How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LibQUAL+ ® : The UK and Irish Experience Selena Killick Library Quality Officer, Cranfield University J. Stephen Town Director of Information, The University.
Advertisements

LibQUAL+ in the local context: results, action and evaluation Selena Lock & Stephen Town Cranfield University 6th Northumbria International Conference.
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
1 What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Years of CUL LibQUAL Data Liane O’Brien, Linda Miller, Xin Li May 21, 2008.
Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+. Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting.
Presentation to Council 28 th November Summary Personal introduction Evidence and context The Library & Archives vision & strategy Progress and.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration Introduction to LibQUAL+ University of Westminster, London February 5, 2010 Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
The New Library User in Sweden: a LibQUAL+™ study 6th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measures in Libraries and Information Services.
LibQUAL+ at Cranfield University Selena Lock LibQUAL+ International Results Meeting 17 th July 2006.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Perspectives from two UK institutions Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
After the Academy Selena Lock LibQUAL+ Results Meeting 22nd August 2005.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration LibQUAL+® Exchange Northumbria Florence, Italy August 17, 2009 Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
Your LibQUAL+ ® Community: A Results Meeting American Library Association (ALA) Annual Conference Washington, DC June 25, 2007 Martha Kyrillidou, Director.
LibQUAL + ™ 2004 Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2004 survey with comparisons to past surveys.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
How to participate LibQUAL+
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data

Further analysis conducted at Cranfield Campus library results –Results notebook recreated for each campus library Results by discipline Detailed analysis of comments (time consuming++) Longitudinal analysis Internal benchmarking External benchmarking –SCONUL & ARL average –Peer-to-peer

Campus Library Results

Overall CU Results 2005

Overall DCMT Results 2005

DCMT Results 2005 Question TextDCMT Superiority Mean DCMT Desired Ranking Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own The main texts and readings I need for my work The electronic information resources I need Library space that inspires study and learning Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work Making information easily accessible for independent use Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information Timely document delivery / interlibrary loan The printed library materials I need for my work A haven for study, learning, or research Availability of subject specialist assistance

DCMT Results 2005 Question TextDCMT Superiority Mean DCMT Desired Ranking Quiet space for individual work Library staff who instill confidence in users Dependability in handling users' service problems Library staff who have the knowledge to answer user questions Library staff who understand the needs of their users Space for group learning and group study Library keeping me informed about all of its services Willingness to help users Giving users individual attention A comfortable and inviting location Readiness to respond to users' enquiries Provision of information skills training Library staff who deal with users in a caring fashion Library staff who are consistently courteous

Results by Discipline

Business and Management

Computer Science

Comment Analysis

Comments Received Comments received overall Results grouped by topic Catalogued by: –Dimension –Discipline –User group (Undergrad / Postgrad etc.) –Sex –Age

Comment Analysis

Highlighting Issues The only element that needs some work is the ability to interrogate library resources from remote desktops. Postgraduate Computing & Information Technology DCMT Library Male Full-time The new web page of the library (electronic access to various journals) is not as good or as easy to use as before. Academic Staff Electrical Engineering DCMT Library Male Does not apply / NA

Longitudinal Analysis

Year-on-Year Change

Changes over three years

Internal Benchmarking

Affect of Service Information Control Library as Place Overall

External Benchmarking

Peer-to-Peer Benchmarking

Utilising the data - results Reports –To senior management –To Library User committees –Quality department –Academic departments –Supporting departments (Computing) –For annual report –Newsletters –Inspectorate

Utilising the data - results Presentations –Learning centre staff –Senior management Web pages Displayed on notice boards Focus groups created to tackle specific issues raised by survey findings

Utilising the data - free text comments Communicated to Library staff Notice boards Web pages Reports to management and committees

Making the most out of your data

Further data analysis is necessary to maximise the potential of your results Initial results will provide an overview of your service Detailed analysis allows further issues to be highlighted

Find Benchmarking Partners

Accessing other institutions’ results You can access all 2006 participants PDF reports from the Results section of Web site All SCONUL participants agree to share their results with each other across all years, contact Selena for access Contact each other and work together to share your electronic data files (SPSS or Excel) to allow further detailed benchmarking

LibQUAL+ Analysis Service Basic overall summary for a campus = ½ a day per campus Full campus report = 1.5 days per campus Additional subject analysis = 1.5 hours per subject

Acknowledgements Selena Lock, R&D Officer, Cranfield University All SCONUL and ARL LibQUAL+ Participants

J. Stephen Town Director of Knowledge Services Defence College of Management and Technology Deputy University Librarian Cranfield University