David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 10 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protecting Michigans Water Resources James Clift, Michigan Environmental Council October 23, 2008.
Advertisements

New Mexico Infrastructure Finance Conference, October 28, 200.
Public Health - Always Working for a Safer and Healthier Washington Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking.
Introduction to GIS All lecture materials by Austin Troy © 2003 unless otherwise noted Putting GIS to work By Austin Troy, University of Vermont.
Evaluating Shadow Flicker in the Current Regulatory Environment Massachusetts Wind Working Group Meeting: October 30, 2013 Richard Lampeter, INCE Senior.
Environmental Impact Assessment: A Land Use Planning Tool Diane Sherman, Ben Purdy, and Sara Felker Department of Resource Development Introduction Environmental.
The Compact  Legally enforceable contract among the Great Lakes States  Provided for in the U.S. Constitution  Ratification by State legislatures 
Technology Overview Geographic Information Systems.
Water Use Requirements January 2008 Lyndon Kelley MSU Extension/Purdue University Irrigation Management Educator.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
©2002 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University Great Lakes Protection Fund Project Restoring.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 26 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
Restoring Great Lakes Basin Waters Through the Use of Conservation Credits and an Integrated Water Balance Analysis System Institute of Water Research,
1 Evaluating Infill Potential: Identifying and Quantifying Infill Opportunity Sites Infill Potential Methodology Project May 2004.
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 18 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Context within regional water policy discussions Context within regional water policy discussions –Aquatic ecosystems.
The New Water Use Requirements January, 2007 Lyndon Kelley- MSU Extension Water Quality Agent.
Gwinnett GIS Community Partnership. Outline of Presentation Background Statement of Purpose Participants & Geography Topics of Discussion Benefits (from.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 15 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
Permits to Take Water: What you need to know.
Morphum Environmental Ltd Environmental Engineers and Consultants
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 35 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 19 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
Tufts: New Developments in Spatial Exploration and Analysis for the Tufts Community Patrick Florance GIS Center Manager & Senior GIS Specialist UIT.
EPA Drinking Water Mapping Application (DWMA) Authors: James Sinnott, RTI International (presenter) Jay Rineer, RTI International William Cooter, RTI International.
Activities, Results and Preliminary Report ACWI Meeting September 14, 2005 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable (SWRR)
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
A GIS-Based Model to Identify Sensitive Water Resource Properties in Need of Protection 2009 Watershed Science and Technical Conference September 14 &
Rural-Urban Interaction in NL: Understanding & Managing Functional Regions Functional Regions Element Update Funding support provided by the Canada- Newfoundland.
2006 Governor’s Pollution Prevention Awards Bloomington, October 25, 2006 WATER SUPPLY PLANNING IN ILLINOIS Derek Winstanley Chief Illinois State Water.
EPA’s Role in Source Water Protection
Kate Longley, Project Scientist – SeaPlan May 14, 2013 Northeast Arc Users Spring Conference GIS as a Tool in Marine Spatial Planning and Ocean Management.
Smart Forestry for Smart Growth Issues Elements Data The Division of Forestry’s Smart Forestry for Smart Growth initiative is designed to provide local.
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 14 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Overview of the Current Threats and Water Protection Efforts in the Region Presented by Dr. Jon F. Bartholic, Director October 26-27, 2009 Pilot House,
Reached Indexing Using the NHD Hydrologic Event Management (HEM) Tool IDEM – Joanna Wood.
A Vision for a Revised Nitrate Hazard Leaching Index (NHI) Toby O’Geen, Ph.D. Soil Resource Specialist in Cooperative Extension Department of Land, Air.
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 By: Alex Rembolt Period 3 This was approved on August 3, It was amended in 1978, 1980, 1981, 1982,
Mount Buller Geography Unit 3 Fieldwork 2010 Format of the SAC A written and media booklet is developed in and out of class over the next 3 weeks. This.
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
Project SLUCE: Spatial Land Use Change and Ecological Effects Daniel G. Brown With funding from Biocomplexity Land Cover and Land Use Change CSISS ABM-LUCC.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
March 21, 2006 Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2860 Columbia River Basin – Water Supply Keith Holliday Watershed Lead Washington State Dept. of.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
PALERANG COUNCIL Proposed Special Rate Variation 2016/ /21 Public Exhibition : Draft Long Term Financial Plan and Draft Delivery Program (as amended)
Overview What is geography? What is geographic information?
Citizens Committee Meeting #10 October 15, Agenda 1.Project Update Minutes - Special Meeting – Sept. 30 th 2.RDOS Planning and Development Committee.
POLK RAIL QUIET ZONE ANALYSIS Conditions Assessment CSX “S” Line March 24, 2016.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Storm Water Management at MSU Ruth Kline-Robach Michigan State University Institute of Water Research Dept. of CARRS.
Joy Patterson, Principal Planner City of Sacramento March 16 th, 2016 For the 2016 Planning Academy.
Electoral Area ‘B’ Official Community Plan Review May 4, 2010.
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update July 23, 2014.
BUILDABLE LANDS ANALYSIS City of Snoqualmie Planning & Buildable Sno-lutions Chris Sungjin Im Ian Garnier Nick Nielson Geography 469.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Infrastructure planning and management
Anne Arundel County Maryland
State of Water Information and Management Systems in Ontario
Concepts in Water Resources Management
The New Water Use Requirements
Technical Advisory Committee
Environmental Engineering
Water Supply Planning for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation transcript:

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 10 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography, Remote Sensing & GIS Research and Outreach Services Group Institute of Water Research Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process and Using the WWA Tool for Planning and Watershed Management and

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 2 / 10 Overview of the groundwater & surface water resources of the regions Overview of the Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WWAT) Example uses of the WWAT for sustainable community development Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 3 / 10 Evaluating your Master Plan –Check all the areas zoned residential (self-supplied) or Commercial/Industrial (self-supplied) to determine which catchments they fall within. –“Roads” and “Aerial Photos” Data Layers in WWAT are very useful spatial references. –Use “New Withdrawal” in WWAT to determine the total allowable depletion in those catchments. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 4 / 10 Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management 12 3 For exploration purposes, we can ignore these boxes.

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 5 / 10 trans=5400 &shore=0 &bdrkf=1 &bdrkt=99999 &aline=0.000 &bline= &cline= Allowable catchment depletion (gpm) (initial amount – not yet updated!!) &dphzoned=125 &estdphbdrk=458 &pctdrift=100 &pctrock=0 &kvw= &type=Cold transitional stream &wsid=12269 &x= &y= &mapx= &mapy= Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 6 / 10 So how many gpm do you need? –A standard residence needs a minimum of 20 gpm (~ 60 gpm with home irrigation). –For clustered developments (e.g., PUDs), multiply the # of parcels times 20 gpm to estimate the cumulative depletion. e.g. 15 parcels x 20 gpm/parcel = 300 gpm –Note: residential water well withdrawals are NOT regulated by state law. Consider re-arranging the zoning map to mitigate potential adverse impacts. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 7 / 10 So how many gpm do you need? –Commercial/industrial user needs vary widely. Some water-intensive businesses may need 600 – 1000 gpm. –PA 33 (2006) prohibits a local unit of government from enacting or enforcing an ordinance that regulates a large quantity withdrawal (i.e., 70 gpm or more). –The evaluation suggested here is with the intent of re-arranging the zoning map to mitigate potential adverse impacts. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 8 / 10 Revise your Site Plan Review process –Amend your site plan review checklist to require submission of applicable LQW Registration with the site plan for any self-supplied facility with a pumping capacity of 70 gpm or more (e.g., within “Other Environmental Impacts” section). Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 9 / 10 Economic Development Office –Check all parcels slated for new/expanded Commercial/Industrial (self-supplied) to determine which catchments they fall within. –Use “New Withdrawal” in WWAT to determine the total allowable depletion in those catchments. –Compare allowable depletions to client’s needs. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 10 / 10 The End This concludes our presentation segments gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management