1 Tokai 2 Kamioka Status and Prospects Antonin Vacheret for the T2K Collaboration Tuesday 7th September NOW 2010, Otranto, Lecce, Italy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

First Neutrino Oscillation Results from T2K Costas Andreopoulos STFC, Rutherford Appleton Lab.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
T2K – Canada Accelerator & Detector Status D. Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF ACOT meeting, May 12, 2007.
Near detectors for long baseline neutrino experiments T. Nakaya (Kyoto) 1T. Nakaya.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
CHIPP 2 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP-K2K-T2K 1. The K2K and T2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
J-PARC upgrade T. Nakadaira (KEK / J-PARC). Outline J-PARC overview & on-going program Motivation of future experiment in J-PARC Overview of future experiment.
First Anti-Neutrino Oscillation Results from the T2K Experiment
Sampling Detectors for e Detection and Identification Adam Para, Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College Interest de jour: what is sin 2 2  13  oscillations.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
CVD diamond detector as a beam monitor for a high intensity and high luminosity accelerator Kodai Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for T2K muon monitor group.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Current and Near Future Long Baseline Experiments Stéphane T’Jampens CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SPP.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
JHF-Kamioka Neutrino Oscillation Experiment using JHF 50 GeV PS Y.Itow ICRR,Univ.of Tokyo Jul27,2002 Jul27,2002 ICHEP02 Amsterdam Introduction Facility.
1 The JHF-Kamioka Neutrino experiment 1.Introduction 2.Overview of the experiment 3.Physics sensitivity in Phase-I 4.Physics sensitivity in Phase-II 5.Summary.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Overview of the KEK Neutrino Beam Facility and its Operation Summary after September 2000 FNAL) K.H. Tanaka for the KEK-PS Beam Channel Group.
1 Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment in Japan III International Workshop on “Neutrino Oscillations in Venice” Koichiro Nishikawa Kyoto University February.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Recent Results from NA61 (Flux Related Systematic Uncertainties) and Recent Results from T2K (Overall Systematic Uncertainties) NNN15 Stony Brook Oct.
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
Recent Results from T2K Jonathan Perkin on behalf of the T2K collaboration.
Measuring Neutrino Oscillations with the T2K Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL Dec-2011.
T2K: ND280 status, progress, and plans Steven Dytman, (Vittorio Paolone) University of Pittsburgh (Representing the T2K collaboration) NUFACT10 XII International.
XLVth Rencontres de Moriond Status of the T2K experiment K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for the T2K collaboration Contents Physics motivations (neutrino oscillation)
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
T2K neutrino oscillation results Kei Ieki for the T2K collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute 2014/2/22 1 ν T okai K amioka.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Current Status of the T2K Experiment Ryan Terri (for the T2K Collaboration) 31 May – 4 June 2010 Planck 2010, CERN.
Status of Super-Kamiokande, K2K and JHF ACFA LC Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K2K collaboration and JHF collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Recent Results from the T2K ND280 detector Jonathan Perkin on behalf of the T2K collaboration KAMIOKA TOKAI 295 km.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
NNN 2011: The d Experiment Joshua Albert Duke University For the T2K Collaboration November 8, 2011.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
T2K : New physics results
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

1 Tokai 2 Kamioka Status and Prospects Antonin Vacheret for the T2K Collaboration Tuesday 7th September NOW 2010, Otranto, Lecce, Italy

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 2 Overview T2K physics goalsT2K physics goals Experimental sensitivityExperimental sensitivity Overview of the experimentOverview of the experiment Status and prospectsStatus and prospects

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 3 Neutrino oscillation matrix Neutrino oscillation described by unitary matrix U MNSP 3 mixing angles ( θ 12, θ 23, θ 13 ) 1 CP violation phase (δ) 2 mass 2 differences (Δm 2 ij = m 2 i - m 2 j ) value of θ 13 is only constrained by datavalue of θ 13 is only constrained by data δ is unknownδ is unknown sign of Δm 2 atm is not yet knownsign of Δm 2 atm is not yet known Necessary to complete oscillation picture ! Δm 2 atm ντντ νμνμ νeνe m12m12 0 m22m22 m32m32 Δm 2 solar NH IH m22m22 m12m12 m32m32 Δm 2 solar ?? Δm 2 atm = 0 ? cij = cos θij, sij = sin θij

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 4 T2K Goals measure last unknown mixing angle θ 13 using ν μ ➞ ν e appearancemeasure last unknown mixing angle θ 13 using ν μ ➞ ν e appearance potentially open up δ CP search in neutrino sector measure precisely the atmospheric parameters using ν μ ➞ ν μ disappearancemeasure precisely the atmospheric parameters using ν μ ➞ ν μ disappearance is there a symmetry between 2nd and 3rd generation ?

