1 State & Private Forestry Redesign Assessment Tool.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Maines Sustainability Solutions Initiative (SSI) Focuses on research of the coupled dynamics of social- ecological systems (SES) and the translation of.
Redesigning State & Private Forestry. Why Change? Forests are being threatened at a scale larger and faster than current programs can address. Pressures.
May 9, Subgroup 4: Management of forests and forest-influenced landscapes Konstantin von Teuffel and Hubert Sterba.
Systematic Conservation Planning, Land Use Planning and SEA in South Africa Sustainable development embodied in Constitution Secure ecologically sustainable.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Centro Internacional para Estudios del Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo Sostenible CIEMADeS Centro Internacional para Estudios del Medioambiente y el Desarrollo.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
USDA Forest Service Research and Development Tribal Engagement Roadmap Consultation - January 10 to May 11, 2014 [DATE of PRSTN]
Bay Bank The Chesapeake’s Ecosystem Service Marketplace.
Science & Monitoring Team Meeting Sept 23rd. Agenda Introductions Overview of CPRW & CO Conservation Exchange Review draft charter/workplan Watershed.
“Pennsylvania Perspectives” Allegheny SAF Winter Meeting February 11, 2011 Dan Devlin, State Forester Conserving Penn’s Woods.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
FOREST AND RANGELANDS ASSESSMENT STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting and Webinar November 7, 2013 Green Infrastructure, Open Spaces, Sustainable Recreation, and.
The National Climate Assessment: Overview Glynis C. Lough, Ph.D. National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
© 2009 IBM Corporation IBM BPM BlueWorks Overview & Key Features.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Demystifying State Assessments Forest Service State & Private Forestry Redesign Version 2 December 10, 2008.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Esri UC2013. Preconference. ArcGIS Online Overview for CyberGIS Steve Kopp.
Dr. Howard Nelson Biodiversity Specialist Ministry of Planning, Housing and the Environment Trinidad and Tobago.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
Funded by the Government of Alberta Ecosystem Services and Conservation Offsets April 24 th, 2012.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROGRAM B U I L D I N G A S C I E N T I F I C F O U N D A T I O N F O R S O U N D E N V I R O N M E N T A L D E.
A Land Preservation Framework for the Cacapon Watershed of West Virginia Michael P. Strager Charles B. Yuill Natural Resource Analysis Center West Virginia.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
Engaging Communities in Developing a Sustainable Wood Products and Biomass Energy Industry By Gerry Gray Vice President for Policy American Forests.
Northeastern Area Overview. Our Mission Lead and help support sustainable forest management and use of forests across the landscape to provide benefits.
1 Integrated Services Program The Virginia Metadata Training Workshop Summer, 2006 Lyle Hornbaker Integrated Services Program
Climate Change Impacts in the United States Third National Climate Assessment Emily Therese Cloyd May 15, 2014.
CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 2012 ANNAPOLIS, MD Social Science Action Team: Incorporating Social Science into the.
GIS Applications in Interagency Fire Management Planning EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI Jeff Baranyi - ESRI EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI.
United States Forest Service S&PF Redesign Spatial Assessment Model.
Redesigning State & Private Forestry. Why Change? Forests are being threatened at a scale larger and faster than current programs can address. Pressures.
Northeast Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Pilot Project Introduction October 2013.
The Terminology used in this PowerPoint has not been sanctioned by the Department of State, the Governor of Maryland, Dean Wei, or any agent of Maryland.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Atlin-Taku Land Use Plan Resource Chapters Update Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #6 Atlin Rec Centre, Nov 27-28, 2009.
Corporate Ecosystem Valuation (CEV) Road Test Case Study: Lafarge May 3, 2011.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Safeguarding California: Implementation Action Plans Listening Tour October 2015.
In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Ron Torgerson – FFSL Central Area Manager Nick Mustoe – Central Area Forester Fred Johnson – Fire Management Officer.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
State of Natural Resources Report Ruth Jenkins. Sustainable management of natural resources State of Natural Resources Report (SoNaRR) State of Natural.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
National Association of Conservation Districts Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL February 2, 2010 The Next Generation of The Next Generation of Conservation.
1 USDA Forest Service Hurricane Preparedness Data Sets Developed Southern Wildland Fire Risk Assessment GIS data sets for use during emergency response.
The Natural Resource Planner and Kansas Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool Dana Peterson, KBS, KDWPT Mike Houts, Gina Ross and Jennifer Delisle, KBS.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability photos:
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Colorado’s Forest Action Plan Mike Lester, State Forester and Director
Potential Process and Decisions for Conn. River Watershed Pilot
Presentation transcript:

1 State & Private Forestry Redesign Assessment Tool

2 S&PF Assessment Tool Outline Overview – Process/Workflow – National Assessment (example) Application Web User-Interface – Output (example) Tool Status/Update Questions/Discussion?

