Tom Blaine, CPPO, FCPM, FCPA Senior Research Associate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topics addressed by SDCs governance Division decentralization democratization Gender Human Rights; access to justice Economic governance.
Advertisements

Price Reasonableness Jan Giffin, CPPO, CPPB, VCO
Evolution of Parametric Analysis within Rolls-Royce Purchasing
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
Organizational buying behavior Presentation created by Mag. Maria Peer based on the lecture BBM1 – Marketing Mag. Andreas Zehetner FH Steyr.
Leadership: the future “must have” item Tom Irvine Director of Leadership.
Centralization vs Decentralization County General Services Association April 3, 4 and 5, 2013.
Decisions, Decisions, and still more Decisions Tom MayerDirector State of Alaska Jason SozaCPO State of Alaska Paul MashAsst. Director State of Utah Steve.
ETHICS FOR THE PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL Wiley C. Rowsey, CPPO, VCO Procurement Director Virginia Department of Education Phone:
Cooperative Purchasing— An Effective Sourcing Strategy Gary D. Link, C.P.M. E&I Cooperative Purchasing Ralph Maier University of Pennsylvania.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
Lord Hunt President of the Health Care Supply Association The NHS Procurement Landscape.
The Political and Bureaucratic Executive in Canada Pols 341 Canadian Public Administration Dr. Douglas Brown January 2013.
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
Reverse Auctioning at the University of Pennsylvania SUNY Purchasing Association Fall Conference October 9, 2003.
Buyer Behaviour - VIU Purchasing at VIU Purchasing at VIU Constraints Constraints Opportunities Opportunities Value Value Relationships Relationships.
EProcurement at the University of Pennsylvania SciQuest “Find, Buy & Manage” Seminar Princeton, New Jersey October 23, 2003.
CONNECTING THE NUMBERS Procurement Forum 2011 Presented by Keith Gagnon, MBA, CPPO, VCO Director of Procurement Virginia Community College System.
School District Purchasing. Purchasing Authority Arizona Statutes Arizona Statutes Arizona Administrative Code Arizona Administrative Code  Primary source.
CLU3M- Introduction Unit 1.
Hospitality Services Group COOPERATIVE PURCHASING SINCE 1989.
MOASBO Spring Conference Bill Sloan – Rockwood School District Director of Purchasing and Transportation.
Procurement & Contracting Officer Meeting Statewide Training & Certification (Reform#8)
Public Administration Jay Shaftitz & E. W. Russell
Contemporary Trends in Local Government John and Carol Nalbandian.
Procurement Management Review Out-Briefing. Agenda OverviewFindings Next Steps and Questions.
Communicating with Key Stakeholders Corporate Communication Chapter 8 (2) Dr. Inas A.Hamid.
The Pearl Initiative creating a corporate culture of transparency and accountability Capital Markets Authority Kuwait Corporate Governance Symposium 2.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 5 Energy Regulation Module 5: STRUCTURE, COMPOSITION AND ROLE OF AN ENERGY REGULATOR.
USSOCOM / Industry Collaboration NDIA Debrief 20 August 2015 Strategic Business Solutions.
Professional Services Procurement Presentation to: Professional Services Trilateral Working Group Date: 1 March 2013.
Eliminating Objections in the Sales Process. Common Objections Can Be Overcome: Know the CUSTOMER’S perspective –What does the customer want? –What will.
The Marketing Environment Chapter 3. 2 Learning Goals 1. Understand environmental forces 2. Learn how demographic and economic factors affect marketing.
The Political and Bureaucratic Executive in Canada Pols 341 Canadian Public Administration Dr. Douglas Brown.
CO “All-Ukrainian Network of People Living with HIV” Potential Problems in Supply – What Can Be Done? Kyiv, 2008.
Objectives and Organization for Effective Purchasing and Supply Management Marketing 3860 – Purchasing July 13, 2004 Kimball Bullington, Ph.D. Associate.
Public Management Power & Environments Wednesday, December 09, 2015 Hun Myoung Park, Ph.D. Public Management & Policy Analysis Program Graduate School.
11 /Module I.3/ Management of public procurement /Module I.3/ а. Procuring entity b. Evaluation committee & Rights and Duties c. Procurement Planning.
April 10–12, 2006 Hyatt Regency Atlanta Atlanta, GA NCMA World Congress 2006 : Achieving High Performance in Global Business: Leadership, Outsourcing,
Local Authority approaches to the Green Deal Descriptor 1 Service Area or Industry or Audience Segment (Author) Descriptor 2 Service or Industry (Topic:
E-procurement in Mexico: Can information systems build trust and improve governance? Eduardo Bohórquez WBI /
Global Principals: Best Practices & Resources for Procurement Professionals National Association of Purchasing Management NAPM-RGV.
What makes U.S. Communities Different? Public Benefit & Purpose Founders - Founded, owned and governed by Association of School Business Officials International,
NACDD Hill Day: Legislative Visits What to Expect Mari T. Brick, MA Program Consultant, NACDD
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
Chapter 16: Understanding the HR Profession Jackson and Schuler © 2003 South-Western College Publishing. All rights reserved. Eighth edition.
Public Policy Process and Public Administration
Reforming the Chilean Public Procurement System A public management reform Felipe Goya - RPM South Asia.
Chapter 3: Purchasing Research and Planning Strategic Planning for Purchasing Strategic planning for purchasing involves the identification of critical.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Eighth Regional Public Procurement Forum May, 22-25, 2012 Tirana
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Contrast between public and private purposes More than just efficiency and effectiveness Must pursue democratic values –Individualism – worth of individuals.
E-Procurement : Towards Transparency and Efficiency in Public Service Delivery.
The Public Tendering and Bidding (招投标) Law of the People's Republic of China Effective since January 1, 2000.
PENNSYLVANIA’S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Operations Management
Call for competition process
Information for New Members of Crown Entity Boards
The Marketing Environment
Perceptual Filters What are the new breakthrough ideas, opportunities, solutions, resources, people, funding sources, clients, markets (that are there!)
ISCOM 361 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ISCOM 361 PAPERS Education for Service--iscom361papers.com.
Purchasing Made Easy with Amazon Business
MyFloridaMarketPlace
Seizing the Value of eMarkets Eric van Heck Bled 2003, Business Panel June 10, 2003
The Marketing Environment
PENNSYLVANIA’S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
The Marketing Environment
Early Learning Social Impact Bond Contract Standardization Working Group Governance Issues and Expanded Agreements Listing.
Effectiveness Working Group
Presentation transcript:

