Enabling biomarker validation in breast cancer molecular subtypes: sensitivity and specificity of array-based subtype classification in 983 patients Balázs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Clustering analysis of tumor samples (IBC 20, nIBC 20) normals excluded sample type ER HER2 AB Figure. Results of hierarchical clustering analysis
Advertisements

TOP2A IS AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL IN UNSELECTED BREAST CANCER Amit Pancholi Molecular Profiling of Breast Cancer: Predictive Markers of Long.
CD10, scored as positive versus negative all path 1 path 2 path 3 path 4 path 5 path 6 path 7 path 8 path 9 CD10 can be reproducibly scored, but is very.
Is mammacarcinoom onder de veertig jaar morfologisch en genetisch een andere ziekte? Marc van de Vijver, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, NL.
The 70-Gene Profile and Chemotherapy Benefit in 1,600 Breast Cancer Patients Bender RA et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. (Oral Presentation)
Gene Co-expression Network Analysis BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University.
Emergent Biology Through Integration and Mining Of Microarray Datasets Lance D. Miller GIS Microarray & Expression Genomics.
Discordance in Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer during Tumor Progression Lindstrom LS et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S3-5.
MammaPrint, the story of the 70-gene profile
Round-Robin Review of HER2 Testing in the Context of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer (NCCTG N9831/BCIRG006/BCIRG005) 1 Concordance of HER2 Central Assessment.
Metastatic Breast Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All Clifford Hudis, M.D. Chief, Breast Cancer Medicine Service MSKCC.
Introduction The goal of translational bioinformatics is to enable the transformation of increasingly voluminous genomic and biological data into diagnostics.
The 12-gene DCIS Score Assay and Quantitative Gene Expression for ER, PR, and HER2: Experience with 3,947 Patients Alvarado MD, 1 Tan V, 2 Bailey H, 2.
Wildiers H, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:1101. Breast Cancer in Elderly (>65 Years) Recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology Surgical.
The 70 gene Mammaprint ™ signature: a comparison with traditional clinico-pathological parameters. Patrizia Querzoli 1, Massimo Pedriali 1, Gardenia Munerato.
Chapter 7 Essential Concepts in Molecular Pathology Companion site for Molecular Pathology Author: William B. Coleman and Gregory J. Tsongalis.
Analysis of Molecular and Clinical Data at PolyomX Adrian Driga 1, Kathryn Graham 1, 2, Sambasivarao Damaraju 1, 2, Jennifer Listgarten 3, Russ Greiner.
ONLINE BIOMARKER VALIDATION OF SURVIVAL- ASSOCIATED BIOMARKERS IN BREAST AND OVARIAN CANCER USING MICROARRAY DATA OF 3,862 4,323 PATIENTS Balázs Győrffy.
Objectives Abstract Background Materials & Methods References 1.Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of.
Supplemental Figures Loss of circadian clock gene expression is associated with tumor progression in breast cancer Cristina Cadenas 1*, Leonie van de Sandt.
Sgroi DC et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-9.
Metabolic Syndrome and Recurrence within the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Risk Categories in Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Lakhani A et al. Proc.
1.DATABASE construction  n=1,715  Median OS=40.0 months, age: 64+/-10 yrs  Histology (adeno/squamous/large): 50% / 45% / 5%  Stage 1/2/3/4: 63% / 27%
Prognostic value of ER, PR, and HER2 breast cancer biomarkers and AJCC’s TNM staging system on overall survival of Caucasian females with breast cancer.
Breast cancer in elderly patients (70 years and older): The University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville 10 year experience Curzon M, Curzon C,
Rate of breast cancer-specific survival Months Low gene expression (N=252) High gene expression (N=37) P < (Log-rank) a Months Low gene expression.
Project of CZ5225 Zhang Jingxian:
Pan-cancer analysis of prognostic genes Jordan Anaya Omnes Res, In this study I have used publicly available clinical and.
High risk premenopausal Luminal A breast cancer patients derive no benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy: results from DBCG77B randomized trial 1 San Antonio.
Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 5.
