MAKING THE CASE… for STEM Education STEM Leadership Network: Forum #1 October 17, 2013 ESD 123 Blue Mtn. Room Georgia Boatman & Peggy Willcuts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
+ Build a Better Candy Bag Build Your Own Robot Arm Critical Load Working With Wind Energy User Handouts Corali Ferrer Yvonne Pelham November 2010.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards.
Developed by ERLC/ARPDC as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation.
The Design Process Engineering Graphics Dr. Stephen Crown.
Science Leadership Network-Fall 2013 NOVEMBER 8, 2013 Presented by Craig Gabler and Vicki Horton.
Implications for Learning Sequences
How organization can improve creativity Robotics and Automation Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. 1.
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
2014 Work Planning Local Program Leadership Team.
Bellwork How are science and technology related? Explain your answer using at least three sentences and give at least one example how they are related.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Framework for K-12 Science Education
April 16, 2015 Macomb Science Leadership Council.
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
STEMCenter for Teaching & Learning™ Engineering byDesign™
Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?
Advancing Language Proficiency through Science and Engineering Practices Presented by: Michelle French Rita Starnes Brad Schleder.
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE SESSION STEM Education: Communication Tools and Collaboration Opportunities May 20, /20/11Superintendents Community of Practice.
Using Technology to Increase Student Engagement in the STEM Classroom Innovations for Learning Conference: Fayette County Schools June 4, 2013 Presenters:
MAKING THE CASE… for STEM Education STEM Leadership Network: Forum #3 April 17, 2014 ESD 123 Blue Mtn. Room Georgia Boatman & Peggy Willcuts.
Instant Design Challenge Using the Design Process and Engineering Notebook.
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
EEA 2012 – Middle School STEM Day 3 Content Session.
Using Picture Books for Professional Development on NGSS Kirk Robbins October 26, 2013.
NGSS Summit. Innovations of the NGSS Innovations in the NGSS 1.Three-Dimensional Learning 2.Students Engaging in Phenomena and Designed Solutions 3.Engineering.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Student Technology Leadership Program (STLP) Procedures to Follow as a Member of STLP!
The Next Generation Science Standards From Awareness to Transition
From SEF to SIP March 24, Content Objectives Participants will 1. Understand SIP law 2. Explore the CNA 3. Explore the Plan-Do-Check-Act Model for.
Basics of Research and Development and Design STEM Education HON4013 ENGR1020 Learning and Action Cycles.
Superintendents Parent Advisory Committee October 1, 2015 Mary Tsukamoto Elementary School Ambassadors Jeff Morin and Jason Akaba (alt.)
K-12 Alliance Experiencing Engineering in a Three Dimensional Lesson 1.
Friday, October 15 Objective: Students will be able to present information they have found on an engineering career. Bell Ringer: Quick Write: What is.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
1.2 EbD Community Engineering and the Core Curriculum 1 ® ®
Teacher-Librarians & NGSS: A Natural Phenomenon
Welcome to: Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) – Creativity: Applications and Assessment Before we start, if you have a smart phone please download.
Working Technologically Early Stage 1 – Stage 3. Students evaluate by: recounting the steps taken to reach a final solution discussing their likes and.
Next Generation Science Standards “Taking the Steps to Implement NGSS” March 29, 2013 TEEAM Conference.
National Research Council Of the National Academies
Middle School Model Selection Kirk Brown and Lissa Gilmore Science and STEM Integration/Innovation San Joaquin County Office of Education.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
The Design Process.
Unpacking NGSS Laura Kresl Julie Roney. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) September 4, 2013 C Subject: State Schools Chief.
January 23, Outcomes Participants will collaborate on plans for implementation of the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science. Participants.
Science Leadership Network Winter Building Expertise with NGSS Innovations.
The Design Process Foundation Concepts for Teaching Problem Solving The Model #302 telephone was the standard for forty years. How long will this one.
The Engineering Design Process
© 2012 by Project Gals New Goals for a New Year A Learning Activity.
Technological Design VS Engineering Design. Technological design and Engineering design are very similar and sometimes the terms are often confused with.
Mark Cerutti, Associate Superintendent, Education Services Anna Trunnell, Director, Curriculum/Professional Learning Ray Pietersen, Program Specialist,
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
1 Digging into the 2 nd Draft of the Next Generation Science Standards January 31, 2013 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant.
Plants and Animals First Grade
NATIONAL PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Designing Like an Engineer!
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process
Science Leadership Network
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Presentation transcript:

MAKING THE CASE… for STEM Education STEM Leadership Network: Forum #1 October 17, 2013 ESD 123 Blue Mtn. Room Georgia Boatman & Peggy Willcuts

PREPARING YOUR STEM NOTEBOOK Title for Today’s Page: SLN Forum #1 October 17, 2013 ESD 123 Blue Mt. Room 2

Tools for Your Use… Quick inventory of table: Table Box – take off the lid and set underneath SLN Binder Add elements from previous sessions 3

4 Remember your two lenses… 4 Adult Learner Instructional Leader

AGENDA OVERVIEW PART ONE: Dipping into the Research: A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas SLN/SNL Weekend Update on NGSS PART TWO: Targeting NGSS Dimensions with STEM PART THREE: Action Planning 5 Lunch !

GOALS Build a shared understanding of the elements of effective STEM instruction Increase awareness of the research supporting effective teaching and learning Experience, first-hand, an immersion activity modeling effective STEM instruction Take action together as school district teams 6

PART ONE: DIPPING INTO THE RESEARCH PART ONE: DIPPING INTO THE RESEARCH Weekend Update with NGSS

SLN/SNL: NGSS Update with Peggy Willcuts and Georgia Boatman! 8

CCSS and NGSS Washington’s Implementation Phases and Timelines 9

10

Widespread Input: 4,000+ educators, stakeholders and students 11

12

13

14

What We Do…..What We Will Need to Do 15 What we are doing now What we will need to do differently

16

17

18 ADOPTED October 4, 2013 !!

States Who Have Adopted Rhode Island Kentucky Kansas Maryland Vermont California Delaware Washington 19

PART TWO: TARGETING ENGINEERING IN THE NGSS WITH STEM DESIGN CHALLENGES

Design Process Graphic Comparison Design Squad/ PNNL Family Engineering NGSS

Design Process Graphic Comparison Design Squad /PNNL Family Engineering NGSS SIMILARITIES? DIFFERENCES?

Artistic Robots Have you worked with toys that light up, wind, move, make sounds when you push a button or flip a switch? What powers those toys?

Artistic Robots Work in teams of 4 engineers Use your creativity to design and build an artistic robot You have ONLY the materials in the bag:  Rubber bands  Craft sticks  Paper clips  Eraser  Cup  Motor  Battery  Markers  Drinking straws  Tape (from table)

Artistic Robots The TWO most important parts of your design to make your robot move: The motor and the battery First questions you must answer: How do you make the energy flow from the battery to the motor? How can you prove that flow of energy from the battery?

Artistic Robots Read together the design challenge. Talk, brainstorm and sketch first. Remain a team and listen to everyone. Remember there are many possible solutions. THEN YOU MAY: Come forward to receive our bag of materials. Use as many things in the bag as you wish. Test often and optimize.

Engineering Design (NGSS) K-2 ETS1.A ETS1.C Defining and Delimiting Engineering Problems Developing Possible Solutions Optimizing the Design Solution ETS1.B A situation that people want to change or create can be approached as a problem to be solved through engineering. Asking questions, making observations, and gathering information are helpful in thinking about problems. Before beginning to design a solution, it is important to clearly understand the problem Designs can be conveyed through sketches, drawings, or physical models. These representations are useful in communicating ideas for a problem’s solutions to other people. Because there is always more than one possible solution to a problem, it is useful to compare and test designs.