Tom Blaine, CPPO, FCPM, FCPA Senior Research Associate

- Dennis Wholey

FINISHED FILES ARE THE RE- SULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIF- IC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS

How many ‘F’s are in the sentence?

FINISHED FILES ARE THE RE- SULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIF- IC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS

Your Experiences As a small business what has been you experience in dealing with the government procurement process?

It’s not your fault! Not all the rules of the game are written down.

Private Sector Purchasing Cost Evaluation Strategic Partnerships, long term relationships Small group of Vendors Select Business Partners via closed process Can do anything that is not illegal Accountable to Management Private vs. Public Sector Purchasing -Similarities and Differences

Public Sector Purchasing Price Evaluation Vendors are adversaries-Arms length relationship Large group of Potential Bidders Most of the process is in the public Competition is the preferred method of purchase Can only do what the rules/laws allowed

Current Trends in Public Procurement Green Purchasing Green Building Standards and Remodeling Energy Saving Products Recycled/Recyclable Products Find a product or service the government wants that the large companies are not selling Spend Analysis Strategic Partnerships

Perspective of the Players Requisitioner /Specifier Wants something that works Doesn’t want a hassle Prefers long working relationships with suppliers If a product or service works well, wants to keep it

Perspective of the Players Departmental Managers Don’t want the rules broken Don’t want productivity of department affected

Perspective of the Players Procurement Staff Multiple stakeholders- administration, elected officials, citizens, news media, vendor community Disinterested third party –Don’t care who gets the award Perspective depends on the type of the organization Clerical, Bureaucratic, Professional

Perspective of the Players Clerical Typically are clerks, push the paper May issue the bid, send results to department for decision Processes the PO after the decisions are made by the department May be organized to look like one of the other types, but no decision authority

Perspective of the Players Bureaucratic Bureaucratic and Professional Purchasing organizations-may be hard to distinguish Impediment to introducing and maintaining efficient government Tends to focus on control processes Know all the rules, regulations and laws pertaining to procurement Process over results Concerned with transparency

Perspective of the Players Bureaucratic Typically makes award decision A majority of the organizations have certified staff and managers Majority of purchasing organizations

Perspective of the Players Professional Highly educated multi-disciplinary staff Concerned with adding and documenting value to the government Significant scrutiny over specifications Focus on knowledge and information Conducts market research Documents vendor performance Eliminates poor performing vendors Concerned with transparency and value May over-exhibit professionalism

Perspective of the Players Elected and Appointed Officials Don’t want scandals May become overactive in the procurement process to assist a constituent Prefer to keep the purchases local Do not have significant knowledge of process and my be influenced by lobbying form those they trust

Who is the decision maker? Centralized vs. decentralized Centralized-Procurement makes /recommends the important decisions Decentralized- Departments make the important decisions Need to determine who makes what decisions Need to do some research