Using Data Process. Assumption #1 Making significant progress in improving student learning and closing achievement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching Mathematics for Learning Nancy Bunt, Ed.D.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Analyzing Student Work
WHAT IS “THE RIGHT STUFF?”
Teaching Mathematics for Learning in the 21 st Century.
Dr. Chialin Hsieh Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness 9/21/2010Research Advisory Group 1.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success
The Professional Learning Community Presented by Tom Jennings.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
Closing the Achievement Gap Leaving No Child Behind.
© 2009 Optimize: Professional Development, LLC Supporting and Maintaining Professional Learning Communities.
This slide show presentation is located on the APEL website: Click on the link: “2015 Summer Leadership Conference.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
September 12, 2014 Lora M. McCalister-Cruel BDS District Data Coach Bay District Schools Data Analysis Framework.
Curriculum & Alignment Institute Susan McCauley, Ph.D.
Improving Assessment Literacy School-wide. School and System Improvement Improvement by Contract -external threats and rewards Improvement by Culture.
Shelly Dickinson Melissa Long.  Icebreaker  What is still needed?  Data Team Meetings  It’s all about data.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
“Results Now!” Our focus of School Improvement efforts at Benson High School
Timberlane Regional School District
OAT Toolkit for Social Studies Building Effective Classroom Instruction and Assessment.
August 23, Use the “Key Drivers” as a Framework for Inquiry for Continuous Improvement Assessment Common Core alignment Assessment Literacy Analysis.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Using Adequate Resources to Double Student Performance Sarah Archibald Allan Odden CPRE Invitational Conference February 21, 2007.
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
When dealing with colleagues in PLC’s…. Welcome Professional Learning Communities Presenters: Pam Hughes & Kristin Magee
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Virginia State University Summer Data Institute: Digging into Data to Identify the Learner-Centered Problem Presented by: Justina O. Osa, Ed.D.
10+ Ways to Analyze Data Presenter: Lupe Lloyd Lupe Lloyd & Associates, Inc.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
2/2007AEIN Data Team Workshop “You never cross the same river twice…”
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Assessment Literacy: From Theory to Practice Webinar Series February-April 2009 Facilitated by Deb Farrington.
Standards Based Grading: A New Outlook on Grading.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
What is the 90/90/90 Research?  The Original Research  169 schools in high-poverty, high minority system  21 schools broke the mold – 90%
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Using Data to Improve Learning
Getting Started with MMD
February 21-22, 2018.
Creating Common Formative Assessments that Advance Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

Using Data Process

Assumption #1 Making significant progress in improving student learning and closing achievement gaps is a moral responsibility and a real possibility in a relatively short amount of time—two to five years. It is not children’s poverty or race or ethnic background that stands in the way of achievement; it is school practices and policies and the beliefs that underlie them that pose the biggest obstacles.

Assumption #2 Data have no meaning. Meaning is imposed through interpretation. Conversely, data themselves can also be a catalyst to questioning assumptions and changing practices based on new ways of thinking.

Assumption #3 Collaborative inquiry—a process where teachers construct their understanding of student-learning problems and invent and test out solutions together through rigorous and frequent use of data and reflective dialogue—unleashes the resourcefulness and creativity to continuously improve instruction and student learning.

Assumption #4 A school culture characterized by collective responsibility for student learning, commitment to equity, and trust is the foundation for collaborative inquiry.

Assumption #5 Using data itself does not improve teaching. Improved teaching comes about when teachers implement sound teaching practices grounded in cultural proficiency—understanding and respect for their students’ cultures—and a thorough understanding of the subject matter and how to teach it.

Assumption #6 Every member of a collaborative school community can act as a leader, dramatically impacting the quality of relationships, the school culture, and student learning.

Summative Formative State Assessments Demographics Benchmarks Common Assessments Classroom Assessments

Task 1: Using Data Project Overview

A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. The Using Data Process

S 1.13 A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. The Data Divide

S 1.14 A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Core Value Significant improvement in student learning and closing achievement gaps is a moral responsibility and a real possibility in a relatively short amount of time—two to five years.

S 1.15 A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Poverty, Race/Ethnicity, and Achievement Poverty and Race/ Ethnicity Enrollment % of Students Proficient or Above Source: Adapted from Accountability in Action (2 nd ed.) by Douglas Reeves, 2004, Denver, CO: Advanced Learning Press. Possibility X Schools with a majority of African American, Latino/a, and/or Native American students and/or students living in poverty are achieving at this level.

