Exploration Physics International, Inc. HAF: An Operational, Event-driven Solar Wind Forecast Model 1 Murray Dryer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHINE, Zermat, Utah July 31-August 4, 2006 Summary of: Modeling the May event using HAFv2 and HHMS 3D MHD models: To show usefulness of models.
Advertisements

The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
© NERC All rights reserved Storms rare but important Balance dataset otherwise storms look like noise Features selected like Split: training set, validation.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
1 SPACE WEATHER EFFECTS ON SATELLITE DRAG 6 January 2006 Cheryl Huang, Frank A. Marcos and William Burke Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research.
The Effects of Geomagnetic Storms on Power Systems Mary Holleboom Justin Voogt ENGR W82 January 22, 2002.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging in Improving Space Weather Prediction SHINE Session 6 Simon Plunkett and Doug Biesecker Thursday Morning.
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
Peter Wintoft Swedish Institute of Space Physics IUGG, Sapporo, Japan, July 2, 2003 Real time forecasting of geomagnetic indices Peter Wintoft Swedish.
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
Synoptic maps and applications Yan Li Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA HMI team meeting, Jan 27, 2005, Stanford.
1 WSA Model and Forecasts Nick Arge Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
Empirical Modeling and Knowledge TransferUniversity of Colorado—LASP The Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling Empirical Model Chain The Center.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1 C. “Nick” Arge Space Vehicles Directorate/Air Force Research Laboratory SHINE Workshop Aug. 2, 2007 Comparing the Observed and Modeled Global Heliospheric.
Forecast Skill and Major Forecast Failures over the Northeastern Pacific and Western North America Lynn McMurdie and Cliff Mass University of Washington.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
How does the Sun drive the dynamics of Earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere Wenbin Wang, Alan Burns, Liying Qian and Stan Solomon High Altitude Observatory.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
AFRL/CISM Collaborations
Solar Shield project - lessons learned and advances made (ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Solar_Shield) Pulkkinen, A., M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky,
Heliospheric Observations during October – November 2003 Hari Om Vats Physical Research Laboratory Ahmedabad INDIA ICRC.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
IAGA Symposium A12.2 Geomagnetic networks, computation and definition of products for space weather and space climate Melbourne, Australia, 2011 GLOBAL,
Synoptic Network Workshop (HAO/NCAR, April 2013) Space Weather and Synoptic Observations V J Pizzo – NOAA/SWPC.
11. Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging, IPS and other remote sensing observations in Improving Space Weather Prediction Bernie Jackson,
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
(c) 2009 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Improving Predictions of the Earth’s Rotation Using Oceanic Angular Momentum.
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Solar Wind Propagation Tool Chihiro Tao 1,2, Nicolas Andre 1, Vincent Génot 1, Alexis P. Rouillard 1, Elena Budnik 1, Arnaud Biegun 1, Andrei Fedorov 1.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
30 April 2009 Space Weather Workshop 2009 The Challenge of Predicting the Ionosphere: Recent results from CISM. W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, Y. Zheng, L. Mays and A. Wold
B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington,
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
Chengming Tan National Astronomical Observatories
ESA SSA Measurement Requirements for SWE Forecasts
Utilizing Scientific Advances in Operational Systems
Forecast Development at the Canadian Space Weather Forecast Centre
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Evolution of solar wind structures between Venus and Mars orbits
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Met Office Forecaster and Customer Requirements and Rationale
COSMO Priority Project ”Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts”
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Winter Climate Forecast
Severe Space Weather: Solar Statistics & Societal Impacts
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
SIDC Space Weather briefing
Introduction to Space Weather
The Second International Space Weather Symposium
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Exploration Physics International, Inc. HAF: An Operational, Event-driven Solar Wind Forecast Model 1 Murray Dryer

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Goal: Improve Space Weather Forecasting 2 Accuracy 0 100% 0% Forecast Lead Time

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Geomagnetic Storm Prediction System 3 Coronal Model Event Proxies Solar Wind Model Near Earth Models v, n, B IMF

Exploration Physics International, Inc. VSS = V 0 + V 1  -  HAF Model Inputs: Ambient Solar Wind Steady State: Source surface (2.5 Rs) B, v synoptic maps Maps from: SEC (Arge & Pizzo) Solar observatories (NSO, MWO, WSO) 4

Exploration Physics International, Inc. HAF Model Inputs: Solar Events 5

Exploration Physics International, Inc. “Fearless Forecast” Study 6 NOAA/SEC, EXPI, GI/UAF February present Interplanetary shock arrival time (SAT) at Earth Ensemble of three models (HAF, ISPM, STOA) Benchmark forecast skill

Exploration Physics International, Inc. “Fearless Forecast” Study

Exploration Physics International, Inc. “April Fools Day” 2001 Events FF#Start date/timeVsLocationComment N22 E33M2.2/1N 255* *N18 E02M4.3/SF N16 W12X1.7/1N 257* S10 W90*Blowout? 258* S10 E115?Blowout? Events HAFv.2: Shock will overtake the two previous interplanetary ICMEs, and the combined structure's shock will arrive at 1800 UT, 30 March SSI = 1.0, and delta(dynamic pressure) = 13.2 nPa. Forecast #256 issued 29 March 2001, 2055 UT 8

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Speed Density Log(  P/P) Dynamic pressure 3/28/01 4/05/01 “FF” # , issued Mar , HAF Model Prediction

Exploration Physics International, Inc. “April Fools Day” 2001 Event 10

Exploration Physics International, Inc. “Bastille Day” 2000 Event 11 “Fearless Forecast” issued at 20:31 UT on July 14, 2000: [Dryer et al., Solar Phys., 2001]. “Strong shock will arrive at 15 UT on July 15, 2000.”

“Fearless Forecast” Metrics Exploration Physics International, Inc. 12 Contingency Table

“Fearless Forecast” Metrics Feb Oct Success rate > 50 % False alarm rate ~ 50% Hit/Miss RatioSTOA best for strong shocks HAF best for medium, weak shocks Heidke skill score~ RMS error  T (SAT PRED - SAT OBS ) ~ hours Exploration Physics International, Inc events, 68 observed shocks

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Solar Cycle 23 - Lessons Learned 14 CIRs produce shocks. Dec. 25, 1998, 20 UT

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Solar Cycle 23 - Lessons Learned Initial shock speed is the most important input to the SAT prediction. SAT forecast skill is best near Central Meridian. SAT forecast skill is worst for limb events because Metric Type II speeds are too low. 15

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Future of Operational, Real-Time, Sun-to-Earth Solar Wind Predictions 16 Increased Customer Support: Make Advanced Operational Decisions Improved Forecast Skill: Assimilate Data Predict B z Better Customer Collaboration: Specify Needs + =

Exploration Physics International, Inc. “Fearless Forecast” Web Site

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Metric Type II Speed

Exploration Physics International, Inc. Provides realistic background and event-driven solar wind conditions at L1 and elsewhere. Takes in solar observations and event reports. Uses “modified kinematic” approach to track solar wind fluid parcels. Predicts interplanetary shocks in the global heliosphere. Drives downstream empirical and first-principle space weather models. Hakamada-Akasofu-Fry (HAF) Solar Wind Model