1 The Dnieper River Aquatic System Radioactive contamination: Long-term Natural Attenuation and Remediation O. Voitsekhovych, G.Laptev, V.Kanients UkrainianHydrometeorological.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Irene Seco Manuel Gómez Alma Schellart Simon Tait Erosion resistance and behaviour of highly organic in-sewer sediment 7th International Conference on.
Advertisements

1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Public perception of pesticides Public has a poor understanding of pesticides Public has a fear due to media and from misuse and accidents.
Section 3: Stream Deposition
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Earth Science 4.3 Water, Air, Land Resources
Vadose-zone Monitoring System
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
Radioecological research during 25 years after the Chernobyl accident
The political aspects of monitoring radioactive materials in the environment of our region E. Wirth, M Zähringer Federal Office for Radiation Protection,
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Earth Science: 15.1 Ocean Water and Life
Ronald Warren Ecological & Environmental Monitoring National Security Technologies, LLC Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 26, 2011.
Decommissioning and Remediation of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Pond Department of Environment Radiation Monitoring Ukrainian Hydrometeorological.
1. Introduction 3. Global-Scale Results 2. Methods and Data Early spring SWE for historic ( ) and future ( ) periods were simulated. Early.
Chernobyl disaster The worst man-made disaster in human history.
Thyroid dose estimation for epidemiologic studies André Bouville (NCI, retired) and Vladimir Drozdovitch (NCI) Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer.
From Chernobyl to Fukushima: introduction Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian.
Lake and Stream Hydrology 2009 UJ,UH, &TPU Timo Huttula JY/BYTL& SYKE/VTO
Strategy of rehabilitation of radioactively contaminated land of Rivne region Master work M.I. Rybitsky Head: Ph.D. Kashparov V.O. National University.
From Chernobyl to Fukushima: introduction Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian.
Working Group 1 Reference models for waste disposal.
Sediment Issues within Transboundary Basins Presented by Paul Bireta and Fernando Salas April 12, 2012.
National Environmental Research Institute Department of Freshwater Ecology WFD-Monitoring in Denmark NOVANA Brian Kronvang NERI.
RADIOACTIVITY IN VIRGIN SOILS AND SOILS FROM SOME AREAS WITH CLOSED URANIUM MINING FACILITIES IN BULGARIA Ivanka Yordanova, Lidia Misheva, Martin Banov,
Environmental pollution Chernobyl 1986 Dudyrev Bogdan 8.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
Assessing changes in contaminant fluxes following removal of a dam in the Pawtuxet River Results and Discussion Methods and Approach Passive samplers (polyethylene;
Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, Ukraine)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Watersheds Human activities and structures, as depicted
Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado, Front Range, United States Fengjing Liu, Mark W. Williams, and Nel Caine 2004.
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
State Nuclear Regulatory Committee of Ukraine 56th Regular Session of the General Conference Senior Regulators’ Meeting 20 September, 2012 Austria, Vienna.
Georgia Climate Change Summit antruth Al Gore: an inconvenient truth IPCC: 4th Assessment Report 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
Lesson 1.5 Pg
HELCOM MORS-PRO Radioactivity in the Baltic Sea Erkki Ilus STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland.
Prevention and Cure. Contents Introduction to Reservoirs Preventing Siltation Cure Cost Benefit Analysis Conclusion.
Standpoint of the French Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) on the impact of radioactive releases from the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear.
Collecting, Processing and Distributing of Water Statistics in the Republic of Belarus Zhanna Vasilevskaya, Belarus International Work Session on Water.
Lesson 1 Identifying Environmental and Economic Impacts from Soil Erosion.
Methylmercury Production in Groundwater Watershed Hg Research Program at SERC Deposition Transport Watershed retention Methylation MDN site MD00 Stream.
Part X, Module X.2, Lesson X.2.2 Protective Actions Lecture
Assessment of Vulnerability on the Aral See Basin NATALYA AGALTSEVA Research Hydrometeorological institute (NIGMI) Uzhydromet Uzbekistan.
Mekong River Commission Meeting the Needs - Keeping the Balance MRC Water Utilization Programme: GEF International Waters Project (GEF/World Bank)
Chapter 7.2 (cont.) Groundwater as precipitation hits the ground, it may either (a) soak into the ground (infiltration) or this water has two alternatives:
Radionuclides in the ocean Ken Buesseler Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, Massachusetts,
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
Watersheds and River Basins
River flooding LS: Explain the soft and hard strategies of reducing flood risk. Write a case study for a flood event in an MEDC and LEDC and explain the.
provided by the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech republic.
Dams in Jordan, a fresh resource to think about!
Environmental Intelligence Platform – Monitoring Nutrients Pollution with Earth Observation Data for Sustainable Agriculture and Clean Waters Blue.
Climate and Green Plan Town Hall Toolkit
Challenges in a Changing World
Human Effects on Hydrosphere Quality
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
Water Resources.
Hydrology CIVL341.
Human Effects on Hydrosphere Quality
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Human Effects on Hydrosphere Quality
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Challenges in a Changing World
Environmental Priorities Environmental Impact Assessment
Presentation transcript:

1 The Dnieper River Aquatic System Radioactive contamination: Long-term Natural Attenuation and Remediation O. Voitsekhovych, G.Laptev, V.Kanients UkrainianHydrometeorological Inst.Kiev and Alexei Konoplev Centre for Environmental Chemistry “ Typhoon ”, Obninsk, Russia

Why Aquatic Ecosystem proposed for consideration NA - in many cases are key factors in self-cleaning of the water bodies Natural attenuation processes Dnieper Basin and other rivers were significantly affected by Chernobyl radioactive fallout during initial period. Secondary contamination of waters can last long, significantly extending the areas of initial contamination. This is caused by radionuclide dispersion via aquatic pathways (infiltration, wash-out, water transport, bio- accumulation & bio-transfer ….) Aquatic pathways do not normally cause significant human exposures (only in some specific cases) However, public perception of risks, which may occur due to radioactive contamination of water bodies as a role, is inadequate and creates significant stress depended social tenses.

Speciation of soils and radionuclide behavior Mobility and bioavailability of radionuclides are determined by ratio of (1) radionuclide chemical forms in fallout and (2) site- specific environmental characteristics.  This determines (a) the rates of leaching,(b) fixation/remobilization, (c) sorption-desorption of mobile fraction (its solid-liquid distribution). The total distribution coefficient for radionuclides can vary in a wide range (4 orders of magnitude for radiostrontium and 5 orders of magnitude for radiocaesium) as a function of fallout characteristics and environmental conditions. The total distribution coefficient for radionuclides is a dynamic characteristic and depends on transformation rates of chemical forms. To reduce uncertainty in the estimates and predictions of radionuclide behavior, the exchangeable distribution coefficient Kdex was suggested to be used instead of Kdtot.

4 Selective sorption and fixation of radiocaesium FESRES High retention of radiocaesium in soils is caused by two main processes: selective reversible sorption on illitic clay minerals and fixation. Advanced methods have been proposed for determining the capacity of selective sorption sites (Frayed Edge Sites – FES) and exchangeable radiocaesium interception potential (RIP ex ). Quantitative data were obtained for a wide range of soils and bottom sediments with respect to FES capacities and RIP ex.

137 Cs monitoring studies in rivers, lakes, bottom sediment of reservoirs and Black Sea

Uncertainties in Assessment and Needs for Experimental Verification of the accidental consequences Radionuclide transport studies due to Runoff, sampling at the contaminated lands and water bodies

Wash-off Snow melting effect Return water running off from floodplain and drainages 90 Sr In the Pripyat river, % of Cs and 40-70% of Sr originate the washed out from the ChNPP zone 90 Cs

It is most significant source of 90 Sr secondary contamination in Dnieper system. No significant impact by 137 Cs, because high adsorption into the soil Flood protective dam has been constructed 1999 The most efficient water protection is to control water level and to mitigate inundation of the most contaminated floodplains by the flood protection sandy dykes constructed at left and right banks of the Pripyat river Pripyat River Floodplain around Chernobyl NPP was contaminated heaviest Contamination

137 Cs activity concentration in water at the lowest reservoir returned to pre-accidental level in In 2012, 137 Cs activities in Kiev (upper reservoir) & Kakhovka (lower reservoir) in a cascade were at Bq m 3 & Bq m 3 range 137 Cs in the waters of the Dnieper reservoirs

