Helge Tuschy 1,2, Christoph Gatzen 3, Pieter Groenemeijer 4,2, Oscar van der Velde 5, Johannes Dahl 6, Jan Hoffmann 7, Angel Dimitrov 1..Institut für Meteorologie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On the Occurrence of Low-topped Supercells across the British Isles
Advertisements

Test Info: 35 questions 20 multiple choice 5 matching 10 short answer
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Identification of Convective Hotspots in Mountainous Terrain Martin Hagen, Leslie Grebe, Joël van Baelen, Evelyne Richard.
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre 04/23/09 Severe and.
Severe convective storms, theory Pieter Groenemeijer FMI Helsinki, 2 May 2005.
European Storm Forecast Experiment A close look at a severe MCS during the Kyrill winter storm over Central Europe Christoph Gatzen, Pieter Groenemeijer,
Wind and Weather.
Summer Weather and Bushfire Threats in SE Australia Tony Langdon VK3JED for the VoIP Weather Net November
Radar Palette Home Click Doppler Post Cold Frontal 1 Poleward DCB The DCB tends to rise isentropically turning cyclonically Typically in the dry slot of.
Radar Palette Home Click Conventional Post Cold Frontal 1 Equatorward of DCB The DCB tends to sink isentropically as it typically curls anticyclonically.
March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm.
February 19, 2004 Texas Dryline/Dust Storm Event.
Conceptual Models of Cold Fronts: Anacoldfront Katacoldfront.
Prof. Paul Sirvatka ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Spotter Training and.
SPC Input – EMC GFS Satellite Data Denial Experiment April 2011 Tornado Outbreak Examination of Day 7 and Day 4 Guidance for SPC Severe Weather Outlooks.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
The Well Mixed Boundary Layer as Part of the Great Plains Severe Storms Environment Jonathan Garner Storm Prediction Center.
1.27 SEVERE CONVECTION ENVIRONMENT IN SOUTHEASTERN ROMANIA Aurora Stan-Sion and Cornel Soci National Meteorological Administration, 97 sos. Bucuresti-Ploiesti.
An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak Richard L. Thompson and Roger Edwards Presentation.
Kari Murray.  This article is extending on a 10-year climatological study done by Rose et al.  Rose et al. found that tornadoes most commonly occur.
More Thunderstorms. Today Homework in Wind shear More multicellular storms.
European Storm Forecast Experiment Verification of Dichotomous Lightning Forecasts at the European Storm Forecast Experiment (ESTOFEX) Pieter Groenemeijer.
The Father’s Day 2002 Severe Weather Outbreak across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS WFO at Albany.
Extratropical Synoptic-Scale Processes and Severe Convection John Monteverdi Doswell, C.A. III, and L.F. Bosart, 2001: Extratropical synoptic-scale processes.
Drylines By: Allie Vegh. Definition: A dryline is a zone of strong horizontal moisture gradient separating warm, moist air from hot, dry air in the boundary.
A Diagnostic Analysis of a Difficult- to-Forecast Cutoff Cyclone from the 2008 Warm Season Matthew A. Scalora, Lance F. Bosart, Daniel Keyser Department.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
Synoptic, Thermodynamic, Shear Setting May 7, 2002 Tornadic Thunderstorm in Southwestern Kansas Michele Blazek May 15, 2005.
A Storm-Scale Analysis of the 16 June 2008 Significant Severe Weather Event across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS at Albany.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.
Corfidi, et al – convection where air parcels originate from a moist absolutely unstable layer above the PBL. Can produce severe hail, damaging.
Use of TAMDAR Data in a Convective Weather Event Saturday, May 21, 2005.
Formation of the Extratropical Cyclone (Cyclogenesis)
Tropical Meteorology I Weather Center Event #4 Tropical Meteorology What is Tropical Meteorology? – The study of cyclones that occur in the tropics.
Simulating Supercell Thunderstorms in a Horizontally-Heterogeneous Convective Boundary Layer Christopher Nowotarski, Paul Markowski, Yvette Richardson.
Lecture 2a Severe Thunderstorm Primer Synoptic Laboratory II – Mesoscale Professor Tripoli.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office – Taunton, MA (BOX)
Real-Time Convection Analysis Exercise
Composite Analysis of Environmental Conditions Favorable for Significant Tornadoes across Eastern Kansas Joshua M. Boustead, and Barbara E. Mayes NOAA/NWS.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell NOAA.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology
AOS 100: Weather and Climate Instructor: Nick Bassill Class TA: Courtney Obergfell.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
Chapter 4. Convective Dynamics 4.6 Supercell Storms
The 1925 Tri-State Tornado What If It Happened Today? Pat Spoden NOAA/NWS WFO Paducah, Kentucky John Hart NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Thunderstorms.
AOS 100: Weather and Climate Instructor: Nick Bassill Class TA: Courtney Obergfell.
The July 19, 2015 “Non Severe” Event in Southern New England What Happened? NROW XVI – November, 2015 Frank Nocera NOAA/NWS Taunton MA.
Forecasted 700 hPa Low (Blizzard of 2006) The RUC was saying “watch out.” This model is becoming a great short range model for East coast snowstorms (courtesy.
Frontogenesis Frontogenesis: The generation of intensity of a front Warm air merged onto colder air Temperature gradient amplified at least one order of.
Chapter 8 Thunder, Lightening and Hail Lee Sang-Min 8 November, 2007.
ABC’s of weather forecasting NOAA/NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WFO BALTIMORE / WASHINGTON OPEN HOUSE – APRIL 30-MAY 1, 2016 RAY MARTIN –– Lead Forecaster.
Common Severe Weather Weather Soundings
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Mobile - Pensacola
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Radar Observation of Severe Weather
Thunderstorms and Severe Weather Part I
The November 26, 2014 banded snowfall case in southern NY
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
VERIFICATION – DAY CLD: 6.5/10.
Following information taken from:
The Course of Synoptic Meteorology
Forecast Verification time!
De donde son ustedes? (Where are you from) Most interesting weather
Presentation transcript:

Helge Tuschy 1,2, Christoph Gatzen 3, Pieter Groenemeijer 4,2, Oscar van der Velde 5, Johannes Dahl 6, Jan Hoffmann 7, Angel Dimitrov 1..Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Leopold-Franzens Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck,Österreich, 2. European Severe Storms Laboratory, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany. 3. MC-Wetter, Berlin, Germany 4. Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung, Forschungszentrum/Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany 5. Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. 6. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany. 7. Institut für Meteorologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Radar reflectivity at Z (1) and at Z (2), radar velocity at Z (3) and surface station data (Meteomedia, Z ). The thunderstorm produced numerous reflectivity maxima of up to 65 dBz (between and Z west of Villingen-Schwenningen) and attendant hot tower exceeded a height of10 km for more than 90 minutes in all available radar data. Although noisy, doppler velocity data indicate a possible cyclonic rotating mesoscyclone at the southern and partially hook-shaped end of the intense thunderstorm with an impressive hail core present at the vertical slices of the 2km layer reflectivity. France, Switzerland, SWrn Germany, northern Italy [...] Approach of the trough […] rising motions […] over eastern France leading to the redevelopment of instability on the order of about 1000 J/kg MLCAPE. Moderate ~15-20 m/s deep-layer shear should prove sufficient for the development of well-organized multicells and supercells. […] main threat of producing large hail [...]...Germany,NW Switzerland, the Czech Republic and extreme western Poland.... Development of a broad 10-12g/kg mixing ration belt […] in front of a slowly eastward shifting confluence zone [...] DLS in the order of m/s […]will be present […] each pulsating storm could pose a hail risk, matching the severe criteria. Wind field tends to increase over E and NE- Germany with 15-20m/s DLS and a few organized storms should develop...If indeed that much instability can be realized,what models indicate, an upgrade of [t]his area to a level-2 could become necessary due to the possibility of isolated extremely large hail ( >5cm). The threat of severe and even damaging hail was recognized on both days by the actual forecaster as overall severe thunderstorm parameters hint on the possible evolution on hailstorms but those events would have justified an upgrade to a level-2. The hailstorm of Villingen-Schwenningen was a very local event and took advantage of an environment, where stout instability release and shear ( strong directional but weak speed shear ) overlap. It is impossible to highlight a special area in a level-2 more than 20 hours ahead, as such local events depend strongly on topography and mesoscale temperature / dewpoint and wind variations. Sparse available synop station data and missing near real-time radars make it very hard to recognice the main area of interest even a few hours before the event takes place. An update / upgrade would have been reaction of an already occuring severe thunderstorm event but no forecast. Stronger signals regarding an enhanced large hail potential were present on the 16 th June, when strong lift and a broad belt of up to 20m/s deep layer shear (DLS) crossed an area with steep mid-level lapse rates and strong instability release. The main reason for not issuing a broad level-2 was the uncertainty if instability values of the global models would verify and which type of storm mode would dominate. During the day, no update was issued because of the lack of time of the actual forecaster. Low-level reflectivity (17.15 Z [ only 37dBz and higher ] ) and doppler velocity (17.08 Z [ only velocity couplet ]) data reveal a classic supercell thunderstorm northeast of Leipzig. Bad radar coverage just around Leipzig limited the available number of radar images. During this time in-/outbound velocity of about 50m/s ( in summa ) was detected. The supercell gradually weakend during the next 45 minutes, while moving towards the northeast. RAOB sounding of Villingen-Schwenningen (modified by ECMWF data ). Great conditions for large hail were present as moderate instability release in the favored (-10 to -25°C ) hail growth zone ( as a resut of quite steep low - and mid-level lapse rates ) overlap with winds of 30-50kt from the southwest. Winds below 700hPa were forecast / observed to be very weak and a constantly veering wind field was present. The area around Villingen Schwenningen saw faint but constant winds from the southeast as a result of the mountain pumping effect and ECMWF also point to a developing SE- erly flow at 850hPa during the late evening hours. This resulted in those high storm relative helicity values (0-3km) of more than 200 J/kg (ECMWF) in an environement of more than 1500 J/kg SBCAPE. The atmosphere was very moist throughout a deep layer, offering an huge amount of supercooled water in the hailgrowth zone. RAOB sounding for Leipzig (Lindenberg, 18Z ). A typical sounding for supercell development with an enhanced severe hail threat. 