MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations Safety -- 22. 5% All US Accidents Efficiency --

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acknowledgements to Jim Kuchar
Advertisements

Complementary Use of Airborne Wx Radar & Datalink Graphical Wx Cheri Haynes – XCELAR Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather Forum October 31, 2012 What if…What.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
1 Weather in the NextGen Era- Progress and Challenges Ahead Steve Abelman NWS Office of Science and Technology May 4, 2010 Steve Abelman NWS Office of.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Influence of Structure on Complexity Management Strategies of Air Traffic.
Investigation of Utility-Based Alerting Lee Winder Jim Kuchar International Center for Air Transportation MIT FAA/NASA Joint University Program FAA Technical.
Turbulence Challenges and Potential Solutions. Turbulence Basics Drivers – Safety, Efficiency/Emissions, Capacity, & Customer Experience Primary users-
Departure Hazards: Turbulence, Icing, C/V, Storms (winter/conv), Oceanic/VA Decisions- problem ID Weather information needed Update Rate (Info Age) SpatialObstacles.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
Science Meeting-1 Lin 12/17/09 MIT Lincoln Laboratory Prediction of Weather Impacts on Air Traffic Through Flow Constrained Areas AMS Seattle Yi-Hsin Lin.
DETECTION OF UPPER LEVEL TURBULENCE VIA GPS OCCULTATION METHODS Larry Cornman National Center for Atmospheric Research USA.
FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting In The
Design of a Certifiably Dependable Next- Generation Air Transportation System Stephen A. JacklinMichelle M. Eshow Michael R. LowryDave McNally Ewen Denny.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations  Safety % All US Accidents  Efficiency.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen): Wx Integration Ray Moy New Weather Concept Development Branch FAA, Aviation Weather Division, ANG-C62.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water NextGen Update WMO; CAeMwww.wmo.int WMO.
Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) – Enhancing Efficiency October 23, 2014 Gary Pokodner, WTIC Program Manager 1 Friends and Partners in Aviation.
Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) - Uncertainty/Probabilistic Information in the Cockpit Projects July 21, 2014 Gary Pokodner 1 Friends and Partners.
RADAR and Integration Bill Watts. Why - The Delay Cost - ATA numbers 86.5 million delay minutes $6.2 billion direct operating costs for airlines (exceeds.
Weather Satellite Data in FAA Operations Randy Bass Aviation Weather Research Program Aviation Weather Division NextGen Organization Federal Aviation Administration.
FAA International Activities
© Crown copyright Met Office Operational OpenRoad verification Presented by Robert Coulson.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Objectives Identify the key operational issues associated with the introduction of information from remote sensing.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
1 NGATS Weather System Concept JPDO Weather IPT “Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather” Vision Forum FAA Headquarters – 800 Independence Avenue – Washington,
HEMS-related Aviation Weather R&D Steve Abelman Dec 18, 2013.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT D ECISION- S UPPORT FOR E NHANCING A VIATION W EATHER I NFORMATION S YSTEMS AND S AFETY.
27 June Human Factors and Safety: Rapporteur and Session Chair Reports.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Supporting Pilots’ Time-Dependent Information Needs During Operations in Adverse Weather L aurence Vigeant-LangloisR. John Hansman, Jr.
Woody Roberts Tom LeFebvre Kevin Manross Paul Schultz Evan Polster Xiangbao Jing ESRL/Global Systems Division Application of RUA/RTMA to AWIPS and the.