D.Gudkov, et al. 2008) 137 Cs Bq/kg w.w. in freshwater fish (Kiev reservoirs and most contaminated lakes near ChNPP) 137 Cs in predatory and non predatory fish species in Kiev reservoir (I.Ryabov et al., 2002) 137 Cs and 90 Sr in (a) predatory and (b) non-predatory fish at Gluboky Lake

Dose estimates for the Dnieper system: if there had been no action to reduce radionuclide fluxes to the river, the CDC70 for the Ukraine population (mainly due to Cs and Sr) could have reached 3000 man Sv.  Countermeasure works! Protective measures, which were carried out during 1992–1993 on the left-bank flood plain of the Pripyat River and later on right bank (1999) decreased exposure by approximately 1000 man Sv. (Voitsekhovich et al. 1996). Collective Dose Commitment (CDC70) caused by 90 Sr and 137 Cs flowing from the Pripyat River (Berkovsky et al. 1996)

Long-term dose assessment due to exposure via aquatic pathways Human exposure via the aquatic pathway took place as a result of consumption of drinking water, fish catch in reservoirs and agricultural products grown using irrigation water from Dnieper reservoirs. Estimated individual doses for people living along the Dnieper cascade through the aquatic pathways (far away from ChNPP) do not exceed 10 μSv y -1. However, estimated collective doses are rather high. No alternative water consumption. Stress component has to be primarily taken into consideration when the water protection actions is planned. Furthermore, in some closed lakes, the concentration of 137 Cs remains high nin both water and fish. People who illegally catch and eat fish may receive internal doses of up to1 mSv per year from fish. The most significant contribution to the individual doses from aquatic pathways caused by 131 I in the first week after the accident, but for very short time (Maximal values about 140 Bq/l observed at the Kiev water intake plant 30 Apr 1986  Fukushima’s Bq/l in a reservoir near Tokyo in March 2011)

Lessons learned  Although the Chernobyl radioactive fallout affected the large scale watershed areas and water bodies, the most of aquatic systems returned to their pre-accidental status within first decade after the accident. The main factors of self-rehabilitation of the water bodies were naturally attenuation processes.  Long-term radiological consequences for aquatic ecosystems will be mainly determined only at the most heavy contaminated lakes and wetlands at the Chernobyl NPP near zone.  Many inadequate water protection measures were carried out during initial post-accidental period because preparedness lacked, data and decision making support tools were in use, environmental radiation monitoring network has not been developed, impact of social stress was huge, and inadequate risk perception took place.  Scientifically defensive assessment tools and required data must be developed and applied as a basis for sufficient justification and water remedial actions optimization

Extra slide

Water protection and Remediation Many remediation measures during initial period after the accident ( ) were put in place, but because actions were not taken on the basis of dose reduction, most of these measures were ineffective. Because of the importance of short lived radionuclides (e.g., 131 I), early intervention measures, particularly changing supplies, can significantly reduce doses to the population. However this opportunity has been missed during first month since the accident. During first months after the accident, restrictions on fishery and irrigation from the contaminated water bodies have been established. Many actions for the water regulation were applied at the small river in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Numerous new countermeasures that were applied months and years after the accident to protect water systems from transfers of radioactivity from contaminated soils were generally ineffective and expensive and led to relatively high exposures to workers implementing the countermeasures. The only effective “late” countermeasure can be the water regulation at the most contaminated floodplains and water runoff regulation from the wetlands in the close zone around ChNPP.

Lessons learned cont’d  Countermeasure and remediation selection must be based on a cost-risk analyses that directly connects the main physical and chemical processes to environment (ecosystem) or human heath risks and costs  Decision makers must be knowledgeable on phenomena being evaluating, efficient in using expert’s experience and analytical and modeling systems. Right and reasonable decisions should mitigate or prevent expose of people, and should also allow “more” safe within the limited resources available.  Decision makers must communicate the facts quickly and honestly to the affected public.  Because the residual radioactive pollution still exists and our knowledge yet are not exhaustive, it is reasonable to continue research programs in ChNPP near zone as Unique Test site for radioecological studies.