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 5 ν μ ➞ ν e appearance Sensitivity down to Δm 2 23 = 2.5 x eV MW x 10 7 s δ CP = 0 x 10

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 6 ν μ disappearance Enter precise measurement era : δ(sin 2 2Θ 23 ) ~ 0.01δ(sin 2 2Θ 23 ) ~ 0.01 δ(Δm 2 13 ) ~ 1 x eV 2δ(Δm 2 13 ) ~ 1 x eV 2 K2K collaboration Phys. Rev. D %CL Statistics x 50 From MINOS presentation at Neutrino 2010 † Super-K collaboration preliminary result

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 7 J-PARC Intense proton beam : 750 KW at design value Far detector Super-Kamiokande : 50 kT Water Cherenkov detector - high statistics CCQE event reconstructed with high efficiency & purity Unique baseline : first Off-axis neutrino beam 2.5º) Narrow band beam ideal for ν e searchNarrow band beam ideal for ν e search peak energy at oscillation maximum < 1 GeV : Quasi-elastic (CCQE) processes dominatepeak energy at oscillation maximum < 1 GeV : Quasi-elastic (CCQE) processes dominate - low contamination from other ν flavour ( 0.5% ν e ) - Background from misreconstructed high energy neutrinos significantly reduced Near 280 m Measure on axis and off-axis beamMeasure on axis and off-axis beam p   120m0m280m 295 km on-axis off-axis 2.5 o -mon The T2K baseline The T2K baseline J-PARC 30 GeV proton beam Super-Kamiokande Near detectors

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 8 Analysis strategy Number of reconstructed events (ν μ and ν e ) at SK can be predicted using near detectors (off-axis beam, neutrino cross sections)near detectors (off-axis beam, neutrino cross sections) hadron production measurements (NA-61)hadron production measurements (NA-61) Compare prediction with SK observation to extract oscillation parameters : omit integral on E ν true SK Det response Det eff. Cross section beam flux Osc. Prob. Flux at Near Det : Flux at SK Hadron production measurement Cross section measurements (SciBooNE, T2K ND) Far to Near extrapolation factor Normalisation & E ν spectrum from T2K ND

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 9 The T2K Collaboration

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 10 The J-PARC facility (KEK/JAEA ) Bird’s eye photo in January of 2008 North Neutrino Beam GeV Main ring GeV Synchrotron (400) MeV Linac Construction JFY2001~ kW (design value)

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 11 The neutrino beam line Fast extracted beam from MR ring 6 bunches/spill (increased to 8 in Fall 2010)6 bunches/spill (increased to 8 in Fall 2010) Superconducting combined function magnets for proton transportSuperconducting combined function magnets for proton transport Primary beam monitors Intensity(CT), position(ESM), profile(SSEM), beam loss(IC), beam profile at target (OTR)Intensity(CT), position(ESM), profile(SSEM), beam loss(IC), beam profile at target (OTR) Target Station graphite core target (26 mm(D) x 900 mm L)graphite core target (26 mm(D) x 900 mm L) kA (320 kA)3 250 kA (320 kA) Target station connected to decay pipe 110 m long filled with Helium Beam dump Hadron absorber graphite modules Hadron absorber graphite modules Secondary beam monitors muon profile after beam dump : ionisation chambers and SiPIN (MUMON)muon profile after beam dump : ionisation chambers and SiPIN (MUMON) Emulsion exposures (low intensity)Emulsion exposures (low intensity) Neutrino detectors at 280 m Super-K direction given by GPS π,μ protons ν ν to SK neutrino beam line Horns Graphite target MUMON Neutrino near detectors complex

