(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Nanomaterials and Risk Assessment (Example: RA for Inhaled Nanoparticles and Inhaled Benzene) Michael A. Jayjock, PhD CIH The LifeLine Group and.
Advertisements

Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
The History of Trona Cloud Hazardous Air Pollutants “Left Click” to Next Slide.
 Those hazards which may cause measurable changes in the body or its functions.
TRP Chapter Chapter 2.3 Environmental impacts and health risks.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
By: Brian Oldakowski Shane DeStefano Jeff Schmidt & Dustin Schneider
Risk Assessment.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
The Trona Cloud Featuring OCI, FMC, General Chemical, and Solvay Minerals “Left Click” to Next Slide.
Using Science to Address Environmental Problems Chapter 2.
Emissions Transport and Fate Concentrations Exposure Dose Dose-response Relationship Health Risk Schematic overview of a Health Risk Assessment.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
New Source Review for Air Toxics November 2, 2005 Peter J. Moore Yorke Engineering x24.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Environmental Health XV. Risk Assessment Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental Engineering.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: Chapter 4 O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry,
Risk Assessment in the Environment. What is the difference between hazard and risk? Risk: probability that an event or effect will occur and  Combination.
Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Introduction
Environmental Hazards, Risk, & Human Health. Leading Causes of Mortality.
RISK Targets: 1. Explain risk, toxicology, toxins and factors that affect chemical risks. 2. Explain how toxicity is measured and methods of determining.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Environmental Risk Analysis
Philip Bedient, Ph.D. Rice University
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: Chapter 4 O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry,
TRAINING FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
SMMSS - Support to Modernisation of Mongolia Standardisation System Food Chain Risk Assessment and Management - Seminar on Food Safety Ulaanbaatar / Mongolia.
 Drinking-Water Standards  History  Key Definitions  How Standards are Developed  Current Issues Confronting Developers of Standards.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
Environmental Hazards & Human Health
Proposed Regulatory Framework Kentucky Air Toxic Program (KATP) Presentation to: Kentucky Chemical Industry Council November 10, 2005 Environmental & Public.
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
CPHA 2014 Cumulative Impacts of Air Pollution Mapped at a Neighbourhood Level Stephanie Gower Toronto Public Health May 27, 2014 Co-authors: Ronald Macfarlane,
June 8, 2004Seafood: Assessing the Benefits and Risks1 of 17 Assessing and Managing the Risks Associated With Eating Seafood Don Schaffner, Ph.D. Professor.
Tier 1 Environmental Performance Tools Economic Criteria.
3. Method of inspection Requirements for the Method of Inspection We assume that k a is much larger than k el. That is, k a is at least five times greater.
Environmental Hazards and Human Health, Part 1. CHEMICAL HAZARDS A hazardous chemical can harm humans or other animals because it may: –Be flammable –Be.
Risk Assessment 1 Thanks to Paul R. Harp, Ph.D., NH Department of Health & Human Services, US EPA Air Quality Planning & Standards Division, and the DOE.
Environmental Health and Toxicology
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
WASTE MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARDS PROFESSOR JIM BRIDGES Emeritus Professor of Toxicology and Environmental Health Chair of the EU scientific committee.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Debbie Miller Water Quality Standards Toxic Criteria Coordinator.
‘DOSE’-‘OUTCOME’ IN GENERAL Relationship between a measured outcome associated with a measured dose –‘outcome’ = level of biological response or prevalence.
Risk Perception, Assessment and Management. Environmental Risk Prior to 1980s assumed that pollutants had a threshold level, below which they were harmless.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
The Environment and Human Health
Health Effects of Air Toxics Joann Held NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop, Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
MEASUREMENT OF TOXICITY By, Dr. M. David Department of Zoology, Karnatak University Dharwad.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Lecture 4: Risk Analysis
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
Risk, Perception, Assessment, and Management Pertemuan 3
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Environmental Risk Assessment
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
TOXICOLOGY.
GL18 (R) – Impurities: Residual Solvents in New Veterinary Medicinal Products, Active Substance and Excipients.
Presentation transcript:

(IAQ)

What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures to environmental hazards Extent to which a group of people has been or may be exposed to a certain chemical is determined Extent of exposure is then considered in relation to the kind and degree of hazard posed by the chemical, thereby permitting an estimate to be made of the present or potential health risk to the group of people involved Risk management: is the action taken based on the risk assessment

Purpose of Risk Assessment Characterizes the types of health effects expected Estimates the probability (risk) of occurrence of these health effects Estimates the number of cases with these health effects Provides an acceptable concentration of a toxicant in air, water, or food Covers cancerous as well as non cancerous chemicals

Process of Risk Assessment Hazard identification : A determination is made as to whether human exposure to the agent in question has the potential to increase the incidence of cancer Dose-response assessment: A quantitative relationship is derived between the dose, or more generally the human exposure, and the probability of induction of a carcinogenic effect Exposure assessment: An evaluation is made of the human exposure to the agent. Exposure assessments identify the exposed population, describe its composition and size, and present the type, magnitude, frequency, and duration of exposure Risk characterization: The exposure and dose-response assessments are combined to produce a quantitative risk estimate and in which the strengths and weaknesses, major assumptions, judgments, and estimates of uncertainties are discussed

Hazard Assessment Technical hazard Characterization Population Data Response Assessment Exposure Assessment Technical Dose response Characterization Technical Exposure Characterization Integrative analysis Risk characterization summary Characterization of Risk Assessment

