Designing 1-1 Interviews and Focus Groups Desmond Thomas, University of Essex.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploratory Research and Qualitative Analysis
Advertisements

Sonia Morán & Ying Wang. Quantitative or qualitative? Group interview? Dynamics, interaction Shared & individual characteristics What are Focus Groups?
Focus Groups 21 February 2011 Ian Rowen. What are Focus Groups? Small structured discussion groups with selected participants, led by a moderator “Carefully.
Conducting Focus groups ACE seminar teaching session By Susan Mlangwa.
CHAPTER 16 Interviews. Interviews serve many purposes.
Collecting data Chapter 5
GETTING THE MOST OUT OF FOCUS GROUPS Andrew Scott Ziner, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Accreditation Office of Assessment and Accreditation Science.
A Student’s Guide to Methodology Justifying Enquiry 3 rd edition P ETER C LOUGH AND C ATHY N UTBROWN.
Depth Interviews. Funnel Method Funnel Method let respondent do all the talking let respondent do all the talking can be a diagnostic interview can be.
CHAPTER 10, qualitative field research
E43 Johan Brink IIE 29 November Qualitative research I, Interview Lecture
Qualitative Methods Lisa Harrison: Chapter 5. Qualitative and Quantitative (74) Quantitative: Focuses on the analysis of numerical data (statistics, polling),
An evaluation framework
Types of interview used in research
Chapter 6 The Survey Interview Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHOD Depth/intensive interviewing.
USING THE METHODOLOGY FOR EXTERNAL LEGAL EDUCATION QUALITY ASSESSMENT Training on behalf of USAID FAIR Justice project – 27 th and 28 th May 2015.
Chapter 14 Overview of Qualitative Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Methodology.
Customer Care.  Qualitative research is based on opinions, attitudes, beliefs and intentions.  This kind of research deals with questions such as “
Methods used to validate qualitative
Slide 10.1 Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 5 th Edition, © Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009.
The Research Process Interpretivist Positivist
Evaluation Framework Prevention vs. Intervention CHONG POH WAN 21 JUNE 2011.
Research Methods in Psychology (Pp 1-31). Research Studies Pay particular attention to research studies cited throughout your textbook(s) as you prepare.
مصاحبه Interview محمد مهدی کریم پور معارف اسلامی و مدیریت 88.
CHAPTER 16 Interviews. Interviews serve many purposes Initial exploration Shaping the project Main information- gathering Drawing conclusions and making.
Chapter 11: An Evaluation Framework Group 4: Tony Masi, Sam Esswein, Brian Rood, & Chris Troisi.
Week 8: Research Methods: Qualitative Research 1.
Qualitative Assessment Methods Session 1.3 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Incorporating an Evaluation Plan into Program Design: Using Qualitative Data Connie Baird Thomas, PhD Linda H. Southward, PhD Colleen McKee, MS Social.
Evaluating a Research Report
Data Collection Methods
EXPLORATORY RESEARCH INITIAL RESEARCH CONDUCTED TO CLARIFY AND DEFINE THE NATURE OF A PROBLEM DOES NOT PROVIDE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE SUBSEQUENT RESEARCH.
LOOKING FOR EVIDENCE? A CASE FOR THE CASE STUDY DR. GURU NAGARAJAN DR. SARA BHATTACHARJI.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
University of Sunderland Professionalism and Personal Skills Unit 9 Professionalism and Personal Skills Lecture Data Collection.
CHAPTER 10, QUALITATIVE FIELD RESEARCH. Chapter Outline  Topics Appropriate to Field Research  Special Consideration in Qualitative Field Research 
Communicating Culture interviewing. Interviewing: Definition  Interviewing is a meeting of two persons to exchange information and ideas through questions.
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter Eleven Watching And Listening: Qualitative Research For In-depth Understanding.
Interviews By Mr Daniel Hansson.
© (2015, 2012, 2008) by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7: Collecting Qualitative Data Educational Research: Planning, Conducting,
AS Sociology.  Structured  Unstructured  Semi structured  Focus groups WE.
Research Methods Observations Interviews Case Studies Surveys Quasi Experiments.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.2 Explain strengths and limitations of a qualitative approach to research?
Paper III Qualitative research methodology.  Qualitative research is designed to reveal a specific target audience’s range of behavior and the perceptions.
Fashion MARKETING TID1131. Types of research Quantitative research Information relating to numbers – quantity. Method - surveys Qualitative research To.
Week 2: Interviews. Definition and Types  What is an interview? Conversation with a purpose  Types of interviews 1. Unstructured 2. Structured 3. Focus.
{ Focus Groups An Assessment Tool in Student Affairs Image Retrieved from:
NEEDS ASSESSMET Primary Data for Needs Assessment.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Fact Finding (Capturing Requirements) Systems Development.
Introduction Ms. Binns.  Distinguish between qualitative and quantitative data  Explain strengths and limitations of a qualitative approach to research.
CHAPTER 10, qualitative field research
Interviews & focus groups
Collecting Qualitative Data
SP_ IRS : Research in Inclusive and Special Education
Interviews Focus Groups
Consumer Behavior MKTG 302-PSYC 335 Consumer Research
Chapter 18 Qualitative Research: Specific Methods
Interviews & focus groups
Data Collection Strategies
CHAPTER 10, qualitative field research
Interviews & focus groups
Interviews & focus groups
Chapter 6: Principles of Interviewing
Types of interview used in research
MA in Educational Leadership (Teach First)
Case studies: interviews
Presentation transcript:

Designing 1-1 Interviews and Focus Groups Desmond Thomas, University of Essex

Some points to consider … The aims of interviewing Problem areas in interviewing How to formulate questions and interpret answers Ethical considerations How to standardize interview procedures How to record & analyse interview data

Useful references Gillham, B. 2005, Research Interviewing, Maidenhead: Open University Press Seale, C.(ed.), 2004, Researching Society and Culture, London: Sage Krueger, R. 1994, Focus Groups: a Practical Guide for Applied Research, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage

Aims of interviewing? To obtain qualitative (or sometimes quantitative) data which is: Relevant Accurate Valid Reliable Obtained ethically

Advantages of 1-to-1 interviews Depth of information Insights eg gained from key informants Flexibility of formats Validity: direct contact means that data can be checked for accuracy and for relevance High response rate Opportunity for targeted individuals to make their voice heard – element of advocacy

Key Problem Areas The ‘interviewer effect’ and power relationships: face-to-face contact can directly influence answers The ‘instant position’ effect: respondents feel obliged to supply answers of some sort Investment of time and resources Complexity of data analysis Reliability issues for multiple interviews Establishing rapport

Features of interview design How many questions are required? In what order? How long/short? Format? (open qqs, statements etc.) Follow-up probes and/or prompts? Wording of questions? Mode of recording/analysing answers?

Design pitfalls (re-visited) Respondents often answer questions when they don’t really know the answer. Respondents can deliberately not answer or answer incorrectly (ie they lie) Respondents misinterpret questions Small changes in wording can produce major changes in responses. Attitudes and opinions can be unstable; circumstances can change Memory can be unreliable. Relationship between what respondents say they do and what they actually do is not strong. Cultural context has an impact on responses The format itself can affect responses The order of questions and answers to earlier questions can affect responses. And …The interviewer can affect responses

Conducting an interview Establishing a relationship/trust Explaining aims & procedures Low key presentation of self and involvement Active listening Clarifications, probes and prompts Recording and analysing data

Ethical interviewing Informed consent: knowing what the interview is for and how the data will be used Right of respondent to withdraw Assurance of confidentiality Adherence to professional guidelines: nity/research_governance/ethics_in_researchhttp:// nity/research_governance/ethics_in_research

What are focus groups? They consist of a small group of people who are brought together by a trained ‘moderator’ (usually the researcher) to explore attitudes, feelings and ideas about a particular topic or set of issues

Main characteristics of FGs A question schedule is prepared by the moderator to focus the discussion Place value on interaction within the group as a means of eliciting information – a social experience No requirement to reach consensus Less pressure to hold a fixed point of view – in fact opinions can develop

FGs are useful when … Topics or issues need to be explored in depth, or attitudes revealed Typical groups of key informants are to be targeted eg language teachers

Advantages of FGs A less directive interview format ‘Interviewer bias’ can be greatly reduced Provide a more natural social forum for the exchange of ideas. Interviewees are able to take the initiative – not just respond The right to silence

FG problem areas Less directive means less predictable Huge amounts of data can be collected, much of which may be unusable Perception that FGs are a market research tool (Tony Blair & New Labour)

Focus Group Case Study: Bulgarian Teacher Trainees Aims: to discover perceptions of main problem areas in teaching Participants: groups of 4-6 trainees Questions: listed on a question schedule Led by: the researcher as moderator Analysis: grouping responses in data categories and comparisons with data from other sources

Successful Interviewing: conclusions & do’s/don’ts Observe design principles. Keep in mind research aims and start with information required (not questions) Observe careful procedures. Clarify your agenda (do not mislead!), think about how to establish rapport, allow time and space for the respondent to produce valid reflective answers. Pilot question schedules and keep impeccable records at all times.