The Girls RISEnet 2010 Survey An Environmental Scan of Girl-Friendly Programs and Exhibits in U.S. Science Museums and Institutions NATIONAL INSTITUTE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
III. Demonstrated skills in teaching and learning... Curriculum Vitae University of Wisconsin - Madison Madison, Wisconsin Your Name i)Ability to.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
The UKRC Research Team. The UKRC: Employers Government Professional bodies Education institutions Trade unions Sector skills councils Enterprise agencies.
Learner Link – Durham County Increasing Access to Early Childhood College Courses Durham’s Partnership for Children Child Care Services Association Durham.
STEM Literacy, Civic Responsibility, and Future Vision: Examining the Effects of the Lawrence Math and Science Partnership Linda C. Foote PhD, Past Director.
Implementation and Evaluation of the Rural Early Adolescent Learning Project (REAL): Commonalities in Diverse Educational Settings Jill V. Hamm, Dylan.
Association of Science-Technology Centers Annual Conference October 18-October 21, 2014 Increasing Audience Diversity Association of Science-Technology.
+ Project IDEAL in Minnesota: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
Community Resource Cultivation Module 3. Start Where You Are Use existing contacts, networks and resources as a starting place for developing your robotics.
“High Schools Improving Lives with Engineering Projects in Community Service-Learning” Serve Explore Prepare Design Succeed.
Amherst Connects N etworking for Students Presentation to the Board of Trustees March 26, 2010.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Association of Science-Technology Annual Conference October 31-November 1, 2009 Session Leader: Diane LaFollette, Network Coordinator, Arkansas Discovery.
An Overview of the NISE Network Presentation Overview NISE Network Network Community Educational Products Get More Involved.
Learning Centers Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education 1.
For more information, visit wildapricot.com/membership-insight-survey wildapricot.com/membership-insight-survey Survey Highlights.
 U of I Extension is part of a national organization called the Cooperative Extension System established in 1914  Its an educational network linking.
Center for Educator Recruitment, Retention, & Advancement.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Accent image here Primary Image here Rhode Island Department of Transportation TRAC/RIDES Program Promoting Pathways for Transportation and Civil Engineering.
Overview of the Environmental Immigrant Bridging Pilot Program.
Copyright NSTC All rights reserved The North Shore Technology Council Sponsorship Presentation Lyn Kaplan – Sponsorship Committee.
© 2014 The Regents of the University of Michigan. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of.
Organizational Development January STEM Task Force Recommendations - STEM Council and STEM Hubs -
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
Afterschool and STEM National Network of Statewide Afterschool Networks.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
Designated County Partner Grassroots Grant Application.
CENTER FOR EDUCATOR RECRUITMENT, RETENTION & ADVANCEMENT.
10/6/20151 David G. Loomis, Ph.D. Professor of Economics Illinois State University Lead Entity, Energy Learning Exchange Illinois Energy Learning Exchange.
An Overview of the NISE Network Presentation Overview NISE Network Network Community Educational Products Evaluation and Research.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Copyright © 2012 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Oregon 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation Mariel Sparr.
Planning a Museum & Community Partnership Project Brown-Bag Workshop | Wednesday, September 30, Welcome (Kayla Berry) 2.Introduction (Rae Ostman)
ITS MINNESOTA Best Practices: Membership Recruitment and Retention Linda Preisen, Research Administration Director Center for Transportation Studies University.
Ann Campion Riley University of Missouri
West Sound STEM Network Working Together to Improve STEM Learning.
Activities Reporting Frequency tabulations Types of activities Target audiences Participants Synthesis of descriptions Evaluation summaries.
The National Connection for Local Public Health Plain Talk in Local Health Departments Tasha Toby, MPH National Association of County and City Health Officials.
Atlanta’s Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Affairs  Nationally accredited by the CAPRA  Serves more than 420,000 residents with recreation.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
1 Georgia Intern-Fellowships for Teachers Georgia Teachers in Academic Laboratories: Research Experiences in the Geosciences Donna Barrett Georgia Institute.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Ava D. Rosales, PhD Instructional Supervisor Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
Destination 1 Local Evaluators. Who Are You?  Roles  Responsibilities  Perspective.
Accountability Report & Budget Request* *SL&L is 100% funded through student fees And receives no E&G funding.
Job Search Strategies Before you view this PowerPoint, go to View, then Notes Page, so you can see all of the extra information that make the slides more.
Library Role in Global Health Survey Global Health Vision Task Force April
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Findings from the AISL Program’s Online Project Monitoring System for projects funded between FY 2006 and FY 2014 Gary Silverstein and Ashley Simpkins,
NSDL All-Projects MeetingOctober 12 – 15, 2003 The Gender & Science Digital Library: Outreach Strategies Education Development Center, Inc. Presented by.
2014 Volunteering to Promote STEM Education (K-12) Panel Presenters: Fauzia Chaudhry, Jennifer Argüello, Lindsay Hall, Linda Kekelis, Michelle Clark Friday,
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Preparing Future Teachers to Teach Earth Science Cathy Manduca, Carleton College Website Team : Heather Rissler, Jennifer Anderson, Char Bezanson, Dean.
Restoration & Education Presented by Matt Vincent.
Northwest Earth & Space Sciences Pipeline Northwest Earth & Space Sciences Pipeline continued to launch programs in four areas: Outreach Events  Rocketry.
Partnering with Families in the Transition Process Sean Roy – PACER Mary Jane Williams – Family to Family Network 2016 Texas Transition Conference.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
COSEE Network Evaluation
phone The SMILE Program Science and Math Investigative Learning Experience Envision, Believe, Succeed .
Kathleen Amos, MLIS & C. William Keck, MD, MPH
phone The SMILE Program Science and Math Investigative Learning Experience Envision, Believe, Succeed .
Mission of the STEM TC What is the STEM TC? Join the STEM TC today
Assessing the Needs in Your District
FOUNDATION CENTER SERVICES
phone The SMILE Program Science and Math Investigative Learning Experience Envision, Believe, Succeed .
Presentation transcript:

The Girls RISEnet 2010 Survey An Environmental Scan of Girl-Friendly Programs and Exhibits in U.S. Science Museums and Institutions NATIONAL INSTITUTE OCTOBER 20-23, 2010 WASHINGTON, DC

Girls RISEnet intends to support a network of science museums and institutions across the United States with resources and activities that support girl-friendly and culturally competent programs and exhibits. The Miami Science Museum is the lead agency for the Girls RISE (Raising Interest in Science and Engineering) Museum Network project. In collaboration with the Association of Science - Technology Centers (ASTC) and SECME, Inc.,

In 2010, Girls RISEnet’s lead evaluator Kathleen Tyner of The University of Texas at Austin worked with the project’s Research Advisory Panel and staff to develop an environmental scan questionnaire as a first-ever baseline measure of girl-friendly programs and exhibits in science museums and institutions throughout the United States. The online questionnaire was directed to a convenience sample of 351 addresses from the ASTC mailing list. A total of 105 institutions responded for a very high response rate of 33%.

Results of this baseline survey are reported by region, and will be used to increase the capacity of the RISEnet regional hub science museums to support girl-friendly and culturally-competent programming and exhibition across the United States. Girls RISEnet is funded by the Research on Gender in Science and Engineering program of the National Science Foundation.

The Sample

Regional Affiliation

Sample by Region (n=105)

Characteristics of Museums with Programs and Exhibits to Attract and Motivate Girls

Recruitment of Minority Girls

Specific Recruitment by Race/Ethnicity (n=65)

n=65

Museums and Science Institutions with No Girl-Specific Programs or Exhibits (n=33)

Exhibits Designed to Attract Girls

Educational Programs for Girls and Minority Girls

n=65

Professional Development about Girls-Specific Programs for Staff and Educators

Measuring the Impact of Girl-Specific Programs

Visibility and Outreach to Girls

Does your institution maintain an official presence? In your professional role, do you participate on these sponsored sites? Institutional and Individual Use of Social Networks

Facebook

Blogs

LinkedIn

Twitter

Webinars

Flickr

ASTC Connects

Second Life

In Summary....

Sample Characteristics East North Central regions reports the greatest number of girl- specific programs followed by North South Central and West South Central regions. The museums/institutions report a wide range of youth through multiple programs. Saturday, summer and holiday programs serve the greatest number of students. After-school and internship programs, serve fewer than 50 per year. The vast majority provide staff development for under 50 staff members each year. The majority provide professional development for up to 250 K-12 teachers and other ISE educators per year.

` Support for Girl-Specific Programs Funding for girl-specific programs was most likely to come from the general operating budgets of the museums/institution (46%), followed by foundations (37%). Funding was identified by 24% of respondents with no girl-specific programs as a barrier. The majority reporting no girl-specific funding cited staff shortages as the major barrier (58%).

Recruitment of Minority Girls 21% report no recruitment and 14% recruitment under 10%. 12% report that % of their programs recruit minority girls. African-American girls (48%) and Latina/Hispanic girls (46%) are the most represented minority populations recruited When asked to identify multiple barriers to participation, they identified transportation (65%), staff shortages (43%), and a need for stipends (40%). The top barrier was identified as staff shortages for the respondents with girl-specific programs (20%)

Exhibits & Educational Programming 37% reported no exhibits designed to attract girls over the last 3 years. The grade levels served by the majority of respondents were middle school (94%), elementary school (86%), and high school (63%). Public schools, member outreach and community groups were the top 3 ways that respondents recruited girls. The majority (85%) hope to provide STEM programming for all girls.

Professional Development 78% do not offer staff development or professional development outside the institution for girl-specific programming. The majority used local public schools and college and universities to help with recruitment of educators. 59% offer their educational materials for free or for sale.

Measuring Impact Staff conducted formal evaluation (24%) in some cases and 14% employed a third-party evaluator. 65% do not formally state their recruitment and retention goals 38% used anecdotal methods and 35% did not know their institutions’ methods for assessing the effectiveness of exhibits. 74% used informal staff assessment to measure educational program effectiveness. The majority (54%) used evaluation results for curriculum development. 63% were not able to share their results.

Visibility & Outreach Respondents used a wide range of traditional media to inform audiences about programs and exhibits. Online media was most often used to communication information about programs and exhibits. The majority of institutions sponsored new media sites such as Facebook and Twitter. A small minority of respondents reported that they used the sites in their professional roles. They were most likely to use Facebook, Webinars and ASTC Connects.