NSSE:RetrospectiveandProspective George Kuh AAC&U General Education and Assessment Conference March 2, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Advertisements

George D. Kuh 16 th ISL Symposium Durham, England September 2, 2008 High Impact Activities What They Are, What They Are, Why They Work, Who Benefits.
Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
Beyond Engagement: Academic Advisers as Process Engineers NACADA Georgia Drive-In Georgia Perimeter College September 23, 2011.
Nsse.iub.eduNational Survey of Student Engagement An Experience-Based View of University Quality in the USA: The National Survey of Student Engagement.
Enhancing Student Engagement – what are we talking about? Graham Gibbs Research Centre for Student Engaged Educational Development.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Student Engagement at Lutheran Colleges Story Lines from Employers and NSSE in an Era of Accountability George D. Kuh LECNA Destin, FL February 6, 2010.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
Student Success Programs Where Retention Theory and Practice Converge Mary Stuart Hunter Houghton Mifflin College Survival National Conference July 12,
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
What Matters to Student Success: The Promise of High- Impact Practices George D. Kuh RIT Faculty Institute Rochester, NY May 26, 2010.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
NSSE:RetrospectiveandProspective George Kuh SCSU NSSE Users Conference October 19, 2006.
NSSE:RetrospectiveandProspective George Kuh UCO Regional Users Conference October 6, 2005.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
Shimon Sarraf Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University Bloomington Using NSSE to Answer Assessment Questions Regional User’s Workshop October.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to Enhance Student Academic Success: Best Practices on Canadian Campuses Debra Dawson Ryerson University.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty In-service June 5, 2006.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
George D. Kuh U of Maine System March 20, 2007 Strengthening Institutional Responsibility for Student Success: Lessons from NSSE.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
George D. Kuh Fall Faculty Conference Arkansas State University August 18, 2010 What Matters to Student Success: Lessons for ASU.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
An Overview.  Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U)  Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP)  aacu.org/leap.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
STUDENT DIVERSITY AND HOW IT RELATES TO STUDENT SUCCESS Dr. Michael Conyette.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Closing the Experience Gap March 30, 2017
Student Engagement Data in the UK: Policy and Practice
NSSE Results for Faculty
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
What’s Your Evidence? Using Data to Support Student Success
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
The Heart of Student Success
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
Presentation transcript:

NSSE:RetrospectiveandProspective George Kuh AAC&U General Education and Assessment Conference March 2, 2007

National Survey of Student Engagement Community College Survey of Student Engagement National Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced nessie) Community College Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced cessie) College student surveys that assess the extent to which students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development

We value what we measure Wise decisions are needed about what to measure in the context of campus mission, values, and desired outcomes.

Overview 1.Why student engagement matters 2.What weve learned 3.Conversation

What Really Matters in College: Student Engagement Because individual effort and involvement are the critical determinants of impact, institutions should focus on the ways they can shape their academic, interpersonal, and extracurricular offerings to encourage student engagement. Pascarella & Terenzini, How College Affects Students, 2005, p. 602

Foundations of Student Engagement Time on task (Tyler, 1930s) Quality of effort (Pace, s) Student involvement (Astin, 1984) Social, academic integration (Tinto,1987, 1993) Good practices in undergraduate education (Chickering & Gamson, 1987) College impact (Pascarella, 1985) Student engagement (Kuh, 1991, 2005)

Good Practices in Undergraduate Education (Chickering & Gamson, 1987; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005 ) Student-faculty contact Student-faculty contact Active learning Active learning Prompt feedback Prompt feedback Time on task Time on task High expectations High expectations Experiences with diversity Experiences with diversity Cooperation among students Cooperation among students

The Student Engagement Trinity What students do -- time and energy devoted to educationally purposeful activities What students do -- time and energy devoted to educationally purposeful activities What institutions do -- using effective educational practices to induce students to do the right things What institutions do -- using effective educational practices to induce students to do the right things Educationally effective institutions channel student energy toward the right activities Educationally effective institutions channel student energy toward the right activities

The College Student Report NSSEs Survey Instrument The College Student Report Student Behaviors Institutional Actions & Requirements Reactions to College Student Background Information Student Learning & Development

Effective Educational Practices Level of Academic Challenge Active & Collaborative Learning Enriching Educational Experiences SupportiveCampusEnvironment Student Faculty Interaction

NSSE Project Scope 1,000,000+ students from 1,100+ different schools 1,000,000+ students from 1,100+ different schools 80% of 4-yr U.S. undergraduate FTE 80% of 4-yr U.S. undergraduate FTE 50 states, Puerto Rico, Canada 50 states, Puerto Rico, Canada 70+ consortia 70+ consortia

Documenting Good Practice InstitutionalImprovement Public Advocacy NSSE Core Purposes NSSE Core Purposes

Customized Institutional Report Overview Overview Institutional data Institutional data Means and frequencies Means and frequencies 1st year students and seniors 1st year students and seniors Comparisons by peers, Carnegie, national Comparisons by peers, Carnegie, national National benchmarks National benchmarks Data use tips Data use tips CD with raw data, etc. CD with raw data, etc. And more! And more!

What have we learned so far?

Student engagement varies more within than between institutions.

