GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VAPOR INTRUSION: AN INTRODUCTION OHIO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE JENNIFER MILLER NOVEMBER 7, 2012.
Advertisements

Field Evaluation of Diffusive Samplers for Indoor Air VOC Measurements
Case Study of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion at a Dry Cleaner Site Amy Goldberg Day AEHS Annual East Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments.
COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
U.S. EPA Region 9’s New Response Action Levels 02 October 2014 Derral Van Winkle, P.G. NAVFAC Southwest, Environmental Restoration Program Manager.
Multi-Level Ground-Water Monitoring Travis von Dessonneck.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Radon in Your Home Presenter information here 4/2014.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
Vapor Intrusion: Investigation of Buildings
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
1 Soil Vapor Extraction Limitations and Enhancements LeeAnn Racz AgE 558 Semester Project April 2001.
How long will the test last?
Lesson 6 What are the testing strategies for radon?
Vapor Intrusion: Investigation of Buildings Overview of the US vapour intrusion framework, empirical attenuation factors, and the conceptual understanding.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
A Numerical Study of Barometric Pumping Jeff Sondrup AgE 588 Fluid Mechanics of Porous Materials April 11, 2001.
Personal Monitoring for Air Pollution Exposure Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Atmospheric Measurements Manager South Coast Air Quality Management District CAPCOA.
Lesson 5 What devices do we use to measure radon?.
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
Pressure and particles
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance The 20 th Annual International Conference on Soils,
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF DIOXIN LIKE COMPOUNDS IN THE UNITED STATES Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America Fourth Workshop on Sources.
Discerning Background Sources from Vapor Intrusion Jeffrey Kurtz, Ph.D. and David Folkes, PE EnviroGroup Limited Denver Boston Albuquerque Seattle Colorado.
Statistical Evaluation of Attenuation Factors at Lowry Air Force Base, CO Helen E. Dawson, PHD Regional Superfund Hydrogeologist US EPA Region VIII Denver,
MEASUREMENT OF AIR TOXICS IN THE CABINS OF COMMUTER VEHICLES UNDER SUMMER AND WINTER CONDITIONS IN OTTAWA, CANADA Deniz Karman, Oznur Oguz (*), and Gultekin.
The Ira A. Fulton School of EngineeringArizona State University Paul Johnson, Ph.D. Lilian Abreu Ph.D. Candidate Department of Civil and Environmental.
Radon Sampling.
1 Effective Characterization Technologies Deana M. Crumbling, M.S. Technology Innovation Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. (703)
VI Draft Guidance: Overview of Comments to November, 2002 OSWER VI Guidance Michael Sowinski DPRA, Inc.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
C O A L I T I O N Corner Radon: Health Hazard and Disclosure Issue Coalition Corner: Business training tools for HR staff, real estate licensees and other.
Citizen Air Monitoring in the Houston Area Jane Laping, Executive Director Mothers for Clean Air
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc
Petroleum Vapor Intrusion 2013 Springfield Environmental Summit Valerie Garrett Technical Environmental Specialist Hazardous Waste Program, Tanks Section.
Chapter 5 Gases.
Using VSP for Groundwater Monitoring Program Optimization ASP Workshop Charleston, SC September 16, 2015 Alex Mikszewski, PE Amec Foster Wheeler.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
GORE, GORE-TEX and designs are trademarks of W. L. Gore & Associates © 2007 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. 1 Environmental Investigations Using Versatile,
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Updates VAP CP Training October 27, 2015 Audrey Rush Ohio EPA DERR
A presentation for by ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting and Management International Petroleum Environmental Conference 22.
Exposure Assessment for Health Effect Studies: Insights from Air Pollution Epidemiology Lianne Sheppard University of Washington Special thanks to Sun-Young.
Charge Questions for Expert Panel Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst,
Assessment Methods for Ammonia Hot-Spots (Working Group 3) Expert Workshop under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution 4-6 Dec.
Closing Session Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst, MA.
Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Jim Weaver United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National.
Evaluation of Methane Pathway, Risk and Control Rafat Abbasi, P.E., Senior Project Manager Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program Department.
Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
3M Drug Delivery Systems 3 Introduction The headspace of pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI) canisters is filled by the vapor of volatile components,
HEER Webinar (note change on mainland due to Daylight Savings Time) When:March 11 th, 2015 Time:11am-12pm Hawaii Time (2:00pm Pacific Time, 5:00pm Pacific.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
What’s the Problem: The Vapor Intrusion Issue Brownfields 2008 Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Dry Cleaners Detroit, MI May 5, 2008 Presented by: Henry Schuver,
Lesson 6 What are the testing strategies for radon?
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
General Principles for Hydrocarbon Vapor Intrusion
East Hennepin Avenue Site
Using the HAPSITE® as a Vapor Intrusion Investigation Tool
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations: Volatilization Criteria
Case Studies Bruce H. Trimble Sunbelt Environmental Services, Inc.
Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative
Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Calculator
VI Issues: Lessons Learned
Presentation transcript:

GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntec Outline Improved Protocols – What’s Coming Improved Protocols – What’s Coming Qsoil Qsoil Perimeter crack model vs 0.05>Q soil /Q bldg > Perimeter crack model vs 0.05>Q soil /Q bldg > Barometric Pumping Barometric Pumping Implications for Data Variability Implications for Data Variability Alternative Sampling Options Alternative Sampling Options More discrete in time and space More discrete in time and space More integrated More integrated

GeoSyntec API - API - Collecting and Interpreting Soil Gas Samples from the Vadose Zone: A Practical Strategy for Assessing the Subsurface Vapor-to-Indoor-Air Migration Pathway at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites – Final Draft, July 2004 Health Canada – Soil Vapour Intrusion Guidance for Health Canada Screening Level Risk Assessment (SLRA) – Final Draft, October 2004 EPRI - Best Practices Manual For Evaluating Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air – Preliminary Draft, Sept 2004 ITRC – Workshop next week to develop an outline Others? Improved Protocols

GeoSyntec Conceptual Models Conceptual Models More tools in the toolbox More tools in the toolbox Standardization Standardization QA/QC checks QA/QC checks Interpretive Tools Interpretive Tools Areas for Advancement

GeoSyntec Q soil : Perimeter Crack Model 0.8 L/min > Qsoil > 0.05 L/min

GeoSyntec Q soil : Current Recommendation 0.05 > Qsoil/Qbuilding > (Johnson, 2002) (perhaps 0.01 to is more common) For a typical residence: V ~ 600m3, AER ~0.5 hr-1 Qbuilding ~ 300 m3/hr or 5,000 L/min 250 L/min > Qsoil > 0.5 L/min (perhaps 50 to 0.5) Generally higher than perimeter crack model OSWER Guidance uses 5 L/min, strictly empirical

GeoSyntec Barometric Pumping Increasing B.P. Decreasing B.P. Gas is compressible, so changes in B.P. either compress soil gas or allow it to expand. No net flow in the long-term, but short term... Ideal Gas Law: P 1 V 1 = P 2 V 2 Ground Surface

GeoSyntec Transient Effect of Barometric Pumping Q soil-BP = transient soil gas flow rate induced by B.P. change Q soil-BP = transient soil gas flow rate induced by B.P. change A = area of the footprint of the building A = area of the footprint of the building  a = air-filled porosity  a = air-filled porosity x bp = depth of barometric pressure propagation x bp = depth of barometric pressure propagation ΔP = barometric pressure change over time period “t bp ” ΔP = barometric pressure change over time period “t bp ” P o = mean air pressure P o = mean air pressure 0.02 > ΔP/P o t bp > (Parker, 2002)

GeoSyntec Q soil : Perimeter Crack Model vs Delta BP Magnitude agrees well with empirical estimate of 5 L/min But in the short-term, Qsoil can be -5 to 5 L/min!

GeoSyntec Barometric Pressure Changes Arrows represent approximately 24 hours, during which BP may change a lot (>200Pa in this example), or hardly at all Compare this to 4Pa stack effect! (dP can be up to 5,000 Pa)

GeoSyntec Temporal Variability

GeoSyntec Implications for Data Variability How much of this is due to short-term barometric pressure fluctuations?

GeoSyntec Alternative Sampling Options Option 1: More Integrated Data Time-Integrated: sample over several barometric cycles (e.g. 7 days) to smooth temporal variability Volume-Integrated: to smooth spatial variability Option 2:More Discrete Data over time Real-time monitoring Vertical Profiling Monitor BP and delta P to establish correlation

GeoSyntec Time-Integrated Samples Summa Canisters Summa Canisters Smaller critical orifice Smaller critical orifice Solenoid valve “timer” Solenoid valve “timer” ATD Tubes ATD Tubes Lower Flow Rate over Longer Time Lower Flow Rate over Longer Time VOST Samplers – borrow stack testing tools? VOST Samplers – borrow stack testing tools? PUF: TO-13 designed for 300m 3 samples PUF: TO-13 designed for 300m 3 samples 10m by 10m house, 10 m vadose zone, 30% air-porosity… 10m by 10m house, 10 m vadose zone, 30% air-porosity… Or Qsoil for 24 hours… Or Qsoil for 24 hours… Radon analogy: passive electret samplers

GeoSyntec Volume Integrated Samples (DiGiulio, 2004) Representative Purge Volume

GeoSyntec High Purge Volume Sampling

GeoSyntec PID readings ~ 1,000 ppmv over 1,700,000 L (3 days) indicates concentrations are spatially uniform Total mass removed ~ 10 kg (10 -6 risk needs only kg!) Combine with pneumatic testing, assess gas K Q = 15 scfm

GeoSyntec Is Bigger Always Better?

Huntington Beach Soil Gas

GeoSyntec Summary & Conclusions New and Improved Protocols are coming – data quality New and Improved Protocols are coming – data quality Qsoil from BP changes is probably not negligible Qsoil from BP changes is probably not negligible What is the contribution to data variability? What is the contribution to data variability? $$ to find out? $$ to find out? Risk assessment requires long-term average exposures Risk assessment requires long-term average exposures Time- or volume-integrated samples may help Time- or volume-integrated samples may help Vertical profiling needed for assessing biodegradation Vertical profiling needed for assessing biodegradation