What is Risk? Hazard is the potential of an entity (or activity) to cause harm to nature, property, or people. Risk from a hazard: risk (harm/unit time) = frequency (event exposure/ unit time) * Consequence (harm/event exposure])

What is Total Risk? Total risk: R = i = 1 N ∑ R i= 1,2,3,…,n where, i is hazard For low value of C, R = f x Ch For high value of C, R = f x Chn where n is some known number that reflects the roles of disruptions by severe accidents, as well as the public perception

How to calculate frequency (f)? Frequency (f) = Exposure / Unit time = Daily amount of air pollutant inhaled over a life time / person’s weight = (Breathing rate ( m 3 / day) x indoor concentration ( µg/ m 3 ) ) / ( Weight of an individual in kg) = (B x C) / W where, B is breathing rate, C is indoor concentration, W is weight of an individual. Units of frequency is ( µg / kg-day)

How to calculate Consequence (C) ? Consequence (c) = Life time excess cancer risk / Daily exposure to 1 µg of the pollutant/weight of an individual = β a x K ah x I where, β a = “potency” of the pollutant for inhalation in (µg/kg-day) -1 K ah = a conversion factor expressing the ratio of the risk to a human to the corresponding risk to an animal based on inhalation toxicity I = a factor relating inhalation data to risk if other pathways were also available, also known as data potency

What is lifetime excess cancer risk ? It is expressed as follows: R = (B x d). (β a x K ah x I ) W

Example of lifetime excess cancer risk Risk to an adult from the exposure to tetrachloroethylene is calculated as follows by using the given information B = 20, W = 70, d = 3.5, β a = 9.2 x 10-6, K ah = 1, I = 1 By using the above formula and substituting the above given values in the formula we get the lifetime excess cancer risk to an individual is R = 9.2 x The above value of risk implies that an individual has a 9.2 chance in a million of getting cancer over his or her lifetime because of the daily exposure to tetracholoroethylene at a concentration level of 3.5 µg/m3 of air. If an individual has a life span of 70 years, then chance of getting cancer in any one year is 9.2/70 = 0.13 in a million

Why are risk studies conducted on Animals? While carrying out experiments there are risks from a spectral of real, suspected or conjured hazards related to chemical and biological substances. The effect from a single substance on humans under controlled conditions cannot be studied. Therefore, studies are conducted on test animals that are subjected to massive doses of a substance on a relatively short time scale. These test conditions carried out on animals like rats and monkeys are atypical of human exposures. The results of these animal studies are extrapolated for applications to human conditions by the use of mathematical models. The mathematical models are actually equations which are formulated and solved for applications to animal test conditions

Understanding Risk Factors EPA Reference Dose: Maximum daily acceptable oral dose of a toxic substance, smaller numbers mean a pollutant is more toxic Carcinogenic Potency factor or Carcinogenic Slope Factor: a way to measure the safe dose of a toxin. The EPA says that this chemical is safe to this dose with a 95 th percentile of certainty. Higher numbers are safer.

Risk Factors of Various Pollutants Toxic Air Pollutants EPA reference dose (mg/kg-day) Carcinogenic Potency (kg –day / mg) Antimony4*10 -4 Arsenic3*10 -4 Cadmium5.71* Cobalt6*10 -2 Lead4.29*10 -4 Magnesium1.15*10 -6 Manganese1.43*10 -5 Mercury8.57*10 -5 Nickel2*10 -2

Risk Factors of Various Pollutants Toxic Air Pollutants EPA reference dose (mg/kg-day) Carcinogenic Potency (kg –day / mg) Selenium5*10 -3 Vanadium7*10 -3 Biphenyl5*10 -2 Acenaphthene6*10 -2 Benzo-anthracene6.1*10 -1 Benzo pyrene6.1 Chrysene6.1*10 -3 Fluoranthene4*10 -2 Fluorene4*10 -2 Naphthalene4*10 -2

Risk Factors of Various Pollutants Toxic Air Pollutants EPA reference dose (mg/kg-day) Carcinogenic Potency (kg –day / mg) Pyrene3*10 -2 Phenanthrene3* methyl chrysene4.1*10 -1 Acetaldehyde7.7*10 -1 Acetophenone5.71*10 -6 Acrolein5.71*10 -6 Benzene2.9*10 -2 Benzyl chloride1.7*10 -1 Bromoform3.85*10 -3

Risk Factors of Various Pollutants Toxic Air Pollutants EPA reference dose (mg/kg-day) Carcinogenic Potency (kg –day / mg) Carbon disulfide2*10 -1 Chlorobenzene5.71*10 -3 Chloroform8.05*10 -2 Cumene2.57*10 -3 Cynide2*10 -2 Di methyl sulfate4.1*10 -1 Ethyl benzene2.86*10 -1 Ethyl chloride2.86 Ethylene dibromide7.7*10 -1

Risk Factors of Various Pollutants Toxic Air Pollutants EPA reference dose (mg/kg-day) Carcinogenic Potency (kg –day / mg) Formaldehyde4.55*10 -2 Hexane5.71*10 -2 Isophorone9.5*10 -4 Methyl bromide1.43*10 -3 Methylene chloride1.64*10 -2 Phenol6*10 -1 Toluene1.14*10 -1 Tetrachloroethylene2.03*10 -3 Styrene2.86*10 -1

Risk Factors of Various Pollutants Toxic Air Pollutants EPA reference dose (mg/kg-day) Carcinogenic Potency (kg –day / mg) Xylenes2 Vinyl Acetate5.71*10 -2 HCL gas5.71*10 -3 HF gas7*10 -4