S 1.16 A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Core Value Collaborative inquiry—school teams constructing meaning of student-learning problems and testing out solutions together through rigorous use of data and reflective dialogue—unleashes the resourcefulness of educators to continuously improve instruction and student learning.

S 1.17 A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Anne Lieberman Dan Lorti Robert Marzano Milbrey McLaughlin Jay McTighe Fred Newmann Allan Odden Doug Reeves Mike Schmoker Deborah Shifter Dennis Sparks James Stigler Gary Wehlage Grant Wiggins and more… Deborah Ball Roland Barth Carol Belcher Louis Castenell Jim Collins Tom Corcoran Linda Darling-Hammond Lisa Delpit Rick DuFour Karen Eastwood Richard Elmore Susan Fuhrman Carl Glickman Asa Hilliard Virtually All Education Researchers Agree: Collaboration is Key

S 1.18 A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Building the Bridge Between Data and Results Instructional Improvement Data UseCollaboration Leadership & Capacity Culture/Equity/Trust

S 1.19 A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Culture, Equity, Trust Instructional Improvement Collaboration Data Use Leadership & Capacity Shifts That Are Evident in Using Data Schools Less EmphasisMore Emphasis External accountability, cultural blindness, little trust Internal and collective responsibility,cultural proficiency, trust Data to sort, learning left to chance Data to serve, expanding opportunities for all Top-down, data-driven decision making Ongoing Data-Driven Dialogue and collaborative inquiry Punishment/reward, avoidance Feedback for continuous improvement, frequent and in-depth use by teachers and students Individual charismatic leaders as change agents Learning communities with many change agents

A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Unique Features of the Using Data Process Builds everyone’s knowledge and skills Focuses on cultural proficiency, equity, and school culture Focuses on data culture and collaboration Includes both long-term and short-cycle improvement Is a structured and adaptable process: –identifies the student-learning problem –verifies its causes –uses research and a logic model to design interventions –monitors results Provides tools for collaboration and sense making

A Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry © 2008 by Corwin Press. All rights reserved. Using Data Process is the Intersection

New Baseline Year for Mathematics and Reading Purpose for Grades 3 – 8 Standard Setting Increase rigor by raising standards for Grades 3 – 8 student achievement on the OCCT as a means to be more competitive at the national and international levels. Align student expectations on the OCCT more closely with student expectations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Because tests were implemented over multiple years, there were outliers. Vertically aligning performance standards for students on the OCCT tests for Grades 3 – 8 allows for consistent expectations. 22 August 27, 2009 State Board of Education Meeting

A scaled score is derived from the number correct and is used to place a student in one of the given performance levels for each content area. Score ranges vary across content areas. A scaled score of 700 is Satisfactory or Proficient across all content areas. Oklahoma Performance Index (OPI) 23

Standard Setting is the process that allows experts to make judgments about the content that a student should know and be able to do in order to be classified in a specific performance level. Cut scores are necessary for the categorization of student test scores into the four performance levels utilized in Oklahoma: Advanced, Proficient, Limited Knowledge, and Unsatisfactory. Standard Setting and Cut Scores 24

Standard Setting and Cut Scores The experts included on the standard setting committees were educators across Grades 3-8 with significant experience in reading or mathematics instruction, as well as representatives from higher education and business. One panel of experts conducted standard setting for reading and another panel conducted standard setting for mathematics. 25

Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests Performance Benchmarks or "Cut Scores” The standard setting panelists determined cut score recommendations based on test content, performance standards, and test item difficulty, NOT based on number of test items answered correctly. –Raw scores were mapped to scale scores as is standard procedure with large-scale assessments such as the NAEP, ACT, or SAT. –Scale scores provide a consistent interpretation of assessments across years. 26

No blaming students. No blaming teachers. Data is just information. Use data for instructional purposes. “De-emotionalize” data. 27 Ground Rules

The median is the middle score in a set of ordered scores. The median is a better measure of central tendency than the mean (average) because it is not affected by extreme scores. Remember: Comparing Median % Correct does not take into account difficulty of items across years, yet it will show general trends in strengths and weaknesses. Median 28

1. What does the data show? (Factual Information) 2. Why might this be? (Hypotheses) 3. How should we respond? (Plan for action) 4. How will you measure success? 29 Key Points When Analyzing Data

QUESTIONS COMMENTS CONCERNS