Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Program Reviewer Technical Assistance Office of Professional Preparation Services Michigan Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Advertisements

Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Dorchester School District Two & Charleston Southern University
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Instructional Materials Process and Progress Update Chief Academic Officer Quarterly Meeting November 13, 2012.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.
Early Childhood ZS (General and Special Education) Endorsement Program Reviewer Technical Assistance Office of Professional Preparation Services Michigan.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Dr. Kathleen Magiera & Dr. Rhea Simmons Fredonia The State University of New York OSEP Project Directors’ Meeting Washington, D.C. July 23, 2014.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Writing Policy Review Process Rebecca Woosley Carol Franks Renee Boss KDE Literacy Consultants 1.
October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Geography (CB) Endorsement Program Reviewer Technical Assistance Office of Professional Preparation Services Michigan Department of Education.
Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Program Review December 12, 2008 Dr. Bonnie Rockafellow Education Consultant Office of Professional Preparation.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Introduction to Formative Assessment October 25, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg Wheeler.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Program Standards for Bilingual Authorization Jo A. Birdsell, Ed.D. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Technical Assistance Meetings November 21 & 25,
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Program Reviewer’s Guidelines December 12, 2008 PM Dr. Bonnie Rockafellow Education Consultant Office of Professional.
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Anne Hanley Director of Graduate Studies Department of History Northern Illinois University The Teaching Portfolio for Ph.D Candidacy Examinations.
ALTERNATIVE TEACHER LICENSE PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE TEACHER LICENSE PROGRAM Presented by Joy Yudnich, Mountain BOCES.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Global Educator Badging Process Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Developing Global Competence Symposium June 24, 2014.
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification Now go to the top of your profession.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
MODULE 3 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Academic Seminar – Week 6 Lesson Plans & Formative Assessment Graphs.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Component 1: Content Knowledge
Subcontracting SBP 210 Lesson 1: Introduction
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
EED 400 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EED 400 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
EED 400 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Program Administrator Meeting
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Your session will begin shortly
Senior Capstone Project
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Program Reviewer Technical Assistance Office of Professional Preparation Services Michigan Department of Education

Application Process Overview  Applications and supporting documentation must be submitted in an electronic format.  All endorsement program applications must be submitted by November 1,  All fees must be paid by December 1, 2010.

Review Process  During the Month of December  January-March 1 complete reviewer comment form  January-March 1 complete reviewer comment form  March 1 review teams meet on own schedule Complete team reviews and send one combined reviewer recommendation form to Bonnie Rockafellow by April 1, 2011 Complete team reviews and send one combined reviewer recommendation form to Bonnie Rockafellow by April 1, 2011  Office of Professional Preparation Services will send reviewer recommendation forms to Teacher Preparation Institution

Purpose of Peer Review  As you review please remember that this review process should: support institutions as they offer documentation highlighting the quality of the ZA program. support institutions as they offer documentation highlighting the quality of the ZA program. provide valuable feedback in relationship to the new Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Standards provide valuable feedback in relationship to the new Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Standards

Purpose of Peer Review  The process is not designed to: replicate a program you may have graduated from or work within. replicate a program you may have graduated from or work within. evaluate the institution’s capacity to use technology for documentation. evaluate the institution’s capacity to use technology for documentation.

Reviewer’s Guidelines Review Forms:  Application for State Approval of Teacher Preparation Specialty Programs _7.doc This is the documentation format we expect to see for all the programs. This is the documentation format we expect to see for all the programs.

Reviewer’s Guidelines  Reviewer Comment Form The reviewer's comment form was prepared to help reviewers working with institutional documents submitted for review. It may also be useful for your conversations with your review partner. This form is for the reviewer’s use and is NOT used by the institution under review.

Reviewer’s Guidelines  The Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement standards are available at: _5683_ ,00.html _5683_ ,00.html These are the standards that each institution must address when completing a standards matrix for the program (see instructions for Section VI of the Application for State Approval of Teacher Preparation Specialty Programs). These are the standards that each institution must address when completing a standards matrix for the program (see instructions for Section VI of the Application for State Approval of Teacher Preparation Specialty Programs).

Review of Standards  Awareness Possesses General Knowledge (exposure) Possesses General Knowledge (exposure)  Basic Understanding Ability to Comprehend and Apply (Use) Ability to Comprehend and Apply (Use)  Comprehensive Understanding A High Level of Understanding, Application and Reflecting (Proficient) A High Level of Understanding, Application and Reflecting (Proficient)

Awareness  Syllabus The Text provides the information The Text provides the information A Lecture has the information as a topic A Lecture has the information as a topic

Basic  Syllabus Text has information Text has information Lecture includes issues as topics Lecture includes issues as topics Assignments for field experience is inclusive of issues Assignments for field experience is inclusive of issues Assessments clearly address issues Assessments clearly address issues

Comprehensive  Syllabus Text and Additional Readings Provide Multiple Perspectives Relative to the Issues Text and Additional Readings Provide Multiple Perspectives Relative to the Issues Assignments Require Reflection and Comparative Analysis of Issues Assignments Require Reflection and Comparative Analysis of Issues Evidence of Application During Field Experiences Evidence of Application During Field Experiences Assessment Criteria and Rubrics Provide Clear Expectation of Use and Student Learning/Impact Analysis Assessment Criteria and Rubrics Provide Clear Expectation of Use and Student Learning/Impact Analysis

Additional Resources  ELL Resource Web_Resources_263842_7.doc  Assistive and AdaptiveTechnology  How to review specialty programs _5683_ ,00.html _5683_ ,00.html _5683_ ,00.html

The Review  Individual review  Team Review and building consensus Use reviewer comment form for team notes Use reviewer comment form for team notes

The review  Reviewer Recommendation Form  Send completed reviewer recommendation form AND reviewer comment form to Bonnie Rockafellow by no later than April 1, 2011  forms to

Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Program  Questions regarding the review process can be sent to Bonnie Rockafellow at  A more in-depth discussion of specific content components of the review will be held during the Early Childhood Conference on October 21 st.