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 12 INGRID On-axis monitor On-Axis detector is crucial for off-axis measurements : monitor beam direction, intensity and mean energymonitor beam direction, intensity and mean energy beam coverage ~ 10 x 10 m 2beam coverage ~ 10 x 10 m 2 Off-axis angle measurement accuracy goal is 1 mrad (< 15 MeV on off-axis peak energy)Off-axis angle measurement accuracy goal is 1 mrad (< 15 MeV on off-axis peak energy) beam position resolution ~ 7cm corresponding to ~3 mm shift at proton targetbeam position resolution ~ 7cm corresponding to ~3 mm shift at proton target ~ 10 k ν interactions per day at full power 2 remaining diagonal modules and 1 full plastic “proton” module to be installed for next T2K run2 remaining diagonal modules and 1 full plastic “proton” module to be installed for next T2K run ν INGRID “cross” is formed with 14 identical modules + 2 diagonal modules made of plastic scintillator planes and 6.5 cm thick Iron planes surrounded by veto planes ν beam

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 13 The Off-axis near detector The Off-axis near detector (ND280) provides Off axis beam measurement based on CCQEOff axis beam measurement based on CCQE beam nue contaminationbeam nue contamination Super-K background measurements (NCπ 0 )Super-K background measurements (NCπ 0 ) Two target regions : The P0D (Brass/Plastic segmented) : π 0 detectorThe P0D (Brass/Plastic segmented) : π 0 detector The tracker region : Fined grained plastic detector and TPCThe tracker region : Fined grained plastic detector and TPC Both region have passive water planesBoth region have passive water planes Large Calorimeter coverage (Plastic/Pb segmented) Additional NCπ 0 production measurement in tracker and PID, hermicity, active vetoAdditional NCπ 0 production measurement in tracker and PID, hermicity, active veto Side Muon ranging detector Neutrino Rate, Side muons, cosmics triggerNeutrino Rate, Side muons, cosmics trigger Precise cross-section measurements with very large statistics !!! ND280 P0D Tracker ECals Yoke/SMRD UA1 Magnet (CERN donation) ν beam 8 m

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 14 Near Detector Technologies Scintillator + WLS fibre read out by novel MPPC ND280 Low cost high performance and uniformity detector elementLow cost high performance and uniformity detector element novel solid state photosensor insensitive to magnetic fieldnovel solid state photosensor insensitive to magnetic field Photon counting, high PDE, low power consumption, ceramic packagePhoton counting, high PDE, low power consumption, ceramic package ~ channels~ channels T2K first experiment to use MPPC at such a large scaleT2K first experiment to use MPPC at such a large scale 1.3mm 50μm Front end Board AFTER ASIC (FGD & TPC) TRIP-t ASIC (others) HAMAMATSU MPPC 667 Pixels array Various shapes of Plastic scintillator with Y-11 fibre 10 mm P0DFGD TPC Very Large TPC based on MicroMegas read out 3x large modules with double wall structure3x large modules with double wall structure Sensitive volume 180 x 200 x 70 cmSensitive volume 180 x 200 x 70 cm Precise assembly, commissioning and alignment within mmPrecise assembly, commissioning and alignment within mm channels channels

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 15 The Far detector : Super Kamiokande IV 50 (22.5 Fid.) kT Water Cherekov detector with ” PMTS in inner detector (ID) and ” PMTS instrumenting outer detector (OD) Super-K in operation since 1996 Dead-timeless read out electronics and DAQ upgrade in 2008Dead-timeless read out electronics and DAQ upgrade in 2008 GPS system used to select time arrival of beam eventsGPS system used to select time arrival of beam events Water transparency (light att. length) 90 m

16 T2K Status

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 17 Beam performance First T2K run completed ( January to June 2010) 3.3 x protons accumulated for T2K analysis3.3 x protons accumulated for T2K analysis 50 kW stable operation with trials at 100 kW 50 kW stable operation with trials at 100 kW Super-K live fraction in excess of 99%Super-K live fraction in excess of 99% 50 kW 80 kW

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 18 Beam Monitors Proton beam precisely tuned (less than 1 mm deviation at target) to minimise beam loss and control secondary beam spill by spill MUMON : profile center < +/- 1 mrad ( ΔE ν peak ~2%/mrad)

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 19 Beam target Extrapolated Position Extrapolated Angle Extrapolated width target ∅ 26 mm target radius 13 mm Accumulated beam target ( Jan-June period) μ= 0.27 mm σ = 4.13 mm μ= 0.85 mm σ = 4.19 mm

