Contract Drafting Class 10 Thurs. Feb 16

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Issues for Arizona Design Professionals January 25, 2007 Dennis I. Wilenchik Tyler Q. Swensen.
Advertisements

6/4/2014 Introduction to Contract Review and Negotiation Robert W. Smithee, JD Director Virtual Medical Group Programs Center for Healthcare Innovation,
Compensatory Damages: In addition to general (or direct) damages caused by injury to the very thing that was hurt (tort) or the subject of the agreement.
Contract Drafting Class 7 Tues Feb 7 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
Civil & criminal law Civil Law.
A LITIGATOR’S ADVICE ON LITIGATION AVOIDANCE Alan N. Greenspan Jackson Walker LLP © 2004 by Alan N. Greenspan. All rights reserved.
NEGOTIATING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE AGREEMENTS TOP TIPS TO CONSIDER © 2013, WILSON VUKELICH LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Diane L. Karnay September.
Contract Drafting Class 11 Tues. Feb 21
Commercial Law (Mgmt 348) Professor Charles H. Smith Professional Liability and Accountability (Chapter 51) Spring 2009.
Chapter 6. If the offeror makes a valid offer, and the offeree has made a valid acceptance, then a genuine agreement has been reached—”meeting of the.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
Contract Drafting Class 4 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
Contracts for the Sale of Goods & Warranties Law A.
Contract Drafting Class 26 Thurs. Apr. 19
Contract Drafting Class 13 Tues. Feb 28
P A R T P A R T Sales Formation & Terms Product Liability Performance of Sales Contracts Remedies for Breach of Sales Contracts 4 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business.
Product Liability When goods cause injury, there is a question of product liability. There are three main issues related to product liability cases: –
Contract Drafting Class 9 Tues. Feb 14
BELL QUIZ ON CHAPTER 5 What is any agreement that is enforceable by law? There are six elements of a contract. Name TWO. How many promises does a bilateral.
$200 $300 $400 Final Jeopardy $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 PropertyPotpourri.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
NATURE OF TERMS Whether expressed or implied, a term may take any one of the three natures. It may be a condition or warranty or an innominate term.
Expectancy and Rightful Position  In breach of contract cases courts prefer to award damages that implement the notion of “expectancy” – i.e., damages.
Sales Contracts and Warranties OBE 118, Section 10, Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey Now we focus on the UCC, in other words Commercial Law How the UCC governs.
An introduction Dr. Valentina Adami - Verona,
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 23 Sales and Lease Warranties Chapter 23 Sales and Lease Warranties.
CHAPTER 19 WARRANTIES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8 th Ed.)
Prepared by Douglas Peterson, University of Alberta 11-1 Part 3 – The Law of Contract Chapter 11 Failure to Create an Enforceable Contract.
1 REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT. 2 When one of the parties to the contract makes a breach of the contract the following remedies are available to the.
Contract Drafting Class 8 Thurs Feb 9 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
Copyright © 2008 by Robert B. Carton Selected Business Law Topics.
Contract Drafting Class 3 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act § – Waiver by consumer is void as against public policy, unless: In writing, signed by consumer, Consumer not.
Middleware Promises Warranties that Don’t Indemnities that Won’t Stephen Rubin, Esquire
Genuine Agreement Chapter 6.
Genuine Agreement If the offeror makes a valid offer, and the offeree has made a valid acceptance, then a genuine agreement has been reached. The courts.
Contract Review.  1. The final step in the vendor contracting process should be getting the vendor’s standard written contract and signing the contract.
Contract Drafting Class 19 Tues. Mar. 27 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
Contract Drafting Class 11 Tues. Feb 21 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
Contract Drafting Class 14 Thurs. Mar. 1 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
Practical Contracts. “ We talk about a contract as a meeting of the minds of the parties, and thence it is inferred in various cases that there is no.
Genuine Agreement Mr. Sherpinsky’s Business Law Class.
CHAPTER 14 INTERPRETATION OF THE CONTRACT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THIRD PERSONS DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles.
Forensic and Investigative Accounting Chapter 10 Commercial Damages © 2007 CCH. All Rights Reserved W. Peterson Ave. Chicago, IL
HOUSING FRAUD AND THE LAW ROBERT DARBYSHIRE RICHARD PRICE 9 ST JOHN STREET.
Contract Drafting Class 13 Tues. Feb 28 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III.
CHAPTERCHAPTER McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Compensatory and Related Damages THIRTEENTHIRTEEN.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Forensic and Investigative Accounting Chapter 10 Commercial Damages © 2011 CCH. All Rights Reserved W. Peterson Ave. Chicago, IL
Contract Remedies Introduction A contract remedy compensates a Claimant for his losses. A Claimants loss includes any harm to the person or property of.
Genuine Agreement “meeting of the minds”
20-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 6 Mistakes, Misrepresentation, and Fraud
Let’s Make a Deal Buying and Selling a Practice. Presented by Denise Robertson, Mills & Mills LLP Denise joined Mills & Mills LLP as an Associate in 2005.
Consequential Damages – Buck v. Morrow
Week 6  Performance  Remedies. Discharge  Discharge means to “release”  Failure to perform obligation set forth in a contract is not a breach if performance.
Introduced some basic knowledge of the contract First, what is the contract? Contract, also known as contract. China's definition of the contract, the.
FORMING A CONTRACT Just sign on the dotted line. What is a Contract? A contract is an agreement between two parties that creates an obligation to perform.
MISREPRESENTATION Sec. 18 & 19.
CHAPTER 7 GENUINENESS OF ASSENT.
CHAPTER 8: BREACH OF CONTRACT AND REMEDIES Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
Contract Law - Back to Basics LIABILITY! David Lowe Partner.
Law in Society Ms. Baumgartner. Section 1 Objectives  Recognize when genuine assent is not present  Identify the two key elements in undue influence.
Class II Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Fraud and Misrepresentation Section 6.1 Genuine Agreement If the offeror makes a valid offer, and the offeree has.
COPYRIGHT © 2006 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
EAANA Annual Meeting January 26, 2013
MISTAKE Mistake: The parties entered into a contract with different understandings of one or more material facts relating to the subject matter of the.
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Chapter 9 Strict Liability and Product Liability.
Presentation transcript:

Contract Drafting Class 10 Thurs. Feb 16 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III

Common contract screw-ups

Common contract screw-ups “7. The contract that has additional signature blocks in [a schedule or exhibit, e.g., a form of deed], and these are signed as well as or instead of the main signature blocks of the contract.” [From “Top 10 howlers when preparing contracts for signature,” by the IP Draughts blog at http://goo.gl/Km6Dw.]

Pretentiousness

Some pretentious expressions How could these be improved? During such time as Customer needs help During the course of Provider’s work Provider will effectuate its obligations The parties will endeavor to agree Provider will forthwith notify Customer

Defined terms

Defined terms – where to put? Team exercise: Write down six places where you might find the definition of a defined term in a contract (careful – try to think “outside the box”)

Introducing a defined term Stark p. 80: “Mechanical Failure” means [definition follows] Adams, MSCD: Mechanical Failure refers to [definition follows]

Can Stark be improved on? P. 84, # 19 (“Song” example) Compare with p. 81, # 13 P. 84, # 20

Which do you like better, & why? Stark p. 87, # 1 Version 1? Version 2

Dell Master Purcha-sing Agrmt (Z&B pp. 236 et seq.)

Representations and Warranties - preview

Buying a used car What are the important points about this car that a buyer might want to know? What would be deal-breakers? What would affect the price the buyer would be willing to pay? [STUDENT DISCUSSION] Reps and warranties can take up to 30% of a contract.

