Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
1 Certification of Compliance with New Meal Pattern Requirements.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
Correction of Non-Compliance Prior to Notification Monitoring and Supervision March 11, 2013.
Title III National Professional Development (NPD) Program Grantee Performance Reporting: A Webinar for FY2011 and FY2012 Grantees February 28, 2013 Prepared.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Special Education Data In the Era of Accountability & District Improvement Steve Smith ODE IDEA Data Manager Fall 2007.
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Special Education Data Collection and Reporting Data Collection, Verification, and Reporting Timelines Sara Berscheit / Steve W. Smith 2009 COSA Conference.
National Instrument Institutional Trade Matching and Settlement Meg Tassie.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
Kansas Department of Health and Environment Kansas Inservice Training System – KITS – University of Kansas Kansas IDEA Part C Procedure Manual Training.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
RESULTS-DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION Ann Moore, State Director Office of Special Education (OSE) January 2013.
BIE Special Education Academy September 2011 Tampa Bay, Florida Presenter: Donald Griffin Education Specialist, Special Education Bureau of Indian Education.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
1 General Supervision. 2 General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum Components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the Components.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Intensive Technical Assistance Schools Identified with Continued Findings of Noncompliance for SY March 10, 2011.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
March’s Special Education Coordinator Meeting March 12, 2013.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Vanessa Winborne Kelly Hurshe Colleen O’Connor EARLY ON ® UPDATES.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
CCB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CALL July 12, :30-1:30 1.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
August 19, 2014 Welcome! The New CIMS Coordinator webinar will begin in a few moments. –Event password: Welcome2014 –Event number: To hear.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Part C Data Managers — Review, Resources, and Relationship Building
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Guam Department of Education
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
SPR&I Regional Training
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual. 2) Participants will understand that the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedure Manual is the modus operandi (way of doing business). 3) Participants will understand the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedure Manual is based on state and federal law and regulations. 4) Participants will understand expectations for use of Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedure Manual.

34 CFR Section – Regulation requiring the state lead agency (KDHE) to:  Monitor implementation of IDEA  Make annual determinations for each EIS program  Enforce the regulatory requirements  Report annually on the performance of the state and each EIS program.

The state monitoring focus is directed to be primarily on:  Improving early intervention results and functional outcomes for infants and toddlers  Ensuring EIS programs meet program requirements under Part C

The state must use quantifiable indicators and measures needed to measure the priority areas of:  providing services in the natural environment, and  general supervision, including child find, monitoring, mediation, and a system of transition services.

All actions and activities related to general supervision under the federal regulations are used for:  collecting data,  monitoring programs,  Federal reporting,  issuing local determinations,  finding and correcting noncompliance,  reviewing grant applications, and  providing technical assistance during the next fiscal year

 State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR)  Grant Application Process  Semi-Annual Reports  Random IFSP Reviews  Kansas Part C Statutes and Regulations  Kansas ITS Procedure Manual  Interagency Agreements  Contracts with Local tiny-k Programs  Audit Reviews  Kansas ITS Monitoring Activities  Training and Technical Assistance  On-Site Visits  Corrective Action Plans  Complaints/ Dispute Resolution  Incentives and Sanctions

 May – Grant Applications Due  Quarterly – Mark Data Ready Dates for Grant Disbursements, Quarterly Data Monitoring  July – Semi-Annual Report and Annual ITS and OWS Data Finalization  Late August/Early September – Annual Database Review of prior fiscal year, and two months of subsequent data for Compliance purposes  October – Random IFSP Pull ( may prompt issuance of a finding)  November – Federal Tables 3 and 4 due  January – Semi-Annual Report and Semi-Annual ITS and OWS Data Clean- up  February – SPP/APR due, Federal Data Tables 1 and 2 due  April – Determinations Issued

A finding of noncompliance is an official citation of a regulatory violation, which may or may not be related to a compliance indicator on the SPP/APR. Findings must be issued in writing, but no later than three months after a confirmed determination of noncompliance. A “finding and release” may be issued if the noncompliance found is not seen in a review of data subsequent to the annual review period. This is still a finding, and will be part of the next year’s determinations.

A CAP may be used as a method for correcting the noncompliance in the finding. Requirements of the CAP depend on whether the noncompliance:  was extensive or found in a small percentage of files,  resulted in the denial of a basic right under IDEA,  represented an isolated incident in the program, or  reflected a long-standing, or repeated, failure to meet the IDEA requirements

Under federal regulations, the state is required to report to the public on the performance of programs funded by Part C. This includes the SPP/ APR, the SAR data sheets, and the status determinations. This information appears on the Kansas ITS website.

Remaining documents found in this section of the manual are sample formats for findings letters, CAPs, tracking of compliance actions, and the current internal procedure for audit reviews.

Please use the following link to complete a brief evaluation of the webinar. Note that this link will close at Noon on Wednesday, May 21,