Lodi Unified School District 2013 End of Year Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 6/11/13 export.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Work session on Strategies to meet Results Targets A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad.
Advertisements

Have you been using AR to its full capacity?
Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) Report December 11,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November, 2012 Maria G. Cervantes, Principal.
Enquiring mines wanna no.... Who is it? Coleman Report “[S]chools bring little influence to bear upon a child’s achievement that is independent of.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
STAR Basics.
Evaluation of STAR Reading Program Kimberly R. Scott North East Leadership Academy Cohort 1 Spring 2012, NCSU.
Lisa J. Mails Elementary PRO Series (Parents ‘R Onboard) Topic #1: Universal Screening, Intervention, and Goal Setting.
DIFFERENTIATED SPELLING KESHIA EDWARDS AND JAMIE ROYALL.
Assessment Policy. Reporting Student Data in AERIS All student data must be entered into AERIS by the 15 th and approved by the 22 nd of each month for.
Student Assessment Literacy Project “SAL-P”. Why should you be assessment literate? It is your right to be informed and to know  on what you will be.
Richland School District 2013 EOY Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 7/16/13 export.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.
End-of-Year Goals Report. The District’s goals for are: 1.100% of Ripon teachers will use a data dashboard to monitor the Response to.
Lodi Unified School District
California Mini-CorpsOctober 10, Writing SMART Goals In order to become a team – a group of people working interdependently to achieve a common.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
Accelerating All Schools Toward Greatness The New Rhode Island Accountability System.
Welcome to Curriculum Night Tate Elementary School.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Lodi Unified School District
Scammon Elementary School 4201 West Henderson, Chicago, IL CPS: Network 1 July 30, 2014 ACHIEVE 3000.
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports And Behavior Intervention Classrooms Board of Education Meeting September 15, 2015.
AN INTEGRATED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR HIGHLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL YEAR MIKE COULAHAN SARAH LINDWALL COURTNEY JONES PETE REILLEY 11/12/07.
375 students took the number sense common formative assessments this school year. These are their stories. (Please view as a slide show)
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
SCC MAY 12, KELLY TAUTEOLI APPROVE MINUTES FROM LAST MONTH.
Update on Student and Family Empowerment (SAFE) Program and Elementary Counseling Board of Education Report February 3,
Report on Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information.
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Accelerated Reader Overview DEIC Proposal November 3, 2014.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Lodi School District Mid-Year Gains Analysis. 2 Executive Summary An analysis was performed from data for 11 schools that used READ 180 and System 44.
South Elementary School Des Plaines, Illinois Mary Ellen Bleeden, Principal Beatriz Cruz-Bradley, 1st Gr. Bilingual Teacher Keys To Success: Assessment,
PDSA/Fractal Data 8 th Grade Math. Steps to Identify Areas of Need Decided to focus on 8 th grade students in 8 th grade math Determined that I would.
Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Joplin Schools Presented by Lisa Orem, Student Services Coordinator Jolene Alexander, Scholastic Coordinator Anne Sharp, Board of Education President.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Student Growth Goals Work Session. Goals for the day 1.Develop questions to ask teachers to determine if the SGG meets the criteria established in the.
Gains Analysis Lodi Unified School District Results Based On Program Data 08/01/2015 to 03/14/2016 iREAD, READ 180, System 44, MATH 180 Mid-Year Summary.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
10/25/10 SPS Goals Somers Public Schools Building and Department Goals Academic Year.
1) Bear Creek Middle School’s percent of students achieving proficient or distinguished on the 2016 Georgia Milestones Social Studies assessment.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Q2 Benchmark Report1 Lodi Unified School District Benchmark Assessment Results (Mid-Year Student Achievement Monitoring) Prepared by.
Flexible Learning Program The Flexible Learning Program (FLP) is an alternative supplemental academic intervention that is required for Priority and Focus.
Karissa Tatom.  As a beginning teacher who took multiple speech courses, I was interested in the impact of the oral language on students’ academics after.
# of students FLP Score – October 2015 FLP Score – May 2016Gain% of Student Growth CES
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
JACKSON SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School Math Informational Night
CAASPP Results Board Report Executive Summary Academic Support
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Strategies Knowledge Habits of learning
Presentation transcript:

Lodi Unified School District 2013 End of Year Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 6/11/13 export

