Status of USGS Surface-Water Programs and Networks: An OSW Prospective Robert Mason Data Chiefs’ Meeting December 4, 2013 The Role of the GOES DCS in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USGS Data: Resources and Access USGS West Virginia Water Science Center.
Advertisements

Applications, strengths, weaknesses, and calibration of buoy based sensors.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Ernie Wells Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather Service May.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
SNOW SURVEY, SNOTEL (SNOwpack TELemetry) & SCAN (Soil Climate Analysis Network) Presented at NWS Cold Regions Workshop November , 2004.
Benefits of a Flood Warning Network to Findlay, Ohio Brian C. Hurt, P.E. – Former City Engineer Findlay, Ohio.
Who Uses Stream Gage Data? Janet Thigpen, CFM Flood Mitigation Specialist Southern Tier Central Regional Planning & Development Board.
NOAA Hydrology Program Geoff Bonnin Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA National Weather Service x103 Geoff Bonnin.
Monitoring the hydrologic cycle in the Sierra Nevada mountains.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Dr. Thomas Graziano Acting Chief, Hydrologic Services Division Office of.
HOPI TRIBE WATER RESOURCES PROGRAM Navajo Hydroclimate Monitoring Capacity Building Workshop November 24, 2008 Flagstaff, Arizona Jon Mason Nonpoint Source.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
DAVE REED HYDROLOGIST IN CHARGE NOAA/NWS LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER FORECAST CENTER Datums and Stages - Importance to the NOAA/NWS Hydrologic Services Program.
June 23, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 NOAA / CBRFC Water forecasts and data in support of western water management.
Colorado’s Surface Water Monitoring System Colorado Division of Water Resources.
Using HydroServer Organize, Manage, and Publish Your Data Support EAR CUAHSI HIS Sharing hydrologic data Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation Tulsa District The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers and Its Cooperative Partners.
HydrometJanuary AMS Short Course on Instrumentation1 HydrometeorologicalMeasurements Melanie A. Wetzel Desert Research Institute University of.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY Overall Goal – from purpose statement: “To improve the availability and reliability of (surface water) information needed for.
Bastian Richter. Snow Reliability of Ski Resorts Ski Resorts today = 100% % of “Snow- Safe” Ski Resorts.
Slide 1 Soil Moisture and Soil Temperature Observations and Applications Operated by the Natural Resources Conservation Service Garry L. Schaefer, WCM.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
USGS Streamflow Monitoring in Georgia NIDIS Early Warning System Development Workshop May 18-19, 2010 Callaway Gardens, GA.
U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program J. Michael Norris Coordinator, National Streamflow.
Exercises: Organizing, Loading, and Managing Point Observations Using HydroServer Support EAR CUAHSI HIS Sharing hydrologic data
National Flood Conference April 22, 2009 Victor Hom Hydrologic Services Division Office of Climate, Water and Weather NOAA’s National Weather Service National.
Impact of data quality on watershed management—Need for automatic watershed monitoring By: M. J. Abedini and P. Karimaghaei.
Continuous Water-Quality Field Methods Micelis Doyle & Joe Rinella U.S. Geological Survey &
Integration/Dissemination of MERHAB Autonomous Research Vessel In-situ sampler (MARVIN) data.
James River in Richmond, Virginia looking upriver from the Robert E. Lee bridge. Belle Isle is on the right, November What is happening in this.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
Support for GOES Data Collection System Presentation to the Advisory Committee on Water Information by Charles Kazimir, Chairperson of the Satellite Telemetry.
GOES Data Collection System (DCS) in the GOES R Era William E. Brockman Short & Associates, Inc.
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers – Norfolk District Rappahannock River Basin Gaging Analysis 27 JUNE 2012.
USGS Overview Workshop on Improved Quality of Data and Data Exchange for Climate Research and Analysis NOAA National Climatic Data Center Bill Hazell,
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Dr. Thomas Graziano Chief, Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather.
TRANCAT Fifth Framework Programme ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2nd - 3rd October 2003: SECOND TRANSCAT MEETING ARPAL Regional.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Silver Jackets Innovative Collaboration to Maximize Solutions.
Drought Response Plan Clarke County, Virginia Saving Water/Saving Money: Water Conservation in the Shenandoah Valley March 11, 2009 Alison Teetor Natural.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
National Weather Service Recent Advances in Hydrologic Services 6 June 2006 Tom Donaldson WFO Services Program Leader Hydrologic Services Division Office.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Streamgage Network: Implication of Budget Cuts Michael Lewis USGS ID Water Science Center.
The U. S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Network Supporting Society’s Water-Resource Decisions Presented by: Bob Hainly, Assistant Director USGS-PA Water.
July 31, 2012 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Tim Bardsley Western Water Assessment 1 Future Colorado Basin Observing System.
Multiple Purpose Dam & Reservoir
Natural Disaster Reduction and Risk Assessment – Role of USGS Tim Cohn Science Advisor for Hazards U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Integration of Earth Observing Systems and the U.S. Geological Survey.
Afghan Water Task Progress Report September 7, 2006 EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD Gregg J. Wiche Doug G. Emerson U. S. Geological Survey Bismarck,
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Data Model / Database Implementation (continued) Jeffery S. Horsburgh Hydroinformatics Fall 2014 This work was funded by National Science Foundation Grants.
Asia Flood Network— A USAID Program for Flood Mitigation and Preparedness in Asia Asia Flood Network Program Objective –Identify and fill gaps in end-to-end.
2008 FLOODS IN ARKANSAS 2008 FLOODS IN ARKANSAS August 13 – 14, 2009 Jaysson Funkhouser SEVERE.
Streamflow Information for the Next Century A Plan for the National Streamflow Information Program December 2, 1999.
Suwannee-Satilla Drainage Basin: Flood Control Issues and Requested Action Suwannee-Satilla Regional Water Planning Council Douglas, GA December 8, 2010.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Peter Gabrielsen Chief, Hydrologic Services Division Eastern Region NOAA’s.
The Effect of Urbanization to the surface-water runoff The comparison between the urbanized and undeveloped zones.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Monitoring Surface-Water-Quality in the Tongue River Watershed of Montana and Wyoming Stacy Kinsey.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA Rene Vermeeren, P.E., D.WRE Chief, Hydrology and Hydraulics Branch Los Angeles.
NOAA Vision and Mission Goals Pedro J. Restrepo, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Scientist, Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA/NWS First Q2 Workshop (Q2 - "Next.
Brenda Leroux Babin Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium Lei Hu Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Alabama A Tale of Two Observing Systems: September 10-11, 2008Environmental.
Slide 1 U. S. Drought Monitor Forum Automated Soil Moisture Monitoring From CSCAN and SNOTEL Networks Garry L. Schaefer, WCM Branch Leader October 10,
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Hydrology.
Components of an HEC-HMS Model
Monitoring for Flood and Water Supply Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

