NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
Advertisements

Expected Visit Date Spring  Pam Campbell  Patti Chance  Kathi Ducasse  Sandra Odell  Tom Pierce  LeAnn Putney  Nancy Sileo  Shannon Smith.
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
A Definition of Distance Education Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the learning occurs when student and instructor.
LSP Nov 2 Agenda Announcements Reading Follow-up TERI –Update and overview –Partnerships –Task Groups.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
College of Basic and Applied Sciences Advising/Retention Report.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
COURSE ADDITION CATALOG DESCRIPTION To include credit hours, type of course, term(s) offered, prerequisites and/or restrictions. (75 words maximum.) 4/1/091Course.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
NCATE’s Transformation Initiative Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE September 16, 2009 Web Seminar will begin at 2:00 (eastern time). Please.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
THE ASSESSMENT TWO-STEP: It’s more than a line dance.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
The Wave of the Future?. Online education more widely accepted within the last 5 years 48 states have online learning opportunities 39 states with virtual.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Two categories: Academic, Professional Issues: Level and nature of programs consistent with mission Well defined, differ from undergraduate programs Doctoral.
Standard 6 Unit Governance and Resources. 6a: Unit Leadership and Authority The unit and other faculty collaborate with P-12 practitioners in program.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Rowan Cabarrus Community College.
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Performance-Based Accreditation
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Purpose of this Presentation
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
NCATE Standards 5 & 6.
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Failed to Meet Standard 6
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
Writing the Institutional Report
February 21-22, 2018.
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University

Standard 6 Governance and Resources The unit has the leadership and authority, budget, personnel, facilities, and resources (including technology) to prepare candidates to meet professional, state, and institutional standards

Governance is … the system and structure that: defines policy provides leadership manages/coordinates procedures and resources to ensure the preparation of qualified school personnel

Standard 6 Elements 6.aUnit Leadership and Authority 6.bUnit Budget 6.cPersonnel 6.dUnit Facilities 6.eUnit Resources including Technology

Major Changes to Standard 6 6.b – Unit Budget – Added “with clinical components or similar units on other campuses” 6.c – Personnel – Added “per semester or the equivalent” when referring to faculty load and clinical supervision – Added “including class-size” to the rubric 6.e – Unit Resources and Technology – Added a sentence on resources for distance learning

6.a Unit Leadership and Authority Myth # 1 : The unit only includes programs housed in the college, school, or department of education. The Reality : The unit includes all programs that prepare or enhance the skills of educational personnel, regardless of where they are housed.

6.a The Expectations The unit: has the leadership and authority to plan, deliver, and operate coherent programs of study maintains accurate and current publications that clearly describe recruitment/admission practices ensures access to advising, counseling, and other student services involves the professional community in designing, implementing, and evaluating the unit and its programs

6.a The Evidence – A CAUTION The streamlined Institutional Report format and evidence list that takes effect in fall 2008 applies only to institutions hosting continuing visits. The UAB will be considering the Institutional Report format and evidence list for institutions hosting first visits when it meets in April.

6.a The Evidence Descriptions of the unit governance structure, including organization charts Policies on governance and operations of the unit Minutes of meetings of unit governance committees Unit policies on recruitment and admission of candidates

6.a … and More Evidence Current institution and unit publications (including catalogs, handbooks, websites) that describe admission practices, academic calendars, and grading policies. Samples of institution or program advertising Unit policies on student services such as counseling and advising

6.a Don’t forget to … clearly define the unit; include all programs, even those outside of the college, school, or department of education address advanced programs, including those that don’t necessarily lead to licensure

6.b Unit Budget Myth # 2: The unit’s budget only addresses personnel and operating expenses in the college, school, or department of education. The Reality: The budget covers the entire unit and includes expenses for technology, professional development, library resources, distance learning, branch campuses, and off-campus programs. $$$

6.b The Expectations The unit budget: includes sufficient budget allocations supports quality programs, including clinical experiences is proportional to other units that have “clinical components” or similar units on other campuses $$$

6.b The Evidence Unit budget, with provisions for technology (3-5 years) Budget analyses and comparisons with comparable units on campus that have clinical components or similar units on other campuses

6.b Don’t forget to … include budget information for technology, library resources, professional development, distance learning, branch campuses, and off-campus programs

6.c Personnel Myth # 3: Faculty teaching load, including class-size and online course delivery, cannot exceed 12 undergraduate hours or 9 graduate hours per semester or the equivalent; clinical supervision cannot exceed 18 hours per full-time faculty member per semester or the equivalent. The Reality: These are long-range guidelines. The emphasis should be on the impact of faculty teaching load on program integrity and candidate learning.