3 S&PF Assessment Tool Overview

4 S&PF Assessment Tool Overview Web-based GIS decision-support system Capable of supporting analysis of customized data-sets and scenarios at the National/Regional/State level to guide forestry planning and decision-making. Highlight conditions and trends, and help identify opportunities and priorities for multi- state and multi-agency investment and cooperation 4

5 S&PF Assessment Tool Process Standard GIS Weighted Overlay Process – Combination and weighting of multiple factors Advantages: – Integrative and Collaborative Process – Transparency and Repeatability – Interactivity and Scalability – Comparability Across Geographic Regions (If standard data are used) – Ability to Share and Document 5

6 S&PF Assessment Tool Process Utilizes raster-based spatial format compatible with ArcGIS (GeoTIFF) Preloaded National Data Available (1km) – Used for National Assessments – States can also utilize to augment their data States should use their own finer resolution data, if available. – 2-GB file size limit – Upload via FTP 6

7 S&PF Assessment Tool Workflow

8 Conceptual Overview Data Layers Themes Forest Fragmentation Woody Biomass Development Risk WUI Fire Potential Insects and Disease Critical Habitat Water Quality Proximity Jurisdictions Policies Watersheds Others Output S&PF Assessment Tool Conserve Working Forest Landscapes Protect Forests From Harm Enhancing Other Forest- Related Benefits National Scale Regional Scale State Scale National, Regional, State, or Local 8

9 S&PF Assessment Tool Workflow Model Done Home Manage data Analyze data Data layers Data themes My analyses Shared Published Layer info Upload layer Theme info Assign child layers Done Analysis info Configure themes Setup slice Alternative info Weight layer & themes Done Analysis Child layer info Set divide /mask Reclassify data Done 9 Prepare DataAdd Data to Themes Create Analysis Assign Weights

10 S&PF Assessment Tool Prepare Data Processing Steps: Upload and name your data layers… Reclassify data layers – allows the user to decide “high priority” values Masking data – highlights data to area key to the analysis (Forest Mask); 10

11 Geospatial Assessment Process Can build on Forest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project (SAP) The Data Layers from SAP can be used in the State Assessments The weighted overlay analysis used in SAP is similar to this process 11

12 S&PF Assessment Tool Data Disclaimer All data-layers associated with a single analysis must have a common geographic extent, pixel size, pixel alignment, datum, and projection in order for the analysis to produce meaningful results. 12

13 S&PF Assessment Tool Prepare Themes Refined Questions for Each S&PF Redesign Theme Conserve Working Forest Lands Protect Forests From Harm Enhance Public Benefit from Trees & Forests Where is productive forest land most threatened by development and fragmentation? Where are forests most threatened by insects, disease, and wildfire? Where can protection of threatened and endangered species (as a proxy for biodiversity) be most beneficial? 13

14 S&PF Assessment Tool Themes & Objectives States may add their own objectives States decide the relative importance of the national objectives States should define the objectives to address their specific State issues - this is “identifying criteria”… – Requires Collaborative Involvement 14

15 S&PF Assessment Tool Ranking / Weighting Determine Goals/Priorities What is most important in meeting theme goals? Fire, Insect & Disease, Water? Subject area bias, how do we prevent this? – Those doing the ranking should have influence and oversight over multiple disciplines. – Broader agency goals and existing plans 15

16 S&PF Assessment Tool Data Aggregation Chose desired mask and aggregation method (e.g. Forest, Watershed) Difficult to work with “pixels” on a landscape level – Aggregated map a better communication tool Not all layers overlap Preventing unintended uses of the data – “My favorite pixel” Local decisions still based on local data/information 16

17 S&PF Assessment Tool View/Edit Scenario Evaluate Intermediate/Final Results – Easy to see what is driving the maps Change Weights and Re-Run Outputs – Scenarios (Gaming) Different Aggregation Units Swap in Higher Resolution Data 17

18 S&PF Assessment Tool National Assessment Example

19 S&PF Assessment Tool National Themes & Objectives ThemeObjective Conserving Working Forest Landscapes Identify and conserve high priority forest ecosystems and landscapes. Actively and sustainably manage forests. Protect Forests From Harm Restore fire-adapted lands and reduce risk of wildfire impacts. Identify, manage and reduce threats to forest and ecosystem health. Enhance Public Benefits Associated with Trees and Forests Protect and enhance water quality and quantity. Improve air quality and conserve energy. Assist communities in planning for and reducing wildfire risks. Maintain and enhance the economic benefits and values of trees and forests. Protect, conserve, and enhance wildlife and fish habitat. Connect people to trees and forests, and engage them in environmental stewardship activities. Manage and restore trees and forests to mitigate and adapt to global climate change. Themes and Objectives are based on Section 8001 of the 2008 Farm Bill – National Priorities for Private Forest Conservation and were approved by the RIC. 19