P
A B C Supplementary Figure S1. Time-dependent assessment of grade, GGI and PAM50 in untreated patients Landmark analyses of the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Introduction to Oncomine Xiayu Stacy Huang. Oncomine is a cancer-specific microarray database and has a web-based data-mining platform aimed at facilitating.
Nature as blueprint to design antibody factories Life Science Technologies Project course 2016 Aalto CHEM.
Molecular subclasses of breast cancer: how do we define them? The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Statement R4 신재령 / Prof. 김시영 Annals of Oncology 23: 2997–3006,
Design and Multiseries Validation of a Web-Based Gene Expression Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence and Patient Survival Ryan K. Van Laar The.
GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) Deepak Sambhara Georgia Institute of Technology 21 June, 2006.
Department of Pathology UC Davis School of Medicine Jeff Gregg, M.D. The Development of an Informatics Platform for the Characterization of Clinical Samples.
Non ‐ invasive prognostic protein biomarker signatures associated with colorectal cancer by Silvia Surinova, Lenka Radová, Meena Choi, Josef Srovnal, Hermann.
Table S1: The results of ER, PgR, and HER2 status in IHC testing and mRNA expression in the full Consortium population (N=389) HER2 statusER status PgR.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
David Amar, Tom Hait, and Ron Shamir
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier curves for survival in each breast cancer molecular subtype. Radiologic assessment in triple-negative breast cancer (A), HER2-positive.
C Supplemental Figure S2.. C Supplemental Figure S2.
Transcriptional heterogeneity of breast cancer subtypes,
Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 1
EMT inducing transcription factor SIP1: a predictive biomarker of colorectal cancer survival and recurrence? A Patel, R Sreekumar, R Bhome, KA Moutasim,
A New Path Forward: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Bladder Cancer
Genes with Bimodal Expression Are Robust Diagnostic Targets that Define Distinct Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer with Different Overall Survival 
High-level TNFSF13 predict a good response to post-operative chemotherapy in patients with basal-like breast cancer: A systematic review 林惠鈺1,2 歸家豪1,3.
A Long Noncoding RNA Signature That Predicts Pathological Complete Remission Rate Sensitively in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer  Gen Wang, Xiaosong.
Database and Projects Amit Patel.
Tumor intrinsic subtype is reflected in cancer-adjacent tissue.
Recurrence-Associated Long Non-coding RNA Signature for Determining the Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Colon Cancer  Meng Zhou, Long Hu, Zicheng.
Distribution of intrinsic subtypes among TNBC and distribution of TNBC among basal-like breast cancer. Distribution of intrinsic subtypes among TNBC and.
Single Sample Expression-Anchored Mechanisms Predict Survival in Head and Neck Cancer Yang et al Presented by Yves A. Lussier MD PhD The University.
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages (December 2015)
Down-regulation of LATS1 promotes the formation of tumors enriched in basal-like features. Down-regulation of LATS1 promotes the formation of tumors enriched.
János Fekete, Balázs Győrffy
LATS2-associated gene expression pattern is down-regulated specifically in lumB breast tumors. LATS2-associated gene expression pattern is down-regulated.
(A) Distribution of LATS2 mRNA expression levels in different breast cancer subtypes (PAM50, METABTIC dataset); ***P-value < 0.001, t test comparing lumB.
Didi Amar and Tom Hait Group meeting October 2013
EN1 expression in breast cancer and clinical outcome.
MYC–HOXB7–HER2 predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. MYC–HOXB7–HER2 predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e7 (July 2019)
MYC and LYN are coexpressed and have interdependent clinical outcomes.
Subtype classification of breast functional screening results.
Asociación entre el ARNm de PD1 y la respuesta a tratamiento con anti-PD1 en monoterapia en múltiples tipos de cánceres Tomás Pascual*, Laia Paré*, Elia.
