1 Yasushi Mino Theoretical AstroPhysics Including Relativity (TAPIR), CalTech Index 1: Introduction: LISA project 2: MiSaTaQuWa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regularization of the the second-order gravitational perturbations produced by a compact object Eran Rosenthal University of Guelph - Canada Amos Ori Technion.
Advertisements

General Relativity Physics Honours 2009 Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 4.
F. Debbasch (LERMA-ERGA Université Paris 6) and M. Bustamante, C. Chevalier, Y. Ollivier Statistical Physics and relativistic gravity ( )
Backreaction as an explanation for Dark Energy ? with some remarks on cosmological perturbation theory James M. Bardeen University of Washington The Very.
Theories of gravity in 5D brane-world scenarios
The Crisis of Classical Physics
Numerical Relativity & Gravitational waves I.Introduction II.Status III.Latest results IV.Summary M. Shibata (U. Tokyo)
Beyond delta-N formalism Atsushi Naruko Yukawa Institute Theoretical Physics, Kyoto In collaboration with Yuichi Takamizu (Waseda) and Misao Sasaki (YITP)
07 Nov 2003Gravitational Wave Phenomenology Workshop1 Numerical Relativity Deirdre ShoemakerCornell University  The role of numerical relativity in gravitational-wave.
Extragalactic Astronomy & Cosmology First-Half Review [4246] Physics 316.
Current status of numerical relativity Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries Masaru Shibata (Yukawa Institute, Kyoto University)
Singularities in String Theory Hong Liu Massachusetts Institute of Technology ICHEP 04 Beijing.
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
July 2005 Einstein Conference Paris Thermodynamics of a Schwarzschild black hole observed with finite precision C. Chevalier 1, F. Debbasch 1, M. Bustamante.
The attractor mechanism, C-functions and aspects of holography in Lovelock gravity Mohamed M. Anber November HET bag-lunch.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2007 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 8.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Cosmic Microwave Radiation Anisotropies in brane worlds K. Koyama astro-ph/ K. Koyama PRD (2002) Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2007 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 4.
Gravitational Radiation Energy From Radial In-fall Into Schwarzschild and Kerr Geometries Project for Physics 879, Professor A. Buonanno, University of.
Strings and Black Holes David Lowe Brown University AAPT/APS Joint Fall Meeting.
PHY 042: Electricity and Magnetism Introduction Prof. Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin.
MANY-BODY PROBLEM in KALUZA-KLEIN MODELS with TOROIDAL COMPACTIFICATION Astronomical Observatory and Department of Theoretical Physics, Odessa National.
1 How to test the Einstein gravity using gravitational waves Takahiro Tanaka (YITP, Kyoto university) Gravitational waves Based on the work in collaboration.
Schwarzschild Perturbations in the Lorenz Gauge Leor Barack (Soton) Carlos Lousto (UTB)
Williams Research Gravity Pharis E. Williams 19 th Natural Philosophy Alliance Albuquerque, NM July, 2012.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF BRANE KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS Introduction Strings, branes, geometric principle, background independence Brane space M (brane kinematics)
Construction of gauge-invariant variables for linear-order metric perturbations on general background spacetime Kouji Nakamura (NAOJ) References : K.N.
Cosmological post-Newtonian Approximation compared with Perturbation Theory J. Hwang KNU/KIAS
2次ゲージ不変摂動論定式化の進行状況 Kouji Nakamura (Grad. Univ. Adv. Stud. (NAOJ)) References : K.N. Prog. Theor. Phys., vol.110 (2003), 723. (gr-qc/ ). K.N. Prog.
Self – accelerating universe from nonlinear massive gravity Chunshan Lin Kavli
Gravitational Waves (& Gravitons ?)