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 20 CERN NA-61/SHINE Neutrino beam depends upon secondary beam geometry and hadron distribution off target NA-61/SHINE : dedicated hadron production experiment using T2K target to reduce uncertainties in hadron production models Pilot run in 2007 and high statistics run in 2009 : p(30 GeV) with Carbon thin target and T2K replica targetPilot run in 2007 and high statistics run in 2009 : p(30 GeV) with Carbon thin target and T2K replica target preliminary results from 2007 used in T2K beam MCpreliminary results from 2007 used in T2K beam MC MC=GFLUKA Preliminary

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 21 INGRID measurements First event Beam Profile X Beam Profile Center X Beam Profile Y Beam Profile Center Y

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 22 ND280 off-axis detector performance Interaction vertex reconstruction off-axis beam profile clearly visible in both target regions (FGD and P0D)off-axis beam profile clearly visible in both target regions (FGD and P0D) Particle identification (TPC dEdx) crucial for measuring ν μ and beam ν e spectracrucial for measuring ν μ and beam ν e spectra Vertex X-Y distribution P0D FGD ⊗ ν beam direction Energy loss beam TPC negative tracks TPC positive tracks

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 23 ND280 timing & rate stability 18 FGD activity in time with beam Daily DsECal cluster rates P0D reconstructed vertices

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 24 ND280 off-axis neutrino events

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 25 Super-K time distribution Very good synchronisation with T2K beam achievedVery good synchronisation with T2K beam achieved ∆T 0 = SK trig time -T2K beam trigger time Bunch residual time (nsec) RMS ~ 26 ns

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 26 Super-K ν events P μ = 1025 MeV/c 1 decay-e P μ = 1438 MeV/c 2 decay-e μ-like multi-rings event single μ-like ring event

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 27 T2K neutrino events at Super-K CategoryNumber total POT3.23 x Fully Contained (FC)33 Fiducial volume cut + visible energy > 30 MeV (FCFV) 23

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 28 Super-K Outer detector results ODC : OD contained ODEX : OD exiting ODEN : OD entering from ID

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 29 Summary Jan-Jun 2010 T2K run completed Continuous beam operation at ~ 50 kWContinuous beam operation at ~ 50 kW Good overall stability of beam and detector performanceGood overall stability of beam and detector performance accumulated 3.23 x PoTaccumulated 3.23 x PoT measured 23 neutrino beam events (FCFV) at Super-Kmeasured 23 neutrino beam events (FCFV) at Super-K analyses are ongoing at near and far detectorsanalyses are ongoing at near and far detectors Summer-fall Shut down Calorimeter modules installation and commissioning : full coverage at ND280Calorimeter modules installation and commissioning : full coverage at ND280 new kicker magnet & power supplies installednew kicker magnet & power supplies installed INGRID modules assembly and installationINGRID modules assembly and installation new kicker magnet installed ND280 ECal modules installation INGRID proton module

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 30 Prospects for next year Next T2K run scheduled this fall Expected beam at 150 kW x 10 7 s until july 2011Expected beam at 150 kW x 10 7 s until july 2011 High statistics at near detectorsHigh statistics at near detectors Sensitivity to sin 2 2θ 13 ~ 0.05Sensitivity to sin 2 2θ 13 ~ 0.05 July MW x 10 7 s

31 The End

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 32 Beam power

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 33 Super Kamiokande event selection J-PARC neutrino events selected using GPS time SK selection and cuts values are fixed for T2K Unbiased selectionUnbiased selection For ν μ disappearance analysis For ν e appearance search Timing coincidence w/ beam timing (+TOF) Fully contained (No OD activity) Vertex in fiducial volume (Vertex >2m from wall) Evis > 30MeVEvis > 100MeV # of ring =1 μ-like ringe-like ring No decay electron Inv. mass w/ forced-found 2 nd ring < 105MeV E ν rec < 1250MeV

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 34 Precision measurement and systematics Precision measurement of  23, Δ m 2 23 possible systematic errors and phase-1 stat. Systematic errors normalization (10% ( →5%(K2K)) non-qe/qe ratio (20% (to be measured)) E scale (4% (K2K 2%)) Spectrum shape (Fluka/MARS →(Near D.)) Spectrum width (10%)  (sin 2 2   )~0.01  (Δm 2 23 ) <1×10 -4 eV 2 Goal

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 35 T2K sensitivity and discovery potential

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 36 θ 13 sensitivity with varying δ CP NH

Antonin Vacheret, Imperial College London NOW 2010, 7th September Otranto Lecce Italy 37 θ 13 sensitivity with varying δ CP IH