The GAINS model State of play

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STATE CLIMATE POLICY OPTIONS Meeting of the Illinois Climate Change Advisory Group Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle St., Room C500 Chicago,
Advertisements

Climate Change and KS : Mitigation Charles W. Rice Soil Microbiologist Department of Agronomy Lead Author, IPCC AR4 WGIII K-State Research and Extension.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Links between climate, air pollution and energy policies Findings from the.
A Lower-Cost Option for Substantial CO 2 Emission Reductions Ron Edelstein Gas Technology Institute NARUC Meeting Washington DC February 2008.
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
1 Egypt GHG Mitigation Potential Eng. Maher Aziz Energy & Environment Consultant (E&E) General Director of Environmental Studies, EEHC TIMS/EEAA 2 nd Phase.
Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases Jill Heemstra, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Building Environmental Leaders in Animal Agriculture (BELAA)
Biomass as a Fossil Fuel. Biofuel (also called agrofuel) can be defined as solid, liquid, or gas fuel consisting of, or derived from biomass. Biofuels.
Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.
1/18 Long-term Scenarios for Climate Change-Implications for Energy, GHG Emissions and Air Quality Shilpa Rao, International Institute of Applied Systems.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,
NIAM – IIASA 23 rd March 2009 Assessment with the Italian national IAM of technical and non-technical measures in the Regional Air Quality Management Plans.
National work with the GAINS model: experiences from Sweden and other countries Работы в рамках модели GAINS на национальном уровне: опыт Швеции и других.
The potential for further reductions of PM emissions in Europe M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Agenda Markus Amann Methodology Fabian Wagner Initial results for emissions from energy use and industrial activities Ian McCallum Estimates of mitigation.
Janusz Cofala The RAINS model: Modelling of emission controls and costs.
Technological Options for Reducing Non- CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Jeff Kuo, Ph.D., P.E. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering.
Recent methodological changes in the GAINS model M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, F. Wagner Meeting of the Task.
M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.
6-8 September 2004 US Approach for Projected Greenhouse Gas Emissions Casey Delhotal Issues in the preparation of GHG projections for the energy, transport,
Slide 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Task.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
Workshop on the use of GAINS model for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol Focus on key measures to improve air quality in Europe and the role of EECCA.
The GAINS model. Rationale Air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) often stem from the same sources Energy consumption and agricultural activities.
EC4MACS European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate Strategies GAINS Greenhouse Gas – Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies DG ECFIN.
Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
BREW Generic Approach by Martin Patel (Un. Utrecht) Tim Nisbet (Shell) Peter Nossin (DSM) BREW plenary meeting - September 9, 2003.
Global Emissions from the Agriculture and Forest Sectors: Status and Trends Indu K Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
The impacts of the UN/ECE protocols on PM emissions in Europe Preliminary results of a study conducted for the PMEG Meeting, Dessau, March 10, 2006 with.
WP 5 : Joint Implementation and Emissions Trading in Eastern Europe Jin Lee, Policy Associate Jake Schmidt, International Team Manager ******** 30 November.
M. Amann G. Klaassen, R. Mechler, J. Cofala, C. Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Modelling synergies and trade-offs between.
Mitigation of primary PM emissions Overview of existing technical and non- technical emissions mitigation techniques M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International.
Co-benefits of Integrated Approach to Air Quality Management and Climate Change Mitigation Role of Integrated Assessment Methods in SEA Dr. Vladislav.
1 JRC – Ispra DG JRC and EC4MACS IPTS Institute for Prospective Technology Studies - Peter Russ - Antonio Soria - Szabolc Szekeres IES Institute for Environment.
DAC PROJECT Capacity Building in Balcan Countries for the Abatement of Greenhouse Gases Setting priorities for GHG emissions’ reduction George Mavrotas.
GAINS databases Links and interactions with the international reporting processes UNECE TFEIP/EIONET meeting Dublin, Ireland, October, 2007 Z.Klimont.
Recent developments at CIAM Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Climate Change John Sherwell PPRP. Two major initiatives 1 – RGGI All NE states except PA Component of the HAA.
IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.
RAINS becomes GAINS and other “future” stories TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre.
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January.
1 Synergies Between Climate Change Financing Mechanisms: Options for China The PCF/CC Synergy Workshop.
Current knowledge and possible systematic biases Linkages with greenhouse gas policy Fabian Wagner M. Amann, C. Berglund, J. Cofala, L. Höglund, Z. Klimont,
CDM Business Opportunities in Thailand Pattama Domrongphol Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Thailand.
Presented at: Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Greenhouse Gas/Climate Change Workshop Saskatoon December 11, 2000 Llewellyn Matthews and.
Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Offset Projects: Basic Considerations Karl H. Schultz Climate Mitigation Works International LLC Panel Three: Design Issues RGGI.
Improvements of the Netherlands’ Greenhouse Gas Inventory & resulting (lower) uncertainties ? Uncertainty Workshop, Helsinki 5-6 September 2005 H.H.J.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
Future challenges for integrated assessment modelling Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
NIAM/APRIL/UCL meeting, 8-9 January 2009 ‘Reducing the environmental impacts of transport with behavioural change’ Type of measure Example Instruments.
Comparison of GHG mitigation efforts between Annex 1 countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS UNFCCC /UNDP EXPERT MEETING ON METHODOLOGIES FOR TECHONOLGY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS SEOUL, KOREA April.
V.Sedyakin A. Nakhutin Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (IGCE) Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (IGCE)
Climate Action Team CIWMB Update CIWMB Board Meeting November 15, 2005.
GHG Emission Trends & Technological Options for its reduction in Pakistan By Jawed Ali Khan, TNA Consultant Mitigation Feb
Climate Change Mitigation and Complexity Agus P Sari Country Director, Indonesia EcoSecurities.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND INCENTIVES AT NATIONAL AND LOCAL LEVELS IN MITIGATION ACTIVITIES Noviembre 2010 Gabriel Quadri de la Torre
Contacts: Energy, environment and climate assessment using the MARKAL energy system model U.S. EPA Office of Research.
1.
Clean Air for Europe ROLE OF ENERGY BASELINE IN CAFE 28 February 2002 Matti Vainio DG Environment, Air Quality and Noise Unit.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
MULTIPLE BENEFITS PATHWAYS APPROACH – EXPERIENCE FROM BANGLADESH
31 January 2007 GAINS Review Peringe Grennfelt Christer Agren Matti Johansson Rob Maas Simone Schucht Les White With comments from: Helen ApSimon Julio.
Three policy scenarios for CAFE
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
Establishing FE college emissions and potential targets
GLOBAL EFFECTS.
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR
Presentation transcript:

The GAINS model State of play Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) The GAINS model State of play

GAINS GHG-Air pollution INteractions and Synergies model Extension of RAINS integrated assessment model for air pollution to GHGs CO2, CH4, N2O, HFC, PFC, SF6 in addition to SO2, NOx, VOC, NH3, PM Currently implemented for 43 countries in Europe (funded by the Netherlands), GAINS-Asia (China and India) implementation started last month (funded by DG-Research)

Methodology Data sources: For all anthropogenic sources of GHG emissions in a country: Identification of available mitigation options Including structural changes (fuel switch) and add-on measures Country-specific application potentials Baseline activity rates: exogenous (national of PRIMES) projections Substitution potential and costs derived from alternative PRIMES scenarios Quantification of societal resource costs Excluding transfers (profits, taxes, etc.) Data sources: GHG emission inventories consistent with UNFCCC GHG technology cost data from reviewed literature Activity projections: provided by national governments and EU Commission

Main mitigation options for CO2 162 options considered in GAINS Power plants Fuels shift to natural gas and renewables Co-generation CHP IGCC, carbon capture and storage Transport More efficient vehicles (hybrid cars) Alternative fuels (ethanol, gas, biodiesel, hydrogen) Industry End-use savings (including CHP) Fuel shifts Domestic Insulation Solar, biomass Fuel shift to natural gas Savings for appliances and lighting

Main mitigation options for CH4 28 options considered in GAINS Gas sector Reduced leakages during gas transmission and distribution Flaring instead of venting Waste management Recycling/composting of biodegradable waste instead of landfill Methane recovery from landfills Enteric fermentation Dietary changes for cattle coupled with livestock reductions Manure management Anaerobic digestion plants and stable adaptation Coal mines Upgraded gas recovery in coal mines Rice paddies Modified rice strains Structural changes in agriculture (livestock changes) modeled analog to energy changes

Main mitigation options for N2O 18 options considered in GAINS Arable land and grassland Reduced fertilizer application Optimal timing of fertilizer application Nitrification inhibitors Precision farming Less use of histosols (peat soils) Industry Emission controls in adipic acid and nitric acid industry Combustion Modified fluidized bed combustion Health care Reduced N2O use Waste treatment Optimized waste water treatment

Main mitigation options for F-gases 22 options considered in GAINS Refrigeration (domestic, commercial, transport and industrial) Recollection, alternative refrigerants and good practice Mobile and stationary air conditioning Alternative refrigerants, process modifications, good practice HCFC22 production Incineration Primary aluminum production Conversion to other processes Semiconductor industry Limited PFC use through alternative processes Other sectors SO2 cover for magnesium production Good practice for gas insulated switchgears Alternative propellants for foams and aerosols End of life recollection of SF6

GAINS approach for modeling “NTM” Potentials and costs for structural measures derived from difference between alternative PRIMES scenarios (currently 0, 20, 90 €/t CO2), for CAPRI under development GAINS maintains balance on energy/agricultural services. Option to include demand elasticities, based on external assessments (Auto/Oil, TREMOVE, CAPRI, PRIMES, etc.) Not included in GAINS: Behavioral changes Local traffic regulations (incl. speed limits) Spatial shifts in agricultural production “Controlled activity levels” are used as decision variables instead of cost curves to capture simultaneous effects on CO2, PM, SO2, CH4, NH3, N2O, VOC, etc.

Next steps GAINS optimization method under completion Will be used for NEC analyses (early 2006) Base cases: traditional RAINS approach Sensitivity cases: with/without GHGs and NTMs Structural changes in agricultural sector will take longer.