Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February The NO A Experiment P5 Meeting SLAC 21 February 2008 Gary Feldman.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Preliminary Ideas for a Near Detector at a Neutrino Factory Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 23 September 2005 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
Background Understanding and Suppression in Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments with Water Cherenkov Detector Chiaki Yanagisawa Stony Brook.
1 Recent developments on sensitivity calculations Effect of combined le and me running –Is there a statistical advantage over pure le running? Discrimination.
1 Neutrinos: Past, Present and Future Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
Minnesota Simulations Dan Hennessy, Peter Litchfield, Leon Mualem  Improvements to the Minnesota analysis  Comparison with the Stanford analysis  Optimisation.
NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
1 PHYSICS IN THE NuMI BEAM with a ~10 kiloton LARTPC prototype ASH RIVER or SOUDAN J.Schneps PRELIMINARY,UNFINISHED, & ROUGH Sept. 27, 2007.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
MINOS/NO A Deborah Harris Fermilab NuFact’04 Osaka University July 28, 2004.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
1 Mike Kordosky – NuFact 06 - Aug 27, 2006 Neutrino Interactions in the MINOS Near Detector Mike Kordosky University College London on behalf of the MINOS.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, Oct. 05 Data/MC Comparisons and Estimating the ND Flux with QE Events ● Update on QE event selection.
Study of the ND Data/MC for the CC analysis October 14, 2005 MINOS collaboration meeting M.Ishitsuka Indiana University.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam GdR Saclay – 11/04/08 Magali Besnier hep-ex – v3.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
NOvA in light of non-zero θ 13 Gavin S. Davies Iowa State University for the NOvA Collaboration nuTURN Workshop Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
The Latest MINOS Results Xinjie Qiu Stanford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond Sept
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
The NO A Near Detector: An overview Jose A. Sepulveda-Quiroz For the NO A Collaboration Iowa State University and Argonne National Laboratory APS April.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
NOnA NuMI Off-axis ne Appearance
Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector
Results from T2K and Prospects for Hyper Kamiokande
Peter Litchfield Minnesota University For the NOA collaboration
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Determination of Neutrino Mass Hierarchy at an Intermediate Baseline
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver14/14/2013

NO A is a 14 kton liquid scintillator surface detector NO A uses the NUMI beam at Fermilab, which: – is currently being upgraded to 700 kW – has a 810 km beamline with the detector 14 mrad off-axis – is comprised mostly of  neutrinos ~ 2 GeV NO A will study: – e appearance (see next talk) –  disappearance (this talk) – Exotic physics and more NO A will make precision measurements of: –  13 –  23 –  m 2 32 NO A will have a chance to: – Resolve the mass hierarchy – Resolve the octant – Measure  CP 60 m NO A Overview Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver24/14/2013

 Physics Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver34/14/2013

Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver4 NO A MC This is a 1.8 GeV  QE MC event in our full event display Here it is zoomed in. The QE transfers its E to the muon; generally there isn’t other activity, except maybe a short proton.

4/14/2013Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver5 NO A MC Here is a 2.3 GeV DIS event. There is a pion as well as a muon    Here is a 2.4 GeV NC event. There is no muon, and the event is messier  p p p p

A Basic  Disappearance Analysis Expected event counts 0-5 GeV (oscillated): – 150 contained CC / year – 75 uncontained CC / year – 300 NC / year – Note: 1 full year = 6 x POT NC background: – Require clear  Cosmic ray muons: – high rate (surface); ~1 per beam spill – good rejection using timing, track direction, containment – estimate effectiveness using MC: – can remove all but 1 (out of 8,000,000) from contained sample – 95% signal eff. for contained – uncontained separation still being developed Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver64/14/2013 PID for removing NC events

A Basic  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver7 all events Contained QE (17%): QEs have best E resolution isolate as many as we can Contained non - QE (47%): All other contained events most of our sensitivity Uncontained events (36%): missing energy, poor resolution 4/14/2013 Separate into samples: – contained QE (can isolate most of QE events) – contained nonQE (contained DIS, RES, remaining QE) – uncontained (missing energy, poor E-estimation)

Combined Sensitivity Example Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver84/14/2013 The contours assume no systematics. We believe that even at high exposures, we will be statistics limited, and the systematics will only be a small (few %) effect. 1 full run year = 6 x POT n + n years means n years FHC and n years RHC

T2K LLWI 2013 Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver94/14/2013  Full Reach If sin 2 (2  ) = 1, best limit by 1+1 years For any value of  23, precision measurement will surpass any current measurement by 3+3 years Actual run plan (when to switch to RHC) not yet decided

4/14/2013Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver10 exposure = 43% of 1 full running year  Early Reach The beam ramps up in power The detector is still being built then too Not only less exposure from this, also more events are uncontained Model this ramp up to determine early reach

Conclusions NO A data taking will begin in a few months We have a preliminary  analysis ready Good background rejection (even on surface) Can isolate most QE events Competitive with current world limits in a year Within a few years, precision measurements of  23,  m 2 32 should surpass current limit Expect more soon! Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver114/14/2013

Backup. Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver124/14/2013

Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver134/14/2013

Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver144/14/2013

Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver15

Early Reach Model Model smaller detector in bins (dotted blue) Model beam power in bins (dotted red) 4/14/2013Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver16

muon PID details Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver174/14/2013 Log likelihood based variables used include: track dE/dx track scattering parameters track length value used for this talk: 0.55

QE PID details kNN based variables include: – amount of E not in main track – dE/dx – difference in two different E estimators Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver184/14/2013 value used: 0.6

Containment 4/14/2013Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver19 The detector dimension are roughly: -765 cm < x < 765 cm -765 cm < y < 765 cm 0 < z < 5960 cm The containment cut used requires all activity in the slice (events clustered in time) be: -750 < x < < y < < z < 5950

Systematics 4/14/2013Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver20 No systematics Systematics included (energy scale and normalization) 72e20 POT 36e20 POT 18e20 POT No systematics Systematics included (energy scale and normalization)

Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver21 Example QE event display - almost all of the energy goes into the muon 4/14/2013

Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver22 Example DIS – energy goes to muon and pions 4/14/2013

Kirk Bays, APS DPF Denver23 Example NC event – No muon, big mess 4/14/2013