Presentation transcript:

Enabling biomarker validation in breast cancer molecular subtypes: sensitivity and specificity of array-based subtype classification in 983 patients Balázs Győrffy and András Lánczky Research Laboratory for Pediatrics and Nephrology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences - Semmelweis University 1st Dept. of Pediatrics, Budapest, Hungary Abstract Objective Results Summary Background: The diverse breast cancer molecular subtypes have different clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes. Here, we assessed the correlation between microarray-defined and author-reported molecular subtypes using publicly available breast cancer datasets. Methods: GEO was searched for datasets where the authors determined molecular subtypes. The molecular subtype was re-calculated for each patient using the StGallen guidelines by assessing the microarray-based expression of ER, HER2 and MKI67 (Basal: ER negative + HER2 negative, Luminal A: ER positive + HER2 negative + low MKI67, HER2 enriched: HER2 positive + ER negative, Luminal B: ER positive + HER2 positive and ER positive + HER2 negative + high MKI67). The thresholds used were 500 for ER (probe set 205225_at), 4800 for HER2 (216836_s_at) and 470 for MKI67 (212021_s_at). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each subtype separately. Results: Molecular subtype was published in all together six datasets (GSE1456, GSE21653, GSE25066, GSE20711, GSE31519 and GSE17907) for 983 patients. In these, 380, 306, 169 and 128 were Basal, Luminal A, Luminal B and HER2 enriched, respectively. The microarray-based molecular subtype determination resulted in a sensitivity of 0.70, 0.55, 0.63 and 0.38 and a specificity of 0.96, 0.87, 0.67 and 0.99 for Basal, Luminal A, Luminal B and HER2 enriched subtypes, respectively. Finally, the option to filter for molecular subtypes was implemented into our online biomarker validation platform at www.kmplot.com. Discussion: Microarray data provided highest sensitivity and specificity to independent subtype classification for Basal tumors, while the luminal B subtype displayed the highest discordance. Our registration-free online service enables the validation of gene expression based biomarkers in each subtype separately. What is the correlation between author-reported (IHC-based) and microarray-based molecular subtype determination? Microarray database GEO datasets: GSE1456, GSE21653, GSE25066, GSE20711, GSE31519 and GSE17907 Clinical characteristics (n=983): Relation of published subtype distributions: author: as published in GEO by the authors of the datasets computed: distribution for all arrays in the KM-plotter database Statistics (array vs. IHC, n=983) Highest sensitivity and specificity: Basal tumors Highest discordance: Luminal B Use the classification to validate survival- associated genes in each subtype separately at www.kmplot.com/breast: Materials & Methods RFS OS LN+ EndocrineTh. ChemoTh. Basal 3.31 6.00 51% 8.8% (375) 87% (377) Luminal A 4.61 6.67 95% (291) 73% (293) Luminal B 4.35 6.73 58% 33% (147) 74% (147) HER2 3.87 6.49 64% 35% (100) 95% (104) GEO search for: studies publishing molecular subtypes raw Affymetrix HGU133A and HGU133plus2 arrays at least 30 patients Definition of molecular subtypes using the StGallen guidelines: Microarray probe sets used for the classification: Statistics: sensitivity [=TP/(TP+FN)] specificity [=TN/(TN+FP)] Basal Luminal A Luminal B HER2+ ER Low High HER2 MKI67 N.R. Background Homepages Breast cancer molecular subtypes: different pathological characteristics different outcomes different treatment Can be identified by: IHC RT-PCR microarray www.kmplot.com/breast assess the effect of 22,277 genes on survival in 2,977 breast cancer patients www.kmplot.com/ovar assess the effect of 22,277 genes on survival in 1,464 ovarian cancer patients www.recurrenceonline.com compute the ER & HER2 status and the recurrence score for free using microarrays gyer1-6.sote.hu/gyorffy personal homepage Gene Probe Cutoff ER 205225_at 500 HER2 216836_s_at 4800 MKI67 212021_s_at 470 Annual hazard of recurrence and overall survival according to subtypes (Park et al, Breast, 2012): n Sensitivity Specificity Basal 380 0,70 0,96 Luminal A 306 0,55 0,87 Luminal B 169 0,63 0,67 HER2 128 0,38 0,99 Supported by the OTKA PD 83154 grant. gyorffy@kmplot.com Printed by