Forming Nonsingular Black Holes from Dust Collapse by R. Maier (Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas-Rio de Janeiro) I. Damião Soares (Centro Brasileiro.
The Problem of Initial Conditions for Primordial Black Hole Formation and Asymptotic Quasi-Homogeneous Solution. Alexander Polnarev Queen Mary, University.
Advanced mechanics Physics 302. Instructor: Dr. Alexey Belyanin Office: MIST 426 Office Phone: (979)
Objective of numerical relativity is to develop simulation code and relating computing tools to solve problems of general relativity and relativistic astrophysics.
Chapter 13 Black Holes. What do you think? Are black holes just holes in space? What is at the surface of a black hole? What power or force enables black.
Einstein’s elusive waves
Yi-Zen Chu BCCS Case Western Reserve University 9 December 2008 The n-body problem in General Relativity from perturbative field theory arXiv:
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
Cosmic censorship in overcharging a charged black hole with a charged particle Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics (Kyoto University) Soichiro Isoyama.
1 Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS G. Alekseev G. Alekseev Cosmological solutions Dynamics of waves Fields of accelerated sources Stationary axisymmetric.
Y.K.Lau Institute of Appl. Maths, CAS. Bondi Sachs Formulation of the Kerr Metric Gravitational Wave Physics of a Kerr Black Hole.
Hawking radiation for a Proca field Mengjie Wang (王梦杰 ) In collaboration with Carlos Herdeiro & Marco Sampaio Mengjie Wang 王梦杰 Based on: PRD85(2012)
On finding fields and self force in a gauge appropriate to separable wave equations (gr-qc/ ) 2006 Midwest Relativity Meeting Tobias Keidl University.
1 Building Bridges: CGWA Inauguration 15 December 2003 Lazarus Approach to Binary Black Hole Modeling John Baker Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics.
Principle of Equivalence: Einstein 1907 Box stationary in gravity field Box falling freely Box accelerates in empty space Box moves through space at constant.
In fond memory of Professor A.K. Raychaudhuri who passed away on June 18, 2005.
Black Holes Astrophysics Lesson 14. Learning Objectives To know:-  How to define the event horizon for a black hole.  How to calculate the Schwarzschild.
Binary systems as sources of gravitational waves
Motions of Self-Gravitating bodies to the Second Post- Newtonian Order of General Relativity.
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang.
Spin-orbit Gravitational Radiation Reaction for Two-body Systems Jing Zeng Washington University Gravity Group November
Unit 13 Relativity.
PTA and GW detection --- Lecture K. J. Lee ( 李柯伽 ) Max-Planck Institute for Radio astronomy Aug
1 A formulation for the long-term evolution of EMRIs with linear order conservative self-force Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto university) Gravitational waves in.
Gravitational Self-force on a Particle in the Schwarzschild background Hiroyuki Nakano (Osaka City) Norichika Sago (Osaka) Wataru Hikida (Kyoto, YITP)
1 Yasushi Mino ( 蓑 泰 志 ) WUGRAV, Washington University at St. Louis Index 1: Introduction 2: Self-force in a Linear Perturbation.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
1 Toward the 2 nd order self-force Eran Rosenthal University of Guelph, Canada.
A TEST FOR THE LOCAL INTRINSIC LORENTZ SYMMETRY
BLACK HOLES SIMULATION and visualization
Adiabatic radiation reaction to the orbits in Kerr Spacetime
Black holes, neutron stars and binary star systems
Charged black holes in string-inspired gravity models
Generalized quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in hyperbolic orbits Gihyuk Cho (SNU) Collaborate with H.M. Lee (SNU), Achamveedu Gopakumar.
Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept
A New Approach to Equation of Motion for a fast-moving particle
Graviton Emission in The Bulk from a Higher Dimensional Black Hole
Presentation transcript:

1 Yasushi Mino Theoretical AstroPhysics Including Relativity (TAPIR), CalTech Index 1: Introduction: LISA project 2: MiSaTaQuWa Self-force? 3: Adiabatic Metric Perturbation 4: Radiation Reaction Formula 5: Gauge and Validity 6: Conclusion Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula

2 Everyday we experience gravity. Why should we discuss the gravitational physics? Newtonian Gravity : Gravity as a potential No dynamical Freedom Einstein Gravity : Gravity as a geometry Dynamical Freedom in Gravity We want to know the dynamics of the gravitational physics! Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 1: Introduction: LISA Project

3 The dynamical degree of freedom in Einstein’s Gravity propagates the space-time as gravity waves. When linearized, we have a wave equation of the metric perturbation. Detection of gravitational waves is a strong evidence of the dynamical nature of the gravitational theory. Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula

4 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Einstein Gravity predicts a very strongly self-gravitating object, called “Black hole”. Newtonian Gravity : It makes a singularity if gravitationally collapsed. Einstein Gravity : The singularity is hidden by the horizon. r  We want to know the nature of the strong gravity! r  rHrH

5 Projects of Gravity Wave detection : Experimental test of the relativistic gravitational theory New observational window to distant astrophysical objects Observation of highly relativistic gravitational phenomena Promising Target: NS/BH Binary system, SuperNova, Primordial GWs, Pulser, GammaRayBurst, ….. Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula

6 Space Project: LISA (joint project by NASA & ESA) See LISA project homepage Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula

7 Space Project: LISA (joint project by NASA & ESA) See LISA project homepage Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula

8 Space Project: LISA (joint project by NASA & ESA) See LISA project homepage Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula

9 LISA primary target A compact object (~10M) is inspiralling into a super- massive blackhole (~10^6M). *extreme mass ratio *eccentric orbit *relativistic motion We need to know what gravitational waves are expected to be detected. Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula

10 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Theory is challenged by Experiment. Unlike other theoretical physics, we do not (did not?) have a theory to predict the observation until recently!

11 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 2: MiSaTaQuWa Self-force? It is a good approximation to consider it as a two-body problem in GR. The central black hole is considered to be a Kerr black hole. For its extreme mass-ratio, a linear perturbation might be a good approximation. M m

12 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Suppose we could use a linear perturbation: We approximate the supermassive black hole by a Kerr black hole, and consider the linear metric perturbation induced by an inspiralling compact object. One can calculate the gravitational waveform by a linear perturbation, being given a orbit. We need to solve the orbital equation.

13 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula A binary system is known to emit gravitational waves, and the gravitational waves carry away the binding energy of the system. As a result, the orbit deviates from the background geodesic. MiSaTaQuWa self-force was derived by a linear perturbation. It is considered to include the radiation reaction effect to the orbit. (MiSaTaQuWa=Mino,Sasaki,Tanaka;Quinn,Wald)

14 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula We come to have a regularization method to evaluate MiSaTaQuWa self-force. … Radiation Reaction Formula (Mino) Mode-decomposition method Barack,Ori; Mino,Nakano,Sasaki; Detweiler,Messaritaki,Whiting,Kim Power-expansion method (Mino,Nakano) but … something weird …

15 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Do we have to consider the self-force in a certain gauge? Is the orbital evolution gauge-dependent?

16 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula One may choose a gauge condition such that the self-force vanishes, and it is consistent with the linear perturbation! 1) The linear perturbation is derived by solving the linearized Einstein equation. 2) The linearized Einstein equation requires the conservation law in the background, i.e. a geodesic.

17 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 3) The linear approximation is valid only when the orbital deviation from a geodesic is small. t x Note: Gauge is a freedom to assign the coordinates to a perturbed geometry. It has nothing to do with the causality or hyperbolicity of the Einstein equation. 4) Because the orbital deviation from a geodesic is small, one can bring the orbit’s coordinates back to those of the geodesic.

18 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Conclusion: There is no self-force. Problem: We have to extend “the linear perturbation formalism” so that it can describe the metric perturbation induced by a non-geodesic orbit. Conclusion: MiSaTaQuWa self-force makes no physically meaningful prediction of the orbital evolution by itself.

19 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 3: Adiabatic Metric Perturbation We consider a quasi non-linear extension of the linear metric perturbation so that one can describe the metric perturbation induced by a non-geodesic orbit. For this, we use 1) a physically reasonable class of gauge conditions, 2) the picture of adiabatic approximation. The adiabatic approximation is well known in classical mechanics, but, the application to a classical gauge field is not well known.

