1 Improving Teaching and Learning Through Questioning Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris March 16 & 18, 2010 MTL Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nationellt Centrum för Matematikutbildning vid Göteborgs Universitet Teaching Math through Problem Solving 1 Teaching School Mathematics through Problem.
Advertisements

Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
“To Coach or Not to Coach…What is the Payoff?” National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics April 24, 2012 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Lee Ann Pruske,
Modifying Assessment Items What is the concept/skill being assessed? How could a test item writer ask this in a TEI format? What types of classroom activities.
1 To Summarize… Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris April 15 & 27, 2010 MTL Meeting Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics.
Strengthening Mathematics Instruction Cognitive Complexity and Instructional Strategies Dr. Vicki Jim
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Problem Solving, Protocols and Practice through the Ages Wisconsin Mathematics Council Wisconsin Mathematics Council 41 st Annual Conference 41 st Annual.
Lesson Planning with Formative Assessment Principles: Sharing Our Stories Pandora Bedford Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Melissa Hedges.
Learning to Lead Effectively Laura Maly Astrid Fossum Pandora Bedford Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Math Teacher Leader Training April 2010 The Milwaukee Mathematics.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Kindergarten Math Curriculum and Resource Parent Night Diana Garaitonandia, Ed.D. Louise Kirsh Susan Alloway Mandi Cooper.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
WEEK 2 DAY 2 Goals for the day: Tools to collect evidence of student learning. Create clear teaching points for student learning and criteria for success.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Providing All Students with Access to High Quality Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Tasks in Achieving Equity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
March 19, Elementary Principals Mathematics Update Velvet M. Simington K-12 Mathematics Program Manager ,
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh February 15, 2007
VCLA. What is our purpose? Questions: Do you believe that students need opportunities to take risks, struggle, make mistakes and work in self-directed.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
What We’ve Learned About Assessment, Part 4: A Guide to Formative Assessment Astrid Fossum, Mathematics Teaching Specialist, MPS,
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Planning for Equity Laura Maly Astrid Fossum Lee Ann Pruske Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Math Teacher Leader Training January 2011.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
CAAT Follow Up Meeting #1 Clay County High School Clay County Middle School.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) New Wisconsin Promise Conference Madison, Wisconsin January 14, 2009 Beth Schefelker, MTSMary Mooney, MTS.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership High School Labs Kevin McLeod and DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional.
1 What’s the Diff? Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris May 18 & 20, 2010 MTL Meeting Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics.
Lesson objectives and success criteria Making learning clear.
Effective Conversations That Lead To Effective Instruction: Using A Portfolio Process to Structure Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Beth Schefelker,
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Spring Principal’s Breakfast Sharonda HarrisDeAnn Huinker Daniel Lotesto Kevin McLeod Pandora BedfordAstrid Fossum Melissa.
MAY 2012 MTL MEETING LAURA MALY BERNARD RAHMING CYNTHIA CUELLAR RODRIGUEZ Connecting the Pieces!
Bernard Rahming Lee Ann Pruske Rosann Hollinger Sharonda Harris Assessment Session PRIME Framework: Teaching and Learning Leadership Principle MTL Meeting,
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Examining the Standards for Mathematical Practice MTL Meeting October 18, 2011 Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker.
HSTW MMGW/TCTW Southern Regional Education Board Numeracy Across the Curriculum Friday, July 17, 2015 Jason Adair Amanda Merritt.
Classroom Discourse and Classroom Practice Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin October 12 & 14, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Find a Partner … … whose template/lesson is in the same grade band as yours. You’ll work with that person for the session. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics.
Planning for Discourse in the Classroom Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin December 9 th and 16 th, 2010 MTL.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
March (February) Science Leadership Network March 23, 2016 ACCESS TODAYS MATERIALS AT
March (February) ISLN March 17, 2016
Promoting Perseverance in Mathematics Borough Instructional Leads for Mathematics Math Team Department of STEM December 3, 2015.
PCMI 3 aspect – For your mathematics – For your teaching – For your community Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute1.
Improving Mathematical Number Sense & Technology Integration Teacher Quality Grant Peyton Forest Elementary Atlanta Public Schools Atlanta, GA July 23,
How can the examination of student/educator work be supported as a routine for continuous improvement?
The Mathematical Education of Inservice Teachers: Lessons Learned Opportunities & Challenges Diane J. Briars NCSM Immediate Past President Co-Director,
MELT: Fraction, Ratio, Proportion and Geometry
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Questions and Concerns
Examining Productive Talk
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Instructional Design and Lesson Planning
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Park City Mathematics Institute
PCMI 3 weeks 3 roles Reflecting on Practice
HANDOUT Page for facilitators that lists all the hand outs needed for the workshop and the meanings of icons used on the slides in this workshop. SLIDE.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards in Practice
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Our Leadership Journey
Presentation transcript:

1 Improving Teaching and Learning Through Questioning Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris March 16 & 18, 2010 MTL Meeting Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation.

2 Professional Practice Leader of Self – Plan and teach a lesson using the “Lesson Planning with Formative Assessment Principles” template making the connection to formative assessment principles, cognitive demands, questioning and Bring the lesson, the completed template, and a short reflection. Be ready to share with the group at the March MTL meeting. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

3 Lesson Plan Template Sharing Work with a partner at your table. What did you reflect on after you taught the lesson? How did the questions you planned support the lesson you taught? What did you change as you taught the lesson? You will have 5 minutes each to share. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

4 Learning Intentions We Are Learning To develop effective questions: used in a math lesson to support student learning that maintain the high level cognitive demand of mathematical tasks Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

5 Success Criteria You will know you are successful if … Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

6 Questions Discuss this question with your shoulder partner: What do you do to make good questions a part of your lesson planning process? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

7 Developing Effective Questions Handout Resources Adapted from ____ (1991). Mathematics assessment: Myths, models, good questions, and practical suggestions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ____ (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

8 The Fencing Task Ms. Brown’s class will raise rabbits for their spring science fair. They have 24 feet of fencing with which to build a rectangular rabbit pen to keep the rabbits. a)If Ms. Brown’s students want their rabbits to have as much room as possible, how long would each of the slides of the pen be? b) How long would each of the sides of the pen be if had only 16 feet of fencing? c) How would you go about determining the pen with the most room for any amount of fencing? Organize your work so that someone else who reads it will understand it. Source: Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000) Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

9 Mathematical Task Think about the Fencing Task. What is the big math idea? How did you solve it? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

11 Developing Questions As a table group, create 5 questions. Record them in your notebook. One to access background knowledge Three that push student understanding One to summarize the math Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

12 Each table group will post their questions in the appropriate categories. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation Posting the Questions

13 Gallery Walk Take your 5 sticky dots with you. Stagger your starting point! Visit each category. Read the questions, and vote for the question you think best serves the purpose of the category. Use your sticky dot to vote. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

14 Question Debrief What do you notice about the questions that got the most votes in each category? What about the question that best develops the math in the lesson? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

15 Revisit Your Lesson Look at the questions you prepared. What other follow up questions could you have asked? What questions would you ask the next time you teach this lesson? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

16 Success Criteria You will know you are successful if …

17 Feedback Question In what ways did today’s session help you write effective questions? How do you plan to use this knowledge? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation