Understanding Territorial Impacts: Tool for Territorial Impact Assessment Bernd Schuh (ÖIR) Karkow, Nov. 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test Data Exchange 2008 Test Data Exchange 2008 Assessment of the reported data on Water Abstractions Maggie Kossida George PapoutsoglouETC/W Thematic.
Advertisements

ESPON 2013 Programme – Open Seminar European Territorial Evidence for EU Cohesion Policy and Programming June Aalborg, Denmark Session 2 -
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture (SEEA-AGRI) FAO London Group meeting November, 2013.
Environment and climate change in development cooperation Wrap up– module 9 1.
ESPON and Territorial Impact Assessment (EATIA) Gödöllő, 22 June 2011 Thomas B Fischer and Tom Gore, University of Liverpool.
Crossing Knowledge Frontiers Serving the Territories / Liége, Belgium EU-LUPA European Land Use Patterns Applied Research 2013/1/8.
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Second Interim Report Prepared for the Luxembourg Seminar May 2005 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
Communication on "Land as a Resource" Jacques DELSALLE Head of sector Land & Soil European Commission, DG Environment FoEE Conference "Putting resource.
The ESPON TIA Web Application Assessing potential territorial impacts of EU initiatives Bernd Schuh Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial.
Leonardo da Vinci Project BLENDED LEARNING TRANSFER Rationalising, Learning and Transferring the use of technological platforms to enterprise-based learning.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Event / date: West Balkan NFPs-EEA Coordination meeting / 21 Oct 2014 Author: Anita Künitzer (ETC/ICM) Event / date: West Balkan NFPs-EEA Coordination.
The model Modelling best practice in SEA a 10-step presentation.
EATIA (‘ESPON and Territorial Impact Assessment’): Developing a bottom-up approach for the territorial impact assessment (TIA) of EU policy proposals at.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
1 Adapted from T. De Lopez (2004) Second Regional Workshop Capacity Development for the Clean Development Mechanism (CD4CDM) 23 March 2004 Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Water Scarce Ecosystems A proposal for a UNCCD Policy Framework May
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
Minsk, October 8 th, 2014 Martin Smutný Integra Consulting Ltd.
Developing a Socio-Economic Dataframe AIM: Construct, test and refine a framework for the collection and management of socio- economic fisheries data Make.
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
ESPON 2013 Programme Internal Seminar Evidence-based Cohesion Policy: Territorial Dimensions Kraków, Poland ESPON EU-LUPA.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Partnership  excellence  growth Vulnerability: Concepts and applications to coral reef-dependent regions (Work in progress) Allison Perry.
Promoting CARICOM/CARIFORUM Food Security (Project GTFS/RLA/141/ITA) (FAO Trust Fund for Food Security and Food Safety – Government of Italy Contribution)
Presented by: Edoardo Pizzoli - HANDBOOK ON RURAL HOUSEHOLD, LIVELIHOOD AND WELL-BEING: STATISTICS ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURE HOUSEHOLD INCOME.
Participatory Land Use Planning and SLM Impact Assessment For PALM Project.
ESPON / Social Preparatory Study on Social Aspects of EU Territorial Development Status: Interim Report Erich Dallhammer (ÖIR)
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Measuring Progress towards Green Growth through indicators OECD work UNCEEA Sixth meeting New York, June 2011.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
The ARTS quick-scan methodology ARTS Assessment of Regional and Territorial Sensitivity Aalborg, June 2012.
SANREM TOP Framework GECAFS Interpretation. SEE Conditions (Social, Economic, Environmental) Assessed Practices Changed KASAC (Knowledge, Attitudes, Skills,
UNFCCC Workshop on the preparation of national communications of NAI Parties, Manila, april 2004 Methodologies for, Approaches to, and Frameworks.
ESPON Internal Seminar ARTS – Assessment of Regional and Territorial Sensitivity Liège, November 2010.
Water Framework Directive and the SRDP Jannette MacDonald Land Unit, SEPA.
Capacity Building in Analytical Tools for Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in Africa.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Open Days 2013: Thematic Subsidiarity Workshop 9 October 2013, Bruxelles Territorial Impact Assessment: ESPON TIA tools.
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Final Revised Report Prepared for the Espoo Seminar November 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change Neil Leary, AIACC Science Director AIACC Regional Workshop for Latin America.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Incorporating Biodiversity into Trade-Related Integrated Assessments Presentation.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
29-Mar-2011 Working Group on Environmental Accounts Climate Change: Reflection about the role of Eurostat in EU mitigation and adaptation policies Working.
Expanding the knowledge base for policy implementation and long-term transitions Dr Hans Bruyninckx Executive Director, European Environment Agency (EEA)
1 Agri-environment analysis at the EEA Projects and goals of the European Environment Agency.
Sixth Meeting of the United Nations Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting (UNCEEA) June, New York Pietro Gennari, Statistics.
Ricardo Zapata ECLAC 1 Quality and methods of field data collection: Presentation of ECLAC methodology: why it works and when it does not Expert consultation.
Water quality and water pollution – data for old and new policy questions 5th World Water Forum Session Data integration and dissemination: From.
5 Project funded by the Euro- Mediterranean Regional Programme for Local Water Management of the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS AND GUIDELINES FOR.
Assessment of the state of coasts in Europe – EEA activities and needs Andrus Meiner, European Environment Agency European Conference on Coastal Zone Research:
Introduction to Natural Capital Accounting and the WAVES Global Partnership.
Strategic Initiative for Resource Efficient Biomass Policies
Supporting Kenya and Uganda in developing and strengthening environmental-economic accounting for improved monitoring of sustainable development Alessandra.
TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENT: EXPERIENCES FROM THAILAND
Development of a methodological framework (EEA contributions)
The EU WATER POLICY.
SEEA as a framework for assessing policy responses to climate change
Introduction to the ESPON TIA Quick Check
LA06 Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation Measures for the Water Resources Sector Due to Extreme Events Under Climate Change Conditions. REGIONAL PROJECT.
The ESPON TIA Quick Check
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Territorial Impact Assessment (TIA) - estimation of effects of European policies and legislation The TIA Quick-Check B.Schuh (OIR GmbH)
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Water and Adaptation Modelling
ARTS – Assessment of Regional and Territorial Sensitivity
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Territorial Impacts: Tool for Territorial Impact Assessment Bernd Schuh (ÖIR) Karkow, Nov. 2011

