M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The framework decision on mutual recognition of custodial sentences Estella Baker
Advertisements

EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM,
Communication from the Commission COM(2010) 171 final Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice.
Framework Decisions 909 and 947 A Policy Perspective DUTT Conference Amsterdam, Netherlands 25 January 2013.
Serving Time in a Foreign Land 22 March 2012 Anand Doobay Consultant, Peters & Peters 15 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1BW Tel: + 44 (0) Fax: +
Slide 1/31 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
NEW EXISTING TOOLS FOR ENHANCING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION Towards a new generation of mutual legal assistance mechanisms.
Slide 1/32 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
4/15/20151 A new EU legal framework on confiscation The new Commission proposal for a Directive on confiscation Sebastiano Tiné European Commission DG.
The Law of the Lisbon Treaty. Our emerging European Criminal Process ? Professor Dermot P.J. Walsh School of Law University of Limerick.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
The European Public Prosecutor: Coming soon to a country near you? An EPP working with UK authorities Practical issues Mike Kennedy President of Eurojust.
Irish Centre for European Law Conference The Law of the Lisbon Treaty.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
1 Substantive criminal law and mutual recognition Hans G. NILSSON, Jur Dr h.c. Head of Division Criminal justice Council of the European Union.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Ildikó Németh, Ministry of Justice of Hungary This presentation is Co-funded by the Civil Justice Programme of the European Union Project JUST/2013/JCIV/AG/4691.
QUALETRA “QUALITY IN LEGAL TRANSLATION” WS2 Final Conference KU Leuven Antwerpen October 2014 QUALETRA JUST/2011/JPEN/AG/2975 With financial support.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Red Europea de Formación Judicial (REFJ) European Judicial Training Network (EJTN) Réseau Européen de Formation Judiciaire (REFJ) ONLINE COURSE ON JUDICIAL.
Libby McVeigh Fair
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Qualetra Launch Conference London Metropolitan University London, 4 th April 2013 QUALETRA JUST/2011/JPEN/AG/2975 More info:
Circulation of authentic instruments under Regulation 650/2012 speaker – Ivaylo Ivanov – Bulgarian Notary Chamber.
European Commission Justice March 2012 Cooperazione Giudiziaria UE Corporate Liability for committing corruption Kiev, 8 February 2013 Workshop on the.
European arrest warrant and equality of treatment of EU citizens: Croatian example Elizabeta Ivičević Karas University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law.
Discussion “International Cooperation: Service of Documents, Taking of Evidence” – Practical Implementation of Regulations No 1393/2007 and No 1206/2001.
Digitalization of courts in the context of mutual assistance in criminal matters Dr Arkadiusz Lach Department of Criminal Procedure University of Nicolaus.
Welcome to Maastricht University. Faculty of Law Oral v. written evidence in the European Union Prof. André Klip Maastricht University, Ravenna 14 May.
Access to Justice Development of Green Bench in the Court of Justice October 2005 : The Green Bench, a specialized division was officially set up at the.
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
The Brussels II Regulation The Council Regulation no 2201/2003 concerning the jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgment in matrimonial.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.
The acquis Council Framework Decision of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings (2002/629/JHA). Council Directive 2004/81/EC of 24 April.
Living in an area of freedom, security and justice European CommissionDirectorate-General Justice and Home affairs.
European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges
European Model(s) of Protective Measures in Cross-Border Maintenance Debt Recovery Mirela Župan Professor at Faculty of Law University of Osijek Croatia.
The EU Fight against Environmental Crime – Directive 2008/99 Helge Elisabeth Zeitler DG Justice, Criminal Law.
Prof. Dr. Gert Vermeulen t f Practitioners’ expectations regarding mutual recognition Mutual.
UNIT13: ACCESS TO JUSTICE Francisco de Paula PUIG BLANES Senior Judge.
CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.
OTHER COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTIONS INTRODUCTION.
Experience of Slovenia in implementation of European Arrest Warrant
MINISTRY OF FINANCE Counsellor, docent, Dr Tuomas Pöysti1 The Constitutionalisation and Evolution of Penal Law and Control Policy in the European.
1 European Evidence Warrant Mutual recognition and judicial co- operation in criminal matters in the EU Jarlath Spellman Irish National Member Eurojust.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
TAIEX SEMINAR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: TWENTY YEARS OF SHARING EU EXPERTISE 3 June, 2016 Dr. Anna Fiodorova Working group II EaP session.
Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings in the European Union in Practice Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice
JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU
International cooperation in criminal matters legal framework and examples from practice - Macedonian experiences Ohrid
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
Effective control over arrests The CJEU on the EAW
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
European actions.
Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings Steven Cras Political Administrator, General Secretariat.
Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Roadmap to Legislation at EU Level Overview & Horizontal Mechanism Prof. Dr. Katalin Ligeti EPRS & ELI Roundtable.
Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
European arrest warrant – in theory
Eurojust’s involvement in JITs
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
European Arrest Warrant
Presentation transcript:

M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV

THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION

MUTUAL RECOGNITION ARREST WARRANT ARREST WARRANT ORDER ORDER FREEZING PROPERTY OR FREEZING PROPERTY OR EVIDENCE EVIDENCE CONFISCATION CONFISCATION EUROPEAN EVIDENCE WARRANT EUROPEAN EVIDENCE WARRANT EXECUTION OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES EXECUTION OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES EXECUTION OF NON-CUSTODIAL SUPERVISION MEASURES EXECUTION OF NON-CUSTODIAL SUPERVISION MEASURES EXECUTION OF CUSTODIAL SENTENCES EXECUTION OF CUSTODIAL SENTENCES EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS AND DECISIONS ON PROBATION MEASURES WITH A VIEW TO THE SUPERVISION OF PROBATION MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS AND DECISIONS ON PROBATION MEASURES WITH A VIEW TO THE SUPERVISION OF PROBATION MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS

UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (1) 1. MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 2. GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND INTERPRETATION 3. CONCEPT, NATURE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EAW

UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (2) 4. SCOPE 4.1 Spatial scope 4.2 Temporal scope 4.3 Material scope

UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (3) 5. ISSUING AN EAW 5.1 Competent authority 5.2 The application Procedural stage Form and content 5.3 Transmission 5.4 Action pending the decision Additional information Authorisations Declaration and temporary transfer

UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (4) 5. ISSUING AN EAW (cont.) 5.5. Action after the decision Refusal Surrender Transit 5.6 Effects of surrender Calculation of deprivation of liberty Speciality rule Subsequent surrender 5.7 Expenses

UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (5) 6. EXECUTION OF AN EAW 6.1 Competent authority 6.2 Initial action Arrest and appearance before the judicial authority Hearing of the requested person 6.3 Procedure 6.4 Action pending the decision Supplementary information Declaration and temporary transfer

UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (6) 6. EXECUTION OF AN EAW (cont.) 6.5. Decision Grounds for mandatory non-execution Grounds for optional non-execution Multiple requests Grounds for setting conditions 6.6 Surrender Conditioned or postponed surrender

UNIT X THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (7) 7. ASSESSMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION Eurojust Report 2009: l_reports/2009/Annual_Report_2009_EN.pdf

1.-ORDERS FREEZING PROPERTY OR EVIDENCE IN EUROPE, CONFISCATION AND THE EUROPEAN EVIDENCE WARRANT in the context of the principle of mutual recognition and immediate execution. UNIT XI

2.-CURRENT LEGISLATION 2.1- Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA UNIT XI

3.- MEANING AND SCOPE Freezing orders Confiscation The European evidence warrant. UNIT XI

4.- SCOPE OF EACH OF THE THREE INSTITUTIONS: Material scope Procedural scope Temporal scope. UNIT XI

5.- COMPETENT AND INVOLVED AUTHORITIES IN EACH CASE Issuing authorities 5.2 Executing authorities. UNIT XI

6- THE ACTIVE PROCESS Adoption in proceedings Generation and documentation. The certificate Transmission and incidents. UNIT XI

7- THE PASSIVE PROCESS Recognition Non-recognition or non-execution Postponement of execution Immediate execution Competence Procedure and term Legal remedies Material content of execution Process of execution Cessation of execution Expenses, reimbursement and losses and damages. UNIT XI

MODULE IV UNIT 12 FINANCIAL PENALTIES

1.- INTRODUCTION (in relation to mutual recognition) 1.- INTRODUCTION (in relation to mutual recognition) 2 BACKGROUND TO THE CROSS- BORDER ENFORCEMENT OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES 2 BACKGROUND TO THE CROSS- BORDER ENFORCEMENT OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES

FINANCIAL PENALTIES BACKGROUND TO THE FRAMEWORK DECISION BACKGROUND TO THE FRAMEWORK DECISION - COMMISSION COMMUNICATION (2000) - COMMISSION COMMUNICATION (2000) - COUNCIL’S PROGRAMME OF MEASURES (2001) - COUNCIL’S PROGRAMME OF MEASURES (2001) - GERMAN INITIATIVE (2001) - GERMAN INITIATIVE (2001) - INITIATIVE FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM, FRANCE AND SWEDEN (2001) - INITIATIVE FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM, FRANCE AND SWEDEN (2001) - PARLIAMENT REPORT (2002) - PARLIAMENT REPORT (2002)

FINANCIAL PENALTIES 2.- FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA

FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA SCOPE SCOPE BASIC DEFINITIONS BASIC DEFINITIONS CONCEPT OF CONCEPT OF “DECISION” CONCEPT OF CONCEPT OF “PENALTY” CONCEPT OF CONCEPT OF OFFENCE TERRITORIAL SCOPE

FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA GROUNDS FOR NON- RECOGNITION GROUNDS FOR NON- RECOGNITION GROUNDS. Paying special attention to: Trials in absentia Multiple enforcement. Legal persons The human rights clause CONSEQUENCES

FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA PROCEDURE PROCEDURE JURISDICTION PROCESSING ENFORCEMENT Sum of the penalty Alternative penalty Other incidents Consequences of enforcement.

FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA 3.- CURRENT STATE OF TRANSPOSITION 3.- CURRENT STATE OF TRANSPOSITION DECLARATIONS BY THE STATES

UNIT XIII OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION

UNIT XIII UNIT XIII THE RECOGNITION OF PRE- TRIAL PROCEDURES NOT INVOLVING A DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY 2.1. The action of the Commission: the GREEN PAPER and the proposal on the European supervision order. 2.2 FRAMEWORK DECISION

UNIT XIII UNIT XIII. THE ENFORCEMENT OF SENTENCES INVOLVING THE DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY 3.1. The Strasbourg Convention and the Commission Green Paper 3.2 FRAMEWORK DECISION 3.3 Scope and purpose. Relationship with the EAW 3.4 Coordination with the rules on procedural rights

UNIT XIII UNIT XIII MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS AND PROBATION DECISIONS WITH A VIEW TO THE SUPERVISION OF PROBATION MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS 4.1. The European space of justice and judgments that establish measures involving the conditional suspension of a sentence or alternative penalties 4.2. The structure and aims of Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November The relationship with other European conventions.

UNIT XIII UNIT XIII THE PROSPECTS FOR MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN LIGHT OF THE TREATY OF LISBON