1 Child Rights Departments role in ensuring development of gate-keeping and referral system SECOND CHILD PROTECTION FORUM: Building and Reforming Child.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BSEC Working Group on Institutional Renewal and Good Governance March 26-27, 2007 Istanbul The Black Sea NGOs Network.
Advertisements

System-wide issues in child care reform Clare OBrien, Consultant For UNICEF 2 nd Child Protection Forum Bishkek, 12 May 2009.
Cost Benefit Analysis Results and Proposed Alternative Child Protection Policy in Tajikistan The 2nd Child Protection Forum: Building & Reforming Child.
Foster families in Republic Macedonia Elka Todorova Ministry of Labor and Social Policy.
Child Protection Units
How were the de- institutionalization targets and activities defined in planning and strategic documents in 4 countries? How were they applied, monitored.
Child Welfare Reform in Albania Marieta Zaçe Deputy Minister of Labor, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Albania Sofia 3-6 July 2007.
Breakout session 3 FAMILY AND CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES.
CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM REFORM – MASTER PLAN ON TRANSFORMATION OF RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Azerbaijan Second Child Protection.
Alternative services for children in Azerbaijan Ministry of Education The Republic of Azerbaijan 2 nd Child Protection Forum Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
UNICEFs contribution to the reform Perspectives on child protection Dita Reichenberg, Regional Advisor, Child Protection, CEE/CIS.
Interaction between state and private social service providers of community- based services for children and families at risk Nelly Petrova-Dimitrova,
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
Leicestershires Vision for short break transformation Leicestershire is committed to the transformation and expansion of short break services for disabled.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
Alternative care in Central Asia and Azerbaijan. Policy and legal framework Current situation: Explicit policy, framework law of state programmes favouring.
Healthy Schools, Healthy Children?
Maggie Carter Assistant Director, Learner & Family Support
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
A New Chance Cross Border Fostering Project Project Manager: Eric Plunkett, Eric Plunkett, Principal Social Worker. Principal Social Worker.Consultant:
Early Childhood Intervention and Early Rehabilitation System in the Republic of Belarus.
Breakout session 1 Reforming local level statutory services Chairperson: Ms. Irina Malancuic, International Expert on child care system reform, Moldova.
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Strengthening Child Protection Systems in Viet Nam
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
National Mental Health Programme. Govt of India integrated mental health with other health services at rural level. It is being implemented since 1982.
The introduction of social workers in the primary health care system and its impact on the reduction of baby abandonment in Kazakhstan 10 September 2014,
HOW SOCIAL CHANGES AFFECT THE SOCIAL WORK IN BULGARIA National Development Agency, Berlin, International Conference, 15th May 2014 With financial support.
CHILD WELFARE REFORMS: HOW?
NBAR Monmouthshire Project R Austin Principal School Improvement Officer Inclusion & Behaviour.
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN WELFARE MIX MODEL CREATION Best Practice Model Social Center "Home of colors"
Draft Code of Practice – General Consultation / Implementation Sue Woodgate.
1 Critical issue module 6 Separated children in emergency settings.
Reforms for Justice for Children: A Case Study of Belize Legal and Institutional Reform in Belize: Strengthening Child Protection Systems Presented by.
Identify the institutions which have a stake in the
Vision and regional perspectives for child care system reforms in CEE/CIS International conference “Commitment, Partnership and Action” Moldova November.
Investigation and case planning Your responsibilities under the Children Act 1989 Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 9.
Care Matters: Time for Change A home with someone who cares.
FAMILY STRENGTHENING PROGRAMME An approach to prevent children from losing care of their families of origin.
PROPOSAL FOR A MODEL MENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY BASED SERVICE DELIVERY.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
A presentation made to the way forward project meeting held in Addis Ababa,24 th -27 th May,2011 By James Kaboggoza Ssembatya Assistant commissioner/Children.
Financing and planning of resources in the best interest of the child in the child care system Zhumazhan Zhukenov Chairperson of the Child Rights Protection.
Early help – some signals and examples Nick Page 18 March 2013.
From de-institutionalization towards an inclusive society for all: Outcomes and challenges regarding the rights of children with intellectual disabilities.
THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD IN CARE SITUATION IN LITHUANIA Audrone Bedorf Adviser of the Ombudsman for Children of the Republic of Lithuania.
FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION SOME HINTS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROCESS IN THE BACAU COUNTY Presentation by Sorin Brasoveanu.
Donor Coordination Forum 16 October, key challenges Poverty Social exclusion Functional gaps and system weaknesses in social services.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
De-institutionalization & social inclusion Lessons learned, remaining challenges and steps to accelerate the reform in CEE/CIS.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Safeguarding and Looked After Children’s Services Early Intervention and Prevention.
Redistribution of Resources in the Process of De-institutionalization Halyna Postoliuk Director of “Hope & Homes for Children” in Ukraine Chisinau November.
Family and Child Support Services Breakout Session 3 Building and Reforming Child Care Systems Bishkek, May 2009.
Reform example: Micro- or mezzo level planning for de- institutionalization Viktor Yakzhik Head of the Department of Social and Educational Work of the.
Progress of child care system reform By: Ms. Anna Nordenmark Severinsson, Child Protection Specialist, UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS in Armenia, Belarus,
Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council Social Services CSSIW Performance Evaluation Report 2014–15.
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health Knowledge for welfare and healthKyiv March 22, Round Table on Discussion of the Project.
1 Ministry of Social Protection, Family and Child 27 th September 2007.
Gloucestershire Secondary Schools Place Planning Autumn 2012.
Copyright © 2010, 2006, 2002 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 1 Community-Oriented Nursing and Community-Based Nursing Carolyn A.
Health Sector Managing Authority Ministry of Health Page 1 Health Sector Managing Authority Ministry of Health June 2013 Mental Health.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
LGS – HR POLICY.  OVERALL POLICY STATEMENT  The most valued assets of the Service are the people who individually and collectively contribute to the.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
"Building a caring society. together"1 DSD Annual Report 2007/08 Presented to Portfolio Committee on Social Development 22 January 2009.
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Diana Chiriacescu HISEE, Belgrade, June 15th 2006
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Presentation transcript:

1 Child Rights Departments role in ensuring development of gate-keeping and referral system SECOND CHILD PROTECTION FORUM: Building and Reforming Child Care Systems in Central Asia Mrs. Zuhra Madaminjanova, Head of Board in the Strategic Research Centre of the President and member of the Commission on Child Rights under the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan Bishkek 2009

2 History of the Department Beginning in 2004 the Government of Tajikistan in cooperation with UNICEF established five local pilot Child Rights Departments which have since expanded to nine districts; The CRD took over the functions of the former local Commissions on Minors and in some locations perform the functions of the Guardianship Authorities; The CRDs initially focused on promoting the process of deinstitutionalization of children (social orphans) who were being returned to their families and the community from eight residential institutions; The CRDs also worked as gatekeepers for preventing and regulating future placement of children into institutions; On August 1, 2008 the Government Decree #377 mandated the creation of a CRD in each of the 66 districts throughout the country in the course of three years;

3 Progress of the establishment Preliminary, the overall goal of establishing Child Rights Department in 2004 was to promote the process of de-institutionalization of children in Tajikistan and to contribute to the creation of alternative care programmes in a family environment; The development of the new child protection has called for a need for systemic reform of the child protection system both at local and national levels; It has also showed that it is possible to change entrenched attitudes towards child protection and child care at local level; At project level, the major achievements of the CRDs are: an understanding that the child needs to grow up in a family environment wherever possible and that institutionalisation should be a remedy of last resort the introduction of current notions of good social work practice, including investigation, assessment and care planning (trained institutional staff) training social workers to work with and maintain the family unit de-institutionalisation of significant numbers of children effective gate-keeping preventing children who are not in need of child protection services from entering the institutions

4 Organizational Structure CHILD RIGHTS DEPARTMENTS COM/Guardianship Authority PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION NO FURTHER ACTION Referral to community services (NGO or statutory organs) FULL ASSESSMENT Referral to community services (NGO or statutory organs) REMOVE CHILDREN FROM PARENTS EXTENDED FAMILY ALTERNATIVE FAMILY PLACEMENT IN INSTITUTION

5 Specific Functions of CRD Needs Assessment: Family and child assessments occur for children living in families who are at risk, identification of children with mental and physical disabilities to refer them for disability benefits; children who are at risk of out-of- home placement in residential institutions or in families; Response to Vulnerability: The staff of the CRDs provides information, referral and other assistance to vulnerable children and their families. This assistance includes counselling, identifying and helping secure benefits to which children and families are entitled, and referring the children and families to various governmental and non-governmental programs; Gate-keeping: The CRDs review the applications for placement of children in residential care institutions or find alternative solutions which include providing or arranging for assistance so that children can live safely within their families, or arranging for alternative community placements such as guardianship; Monitor the status of children: The CRDs monitor the status of children who have been reintegrated into families from boarding schools and also monitor the status of children who have been placed into guardianship;

6 Operational Model (Functions) Staffing: Staffing level varies based on the population number in districts but the proposed CRD office will have a chair and two other staff. It is the started option that staff from existing Social Assistance at Home Units of Social Protection departments proceed social work related home visits to compile information for decision making process; Funding: Each local CRD operates under, and is funded by, the local Authorities. The salaries of the core staff of the CRDs are paid by the local government and so far UNICEF provides supplements to cover operational expenses and provides other types of assistance such as computers and office supplies; Impact: According to an evaluation of the deinstitutionalization process in Tajikistan, the CRDs have had a significant impact on the numbers of children being referred to institutions and on the number of the requests for placements being made. The CRDs streamlined a cumbersome, inefficient and ineffective system of placing children in institutions. In most cases children seem to have received appropriate and detailed assessments by the CRDs and social workers.

7 Remaining Constraints Prior to the establishment of Child Rights Departments in the pilot districts, the existence of staff specifically trained to work in child welfare and protection with the skills of modern social work did not exist in the country; Building the capacity of staff that is able to develop community-based services to meet childrens needs takes longer than anticipated, especially in view of the demands placed on the staff; Staff of the Child Rights Departments/UNITS need further exposure to innovative, creative, low cost yet effective child protection services that could be adapted to meet the needs of children in the country; Fragmentation of the system complicates the movement of the Guardianship organs from the Education sector to the CRD which has placement under the local governance; Lack of coordination to link the CRD decisions on referral based on the social work activities of the Social Assistance at Home Units which has unqualified staff to provide certain services for targeted groups; The failures of economy and shortage of skills in public expenditure policy development consequence low governments salary scale which adds burdens to unskilled staff affecting the welfare of children in need of care and protection measures

8 Social Assistance at Home Units of the SOBES Initial assessment Social Assistance at Home Units of the SOBES Initial assessment Gate keeping CRD Request for provision of Services г Specialized Social worker of the Units Comprehensive assessment Social workers for conclusions Child Individual Plan Realization and follow up of the individual plan Information on the risk Commission on Child Rights at district Failure in the realization of child individual plan Передача случая Successful work Рек. на устройство Collective Recommendations and decisions for the services - Instructions to statutory organs/departments - Mobilization of local NGOs - Monitoring of family situation - Review of case management Referral to Guardianship or institutional care Court sentence Proposal for process of deprivation and adoption Deprivation of parental rights Adoption Child Protection Model Scheme