6.c The Expectations Personnel policies and practices: allow for effective teaching, scholarship, assessment, advisement, collaboration, and service address demands of online and off-campus courses ensure program coherence and integrity through appropriate use of full-time, part-time, and clinical faculty, as well as graduate assistants and support personnel provide faculty with professional development activities, including technology

6.c The Evidence Institutional teaching workload policies and guidelines, including policies for developing and teaching online courses Summary of faculty teaching loads (3-5 years)

6.c … and MORE !!! List of support personnel in the unit List of professional development expenditures, including technology training (this might also fit under 6.b Budget)

6.c Don’t forget to … demonstrate that faculty teaching loads and other personnel policies are designed to preserve program integrity and do not adversely impact candidate learning

6.d Unit Facilities Myth # 4: The unit cannot place candidates in schools that do not have modern facilities and the latest in instructional technology. The Reality: There are many ways that the unit can work with its school partners to provide candidates with the opportunity to demonstrate the expected proficiencies outlined in its conceptual framework.

6.d The Expectations The unit: has adequate on-campus and off-campus facilities has adequate P-12 facilities supports faculty and candidate use of information technology for instruction

6.d The Evidence Lists, descriptions of campus facilities, including computer labs and special centers Description of off-campus, P-12 facilities Institutional support for technology Long-range facilities plan for institution, unit

6.d Don’t forget to … demonstrate how you work with schools that do not have the latest in facilities and technology resources so that candidates can demonstrate expected proficiencies

6.e Unit Resources includingTechnology Myth # 5: The unit can easily meet NCATE expectations for technology because it has obtained outstanding technology resources through grant funding. The Reality: The unit must show that it has formally budgeted for the maintenance and replacement of technology resources and is not dependent on “soft” money for this purpose.

6.e The Expectations The unit: allocates resources equitably across all programs provides adequate resources to develop and implement its assessment plan has adequate information technology resources to support faculty and candidates

6.e The Expectations The unit: allocates sufficient resources for distance learning programs to provide reliability, speed, and confidentiality of connection in the delivery system provides access to sufficient and current library, curricular, and electronic resources

6.e The Evidence List of resources that support programs List of resources that support unit assessment system Inventory and sampling of technology supporting faculty and candidates

6.e The Evidence Institution and unit technology plans Inventory and sampling of library holdings Description of access to information technology

6.e Don’t forget to … provide evidence that the institution and the unit does not rely on grant funding to provide, maintain, and update technology resources

Standard 6 Connections Conceptual Framework Resources verify unit / university commitment to technology and also support candidates/faculty Unit policies reflect its commitment to diversity

Standard 6 Connections Standard 1: Candidate Performance Policies and practices support programs to prepare candidates who meet professional standards and can help all students learn Budget supports high-quality curriculum and instruction

Standard 6 Connections Standard 2: Assessment Resources support the unit’s assessment system The assessment system assesses unit operations (more on this in a minute!)

Standard 6 Connections Standard 3: Field Experiences and Clinical Practice Resources support high quality field and clinical experiences and work with school partners

Standard 6 Connections Standard 4: Diversity Policies reflect commitment to diversity Unit manages its programs to prepare candidates to teach all students

Standard 6 Connections Standard 5: Faculty Governance facilitates collaboration Workload policies permit active engagement in teaching, scholarship, service Use of part-time faculty strengthens programs Resources facilitate faculty professional development Budget for faculty supports high-quality work

And One Final Myth !! Myth # 6: The unit assessment system focuses only on candidate performance. The Reality: The unit assessment system must also assess unit operations, especially those identified in Standard 6. Check your conference CD for an assessment rubric that addresses this !