Project: Craig Mountain Wildlife Management Area For/Range 527 Landscape Ecology.
Current Conditions of Camp Sacajawea Team Three: Javier, Charlie, Melissa, Angela.
Analysis of Annual Forest Inventory Data in ME and PA William H. McWilliams, Carol A. Alerich, Tonya W. Lister, and Randall S. Morin USDA Forest Service,
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
Middle Fork American River Project Vegetation & Integrated Pest Management Plan (VIPMP) Meeting March 28, 2011 Handout No. 1.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 1: Vegetation Communities and Wildlife.
Middle Fork American River Project Recreation Resources Technical Working Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
Coniferous Forest Ms Graham 6 th Grade Science. Coniferous Forest Temperature--- – 40 degree C to 20 degree C, – average summer temperature is 10 degree.
June 2016What problems/opportunities/needs are there with forest management? Development of the purpose of and need for action. July 2016What tools are.
MASON GULCH LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC MEETING August 4, 2016.
MAPS. DIFFERENT TYPES OF MAPS Political Physical Climate Vegetation Land Use Resource Distribution.
Mason Gulch landscape Management plan Public meeting
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Entrainment Direct Sampling Approach (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Project Description and Operations Maps
Ponderosa Pine & Cavity Nesters
Middle Fork Project TERR 3 – Noxious Weed Technical Study Report Overview February 17, 2009.
Rancheria Forest Restoration Project
Presentation transcript:

Terrestrial Resources Working Group June 3, 2008

1 Update TERR 2 - Special-Status Plants and TERR 3 - Noxious Weeds

2 Update on TERR 2 and TERR 3 Studies Reference population monitoring completed on May 7, 2008 Reference population monitoring completed on May 7, 2008  Verified survey schedule Early season surveys initiated May 19, 2008 Early season surveys initiated May 19, 2008  Early season surveys to be completed by May 30, 2008 Late season reference population monitoring to be conducted mid-July 2008 Late season reference population monitoring to be conducted mid-July 2008  Late season surveys proposed for late-July 2008

3 TERR 4 - Special-Status Wildlife Northern Goshawk Surveys

4 TERR 4 Northern Goshawk Surveys Focused Northern Goshawk surveys will be conducted at Potential Project Betterments and new recreation facilities that are: Focused Northern Goshawk surveys will be conducted at Potential Project Betterments and new recreation facilities that are:  Proposed in appropriate Northern Goshawk habitat, and  Could alter/remove habitat or result in disturbance

5 Northern Goshawk Habitat  Study Area  Areas within ¼ mile of Project Betterments  Hell Hole Reservoir Seasonal Storage Increase  French Meadows Powerhouse Capacity Upgrade  Ralston Powerhouse Capacity Upgrade

6 Northern Goshawk Habitat Defined as: Defined as:  Conifer and mixed conifer forests with at least 70% tree canopy cover Sierra National Forest Plan - January 2004

7 Vegetation Communities in the Vicinity of the MFP

8 Northern Goshawk Habitat Consists of the following TERR 1 - vegetation communities Consists of the following TERR 1 - vegetation communities  Gray Pine (PD)  Douglas-Fir Pine (DP)  Mixed Conifer-Fir (MF)  Mixed Conifer-Pine (MP)  Pacific Douglas-Fir (DF)  Ponderosa Pine (PP)  White Fir (WF) Mapped as dense (60-80% canopy cover) or extremely dense (>80% canopy cover) communities Mapped as dense (60-80% canopy cover) or extremely dense (>80% canopy cover) communities

9 Northern Goshawk Habitat at Potential Project Betterments

10 Potential Habitat Hell Hole Reservoir Seasonal Storage Increase Hell Hole Reservoir

11 Potential Habitat Hell Hole Reservoir Seasonal Storage Increase South Fork Long Canyon Diversion

12 Potential Habitat French Meadows Powerhouse Capacity Upgrade

13 Potential Habitat Ralston Powerhouse Capacity Upgrade

14 Finalization of Terrestrial Technical Study Reports

15 Finalization of 2007 Technical Study Reports TERR 1 - Vegetation Communities and Wildlife Habitat Technical Study Report  Distributed on January 31, 2008  No comments received  Electronic Distribution of Final TSR - June 2008 TERR 6 - Special-Status Bats Technical Study Report  Distributed on March 5, 2008  No comments received  Electronic Distribution of Final TSR - June 2008