Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for 2013-2014 Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Activity 3a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
At the Mitchell Institute 22 Monument Square, Suite 404 Portland, Maine GreatSchoolsPartnership.org.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
CFN 609 Principals’ Summer Institute Citywide Instructional Expectations Teacher Development Schools will select competencies relevant.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 September 16, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Assistant Principal Meeting September 18, :00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
David Abbott Director of Student Services Mary Barton CFN 204 SATIF November 21, 2011.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Michigan Coalition of Essential Schools Welcome to the Critical Friends Groups November 1, 2013.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Math Leadership Teams October, 2014.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
CFN 201 High School Principals’ Meeting Thursday, September 27, :00 – 3:45 p.m.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Classroom Walk-Through
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Presentation transcript:

Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013

Teacher Teams and their work  The work of teacher teams will be even more of an essential element for the work around the Common Core and Teacher Effectiveness to be successfully implemented in school year. Teacher team work is mentioned or implied in all of the QR indicators for  Teacher team work is specifically mentioned in the following indicators:  1.3  3.4  4.2  5.1

Reflection  Read the indicators/sub indicators on the QR rubric for that specifically mention teacher teams in the proficient category (1.3 b, 3.4 c, 4.2 and 5.1c). Write down some bullet points around the work as to where your school is at the present time. Compare where your school is to the expectations of the rubric.  Have a discussion at your table around the gaps that you have between the QR expectations and teacher teams present practice. What are some practices that you can share with each another around improving practices of teacher teams and their work?

Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Summary of Expectations  Prepare: Set up to meet higher standards  Ensure curricula are aligned to standards in all content areas (1.1, 2.2)  Prepare to implement a new system of teacher evaluation and development (4.1, 4.2)  Organize the school to meet the needs of all students  Establish an instructional focus (1.2, 3.1, 3.4)  Ensure school time is used strategically. (1.3, 4.2)  Plan for both short term and sustained professional learning experiences. (1.4, 3.1, 4.1, 4.2)

Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Summary of Expectations  Implement: Move students toward meeting higher standards  Students: Experience rigorous instruction. (1.1, 1.2, 1,4, 3.4)  Teachers: Shift classroom practice (1.2)  School leaders: Actively support teacher growth. (1.2, 4.1, 4.2)

Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Summary of Expectations  Assess: Review evidence of meeting higher standards  Create systems to look for evidence of growth and gaps and make adjustments. (2.2, 4.2, 5.1)

Teacher Teams  Organize the school to meet the needs of all students.  Establish an instructional focus that creates coherence among multiple initiatives, clearly frames the work teachers and school leaders will prioritize to narrow the gap between what students currently know and are able to do, and allows for strategic use of resources.

Teacher Teams  Continue to assure that school time is used strategically.  Time for teachers to work in teams (WD expectation is that teams have “substantial and regular meetings that are deliberately structured to align teacher workflow to school’s instructional goals and maximizes teacher time on instructional work…”

Teacher Teams  Engage teacher leaders to support the school’s instructional agenda.

Teacher Teams will: Implement: Move students toward meeting higher standards  Shift classroom practice  In , teacher teams should focus on changes to classroom practice.  Teachers should actively participate in their own development as teachers, supported by the new system of teacher evaluation and development.

Teacher Teams  School leaders will actively support teacher growth.  Support teachers and teacher teams in planning lessons and units, strengthening teacher practices, looking at student work for evidence of learning and gaps, and making purposeful adjustments to narrow the gap between what students require and what students know and are able to do.

Teacher Teams  Assess: Review evidence of meeting higher standards  Create systems to regularly and collaboratively look for evidence of growth and gaps in student work and teacher practice in order to make adjustments. (2.2, 4.2, 5.1)  Will review student work and contributions to classroom activities for evidence of individual student growth and gaps in learning in relation to both standards and academic and personal behaviors and make evidence based adjustments to their units, lessons and teaching practices.

Teacher Teams will regularly:  Share successful instructional practices and the evidence of their success through formal and informal structures.  Reflect on their work to identify areas for growth and actively participate in their own development.

Action planning moving forward  After our discussion this morning and around your conversation at your tables, think about three areas for growth around the work of your teacher teams in connection with the CIE and the QR.  What are three actionable items that your school leadership could be put in place around your school’s teams as we move forward?

Thank you!  Thank you for your attention and thoughtful work this morning.  Any questions?  Contact Mary Barton at