20 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Kerr black hole is a stationary solution of the Einstein equation, thus, the linearized Einstein equation of a Kerr background is time-independent. We call this a physically reasonable class of gauge conditions. One can easily extract the physical information of gravitational waves. Technically feasible metric perturbation formalisms belong to this class.

21 Step 2: We approximate the orbit by a geodesic on each foliation hypersurface. x t Step 1: We consider the spacelike foliation. Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 66 44 33 22 11 55 Step 3: We patch the linear metric perturbations of geodesics on each foliation surface. h6h6 h5h5 h4h4 h3h3 h2h2 h1h1 Adiabatic extension of the linear perturbation:

22 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Linear perturbation:  : a geodesic Adiabatic metric perturbation:  (t) : time-evolving geodesic Adiabatic metric perturbation is valid as long as the extra term  is sufficiently small. (around a year) Linear perturbation is valid as long as the orbit does not deviate from a geodesic. (around a week)

23 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 4: Radiation Reaction Formula Radiation Reaction Formula was originally formulated by a linear perturbation in the physically reasonable gauge. (Strictly speaking, all the formula so far is based on the linear perturbation, and we cannot make any physical interpretation.) For a meaningful discussion of the orbital evolution, we have to consider the adiabatic extension of Radiation reaction formula in a manner consistent with the adiabatic metric perturbation.

24 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 4-a: “Original” Radiation Reaction Formula We consider a geodesic. Geodesics are characterized by 6 parameters; Primary constants ; Secondary constants ;

25 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula r/  -motiont/  -motion Asymptotic gravitational field in the physically reasonable class of gauge conditions; : three principal frequencies, functions of (E,L,C)

26 We consider the self-force acting on (E,L,C). In the physically reasonable class of gauge conditions, the linear metric perturbation gives the force as Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula It is proven that the zero-mode is gauge-invariant and can be obtained by the radiative part of the field.

27 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Perturbative evolution of the orbital constants becomes; One can see that the perturbative evolution of the orbit and the linear metric perturbation becomes in valid at the dephasing time scale; (around a week)

28 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 4-b: “Adiabatic” Radiation Reaction Formula Now the “constants” could evolve non-perturbatively; In the physically reasonable class of gauge conditions, the adiabatic metric perturbation gives the force as (We ignore O(  ^2) terms here.)

29 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula We have the adiabatic evolution equation of the orbit. (See the upcoming paper in detail.) The behavior of these evolution equations; Einstein Equation for the adiabatic metric perturbation;

30 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Validity of the adiabatic metric perturbation; Validity of the adiabatic orbital evolution; Beyond this time scale, we do not solve the Einstein equation to the accuracy O(  ). Beyond this time scale, the second order effect will change the orbital evolution. This time scale is around several months for LISA.

31 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 5: Gauge and Validity is proven to be gauge invariant in the physically reasonable class. What about, non-zero components? We found that the non-zero modes are totally gauge dependent. By a special choice of gauge, one can eliminate the non-zero mode.

32 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula We call this gauge condition the radiation reaction gauge. In this gauge, the self-force has only the dissipative term. This DOES NOT mean that the self-force does not have conservative terms. The conservative effect of the self- force is renormalized into the initial conditions.

33 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula General gauge in the physically reasonable class; Radiation reaction gauge; (v) is a typical velocity of the system, and is 0.3 at most.

34 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula Validity of the adiabatic metric perturbation; Validity of the adiabatic orbital evolution; Beyond this time scale, we do not solve the Einstein equation to the accuracy O(  ). Beyond this time scale, the second order effect will change the orbital evolution. This time scale is around several years for LISA.

35 Astrophysics Seminar at University of Florida, Gainesville, Sept. 24, 2004 Self-Force in Radiation Reaction Formula 6: Conclusion A method for an orbital prediction using a linear metric perturbation is established for the first time. The method can predict the orbital evolution for long enough for LISA project. The calculation technique of the method proposed here is already established and the required computational power is minimum. Coding to calculate the waveform is in progress.