Status of USGS Surface-Water Programs and Networks: An OSW Prospective Robert Mason Data Chiefs’ Meeting December 4, 2013 The Role of the GOES DCS in the USGS Streamgage Network –a Users Prospective Robert Mason U.S. Geological Survey March 27, 2015

USGS Mission Provide reliable scientific information to describe and understand the Earth; minimize loss of life and property from natural disasters; manage water, biological, energy, and mineral resources; and enhance and protect our quality of life. 135 years old 8,500 Full-time employees $1.02 B budget What do we do? Research Assessments Monitoring

What do we monitor ? Number of sites Name ,841 Gage height 8,134 Discharge 3,339 Precipitation 2,048 Water temperature 1,832 Ground-water Level 1,087 Specific conductance 815 Lake/Res elevation 632 Dissolved oxygen 492 Stream velocity 466 Air temperature 523 pH 323 Turbidity 179 Wind speed 159 Salinity 144 Wind direction Number of sites Name Reservoir storage 60 Soil temperature 52 Air pressure 50 Relative humidity 39 Soil moisture 25 Chlorophyll 19 Pressure, diss gases 15 Barometric pressure 14 Solar radiation 10 Sodium adsorption ratio 13 Tide elevation 7 Redox potential 5 NO2+NO3 5 Cyanobacteria (7/22/14)

4 Streamflow Information is Essential Engineering Design –Corps, BOR, States, locals Flood Reservoir Operations –Corps (2,478 sites), BOR, TVA Hydroelectric Power Ops–FERC, Utilities Streamflow Forecasting –NWS (3,900 sites) Water-Quality Regulation –EPA, States (TMDLs, etc.) Water/Wastewater Treatment–Local and State Irrigation–BOR, water purveyors Floodplain Mapping –FEMA (NFIP) Evacuation Planning –FEMA (Hazus) Recreational boating–Outfitters, individuals Research–NAWQA, NRP, CWP, EPA, NOAA, universities

Streamgaging/Forecasting Data Interoperability USGS streamflow data USGS Obs. River Stage Rainfall Data Rainfall- Runoff Model USGS Rating NWS Pred.

2011 Major Flood Peaks

Network Costs $162M per year 850+ Partners Funding Sources State / Local Agencies $82M49% Other Federal Agencies (OFA)$27M17% USGS Cooperative Program (CWP) $27M17% USGS Nat Streamflow Info Program$26M17% Streamgages 8,134 gages All real-time Most via GOES 13 th top network The USGS Streamgaging Network

8 Rating The Streamgaging Process Flow Measurements Streamgage Time Shift Flow / Stage Stage Flow

GOES and HRIT Data Transmission

GOES – Current Usage and Cost USGS GOES sites >10,000 (USGS is by far the largest user of the GOES DCS system.) 57 GOES Channels Total average cost is ~$129/year (actual cost per state) $200k for EDDN. Investment in GOES Millions invested so far in hardware and software ( $32 million in deployed GOES dcps and antennas alone). (Basic dcp + antenna ≈ $2,500-$3,500/each). Support staff salaries

Strengths & Weaknesses - GOES Weaknesses Limited in size and frequency of data transmissions Unusable for media transmission 1-way Limited upgradability Lack of alternate or supplemental telemetry. Strengths Reliable Low Operational Cost Established Infrastructure Adequate for most existing sites currently operating Government owned Geostationary Satellite Message traffic processing already in place

GOES and HRIT Data Transmission NOP Series MHz; RSTU Series MHz; LRIT N MHz HRIT R MHz

Our Questions? Given that GOES is weak, what does “sharing” mean for our signals? Will exclusion zones be permitted? Can we create “guard bands” around GOES frequencies? Can we increase the power of GOES signals?

Questions??