Cross-cultural Factorial Validity of the Cultural Learning Environment Questionnaire: the Application of CFA and EFA Arief Darmanegara Liem & Elizabeth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Abstract Two studies examined the internal and external validity of three school climate scales on the School Climate Bullying Survey (SCBS), a self–report.
Advertisements

. N. ORELLANA*, J.M. SUAREZ*, C. BELLOCH*, B. GARGALLO**, R. BO*, G, ALMERICH*, A. SAEZ*, F. ALIAGA*, I. GASTALDO*, I. DIAZ*, R. ROIG*** AND E. GONZALEZ*.
The Technology-Rich Outcomes-Focused Learning Environment Inventory (TROFLEI): A Cross-Cultural Validation Anita Welch, Claudette Peterson, Chris Ray,
CAREER COUNSELLING IN CROSS-CULTURAL EUROPEAN SPACE, KLAIPEDA 2005 Youth’s ’ Dillemmas Anna Paszkowska-Rogacz.
Developing and validating a stress appraisal measure for minority adolescents Journal of Adolescence 28 (2005) 547–557 Impact Factor: A.A. Rowley.
MGTO 324 Workshop 5: Construct Validity. Factor Analysis Suppose you have chosen 4 items (Q1 to Q4 from the data file provided: Q1: Gaze at me; Q2: Touch.
Developing an instrument to assess the impact of attitude and social norms on user selection of an interface design: a repertory grid approach Willem-Paul.
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
Education 795 Class Notes Factor Analysis II Note set 7.
Social Science Research Design and Statistics, 2/e Alfred P. Rovai, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton Internal Consistency Reliability Analysis PowerPoint.
Dimensions of Cultural Established methods for Analyzing Cultures.
Multivariate Methods EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Social Science Research Design and Statistics, 2/e Alfred P. Rovai, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton Factor Analysis PowerPoint Prepared by Alfred.
Copyright © 2001 by The Psychological Corporation 1 The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES) Rating scale technology for identifying students with.
Research in Psychology. Research Basics  All psychological research MUST follow the scientific method  Improves accuracy and validity of findings 
Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey September 11, 2012.
The Learning Behaviors Scale
Statistics for Education Research Lecture 10 Reliability & Validity Instructor: Dr. Tung-hsien He
Michelle J. Leybman 1, David C. Zuroff 1, & Marc A. Fournier 2 McGill University 1, University of Toronto 2 ABSTRACT Based on evolutionary psychology,
Iuliana Zsoldos-Marchis
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.
Organizational culture Factor analysis of a Competing Values Framework instrument Christian D. Helfrich, MPH, PhD Implementation Research Coordinator Ischemic.
MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE ACCEPTANCE OF MICROBLOGGING SOCIAL NETWORKS: 1 THE µBTAM MODEL FRANCISCO REJÓN-GUARDIA FRANCISCO J. LIÉBANA-CABANILLAS.
Teaching culturally diverse groups Jude Carroll January 2014 Presentation at the University of Sheffield.
1 The Effects of Mattering on Probationary Students’ Adaptation and Success in College Esau Tovar, M.S. Merril A. Simon, Ph.D. Annual Conference for the.
Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.
Natural Europe Posttest Students (Control group) The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information on the features and tools of the Natural Europe project.
Advanced Correlational Analyses D/RS 1013 Factor Analysis.
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy Tahseen Muhammad ED 7202 NET.
Competitive Swimmers’ Interpretation of Motivational Climate Rebecca C. Trenz, M.A. Fordham University Psychology of Motivation.
Thursday AM  Presentation of yesterday’s results  Factor analysis  A conceptual introduction to: Structural equation models Structural equation models.
Factor Analysis Revealing the correlational structure among variables Understanding & Reducing Complexity.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Physical Education Teacher Education Keven A. Prusak, PhD and William F. Christensen, PhD Keven A. Prusak, PhD and William F. Christensen, PhD Brigham.
Factor analysis (PCA) in action Thought for the day: “Does one learn better by understanding the abstract definition or by actually doing the activity?”
On the Elusive Nature of Measuring Teacher Change: An Examination of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire 指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Weng, Chung-ming 報告日期:
Exploratory Factor Analysis Principal Component Analysis Chapter 17.
Diversity in Education
Welcome.
ACES: Developing a Valid and Reliable Survey to Assess Faculty Support of Diversity Goals.
This is a mess... How the hell can I validate the consumer behaviors’ scales of my SEM model? Maria Pujol-Jover 1, Irene Esteban-Millat 1 1 Marketing Research.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
What Is My Argument Style?. Influences Personality Personality.
Individual differences in statistics anxiety Donncha Hanna School of Psychology QUB.
Research methods in Cross-cultural Psychology LECTURE 2.
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Interpersonal Relationships Anxiety Questionnaire 1 Carrie M. Brown, Ph.D.; 2 Brien K. Ashdown, Ph.D.; 1 Nastacia.
The Process of Psychometric Validation of an Instrument across Language and Culture Halfway around the World Huey-Shys Chen PhD, RN, CHES Assistant Professor,
The Benefits of Regulating Emotions: Predictions from Adolescent Emotional Repair to Multiple Domains of Young Adult Adjustment. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan.
Chapter Five Cross-cultural Studies. Cross-cultural / Intercultural Refers to the meeting of two cultures or two languages across the political boundaries.
An Evaluation of an Observation Rubric Used to Assess Teacher Performance Kent Sabo Kerry Lawton Hongxia Fu Arizona State University.
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Portuguese
Exploratory Factor Analysis
PAIN & INTEROCEPTIVE BODY–AWARENESS
Further Validation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale – II: Gender Measurement Invariance Harmon, K. A., Shigemoto, Y., Borowa, D., Robitschek, C.,
Karin Karako Hunter college, the city university of new york
Academic Advising Assessment: Perceived Support and Scale Development Tracie D. Burt, Erin M. Buchanan, Michael T. Carr, Marilee L. Teasley, Carly A.
Psychometric Properties of the Seeking of Noetic Goals Test Brandy J
Psychometric Properties of an Acculturation Scale:
Assessments Attitudes of UK Teachers & Parents
Employees’ empathy in the hospitality industry:
Factor Structure of the Cybersex Motives Questionnaire
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire – Portuguese Version Palmeira, A.1,2, Teixeira, P.2, Silva, M2. &
Dr. Chin and Dr. Nettelhorst Winter 2018
Gender Development.
EPSY 5245 EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez
Thomas Korth, Robert Girvin, Jennifer Nikkel, Allan Terry, Ryan Murphy
Cross-cultural studies of gender roles
This lesson is for both investigation and artefact projects.
WrItIng Methodology SectIon (QuantItatIve Research)
Presentation transcript:

Cross-cultural Factorial Validity of the Cultural Learning Environment Questionnaire: the Application of CFA and EFA Arief Darmanegara Liem & Elizabeth Nair Dept. of Social Work and Psychology National University of Singapore Singapore Allan B. I. Bernardo Paulus Hidajat Prasetya Faculty of Education Faculty of Psychology De La Salle University Maranatha Christian University Manila – the Philippines Bandung - Indonesia

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 The C L E Q (Waldrip & Fisher, 2000) - Cultural Learning Environment Questionnaire - To assess culturally sensitive factors of the classroom learning environment (in Australia). - Hofstede’s cultural dimensions (individualism, masculinity- femininity, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance)

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th subscales (gender equity, collaboration, deference, competition, teacher authority, modeling, congruence) - 5 items for each subscale (altogether 35 items) - A five-point Likert scale ranging from 1(disagree) to 5 (agree) The C L E Q (Waldrip & Fisher, 2000)

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Examples of the CLEQ Items - Gender equity: “I feel that male students are just as capable as female students in all class activities.” - Collaboration: “I like working in groups.” - Deference: “I try to say what I think the teacher wants rather than give my own opinion.” - Competition: “I like to compete against the other students.”

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Examples of the CLEQ Items - Teacher Authority: “It is OK for me to argue with teachers.” - Modeling: “I like teachers to show me what to do.” - Congruence: “What I learn in school helps me to do things at home.”

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Aims of the study To examine cross- cultural factorial validity of the CLEQ. To propose tentative culture-specific sets of subscale for further usage.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Participants 4 cultures: Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Australia. 230 year-9 and year-10 secondary students from each culture - Altogether 920 subjects. Male and female were equally represented in each sample.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Participants Compositions of ethnic backgrounds Singapore : 230 (100%) Chinese. Philippines : 230 (100%) Filipinos. Indonesia : (88.70%) Native Indonesians - 26 (11.30%) Chinese Indonesians. Australia : (70.43%) European Australians - 68 (29.57%) Others.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Data Analysis - 1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis or CFA was first used to test the measurement model of the CLEQ (7 factor oblique model). The goodness-of-fit indices (AGFI and SRMR) were evaluated for each cultural measurement model.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Measurement Model 7 factor oblique model

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Result of CFA Measurement Model (7 factor oblique model) CultureAGFISRMR Singapore Indonesia Philippines Australia

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Data Analysis - 2 Two primary types of Exploratory Factor Analysis or EFA - Principal Component Analysis and Maximum Likelihood - were then performed for each cultural data set. Promax (oblique) rotational method was chosen and 7 factors were extracted.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Result of PCA - Singapore

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Result of PCA - Indonesia

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Result of PCA – Philippines

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Result of PCA - Australia

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Cronbach  Internal Consistency Sub- scales SingaporeIndonesiaPhilippinesAustralia Gender Equity Collabo- ration Deference Compe- tition Teacher Authority Modeling Cong- ruence

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Summary of the findings Item def-24 - “It is important that I am able to answer all the questions teachers ask me.” Item def-31 - “It is important to me that I give the right answers to questions in class.” Both loaded together with the competition items in all cultures.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Summary of the findings Deference and Modeling items intermixed. Singapore and Indonesia: 2 factors - teacher - conformity and classmate- conformity. Philippines: 2 factors – teacher- conformity and class members-conformity. Australia: a single factor – class members conformity.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Summary of the findings Item col-23 - “It is important for me to be involved in class discussion.” - is problematic across cultures. Indonesia: Gender Equity items split into 2 factors teacher-gender equity and classmate- gender equity.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Tentative new sets of subscales Items def-24 and def-31 may be included in the competition subscale (5 or 7 items). Deference and modeling subscales are substituted by - teacher- and classmate- conformity subscales (4 items each) for Singapore and Indonesia, - teacher-conformity (3 items) and class member-conformity subscale (4 items) for the Philippines, and - class members-conformity (8 items) for Australia.

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004 Tentative new sets of subscales Teacher Authority subscale (5 items) and Congruence subscale (5 items) remain the same. Item col-23 removed from the collaboration subscale. Gender equity subscale (5 items) remain the same, except for Indonesia – teacher- (3 items) and classmate-gender equity (2 items).

Cultural Learning Environment XVII IACCP - Xi’an, August 2 nd – 6 th 2004

Liem, A. D., Nair, E., Bernardo, A. B. I., & Prasetya, P. H. (2004). Cross-cultural Factorial Validity of the Cultural Learning Environment Questionnaire: the Application of CFA and EFA. Paper presented at the XVII IACCP, Xi’an, August 2 ND – 6 TH 2004