0-6km deep layer shear of up to 20m/s was present and the wind field tend to veer strongly during the lower and mid- troposphere. Wind field should have been even stronger as the event took place further towards the southwest and hence next to the approaching upper-/mid - level jet. Instability release was strong with about 1000 J/kg MLCAPE and SBCAPE values approaching 3000 J/kg. The concern for large hail was enhanced by the robust instability release between –10°C and –25°C. Lapse rates were steep and a somewhat drier boundary layer was present, too. A well defined and positive tilted upper-level trough approached western Germany during the 28 th June. A broad and constantly weakening jet -streak over Switzerland and southeast Germany was present downstream of this feature while another, tiny streak evolved upstream over northwest France. In addition a third streak developed over western Germany during the evening hours, placing southwest Germany under the right rear quadrant. This kind of jet stream distribution was supportive for the trough to stay positive tilted while gradually amplifying. The feature of interest was an upper-level low, situated over the eastern English Channel during the 15 th, moving northeastward on the following day while intensifying. Strengthening warm air advection established an intensifying ridge downstream of this system, which affected eastern Germany during the 16 th. Constantly strengthening wind field in association with the approaching upper-level trough, stout instability release and steep lapse rates at mid-levels resulted in an environment supportive for the development of organized thunderstorms over a wide area, including eastern Germany. Rainfall measured by radar on the 16th June 2006 ( a product of Meteomedia, a private weather service in Germany ) Two severe hail cases were examined, which occured in eastern Germany ( Leipzig, 16 th June 2006 ) and southwestern Germany ( Villingen-Schwenningen, 28 th June 2006 ). Although the environment was favorable for large hail in both events, there still were differences. The Leipzig hailstorm occurred on a day where numerous thunderstorms rapidly developed into organized storms with an attendant large hail and even tornado threat. Ther overall set-up favored the evolution of large and even isolated extreme large hail, as strong speed / directional shear, high instability release and large lapse rates did overlap. The Villingen-Schwenningen hailstorm was very hard to forecast as this was a very local event. Although environment for organized thunderstorms became quite good during the evening hours of the 28 th, the main uncertainty was where exactly those storms would develop. Access to high resolution radar data and surface synoptic stations would help the forecaster to handle such local events better as mesoscale environment has a big influence on such local events. On both days the forecasters of ESTOFEX indeed saw the possibility for large hail reports although final hail report coverage / size of the hailstones would have justified at least a level-2. The main reason for underestimating the hail threat on the 28 th June were aforementioned missing additional data while on the 16 th June the exact storm mode and questionable instability release by models ( e.g. Global forecast model (GFS)) precluded higher probabilities. Signals for possible large hail are strong instability release ( especially in the favored hail growth zone between –10°C and –25°C ), enhanced storm relative helicity between 0-3km, steep lapse rates at low - / and mid – levels and deep layer shear at or above 15m/s. The goal for the forecaster of ESTOFEX in the near future is to try to compare such obvious cases ( Leipzig ) with the more difficult ones ( Villingen – Schwenningen ) to get a feeling in forecasting large hail. The authors would like to thank all the volunteers who provided data, photos and information about this severe weather event. We also want to thank Dr. Georg Mayr, synoptic professor of the University of Innsbruck who provided surface observations and model data of the ECMWF, the Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik (ZAMG), which provided the satellite images and the private weather service Meteomedia, which offered numerous synop station data and also the rainsum chart of the 16th June. Dahl, J., C. Gatzen, P. Groenemeijer and O. van der Velde, (2004): ESTOFEX the European Storm Forecast Experiment towards Operational Forecasting of European Severe Thunderstorms, Preprints, 3rd European Conference on Severe Storms, 9-12 November 2004, León, Spain. Doswell, C.A.III (1996): What is a supercell ? Appears in Preprints, 18th AMS Conf. Severe Local Storms (SanFrancisco, CA), February 1996, Amer. Meteor. Soc.,p Developing supercell at 16th June 2006,17Z ( crossing Leipzig ) Maturing thunderstorm south of Berlin at 16th June 2006, 18 Z Developing thunderstorm at 28th June 2006, 1745Z ( crossing Villingen-Schwenningen) Maturing thunderstorm at 28th June 2006, 1845Z 3 A case-study of two severe hail storms over southern and eastern Germany