ESPON ARTS The Tasks Develop a simplified, evidence-based procedure of Territorial Impact Assessment (TIA) Supply policy makers with an operational procedure that could work as a “evidence informed policy support” Analyse ex-ante the impact of EU policy proposals taking the sensitivity of regions into account Test the TIA quick check with a set of 12 directives

The theoretical approach PoliciesRegions Exposure Territorial sensitivity Territorial impact The vulnerability concept

Vulnerability Concept Potential effects (exposure): Which economic, social, and environmental fields could be affected by EU directives? (Territorial) sensitivity: Which characteristics make a territory potentially affected in its economic, social, and environmental fields? Impact: Which are the territorial effects of a certain policy given its potential effects and regional sensitivities? Adaptive capacity: How weak/strong is the ability of a system to adjust to the potential impact? => link to governance aspects Definitions in ARTS

The TIA Quick Check A user-friendly methodology that allows to make a ‘quick and dirty’ ex-ante analysis of the potential impact of EU policy proposals on the development of regions Combining –a standardised indicator-based Excel tool with –means to systematically collect expert knowledge in a workshop setting An excel tool and a procedure

(Intensity of Impacts of Directives) Regional Sensitivity Matrix Exp. fields Region 1 Exp. Field 1 Directive 1 Directive 2 Exp. Field n Territorial Impact Matrix Intensity of impacts Directive/Exposur e Matrix Regional Exposure Matrix Exp. Field 2 Region 2 Region m Directive 1 Directive 2 Directive 12 Regions Region1 Region 2 Region m ( One matrix ) (One matrix for each directive) Exp. Field 1 Exp. Field 2 Exp. Field n Exp. Field 1 Exp. Field 2 Exp. Field n Regions Region 1 Region 2 Region m Regional exposure Regional sensitivity (Logical Chains from Directives to Exposure Fields) (Regional Exposure to Directives) (Regional Sensitivity to Exposure Fields) Directive 12 Logical chains =xx