Next Gen, When? A Critique By James R. Spensley. Neighborhood Noise Air Traffic Control and Airspace Design Impacts Noise Exposure.
Event-based Verification and Evaluation of NWS Gridded Products: The EVENT Tool Missy Petty Forecast Impact and Quality Assessment Section NOAA/ESRL/GSD.
Situational Awareness Numerous aircraft and operational displays, when combined with effective and efficient communications and facilities, provide Air.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
Space Weather in the Next Generation Air Transportation System April 28, 2009 Cecilia Miner NOAA/NWS/Aviation Services Branch April 28, 2009 Cecilia Miner.
Ray Moy December 01, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Research, Requirements and Transition.
Tim Myers – Metron Aviation August 26, Evaluate weather-related operational inefficiencies or safety hazards in remote, non-radar controlled airspace.
Quality Assessment and NEVS for NextGen Jennifer Mahoney NOAA/ESRL/GSD 2 Dec 2010 Interagency Aviation Meeting.
Using Spatiotemporal Relational Random Forests to Predict Convectively Induced Turbulence Also know as: U.S.R.R.F.P.C.I.T or Purscrift Dr. Amy McGovern.
Presented to: NASA Applied Sciences Weather Program Review By: Warren Fellner, Aviation Weather Office Date: November 18, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration.
Aviation Safety and Security Program Aviation Safety and Security Program TAMDAR Update & Future Plans GLFE and GLOE Meeting August 24-25, 2005 Taumi Daniels.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
“Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather” Forum 1 November 2012 Michael D. McPartland Wind Data Quality Factors & Metrics* *This work was sponsored by the.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
MIT Lincoln Laboratory CIWS D. Meyer 10/21/05 Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS)
2004 Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather Forum 1 Progress in Weather Information Management and Dissemination 2004 Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather.
© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F065-B Risk Management for TFM through Incremental Decision Making NBAA 61 ST Annual Meeting &
NATIONAL AVIATION UNIVERSITY Institute of Air navigation Air Navigation Systems Department Graduate work MASTER’S DEGREE THESIS «Modeling of flight using.
Next Generation Air Transportation System Presentation to the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 26, 2005 Robert A. Pearce.
USE OF INTENT INFORMATION IN AIRCRAFT CONFORMANCE MONITORING
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N FAA Update: TAMDAR Development Alfred Moosakhanian.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Impact of Operating Context on the Use of Structure in Air Traffic.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
Presented to: Friends of Aviation Weather Forum By: Dan Citrenbaum, FAA, Investment Planning and Analysis Office, Operations Research Group Date: October.
1 Rockwell Collins Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather Progress in Turbulence Information Forum NBAA - Orlando Roy E Robertson November 11, 2005.
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
FAA Flight Standards AFS-220/430 FPAW 2017 Summer
Anastasios Plioutsias (Technical University of Athens, GR)
Weather Information for Pilots
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Human Factors and Safety: Rapporteur and Session Chair Reports
IATA Turbulence Program Introduction and update
FPAW 2016 Summer Meeting 3 August 2016 Louis Bailey.
Update on the Status of Numerical Weather Prediction
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Progress in Cockpit-based Dissemination/Display
Sybert Stroeve, Henk Blom, Marco van der Park
Drivers Influencing Weather-related NAS Metrics
Presentation transcript:

