Sources of Measurement Errors in Business Surveys Mojca Bavdaz
Outline Measurement errors & their sources. Empirical study. Sources of measurement errors redefined. Implications.
Measurement errors ‘Theoretical’ definition of a measurement error: ‘deviation’ of the observed survey value from the true value (Groves, 1991); ‘difference’ or ‘discrepancy’ between the observed survey value and the true value (Hansen et al., 1951; Sukhatme and Sukhatme, 1970). ‘Practical’ definition of a measurement error: observational gap between the ideal measurement and the response obtained (Groves et al., 2004); error which occurs at the time of data collection (Biemer and Lyberg, 2003).
Sources of measurement errors (1) In household surveys (e.g. Groves, 1989): respondent; interviewer; instrument (the survey questionnaire); mode of data collection.
Sources of measurement errors (2) In business surveys, the addition of the fifth source: records (Ponikowski, Meily, 1989); information system (Biemer, Fecso, 1995; Biemer, Lyberg, 2003); organization (O'Brien, 2000).
Empirical study Business survey under study: Aim: Research methods: Quarterly Business Survey on Trade (SORS). Aim: examination of actual response process. Research methods: in-depth interview; observation. Sample size (n=28). Challenges of implementation.
Three-dimensional model of business survey response
Sources of measurement error redefined Existing sources Identified sources Respondent → + Business participants Interviewers Survey staff Survey questionnaire (Survey instrument) → Survey instrument Mode of data collection Survey characteristics Records/Information system/Organization Organizational context INTERACTIONS!
Implications Improved tools: Three-dimensional model for comprehensive & systematic analysis of response process in business surveys. Redefined sources of measurement errors for development of approaches to measurement error prevention & reduction.
Implications: Example 1 Self-administered business survey. No interviewer. But really no survey staff involved? One-time & rare contacts make huge impact. Training of (all) survey staff.
Implications: Example 2 Recurring business survey. No source of measurement error. But really no impact of recurrence? Learning curve effect & routine. Support & verification of first-time questionnaire completion (at business & respondent level).
Future research More research on specific aspects: comprehension of economic concepts; role of business participants & survey staff; circulation of survey instrument; impact of ‘soft’ issues; ... Quantification through experiments. Generalization to non-business organizational surveys.
Sources of Measurement Errors in Business Surveys Mojca Bavdaz Mojca.Bavdaz@ef.uni-lj.si