9 Steps to Assess the Territorial Impact of Policy Proposals (1)The conceptual model: How does a directive affect the development of regions? (2)Dealing with discrete cause/effect chains (branching) (3)Which types of regions are affected? (regional exposure) (4)What is the intensity of exposure on different fields? (exposure matrix) (5)What is the territorial impact on regions? (Territorial Impact Matrix) (6)Do the results make sense? (plausibility and quality check) (7)Which regions are affected in which fields? (mapping the results) (8)What are the policy implications? (adaptive capacity discussion) (9)How to communicate the results? (write-up)

(1) Conceptual model: Brainstorming Creating a systemic picture linking the regulations with territorial effects

(1) Result: Conceptual Model Deducing potential effects from Directives Input related sectors – pesticide production – spraying equipment Land use/types of territories –Natura 2000/FFH –special use of land (hospitals, parks, playgrounds) –strong protection Implementation process Socio-economic effects Agricultural production quantity Soil –„immission“ decreases –improvement of soil quality Air –aerial spraying prohibited –Improvement of air quality Water –efficient application techniques (no aerial spraying, no drift application) –Improvement of water quality Quality of LifeHuman Health Recreational value of land National Action Plan – Monitoring & Control Training Education/awareness Agricultural production quality Output related sectors – drinking water – fisheries – tourism Environmental effects Employment Innovation positive correlation Regulative framework Eco-system/ Bio-diversity Social effects negative correlation (sustainable use of) Pesticides Emission

(2) Picturing different cause - effect chains(branching) (1)The conceptual model: How does a directive affect the development of regions? (2)Dealing with discrete cause/effect chains (branching) (3)Which types of regions are affected? (regional exposure) (4)What is the intensity of exposure on different fields? (exposure matrix) (5)What is the territorial impact on regions? (Territorial Impact Matrix) (6)Do the results make sense? (plausibility and quality check) (7)Which regions are affected in which fields? (mapping the results) (8)What are the policy implications? (adaptive capacity discussion) (9)How to communicate the results? (write-up)

(3) Expert judgment: types of regions exposed Provided: 20 types of regions (NUTS2) to be selected

(3) Background: existing typologies of regions 0: no 1: yes

(4) Expert judgment: exposure caused by Directive 0: no 1: yes

(4) Background: List of 41 exposure fields

(5) Input for impact: regional sensitivity Linking indicators with territorial units (NUTS2) 41 Normalised indicators: 0,75: minimum sensitivity 1,25 maximum sensitivity

(5) Result: Calculation of territorial impact Linking indicators with territorial units (NUTS2)

(6): Plausibility check (1)The conceptual model: How does a directive affect the development of regions? (2)Dealing with discrete cause/effect chains (branching) (3)Which types of regions are affected? (regional exposure) (4)What is the intensity of exposure on different fields? (exposure matrix) (5)What is the territorial impact on regions? (Territorial Impact Matrix) (6)Do the results make sense? (plausibility and quality check) (7)Which regions are affected in which fields? (mapping the results) (8)What are the policy implications? (adaptive capacity discussion) (9)How to communicate the results? (write-up)

(7) Result: Map for each indicator Effects of Directive on recognition of qualification on migration balance in countries of origin

(8) + (9): Dealing with the results (1)The conceptual model: How does a directive affect the development of regions? (2)Dealing with discrete cause/effect chains (branching) (3)Which types of regions are affected? (regional exposure) (4)What is the intensity of exposure on different fields? (exposure matrix) (5)What is the territorial impact on regions? (Territorial Impact Matrix) (6)Do the results make sense? (plausibility and quality check) (7)Which regions are affected in which fields? (mapping the results) (8)What are the policy implications? (adaptive capacity discussion) (9)How to communicate the results? (write-up)

TIA Quick Check in 2 versions The standard TIA quick check: Helps to identify the relevant thematic fields that are effected by a policy proposal. Allows to select NUTS2 regions with a potentially high positive or negative impact. Helps to set a focus for further and more detailed impact analysis. The advanced TIA quick check Allows users to define special indicators describing the exposure to policy proposals and the regional sensitivity Provides the technical framework for the vulnerability analysis Can serve for a more detailed analysis of a specific potential impact of policy proposals. A Standard version and an Advanced version