Managerial compensation in a two- level gift-exchange experiment Fernanda Rivas Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Nils Hesse Albert-Ludwigs Universität.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.
Advertisements

Harnessing Success: Determinants of University Technology Licensing Performance Sharon Belenzon Nuffield College, Oxford University Mark Schankerman London.
Moral hazard and contracts
Meng Yang 03/20/2014. SUMMARY The paper was written by Michael T. Maloney & Robert E. McCormick. Department of Economics, Clemson University. Examine.
1 . 2 Uncertainty Dixit: Optimization in Economic Theory (Chapter 9)
Fehr and Falk Wage Rigidity in a Competitive Incomplete Contract Market Economics 328 Spring 2005.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Part Three Target Market Selection and Research Target Markets: Segmentation and Evaluation 7 7.
Target Markets: Segmentation and Evaluation
Introduction Organizations have a relatively large degree of discretion in deciding how to pay. Each employee’s pay is based upon individual performance,
Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 12 Recognizing.
Interactions of Tax and Nontax Costs n Uncertainty u Symmetric uncertainty u Strategic uncertainty (information asymmetry) F Hidden action (moral hazard)
Human Resource Management Lecture-28. Job Pricing.
Designing Compensation and Benefit Packages
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 25-1 REWARDING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE Chapter 25.
Chapter 10 Decentralization: Responsibility Accounting,
MGTO 231 Human Resources Management Compensation I Dr. Kin Fai Ellick WONG.
Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture, 5e Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture, 5e Chapter 15: Incentive Compensation McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
OS 352 4/1/08 I. Exam II is cancelled – April Fool’s!! II. Pay system design (Chapter 12) A. Review from last time. B. Pay Ranges C. Supplemental incentives.
1 Information Markets & Decision Makers Yiling Chen Anthony Kwasnica Tracy Mullen Penn State University This research was supported by the Defense Advanced.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
The Organization of the Firm
Chapter 12 compensating salespeople. Compensation objective _ compensation is one of the most important motivating and retaining field salesperson _ sales.
Two-Stage Games APEC 8205: Applied Game Theory Fall 2007.
Questions: (1) Where do the labor demand and supply curves come from? (2) How well do they explain the facts?
Employers and Wages. The Puzzle Wage paid to a given type of labour should be independent of employer characteristics But wages seem correlated with employer.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Union Role in Wage and Salary Administration Chapter 15.
The World of Pay and Compensation Management
Chapter 5 Supply.
Basis for Compensation fixation
Wage differentials in Greece Inter-industry wage differentials Occupational wage differentials Gender pay gap Minimum vs average wage Public sector / private.
Chapter 9 Determining Pay and Benefits.
Unit Three ECONOMICS DemandandSupply. PA Standards E; G; D; E; F.
Attracting and Retaining the Best Employees
Cash, Bonuses, Insurance,
Stakeholder Objectives
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial & Managerial Accounting The Basis for Business Decisions FOURTEENTH EDITION Williams.
1 Dr. Franz Josef Gellert Prof. Dr. Rene Schalk. Youth employment: Student preferences for Mobiflex work 2 What we need is not the will to believe, but.
Target Markets: Segmentation and Evaluation
Imagine that you are the owner and CEO of a very small firm You have a plot of land (already paid for) You can hire workers to help you –More workers,
CHAPTER 7 MARKET STRUCTURES. Pretending you were the owner of the company on your sheet of paper… 1) How much competition do you have (how many other.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-1 Defining Competitiveness Chapter 7.
Supply Chapter 5 Section 2.
Seeking Alpha: Excess Risk Taking and Competition for Managerial Talent Acharya, Pagano and Volpin Comment Alan Schwartz.
8 Identifying Market Segments and Targets
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 7-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
Compensation & Benefits – Basic Compensation & Employee Benefits CHAPTER 9 HRM.
© 2008 Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland A Multiplicative Model of Optimal CEO Incentives in Market Equilibrium By Edmans, Gabaix,
Economics Review 1. What is the human effort that is used to produce goods called? A profit B capital C labor D stock.
Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning. Divide a market into separate groups.
MGRECON401 Economics of International Business and Multinationals LECTURE 7 Motivating Employees and Performance Evaluation in a Complex Organization.
Lesson Objectives: By the end of this lesson you will be able to: *Explain how firms decide how much labor to hire in order to produce a certain level.
Lecture 5 Financial Incentives This lecture is paired with our previous one that discussed employee benefits. Here we focus on the reasons why monetary.
Basic Principles of Economics Rögnvaldur J. Sæmundsson January
© 2010 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Chapter 7 Incentive Mechanism Principle-Agent Problem Production with Teams Competition.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1 “Observations always involve theory.” -Edwin Hubble.
Explicit versus Implicit Contracts for Dividing the Benefits of Cooperation Marco Casari and Timothy Cason Purdue University.
Compensation Need Assessment Group Members: Aamir Mohammad Syed Wasi Abbas Talha Ahmed Hoban Syed Haris Hussain Sumair Patel.
Strategic Human resource Management compensation.
An Introduction to Human Resource Management 1. Genesis of HRM 2.
The Evolution of “An Experiment on Exit in Duopoly”
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 6 The Organization of the Firm.
Social Connections and Incentives in the Workplace: Evidence from Personnel Data by Oriana Bandiera, Iwan Barankay, and Imran Rasul Comments by Thomas.
Introduction to Labor Economics
Chapter 17 Appendix DERIVED DEMAND.
The World of Pay and Compensation Management
Economics Chapter 5: Supply.
Chapter 5: Supply Section 2
Presentation transcript:

Managerial compensation in a two- level gift-exchange experiment Fernanda Rivas Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Nils Hesse Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Motivation In times of increasing international competition, firms demand employees to make concessions to carry out necessary restructuring measures, that can partly be resisted by the workers, whose behavior at work can not be fully contracted upon Excessive management compensations contradict justice preference of a majority, in particular in times of downsizing

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Research questions 1.Is workers’ effort influenced by the perception of managerial compensation? 2.Is high executive pay particularly salient during downsizing? 3.Do workers still exert their effort in response to wage offers if the wage-setter gets only a small part of the benefits generated by the workers?

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Experiment Subjects divided into three groups: Firm’s owners, Managers, Workers 4 groups of 5 subjects per session: 1 Firm, 1 Manager, 3 Workers 30 rounds per session. Stranger matching TREATMENTS: 4 treatments determined by:  Salary of the Manager: Public / Private information  Decides the Workers’ wage: Firm / Manager Endowment of the Firm: 15 LE in the first 15 periods, 10 LE after period 15

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Experiment : stages in each period IN MD SESSIONS Firm decides Manager’s wage Manager decides Workers’ wage (the 3 workers receive the same wage) Manager and workers choose a level of effort Manager and Firm are informed about the decision of Workers, Workers are informed about the total revenue IN FD SESSIONS Firm decides Manager’s and Workers’ wage (the 3 workers: same wage) Manager and workers choose a level of effort Manager and Firm are informed about the decision of Workers, Workers are informed about the total revenue

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Experiment Payoffs Firm's payoff = Initial Endowment + Total Revenue - Total Salaries Manager's payoff = Manager's Wage + Bonus - Cost of Effort Worker's payoff = Worker's Wage - Cost of Effort Total salaries = fixed salaries workers and managers + Bonus manager Bonus = 20% of Profit provided by Workers = Revenue provided by the workers – Salaries paid to the workers The Bonus is paid if Revenue > Salaries Revenues and costs of effort

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Results Does the perception of the managerial compensation have an impact on the workers' effort choices ? Independent variable: the workers' effort choice Panel data model (also clustering) We report the coefficient of the variable Manager's wage of the estimations We control for: each worker's wage, period, sex, age, field of study, person choosing the workers' wages (firm or manager) We have: period, age and gender effect Result 2: Workers' effort decisions are negatively correlated with the manager's wage, especially after the wage cut

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Results : wage and effort Result 5: There exists a strong positive relation between own wage and effort levels for workers  the higher the own wage the more effort while the managers' effort reaches a maximum for middle wages and then decreases for very high wages

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Results : wage and effort  MD and FD: very similar, especially with public information

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Results : wage and effort Result 6: The ratio effort/wage for the workers decreases from part I to part II with private information, but increases with public information

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Results : wage and effort The ratio for workers is higher in PuW than in PrW in the MD-sessions, and the opposite is observed in FD-sessions  when the manager decides workers' wage it has a positive effect to disclose the managerial compensation

Managerial compensation in a two-level gift-exchange experiment Conclusions Workers' effort decisions are negatively correlated with the manager's wage, especially after wage cuts MD and FD: very similar, especially with public information Negative effect of manager’s wage  wage compression is in fact a good strategy Regardless of the negative effects of high managerial wages, the opportunity to observe the managerial compensation had a positive impact on workers' effort choices, when the managers set the workers' wages. Under these realistic circumstances, it seems that to disclose managerial wages is a good strategy in terms of workers’ effort