Chapter 7.2 Oligopoly & Cartels Chapter 7.2 Oligopoly & Cartels.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pricing and Output Decisions: Imperfectly Competitive Markets
Advertisements

Price leadership Model
Market Structures.
Part 8 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Chapter 5 & Main Monopoly Chapter 5 & Main Monopoly.
Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick 1 Topic 3 : Lecture 17 Perfect competition and Consumer Surplus X p pcpc D Consumer Surplus is given by?
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION, OLIGOPOLY, & GAME THEORY
Lecture notes Prepared by Anton Ljutic. © 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited Imperfect Competition CHAPTER ELEVEN.
Monopolistic Competition. MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION Aims of lecture –To identify the meaning of monopolistic competition and distinguish it from other.
Chapter 12 Oligopoly. Chapter 122 Oligopoly – Characteristics Small number of firms Product differentiation may or may not exist Barriers to entry.
ECON 201 OLIGOPOLIES & GAME THEORY 1. FIGURE 12.4 DUOPOLY EQUILIBRIUM IN A CENTRALIZED CARTEL 2.
1 Welcome to EC 209: Managerial Economics- Group A By: Dr. Jacqueline Khorassani Week Ten.
Oligopoly Topic 7(b).
Monopolistic Competition
Between Competition and Monopoly: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly.
Chapter 10 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly.
Market Structures Monopoly. Monopoly  Defining monopoly  Only one seller  Barriers to entry  economies of scale  product differentiation and brand.
Oligopoly. Oligopoly  Key features of oligopoly  barriers to entry  interdependence of firms  incentives to compete versus incentives to collude 
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. Monopolistic Competition, Oligopoly, and Strategic Pricing Chapter 13.
Oligopolies A2 Economics.
Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Microeconomics 7/e by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal, University of Canberra,
Ch. 24: Monopolistic Competition, Oligopoly & Game Theory Del Mar College John Daly ©2003 South-Western Publishing, A Division of Thomson Learning.
LECTURE 1 OBJECTIVES: Students should be able to:  Identify and explain the characteristics of oligopoly.
Market Structures.
University of Papua New Guinea International Economics Lecture 10: Firms in the Global Economy [Internal Economies of Scale]
Chapter 5 & Main Monopoly Chapter 5 & Main Monopoly.
Two Alternative Theories of Pricing Behavior 13A.
PRICING UNDER DIFFERENT MARKET STRUCTURES Oligopoly
1 Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly ©2005 South-Western College Publishing Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary.
Competition and Market Power
Oligopoly. Two examples of oligopoly Market shares of the largest brewers Market shares of the largest brewers.
Market Analysis.
Market Structure. The Degree of Competition The four market structures –perfect competition –monopoly –monopolistic competition.
# McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 9.
Oligopoly. Structure Assume Duopoly Firms know information about market demand Perfect Information.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Chapter 11.
CHAPTER 23 MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY.
ECON 201 Oligopolies & Game Theory 1. 2 An Economic Application of Game Theory: the Kinked-Demand Curve Above the kink, demand is relatively elastic because.
Oligopolies & Game Theory
Chapter 7.2 Oligopoly & Cartels Chapter 7.2 Oligopoly & Cartels.
Chapter 5. REVENUE Revenue curves when price varies with output (downward-sloping demand curve) – –average revenue (AR) – –marginal revenue (MR) – –total.
Monopolistic competition and Oligopoly
Chapter 5.4 &6 Monopoly Chapter 5.4 &6 Monopoly. REVENUE Revenue curves when price varies with output (downward-sloping demand curve)
Economics of Oligopoly Topic Economics of Oligopoly Topic Students should be able to: Understand the characteristics of this market structure.
Kinked demand curve Lesson aims: To draw and explain the kinked demand curve model To use the kinked demand curve theory to illustrate why prices remain.
Perfect Competition and Monopoly. Alternative Market Structures.
Oligopoly Introduction Derived from Greek word: “oligo” (few) “polo” (to sell) A few dominant sellers sell differentiated.
Imperfect Competition. Monopolistic Competition Monopolistic competition Assumptions of monopolistic competition  many or several firms  free entry.
Oligopoly A few large interdependent firms dominate an industry High concentration ratios (eg. 5-firm conc. Ratio = 80%) Collusion can occur (bad for consumers)
University of Papua New Guinea Principles of Microeconomics Lecture 13: Oligopoly.
OLIGOPOLY-II.
Monopoly.
INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS Topic 9 Oligopoly: Strategic Firm Interaction These slides are copyright © 2010 by Tavis Barr. This work is licensed under.
Markets with Only a Few Sellers
MARKET STRUCTURE 2: MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY
Chapter 10 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Oligopoly.
Oligopolies & Game Theory
Market Failure: Oligopolies
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY
Oligopoly Chapter 16-2.
Today Oligopoly Theory Economic Experiment in Class.
CHAPTER 12 OUTLINE Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Price Competition Competition versus Collusion: The Prisoners’ Dilemma 12.5.
Oligopolies & Game Theory
MARKET STRUCTURE 2: MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY
CHAPTER 10 Oligopoly.
Perfect Competition and Monopoly
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 7.2 Oligopoly & Cartels Chapter 7.2 Oligopoly & Cartels