Executive Summary 2 Program Implementation  During the school year, the district implemented both READ 180 and System 44 across 18 schools throughout the district  5 Elementary Schools: Needham, Beckman, Washington, Sutherland, Lawrence  7 Middle Schools: Christa McAuliffe, Delta Sierra, Houston, Lodi, Millswood, Morada, Lockeford  6 High Schools: Bear Creek, Lodi, McNair, Tokay, Plaza Robles, Liberty  The middle and high schools started the program in school year  The elementary schools started the program in school year Indicators of Success  773 of 1,263 (61%) of READ 180 students demonstrated at least one year’s reading growth on SRI  Of those students, 388 (31%) demonstrated at least two years’ reading growth on SRI  154 of 590 (26%) of System 44 students demonstrated at least one year’s growth on SRI  338 of 535 (63%) of System 44 students demonstrated at least one year’s growth on SPI Fluency Data Included in Analysis  Lodi’s Gains Analysis includes student results from 7/30/12 to 5/30/13. To be included in the analysis, student records must:  Include at least 6 sessions (days) of software usage  Include at least two SRI tests, administered at least 6 weeks apart (READ 180 & System 44)  Include at least two SPI tests, administered at least 6 weeks apart (System 44)

READ 180 Student Performance Results

READ 180 Super Stars 4 Data indicate 674 READ 180 Super Stars with evidence of both strong participation and Lexile Gains. The top 10 are shown above. To reach “Reading Super Star” status, students must have: 1.Include at least 40 sessions (days) of software usage 2.Between 1 and 4 year’s approximate grade level growth 3.Pre-Test SRI Lexile score of over 100L.

Percent Breakdown of Read 180 Super Stars 5

6 Scholastic recommends that READ 180 students complete the SRI four times a year for screening, progress monitoring, and instructional decision-making. Students included in this analysis completed at least two SRI tests. Strongest results are typically achieved when students participate in the READ 180 Instructional Model daily and when care is taken to ensure a positive testing environment. Compare results between midyear and end-of-year and between schools to spotlight successes and identify areas that need additional focus. Review the SRI Growth Summary Report for more information. SRI Reading Gains READ 180 Mean Lexile Gains by Site

7 Lexile Performance Levels Changes in READ 180 Student SRI Performance Results indicate how many students had SRI scores aligned to Lexile Performance Levels; levels indicated are aligned to state assessment performance levels when state assessment alignments were available. Results are positive when lower, non-proficient reader populations decline and higher, proficient reader populations increase. Lexile performance bands used in this analysis can be found in Appendix.

8 SPED Lexile Performance Levels Changes in READ 180 Student SRI Performance Results indicate how many students had SRI scores aligned to Lexile Performance Levels; levels indicated are aligned to state assessment performance levels when state assessment alignments were available. Results are positive when lower, non-proficient reader populations decline and higher, proficient reader populations increase. Lexile performance bands used in this analysis can be found in Appendix.

9 System 44 Student Performance Results

System 44 Super Stars 10 Data indicate 97 System 44 Super Stars with evidence of both strong participation and Lexile Gains. The top 10 are shown above. To reach “Super Star” status, students must have: 1. Include at least 40 sessions (days) of software usage 2.Between 1 and 4 year’s approximate grade level growth 3.Pre-Test SRI Lexile score of over 100L.

Percent Breakdown of System 44 Super Stars 11

12 SPI Proficiency Results System 44 Student Decoding Status Scholastic recommends that System 44 students complete the SPI three times a year for screening and progress monitoring. Students included in this analysis completed at least two SPI tests. Students should be moving into higher levels of decoding as they progress through the program. Strongest results are typically achieved when students participate in the System 44 Instructional Model daily and when care is taken to ensure a positive testing environment. Compare results between pre-test and post-test to spotlight successes and identify areas that need additional focus. Review the SPI Summary Progress Report for more information.

13 System 44 SPI Gains Analysis SPI Metrics by School

14 SPED System 44 SPI Gains Analysis SPI Metrics by School

15 SRI Proficiency Results Changes in System 44 Student SRI Performance Scholastic recommends that System 44 students complete the SRI twice a year for screening and progress monitoring. Students included in this analysis completed at least two SRI tests at least 6 weeks apart. Results are positive when lower, non-proficient reader populations decline and higher, proficient reader populations increase. Students with low-level phonemic awareness likely are operating under the SRI Lexile scale. Lexile performance bands used in this analysis can be found in Appendix.