Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 2.
PK & PCK Discussion Session Facilitated by Dr Zahari Hamidon.
PORTFOLIO.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
As a result of activities in grades 9-12, all students should develop: abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry. understandings about science inquiry.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
K–8 Session 3: Exploring the Domain Progressions in Grades K–8 Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Amy Rominiecki and Nina Kemps
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Conceptual Framework Salisbury University working draft 8/15/05.
Getting Started in Service Learning Lemons to Lemonade Program Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation 2009.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Australian National Curriculum General Capability Literacy.
Half-Day Professional Development November 9, 2012.
ACCESS Accessing Comprehension and Communication in English State to State for English Language Learners.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 2, Session 1. Find Someone Who…. The purpose of this activity is to review concepts presented during day 1.
Differentiation PLC.
NGSS-Health Science August Connection to the Common Core.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Lecture # 32 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION Professional Standards for Teaching Science.
Briar Hill School Data Summary Fall Student Diversity: ESL, Special Education Based on 194 students % of Population Gifted 5% Other Mild/moderate.
Elementary Professional Development Day August 31, 2010 Gar-Field High School Dr. Steven L. Walts Superintendent of Schools.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
July 2001Mara Alagic: Differentiating Instruction 1 Differentiating Instruction: Individualized Learning Adapted from: Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated.
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
BENEFITS OF USING TESOL’S STANDARDS TO GUIDE INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN IN THE CLASSROOM.
Outline of a Quantitative Research Approach Dr. Jim Freemyer.
Integrating the Curriculum Big Ideas, Themes, Point of view.
What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated instruction is the theory that allows teachers to face this challenge by taking diverse student factors.
Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
AP Biology Revised Framework MSTA 2012 Tina Wagner.
A Taste of History and Literature – A Cross- curricular Inquiry Based Lesson.
Colorado Academic Standards Colorado English Language Proficiency (CELP) Standards There are now five English language development standards: Standard.
Implementation Training
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Alabama Quality Teaching Standards
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment 8.0 Planning for Instruction 9.0 Instructional Strategies 10.0 Assessment 11.0 Professional Growth 12.0 Professional Relationships 13.0 Educational Technology 14.0 Professional Conduct If you ask people where “curriculum” is addressed in these standards, I expect most would point to the “Content Knowledge” standard. This reflects widespread notions of the meaning of “curriculum.”

3.0 Content Knowledge: The teacher understands the core concepts and structure(s) of the discipline(s) and their related content standards and creates learning experiences that make the content meaningful to students. The “Content Knowledge” standard is based on a “structures of the disciplines” approach.

2.0 Definitions: … “Disciplines” means academic disciplines which include the arts, humanities, languages, mathematics, and natural and social sciences that provide the basis of the subjects taught in schools. “Structures” means the structures of disciplines which provide the overall framework which both connects and transcends the skills and content of the discipline. The big picture or outline of the discipline helps students understand the commonalties and the interrelationships of concepts within a discipline. An understanding of the structure of a discipline allows students to see connections as they acquire new knowledge. Key terms are defined within the standards.

“Content Knowledge” components/indicators 3.0 Content Knowledge 3.1 Knowledge Components Understands major concepts, principles, and theories that are central to the discipline Understands the dynamic and complex nature of the content of the discipline Understands the processes of inquiry central to the discipline Understands the relationship of knowledge within the discipline to other content areas and to life applications 3.2 Performance Indicators Uses a variety of explanations and multiple representations of concepts to help develop conceptual understanding [“Pedagogical Content Knowledge”] Anticipates and adjusts for common misunderstandings that impede learning within the discipline Engages students in generating and testing knowledge according to the processes of inquiry of the discipline Creates learning experiences that make connections to other content areas and to life experiences The “Content Knowledge” standard (like the other standards) is further defined in terms of “knowledge components” and “performance indicators.”

Standards Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment 8.0 Planning for Instruction 9.0 Instructional Strategies 10.0 Assessment 11.0 Professional Growth 12.0 Professional Relationships 13.0 Educational Technology 14.0 Professional Conduct If there are things outside of the “content knowledge” standard that need to be taken into account as essential elements within the practice of curriculum, is this taken care of by the likelihood that those things can be found somewhere else within the standards?