OLIGOPOLY We have looked at non-cooperative oligopolies; but noted their incentive to collude. Here we want to look at various possible collusion scenarios. Tacit collusion – –price leadership: dominant firm We have looked at non-cooperative oligopolies; but noted their incentive to collude. Here we want to look at various possible collusion scenarios. Tacit collusion – –price leadership: dominant firm

£ Q O D market Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership Leader assumes everyone else will act like a perfectly competitive firm once it sets price, by choosing output such that P=MC

£ Q O D market Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership So Supply curve for everybody else is just their MC curve And the leader takes this MC/supply curve as given

£ Q O S all other firms D market Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership What is left over for the market leader at each price ?

£ Q O S all other firms D market P1P1 P2P2 b Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership Above P 1 it gets nothing, below P 2 no competitors

£ Q O S all other firms D market D leader P1P1 P2P2 a b Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership Above P 1 it gets nothing, below P 2 no competitors P OF

£ Q O S all other firms D market D leader P1P1 P2P2 a b Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership What about at prices between P 1 and P 2 ? What if the price is P OF ? P OF Q OF

£ Q O S all other firms D market D leader P1P1 P2P2 a b Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership The “leftovers” represent demand curve for the leading firm P OF

£ Q O S all other firms D market D leader P1P1 P2P2 a b Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership The leader (of course!) maximises its profit subject to its demand curve

£ Q O S all other firms D market P1P1 P2P2 a b Division of the market between leader and followers Dominant firm price leadership To find optimal P and Q we consider, as usual, the MR, MC and AC curves.

£ Q O S all other firms D market D leader PLPL Determination of price and output MR leader MC leader QLQL l Dominant firm price leadership

£ Q O S all other firms D market D leader PLPL MR leader MC leader QLQL QTQT t l Determination of price and output Dominant firm price leadership

£ Q O S all other firms D market D leader PLPL MR leader MC leader QLQL QFQF QTQT f t l Determination of price and output Dominant firm price leadership Remember followers are a large group of smaller firms And Q T =Q L +Q F

£ Q O AR  D market Alternative Leadership: Price leader aiming to maximise profits for a given market share

£ Q O AR  D leader =40% of Market AR  D market Assume constant market share for leader Price leader aiming to maximise profits for a given market share

£ Q O MR leader AR  D leader AR  D market Price leader aiming to maximise profits for a given market share

£ Q O MC MR leader AR  D leader AR  D market Price leader aiming to maximise profits for a given market share

£ Q O PLPL MC MR leader AR  D leader QLQL l AR  D market Price leader aiming to maximise profits for a given market share

£ Q O AR  D market PLPL MC QTQT MR leader AR  D leader QLQL l t Price leader aiming to maximise profits for a given market share Remainder Q T -Q L divided up amongst other producers

OLIGOPOLY Tacit collusion – –price leadership: dominant firm – –price leadership: barometric   See Sloman. Just like the case where a leading firm has a constant market share. One firm chooses price given D, MR & MC, others follow. Tacit collusion – –price leadership: dominant firm – –price leadership: barometric   See Sloman. Just like the case where a leading firm has a constant market share. One firm chooses price given D, MR & MC, others follow.

OLIGOPOLY – –rules of thumb   AC mark-up pricingP=(1+.10)AC (firms somehow “agree” on a certain rate of profits).   Benchmark Pricing£9.99, £14,99, £19.99 – –rules of thumb   AC mark-up pricingP=(1+.10)AC (firms somehow “agree” on a certain rate of profits).   Benchmark Pricing£9.99, £14,99, £19.99 Tacit collusion

OLIGOPOLY Collusion and the law – –It may be difficult to prove that firms collude, especially if collusion is tacit. – –What is the difference between all firms agreeing a price and a price which is competitively set? Well, it is up to the right authorities to figure this out – typically they cannot prove anything unless it is REALLY bad. Collusion and the law – –It may be difficult to prove that firms collude, especially if collusion is tacit. – –What is the difference between all firms agreeing a price and a price which is competitively set? Well, it is up to the right authorities to figure this out – typically they cannot prove anything unless it is REALLY bad.

SUMMARY We have looked at various types of imperfect competition. Lack of competition is, as a general rule, bad for consumers. Against this speaks that monopolies in some cases tend to innovate more - though this is disputed. The law typically forbids monopolistic behavior, especially collusion, but it is not an easy matter to prove anyone’s guilt.

The remaining material in this presentation was not used in lectures though it is relevant for the classwork for weeks 9 & 10. Thus part of these assignments will consist in reading section 7.3 of Sloman. You will not be asked question about this material at the exam, however.

OLIGOPOLY Non-collusive oligopoly: the kinked demand curve theory – –assumptions of the model   If you drop price everyone will follow   If you raise price you are on your own Non-collusive oligopoly: the kinked demand curve theory – –assumptions of the model   If you drop price everyone will follow   If you raise price you are on your own

Suppose initially we have traditional diagram for firm £ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 D MR MC But once equilibrium is established, if you raise price nobody follows you, and if you lower it everybody does

and below Q 1 it is steeper Kinked demand for a firm under oligopoly £ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 D So above Q 1 Demand curve is now flatter MC

Kinked demand for a firm under oligopoly £ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 D

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 D So now firm faces the following demand curve

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 D  AR a MR MR for the top part of the curve

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 MR a b D  AR MR for the lower part of the curve?

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 MR a b D  AR

Kinked Demand Curve Theory Why is this model important ? Because it helps to explain why we tend to observe relatively stable prices in oligopolistic industries Why is this model important ? Because it helps to explain why we tend to observe relatively stable prices in oligopolistic industries

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 MR a b D  AR Stable price under conditions of a kinked demand curve To see this lets draw in the original D, MR and MC curve here.

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 MR a b D  AR Stable price under conditions of a kinked demand curve To see this let’s draw in the original D, MR and MC curve here.

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 MR a b D  AR Stable price under conditions of a kinked demand curve To see this lets draw in the original D, MR and MC curve here. Notice the original MC lies between points a and b

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 MR a b D  AR Stable price under conditions of a kinked demand curve MC 1 MC 2 But what if MC changes?

£ Q O P1P1 Q1Q1 MR a b D  AR Stable price under conditions of a kinked demand curve MC 1 MC 2 So MC can vary a lot and price won’t change

OLIGOPOLY Non-collusive oligopoly: the kinked demand curve theory Offers a reason for stable prices besides collusion But other reasons why prices may be stable Prices may be costly to change Menu costs Non-collusive oligopoly: the kinked demand curve theory Offers a reason for stable prices besides collusion But other reasons why prices may be stable Prices may be costly to change Menu costs

OLIGOPOLY Oligopoly and the public interest – –advantages – –disadvantages – –difficulties in drawing general conclusions Advertising and the public interest Oligopoly and contestable markets Oligopoly and the public interest – –advantages – –disadvantages – –difficulties in drawing general conclusions Advertising and the public interest Oligopoly and contestable markets

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree

O P1P1 D 200 P Q First-degree price discrimination

O P1P1 D 200 P Q First-degree price discrimination

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree – –second degree Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree – –second degree

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree – –second degree – –third degree Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree – –second degree – –third degree

Third-degree price discrimination P Q O P1P1 D 200

O P1P1 D P2P P Q Third-degree price discrimination

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree – –second degree – –third degree Conditions necessary for price discrimination to operate Meaning of price discrimination Types of price discrimination – –first degree – –second degree – –third degree Conditions necessary for price discrimination to operate

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree

Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination OOO DXDX MR X (a) Market X

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y (a) Market X (b) Market Y Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T MC (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T MC 3000 (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T MC (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T MC (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T MC (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T MC (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

OOO DXDX DYDY MR X MR Y MR T MC (a) Market X (b) Market Y (c) Total (markets X + Y) Profit-maximising output under third-degree price discrimination

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm Price discrimination and the public interest Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm Price discrimination and the public interest

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm Price discrimination and the public interest – –advantages Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm Price discrimination and the public interest – –advantages

PRICE DISCRIMINATION Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm Price discrimination and the public interest – –advantages – –disadvantages Profit-maximising prices and output under price discrimination – –first degree – –third degree Advantages to the firm Price discrimination and the public interest – –advantages – –disadvantages