The aquatic ecosystem radioactive contamination story, natural attenuation process and assessment for effectiveness of the water protection Y.Onishi, O.Voitsekhovych, M.Zheleznyak Chernobyl What Have we learned. The Successes and Failures to Mitigate Water Contamination over 20 years. Springer

Thank you very much for your attention

Duplicated slides

Fuel Particles in the Chernobyl fallout Dominant part of radionuclides deposited on the soil surface in the Chernobyl NPP vicinity was incorporated within fuel particles. Particles dissolution was the key process governing radionuclides mobility and bioavailability in soils during first years after the accident and several decades if particles were deposited to the water body sediments. 20 After B. Salbu

Main messages from Chernobyl soil-water studies 21 Information on radionuclide deposition levels alone is not enough to accurately predict future and to assess human dose. Data on speciation in fallout, rates of transformation processes and site-specific environmental characteristics determining these rates are needed. Information on radionuclide chemical forms, their transformation in other words mobility and bioavailability should be taken into account when rehabilitation and decontamination strategies are developed on local or regional scale.

Experiments on runoff plots Available are results of the study radionuclides wash-off by rainfall and snowmelt surface runoff. These studies were conducted in the contaminated territories on the runoff plots of 1 m 2 to 1000 m 2. Available are characteristics of runoff plots, speciation and content of 137 Cs and 90 Sr in soil, rain and runoff hydrographs, concentration of 137 Cs and 90 Sr in solution and on suspended matter in the run-off, and chemical composition of run-off and radionuclide speciation in soil for selected runoff plots. Snow melt wash-out studies Artificial raining of the contaminated catchments

Calculated plume formation according to meteorological conditions for instantaneous releases on the following dates and times (GMT): (1) 26 April, 00:00; (2) 27 April, 00:00; (3) 27 April, 12:00; (4) 29 April, 00:00; (5) 2 May, 00:00; and (6) 4 May, 12:00 (Borsilov and Klepikova 1993). Radioactive contamination of the catchments and aquatic environment as versus of fallout formation date, its physical and chemical forms and also the landscapes at the deposited river watersheds 137 Cs activity concentration in different rivers per unit of deposition, Smith, 2004

Radionuclides in Rivers Annual averaged 137 Cs in the Dnieper River Ratio of 90 Sr and 137 Cs in soluble forms in Pripyat River near Chernobyl Bq Radionuclide inlet to the Kiev reservoir. Pripyat River The 137 Cs concentration in river water has been shown to be directly proportional to the relative fraction of its exchangeable form in the surface soil layer. The monitoring data allowed to validate mathematical models Rain flood Spring flood Winter ice jam

Sedimentation is a key factor of 137 Cs removal from the water column to the bottom sediments Sedimentation is a key factor of 137 Cs removal from the water column to the bottom sediments Upper part of Kiev Reservoir 1994 Dnieper River Pripyat River Data of UHMI Low part of Kiev Reservoir 137 Cs Since 1991 to 2009 as result of several high floods the most of Cs-137 in bottom sediment has been removed with the sediment particles from the upper part deposited area to the down part sector of the Kiev reservoir Kiev Reservoir

After Chernobyl 137 Cs inventory in the 0-50 m layer increased by a factor of 6-10 and the total 137 Cs inventory in the whole BS basin increased by a factor of at least 2 (pre- Chernobyl value of 1.4  0.3 PBq after bomb- testing fallout). 137 Cs input from the Danube and the Dnieper rivers (0.05 PBq in the period ) was insignificant in comparison with the short-term atmospheric fallout 137 Cs-137 in the Black Sea

During initial period after the Chernobyl Accident the number of expensive actions to reduce secondary contamination of the rivers and groundwater have been applied. Most of the actions were extremely expensive and ineffective. In spite of doses were estimated to be very low, there was an inadequate perception of the real risks by Public using water from contaminated aquatic systems. This factor made reasonable to justify some set of limited water remediation actions to reduce Public stressing and prevent further long term surface water contamination of the Pripyat Food product, milk water external inhalation Actual dose Public perception about Dose realization (%) during a 70 years for children born in 1986 From I. Los, O. Voitsekhovych, 2001 For 1-st year about 47 % For 10 years about 80% Years Inadequate Radiation Risk Perception by Public was a key reason in WATER PROTECTION ACTION PLAN implementing