Representation (Stark p. 12) Statement of fact As of a moment in time Intended to induce reliance Justifiable reliance is required for a cause of action As of a moment in time – got to go back in time; that’s when liability attaches Due diligence: You don’t get what you EXpect, but only what you INspect. Client would rather find out NOW.

Warranty (Stark p. 13) Technical definition Real world definition A promise that a statement is true Real world definition A promise that the maker of a statement will pay damages to the recipient of the statement if the statement isn’t true and the recipient suffers damages There is no reliance component, nor intent. Deal lawyers commonly ask for “reps” – they mean both.

Warranty The car is yellow. Richard Pryor – who you gonna believe: Me, or your lying eyes? Warranty: You can believe the guy. Representation: Gotta believe your eyes – reliance must be justified

Remedies for breach of warranty (Stark pp. 14-16) Benefit of bargain Diminution in value Alt: Cost of paint job? Incidental damages? Rental cost, while car is in paint shop Consequentials? UCC: If not disclaimed Damages cap in contract? Attorneys’ fees? Watch out for a drafter “sneaking in” a disclaimer of incidentals.

Remedies for Misrepresentations Honest or negligent, if material Avoidance Restitutionary Recovery Fraud Choice between Avoidance and Restitutionary Recovery and Damages Out-of-pocket Benefit of the bargain Punitive

Trade-offs: Representations versus Warranties Avoidance Punitive damages Warranties No reliance component Benefit of the bargain damages No need to prove defendant’s scienter If you’re a vendor, you might not WANT to give both reps and warranties.

CBS v. Ziff-Davis – sale of magazine division Rep/warranty re financial statements Due diligence: Accounting problems Lawsuit: Misrep. + breach of warranty (really: litigating the price afterwards) Holding: No misrep.: Reliance not justified BUT: Warranty claim succeeded Parties settled after appellate holding Rep about financial statements is VERY common. Wanted to close the deal because it still made sense.

British Sky Broadcasting v. EDS Case: http://bit.ly/9bPMbe (468-page PDF) HTML: http://bit.ly/c3SUZh Entire-agreement clause £30MM damages cap N/A to fraud. misrep. or negl. misrep. UK judge found EDS exec lied No contract liability finding

British Sky Broadcasting v. EDS ¶ 841: “Although it is not necessary to establish motive, motive provides support. Joe Galloway was quite clearly anxious to further his career. He was ambitious and to achieve a successful bid with Sky for the CRM Project would provide him with an opportunity to demonstrate his abilities to those in EDS. It was that motive which led him to say that he could achieve the Sky CRM Project in the required timescale when he knew that he had no proper basis for doing so. EDS say that there can be no motive in obtaining a project on the basis of times which cannot be met. I do not think he took that type of long term view. His wish was to be awarded the CRM Project and use that for advancement.”

211 – No reliance Representations outside this Agreement: None – the parties have specifically negotiated this section. Each party represents and warrants that, in entering into this Agreement, it is not relying on any representation by the other party, other than those set forth herein or incorporated by reference. Bold-faced emphasis: Convince a judge to “buy” it Representation and warranty: Defendant can respond to a fraudulent-rep claim: “YOU lied by signing the agreement.”

Why include no-reliance clause? Vendor: Avoid fraudulent-misrep. claims Customer (silver lining if forced to agree): Identify problems BEFORE they arise

Discovery issues for either warranty or misrep. claim True value of asset sold Inspections Comparables Expert testimony Alt: Repair costs Estimates

Extra discovery issues for misrepresentations Standard of care (negligence claims): Past deals, practices, problems – interrog., document production, depositions Expert witnesses – fees, report review, depositions, trial props, trial prep Intent (fraud claims): Email trails, interrog., depositions Net worth – for punitive damages From a trial-tactics perspective, why would a customer want to make a fraud accusation? Because non-technical jurors are more likely to grasp “they lied!” than technical claims about product performance.

Negotiating risk allocation (Stark pp. 17-19) See Stark’s examples Flat representation Unequivocal Without wiggle room Qualified representation Hedged

End of class