20 S&PF Assessment Tool Ranking / Weighting Assign Data-Layers… Development Woody Biomass Forest Fragmentation Fire Potential Insect & Disease Risk Wildland Urban Interface Critical Habitat Conserve Working Forest Lands Protect Forests From Harm Enhance Public Benefit from Trees & Forests to Themes 2006 Nat. Insect and Disease Risk Map 2000 Wildland Fire Potential Map Development Risk Map Woody Biomass Map Forest Fragmentation Map Wildland Urban Interface Map Critical Habitat Characteristics Map 20

21 S&PF Assessment Tool Layer/Theme Weighting Assigned weights within themes…. Development Woody Biomass Forest Fragmentation Fire Potential Insect & Disease Risk Wildland Urban Interface Critical Habitat 65% 22% 13% 50% 75% 25% 45% 10% 45% Conserve Working Forest Lands Protect Forests From Harm Enhance Public Benefit from Trees & Forests National Assessment … then assigned weights between themes… 21

22 Development 65% Woody Biomass 22% Fragmentation 13% Priority Watersheds by Area Draft National Assessment Conserve Working Forest Land L E G E N D HighModerateLow 22

23 Insect and Disease 50% Fire Potential 50% Protect Forests From Harm Priority Watersheds by Area Draft National Assessment L E G E N D HighModerateLow 23

24 WUI 25% Critical Habitat 75% Enhance Public Benefits from Trees and Forests Priority Watersheds by Area Draft National Assessment L E G E N D HighModerateLow 24

25 Enhance Public Benefits from Trees and Forests 10% Protect Forests From Harm 45% Conserve Working Forest Land 45% Draft National Assessment Priority Watersheds by Area L E G E N D HighModerateLow 25

Draft National Assessment Priority Watersheds by Area L E G E N D HighModerateLow 26

27 S&PF Assessment Tool Web User Interface

28 S&PF Assessment Tool Welcome Screen

29 S&PF Assessment Tool Input Data Layers

30 S&PF Assessment Tool Assign Data to Themes

31 S&PF Assessment Tool Add New Data Layer

32 S&PF Assessment Tool Select Data Layer

33 S&PF Assessment Tool Select Auxiliary Data Layer

34 S&PF Assessment Tool Reclassify Continuous Data

35 S&PF Assessment Tool Reclassify Discrete Data

36 S&PF Assessment Tool Weight Layers and Themes

37 S&PF Assessment Tool View/Edit Results

38 S&PF Assessment Tool Sample Automated Output Report USFS S&PFAT Sample Report 38

39 S&PF Assessment Tool Status/Update

40 S&PF Assessment Tool History Initial Design and Development – May 07 to Sept 08 – Requirements Analysis – Data (Availability, Consistency) – Prototype Development (Error Detection, Refinement) Prototype Enhancement – Nov 08 to Aug 09 – Streamlined user-interface/workflow – Output (Reports, Map Viewer) – Data (Local Data, Processing) – Role-based access (National, Regional, State) 40

41 S&PF Assessment Tool Current Status Transition from ESRI development environment to Interim Hosting Environment (LenTech) – New Production Configuration – New Test/Development Environments Available For Use – Jan ‘10 – Pre-Production Use – Ongoing Development/Testing 41

42 S&PF Assessment Tool Next Steps Mandatory Security Requirements – USDA eAuthentication – Security Certification & Accreditation (C&A) Migrate to Government Data Center Data/System Administration (ongoing) Application Maintenance & Enhancements – Internet Explorer v7/8 compatibility – Enhanced On-Line Help/Tutorial – Data-Preparation & Output Transformation 42

43 S&PF Assessment Tool Lessons Learned Need clearly defined goals and objectives – what questions are being addressed by analysis. – Interdisciplinary Team (GIS & Program Experts) – Decisions made by Leadership Refined/Streamlined workflow Data limitations. – Improvement/Development Needs – Scaling issue(s) with Urban & Community Forestry Risk vs. Opportunity

44 S&PF Assessment Tool Lessons Learned Need visualization tools to aid in assessment process decisions. Need for standardized language (semantics). – Consistency – Understanding Efforts to make tool user-friendly to “lay” people did not extend to Data Preparation – still requires some level of GIS expertise and knowledge of data.

45 S&PF Assessment Tool Questions? Contact(s): Mike Barrowcliff Bill Rush 45