Engineering Design (NGSS) 3-5 ETS1.A ETS1.C Defining and Delimiting Engineering Problems Developing Possible Solutions Optimizing the Design Solution ETS1.B Possible solutions to a problem are limited by available materials and resources (constraints). The success of a designed solution is determined by considering the desired features of a solution (criteria). Different proposals for solutions can be compared on the basis of how well each one meets the specified criteria for success or how well each takes the constraints into account. Research on a problem should be carried out before beginning to design a solution. Testing a solution involves investigating how well it performs under a range of likely conditions. At whatever stage, communicating with peers about proposed solutions is an important part of the design process, and shared ideas can lead to improved designs. Tests are often designed to identify failure points or difficulties, which suggest the elements of the design that need to be improved Different solutions need to be tested in order to determine which of them best solves the problem, given the criteria and the constraints.

Engineering Design (NGSS) Middle School ETS1.A ETS1.C Defining and Delimiting Engineering Problems Developing Possible Solutions Optimizing the Design Solution ETS1.B The more precisely a design task’s criteria and constraints can be defined, the more likely it is that the designed solution will be successful. Specification of constraints includes consideration of scientific principles and other relevant knowledge that are likely to limit possible solutions. A solution needs to be tested, and then modified on the basis of the test results, in order to improve it. There are systematic processes for evaluating solutions with respect to how well they meet the criteria and constraints of a problem. Sometimes parts of different solutions can be combined to create a solution that is better than any of its predecessors. Models of all kinds are important for testing solutions. Although one design may not perform the best across all tests, identifying the characteristics of the design that performed the best in each test can provide useful information for the redesign process – that is, some of those characteristics may be incorporated into the new design The iterative process of testing the most promising solutions and modifying what is proposed on the basis of the test results leads to greater refinement and ultimately to an optimal solution.

Engineering Design (NGSS) High School ETS1.AETS1.C Defining and Delimiting Engineering Problems Developing Possible Solutions Optimizing the Design Solution ETS1.B Criteria and constraints also include satisfying any requirements set by society, such as taking issues of risk mitigation into account, and they should be quantified to the extent possible and stated in such a way that one can tell if a given design meets them. Humanity faces major global challenges today, which can be addressed through engineering These global challenges also may have manifestations in local communities. When evaluating solutions, it is important to take into account a range of constraints, including cost, safety, reliability, and aesthetics, and to consider social, cultural, and environmental impacts. Both physical models and computers can be used in various ways to aid in the engineering design process. Computers are useful for a variety of purposes, such as running simulations to test different ways of solving a problem or to see which on is most efficient or economical; and in making a persuasive presentation to a client about how a given design will meet his or her needs. Criteria may need to be broken down into simpler ones that can be approached systematically, and decisions about the priority of certain criteria over other (trade-offs) may be needed.

Family Engineering as a Resource Family Engineering In the Classroom At a Family Event Aligned with: Career Awareness Launch STEM Efforts Partnership Opportunity for Engineers and Business NGSS : SEP, CCC, DCI, ETS Common Core (ELA & Math) Instructional Materials 21 st Century Skills Engage and Inform Parents Broader Community?

Family Engineering as a Resource Family Scienc e Ice Breakers Engineering Challenges No Materials Simple Materials Materials Dependen t Self Directed Openers 5 – 10 minutes minutes Use Design Process Up to 60 minutes Family Engineering

TIME TO GET LUNCH ! 33

PART THREE: ACTION PLANNING

Action Planning: Divide and Conquer 35 Sort yourselves into two groups: Teams new to the STEM Leadership Network Veteran STEM Leadership Network Teams Meet with…. New Teams-Georgia Veteran Teams-Peggy

Final Notes… Please complete your evaluation Next Meeting: January 24 th 10:00 Bring your Framework for K-12 Science Education Book Bring your Action Plan Documents Drive safely! 36

MAKING THE CASE… for STEM Education STEM Leadership Network: Forum #1 October 25, 2012 ESD 123 Blue Mtn. Room Georgia Boatman & Peggy Willcuts