Academic Challenge by Institutional Type Seniors Doc Ext Doc Int MA Bac LA Bac Gen Nation First-Year Students Doc Ext Doc Int MA Bac LA Bac Gen Nation Benchmark Scores

Behold the compensatory effects of engagement

Association of American Colleges and Universities

Narrow Learning is Not Enough The Essential Learning Outcomes Knowledge of Human Cultures and the Physical & Natural World Intellectual and Practical Skills Intellectual and Practical Skills Personal and Social Responsibility Personal and Social Responsibility Integrative Learning Integrative Learning

Integrating ideas or information from various sources Included diverse perspectives in class discussions/writing Put together ideas from different courses Discussed ideas with faculty members outside of class Discussed ideas with others outside of class Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Essential Learning Outcome: Integrative Learning Synthesizing & organizing ideas, info., or experiences Making judgments about the value of information Applying theories to practical problems or in new situations Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your own views Tried to better understand someone else's views Learned something that changed how you understand an issue NSSE DEEP LEARNING SCALE

Essential Learning Outcome: Intellectual and Practical Skills NSSE SELF-REPORTED GAINS Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills Writing clearly and effectively Speaking clearly and effectively Thinking critically and analytically Analyzing quantitative problems Using computing and information technology Working effectively with others Solving complex real-world problems

NSSE SELF-REPORTED GAINS Voting in local, state, or national elections Learning effectively on your own Understanding yourself Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds Developing a personal code of values and ethics Contributing to the welfare of your community Developing a deepened sense of spirituality Essential Learning Outcome: Personal & Social Responsibilities

Very much Quite a bit Some Very little

Very much Quite a bit Some Very little

Effective Educational Practices First-Year Seminars and Experiences First-Year Seminars and Experiences Common Intellectual Experiences Common Intellectual Experiences Learning Communities Learning Communities Writing-Intensive Courses Writing-Intensive Courses Collaborative Assignments and Projects Collaborative Assignments and Projects Science as Science Is Done; Undergraduate Research Science as Science Is Done; Undergraduate Research Diversity/Global Learning Diversity/Global Learning Service Learning, Community-Based Learning Service Learning, Community-Based Learning Internships Internships Capstone Courses and Projects Capstone Courses and Projects

Effects of Learning Communities on Engagement

Faculty Time Devoted to Research and Probability of Students Doing Research

Faculty View of Importance of Doing Research with Students and Probability of Students Doing Research Probability of Undergraduate Research Importance of Undergraduate Research

Faculty Priorities and Student Engagement

What to Make of This? 1.When faculty members emphasize certain educational practices, students engage in them to a greater extent than their peers elsewhere. 2.Good things go together

Effective Educational Practices First-Year Seminars and Experiences First-Year Seminars and Experiences Common Intellectual Experiences Common Intellectual Experiences Learning Communities Learning Communities Writing-Intensive Courses Writing-Intensive Courses Collaborative Assignments and Projects Collaborative Assignments and Projects Science as Science Is Done; Undergraduate Research Science as Science Is Done; Undergraduate Research Diversity/Global Learning Diversity/Global Learning Service Learning, Community-Based Learning Service Learning, Community-Based Learning Internships Internships Capstone Courses and Projects Capstone Courses and Projects

Effective Educational Practices Increase Odds That Students Will: Effective Educational Practices Increase Odds That Students Will: Invest time and effort Invest time and effort Interact with faculty and peers about substantive matters Interact with faculty and peers about substantive matters Experience diversity Experience diversity Get more frequent feedback Get more frequent feedback Discover relevance of their learning through real-world applications Discover relevance of their learning through real-world applications

Institutional Reflection Areas of EffectiveEducationalPractice Question or Improvement

Possibilities Merge NSSE data with school records Merge NSSE data with school records Identify engagement patterns by student characteristics Identify engagement patterns by student characteristics Predict retention, degree attainment, grades, other outcomes Predict retention, degree attainment, grades, other outcomes Track student engagement year to year Track student engagement year to year Compare vs. peer, aspirational, same- region schools Compare vs. peer, aspirational, same- region schools Program evaluation Program evaluation Accreditation Accreditation Consortium and system data sharing Consortium and system data sharing Student outcomes research Student outcomes research Public reporting Public reporting A national reporting template?!? A national reporting template?!?

NSSE Virtues Research based Focus on educationally purposeful activities Results point to areas where improvement is desirable Results point to areas where improvement is desirable Compelling face validity Established psychometrics Transparent operations Third party administration

NSSE Virtues NSSE Virtues Random sampling Targeted sampling Flexibility: consortium question, modules Benchmarks for peer, national and other comparisons Benchmarks for peer, national and other comparisons Link/integrate with other measures -- BCSSE, FSSE, CLA, MAPP, portfolios, graduation rates etc. Link/integrate with other measures -- BCSSE, FSSE, CLA, MAPP, portfolios, graduation rates etc.

Other Data Sources Locally-developed measures National instruments –Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) –Your First College Year (YFCY) –College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) –Noel Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory –ETS MAPP and Major Field Tests –ACT Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency –Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) Institutional data -- GPA, financial aid, transcripts, retention, certification tests, alumni surveys, satisfaction surveys… Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) and Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE)

NSSE Accreditation Toolkit Links Between NSSE & Accreditation Mapping NSSE to Accreditation Standards Vignettes of Institutional Usage NSSE Questions 1.l.l. Used an electronic medium (list-serv, chat group, Internet, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment 1.m.Used to communicate with an instructor 10.g.Using computers in academic work 11.g.Using computing and information technology SACS Standard The institutions use of technology enhances student learning, is appropriate for meeting the objectives of its programs, and ensures that students have access to and training in the use of technology.

NSSE Cautions NSSE Cautions Only one source of information Corroborate results Engagement skeptics Not an outcomes measure Denial in face of less-than- desirable results Eschew rankings

Discussion