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations Safety % All US Accidents Efficiency -- 17% / $1.7B per year Avoidable Weather Delays (Source: FAA) Effervescence of Weather Information Technical Development Datalink There is a Need for a Coherent Approach for the Presentation of Hazardous Weather Information to Pilots and Other ATM Decision- Makers Turbulence & Clear Air Turbulence Thunderstorms & Microbursts In-Flight Icing (Courtesy of NASA)

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Human-Centered Approach Closed Loop Feedback Process Aircraft Sensors Numerical Wx Models Flight Controls Direct Weather Observation Situation Dynamics Pilot Interaction Weather Aircraft State Displays Direct Aircraft State Observation Sensors Model Human Operator Displays Aviation Weather Information Remote Wx Sensors Sensor Readings Reports Fore- casts Voice Datalink In-Situ Wx Sensors Dissemination

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT New Weather Datalink Products ARNAV Vigyan Bendix/King FAA FISDL Avidyne Echo Flight Garmin Control Vision UPS – AirCell

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Human-Centered Approach Closed Loop Feedback Process Aircraft Sensors Numerical Wx Models Flight Controls Direct Weather Observation Situation Dynamics Pilot Interaction Weather Aircraft State Displays Direct Aircraft State Observation Sensors Model Human Operator Displays Aviation Weather Information Remote Wx Sensors Sensor Readings Reports Fore- casts Voice Datalink In-Situ Wx Sensors Dissemination

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Pilots’ Cognitive Tasks and Information Needs Pilots’ Cognitive Tasks  Identify a planned flight trajectory  Nominal  Alternative  Accept or reject a planned flight trajectory  Go/no-go  Continue/deviate  Fly to destination/alternate  Select resources for a flight trajectory (e.g., fuel)  Opt for legal fair-weather minimum or extra fuel How much extra fuel?  Manage systems along a flight trajectory  When to update weather information  When to use ice protection systems, seat-belt signs, flight attendant warnings Pilot weather information needs focus on the spatial distribution of hazardous weather conditions along 4-D aircraft trajectories  Reactive  Tactical  Strategic

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT TEMPORAL REGIMES OF WEATHER REPRESENTATION Historical Quasi-Constant Quasi-Deterministic Non-Deterministic ? ReactiveTactical Strategic TIME TEMPORAL REGIMES OF FLIGHT PLANNING Future Past Temporal Regimes of Cognitive Processes

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT 4-D Trajectory Framework Aircraft Trajectory Modeled as a 4-D Aircraft Hypertube  3-D space + time  Specified variables: origin, destination, routing, ETD, ETE, cruising velocity Weather Field Modeled as Either: A Spatially Distributed and Temporally Varying Multi-Attribute Field  4D Gridded RUC-2 Data (20 km resolutions, 50 vertical levels) A Hazardous Weather Hypervolume  Assumption: hazardous weather condition thresholds identifiable Interaction Modeled as the 4-D Intersection of Hypervolumes Key Issues  How to represent time?  How to represent uncertainty? Protected Aircraft Hypertube Spatio-Temporal Multi-Attribute Field

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Aircraft Hypertube Long. Latitude t Hazardous Weather Hypervolume Long. Latitude Altitude Hazardous Weather Space Propagated Over  t at Constant Altitude Illustration of 4-D Intersection Test (Quasi-Deterministic Regime) Aircraft Protected Airspace Propagated Over  at Constant Altitude

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Pilots’ Perception of Forecast Accuracy Protected Aircraft Hypertube Hazardous Weather Hypervolume Prediction of 4-D Intersection* YN Occurrence of 4-D Intersection* YHitMiss N False Alarm Correct Rejection *Between Protected Aircraft Hypertube and Hazardous Weather Hypervolume CONTINGENCY MATRIX

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Traditional Forecast Verification Methodology for  Hours Forecast Area Actual Adverse Weather Miss Hit False Alarm Correct Rejection Good forecast based on 4 contingencies above: Mean Square Error14% Critical Success Index73% Signal Detection Theory Hit Rate89% Signal Detection Theory False Alarm Rate17%

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Sensitivity of 4-D Intersection to Estimated Time of Departure Actual Forecast Estimated Departure Time (Hrs) 4-D Intersection with Aircraft Hypertube No Yes 0 4 Correct Detection Correct Rejection False Alarm Forecast Area

MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Conclusions Limitations currently exist in the dissemination and representation of temporally varying weather information Weather datalink capabilities are improving the dissemination potential to pilots These limitations impair the ability to provide weather forecasts that can be perceived accurate by users of aviation weather information The 4-D trajectory framework serves as a basis for investigating across the flight deck, ATC and AOC environments: How to represent temporally varying information How to represent uncertainty in the adverse weather avoidance problem Continuing Work Advanced Visualization Techniques for 4-D Fields Trade-Offs in Representing Uncertainty in Quasi-Deterministic Regime Representation of Weather in Non-Deterministic Regime